Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 15;7(3):e1337. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1337

TABLE 2.

Comparison of the significant results of the studies of Rannou 2007, Boisson 2019, Dudli 2020, Karppinen 2021, Giefsen 2021, Li 2022, and Aboushaala 2024 with our results. ‐ = not measured, n.s. and green = no significant result, n.d. = not detected (DIA/SWATH‐MS) or below detection limit (in all other tests), orange = significant result.

Study Current study Rannou 2007 Boisson 2019 Dudli 2020 Karppinen 2021 Giefsen 2021 Li 2022 Aboushaala 2024
Population Population cohort Patients hospitalized for cLBP (noMC vs. MC1 and MC2), MC only on 1 level in the lumbar spine Outpatient patients with cLBP + MC1 versus cLBP + noMC Outpatient patients with cLBP + noMC vs. MC1, MC2 vs. age and sex‐matched volonteers with noLBP + noMC and MC Outpatient patients with cLBP + MC1, MC2 or MC1/2 versus volonteers with noLBP + noMC Outpatient patients with cLBP + MC1, MC2 versus volunteers with noLBP (no MRI) Population cohort Patients undergoing spinal fusion or micro‐discectomy surgery with or without MC
n MS: MC n = 50, noMC =50 Cytokine/chemokine panel: MC n = 158, noMC n = 168 MC1 n = 12, MC2 n = 2, noMC n = 12 MC1 n = 13, noMC n = 21 MC + cLBP n = 19, noMC + cLBP n = 19, noLBP + noMC n = 14 MC + cLBP n = 40, noMC + noLBP n = 40 MC1 n = 46, MC2 n = 37, noMC n = 50 Total n = 3584 MC = 13, noMC = 18
C‐reactive protein n.s. n.s. Increased in MC1 versus noMC and MC2 n.s. n.s.
Neo‐epitopes of pro‐collagen type 3 n.d. Increased in MC1 + cLBP and MC2 + cLBP versus noMC
Neo‐epitopes of pro‐collagen type 4 n.d. Increased in MC2 versus noMC
Collagen degradation neo‐eiptope type 4 n.d. Increased in any MC versus no MC
Interleukin‐6 n.d. n.s. n.s. n.s. Increased in MC1 and MC2 versus controls n.d.
Interleukin‐8 n.d. n.s. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus no MC n.s. n.d.
Tumor necrosis factor‐α n.d. n.s. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus no MC n.s. n.d.
C‐terminal polypeptide‐1 n.d. Decreased in any MC versus no MC
Eotaxin‐1/CCL11 n.d. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus no MC n.s. n.s.
Eotaxin‐3/CCL26 n.d. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus no MC n.s. n.d.
Macrophage inflammatory protein‐1α/CCL3 n.d. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus no MC n.s. n.d.
Mast cell protease‐1 n.d. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus no MC
Regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES)/CCL5 n.d. Decreased in any MC versus noMC Increased in MC vc noMC
TARC /CCL17 n.d. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus noMC n.s. n.d.
Interleukin‐15 n.d. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus noMC n.d.
Interleukin‐16 n.d. n.s. n.s. Increased in MC1 and MC2 versus controls n.s.
Tumor necrosis factor‐β n.d. n.s. Decreased in any MC versusno MC n.d.
Interleukin‐1sRII n.d. Increased in any MC versus noMC
Interferon‐γ n.d. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus noMC n.s. n.d.
Vascular endothelial growth factor‐C n.d. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus noMC
Vascular endothelial growth factor‐D n.d. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus noMC
Angiopoetin receptor (Tie)‐2 n.d. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus noMC
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor −1 n.d. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus no MC
Hepatocyte growth factor n.d. n.s. Increased in any MC versus no MC n.s.
Intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 n.s. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus no MC, neg. correlation between MC and MC1 size and serum concentration
Vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 n.s. n.s. Decreased in any MC versus no MC
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor n.d. Increased in MC1 and MC2 versus controls Decreased in MC versus noMC
CCL20 n.d. Increased in MC1 versus controls n.d.
CCL27 n.d. Increased in MC1 and MC2 versus controls
CX3CL1 n.d. Increased in MC1 and MC2 versus controls n.d.
Cholesterol esters in large LDL Correlated with lumbar MC
Phospholipids in large LDL Correlated with MC2
Mean diameter for LDL including IDL Negatively correlated with MC2
Mean diameter for VLDL Negatively correlated with lumbar MC, indication for causal effect
Phospholipids in chylomicrons and extremely large VLDL Negatively correlated with MC2