Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 16;7(7):e2251. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2251

Table 6.

Comparisons between the general features of natural and synthetic polymers and their main potential improvement when incorporated into honey hydrogel.

Properties Natural Synthetic Hybrid Literature
Polymers CS, gelatin PVA, PEG Honey/CS/gelatin, PVA/CS, honey/CS/PVA N/A
Cytotoxicity Non‐cytotoxic Non‐cytotoxic Non‐cytotoxic [69, 83]
Biocompatibility Yes Yes Yes [63, 69]
Natural bioactivity Bioactive Bioinert Bioactive due to the presence of natural polymer(s) [63, 69]
Mechanical strength Poor Good Good [63, 69]
Swelling behavior Good Poor Good [63, 69]
Biodegradation rate Fast Slow Moderate [63, 92]
The main potential improvement of honey hydrogel upon crosslinking with the polymers Enhanced swelling behavior Enhanced mechanical property Enhanced swelling and mechanical strength, optimized biodegradation rate [83, 88]

Abbreviations: CS, chitosan; N/A, not applicable; PEG, polyethylene glycol; PVA, poly(vinyl alcohol).