Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2024 Jun 19;240(8):e14191. doi: 10.1111/apha.14191

Greater physical fitness (Vo2max) in healthy older adults associated with increased integrity of the Locus Coeruleus-Noradrenergic system

Emanuele RG Plini 1,*, Michael C Melnychuk 1, Ralph Andrews 1, Rory Boyle 2, Robert Whelan 1, Jeffrey S Spence 3, Sandra B Chapman 3, Ian H Robertson 1,2,3,4, Paul M Dockree 1
PMCID: PMC11250687  NIHMSID: NIHMS2001189  PMID: 38895950

Abstract

Aim

Physical activity (PA) is a key component for brain health and Reserve, and it is among the main dementia protective factors. However, the neurobiological mechanisms underpinning Reserve are not fully understood. In this regard, a noradrenergic (NA) theory of cognitive reserve (Robertson, 2013) has proposed that the upregulation of NA system might be a key factor for building reserve and resilience to neurodegeneration because of the neuroprotective role of NA across the brain. PA elicits an enhanced catecholamine response, in particular for NA. By increasing physical commitment, a greater amount of NA is synthetised in response to higher oxygen demand. More physically trained individuals show greater capabilities to carry oxygen resulting in greater Vo2max – a measure of oxygen uptake and physical fitness (PF).

Methods

We hypothesised that greater Vo2max would be related to greater Locus Coeruleus (LC) MRI signal intensity. In a sample of 41 healthy subjects, we performed Voxel-Based Morphometry analyses, then repeated for the other neuromodulators as a control procedure (Serotonin, Dopamine and Acetylcholine).

Results

As hypothesised, greater Vo2max related to greater LC signal intensity, and weaker associations emerged for the other neuromodulators.

Conclusion

This newly established link between Vo2max and LC-NA system offers further understanding of the neurobiology underpinning Reserve in relationship to PA. While this study supports Robertson’s theory proposing the upregulation of the noradrenergic system as a possible key factor building Reserve, it also provides grounds for increasing LC-NA system resilience to neurodegeneration via Vo2max enhancement.

Keywords: Locus Coeruleus, Vo2Max, aging, brain age, neuroimaging, voxel-based morphometry, neuromodulators

Introduction

It is estimated that 40% of dementia causes are modifiable by simply addressing people’s lifestyle (1). Of this 40%, lifetime physical activity (PA) has a crucial role in protecting against neurodegeneration and related cognitive decay (1). It is documented that individuals with a greater physical fitness (PF) level can sustain more severe neuropathological burdens resulting in mitigated cognitive impairment (1, 2, 3). For these reasons PA has been associated with the construct of reserve, which is defined as the individual’s ability to maintain better-than-expected cognitive and brain functions given brain insult or psychological and neurological illnesses (4, 5, 6, 7). Hence, it is understood that PA contributes to maintaining healthy cognition and reducing neurodegeneration (8, 1, 2, 3).

In the current study we investigated whether the association between physical fitness and resilience to dementia may be explained by the noradrenergic theory of cognitive reserve (9, 10), proposing that continuous activation (and the related integrity) of the Locus Coeruleus (LC) – noradrenergic system could be a key candidate affecting cognitive reserve and resilience capabilities. Specifically, it is hypothesized that the continuous upregulation of the LC-NA system over the lifespan might be one of the key neurobiological components for building cognitive reserve, given the marked noradrenergic decay observed in neurodegenerative diseases (11, 12). In fact, it is documented that the LC-NA system degeneration is the primary marker of dementia, and its loss of functionality and integrity has been associated with cognitive decline (11, 13, 14, 15, 16). In Robertson’s model, the noradrenergic up-regulation would be protective against the neurodegenerative dynamics due to the neuroprotective role of NA in brain (17, 18). Supporting evidence has shown anti-oxidative (19) and anti-inflammatory (20, 21) properties of NA along with promotion of neurogenesis and synaptogenesis by increasing brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (22, 23, 24, 25). Accordingly, in the last decades several studies have supported this model reporting that LC-NA system integrity was related to greater brain and cognitive health (26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34), including better attentive and mnemonic functions both in healthy and clinical populations (35, 36, 27, 28, 31, 37, 33, 34).

However, no studies have investigated the possible relationship between LC-NA system integrity and PA. As shown in figure 1, by increasing physical exertion, a greater amount NA is synthesized and released in response to higher oxygen demand (38, 39, 40, 41, 42). Maximal training intensity (between 110% and 80% of maximal oxygen consumption – Vo2max) elicits the highest NA release in comparison with lesser demanding training intensities. Indeed, the LC-NA system is involved in breath cycles and LC neurons are highly sensitive to oxygen and Co2 variations (43, 44, 45), and in mediating vasoconstriction and vasodilation in response to oxygen demand variations (46, 47, 48, 39). Further, trained individuals show greater oxygen carrying capacity while training (49, 50). Vo2max is a measure of oxygen uptake commonly used as a main parameter of physical fitness and cardiovascular health (51, 52, 53, 54, https://health.ucdavis.edu/sports-medicine/resources/vo2description). A large meta-analysis carried out on 102,980 individuals found that greater Vo2 max was protective against all causes of mortality, while individuals with lower physical fitness show elevated risk (55).More recently, greater levels of Vo2max have been associated with better brain and cognitive health (56, 57, 58, 2; 59), greater cortical thickness (60) and greater white matter integrity (61, 62). Furthermore, a study conducted on 2013 healthy adults (age range 21–84) found that greater cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) was associated with greater total brain volume, and greater grey matter volume in key brain regions such as the middle temporal gyrus, the hippocampal gyrus and the orbitofrontal cortex (63). In the same study greater Vo2max was also related to greater volume in the bilateral anterior cingulate cortex, an area rich in noradrenergic receptors (64, 65). Correspondingly, literature on dementia reported that higher Vo2 max and overall higher levels of physical fitness were associated with better brain and cognitive health (66, 67, 68) and stronger resilience to neurodegeneration (namely more preserved brain integrity and functioning – 60, 69, 70, 71, 1).

Figure1 –

Figure1 –

Plasma noradrenaline concentration in relation to intensity and duration of exercise. Figure adapted from Kjaer et al. 1987 with permission of Prof. Michael Kjaer

In light of the neuroprotective effects of greater Vo2 max together with the well documented LC-NA system role in dementia progression, we investigated whether variation in Vo2max was related to the MRI signal intensity (a parameter of integrity / tissue density) of the LC-NA system. We hypothesised that greater Vo2max would be associated with greater LC signal intensity due to the neuroprotective effects of NA release. Specifically, we considered Vo2max levels as a proxy measure of chronic NA up-regulation, and therefore, greater Vo2max as an outcome of the frequent and intense LC-NA system up-regulation required by strenuous PA accumulated across the lifespan. (see figure 1adapted from Kajer et al. 1987).

To test Robertson’s model, we performed voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analyses on 41 healthy older adults provided by the Centre for BrainHealth®, The University of Texas at Dallas -USA (72). First, the relationship between LC signal intensity and Vo2 max was investigated. Second, the relationship between Vo2max and other key neuromodulator seeds were investigated as a control procedure. Therefore, the analyses were repeated for the Dopaminergic system using the Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA), for the Serotoninergic system using on the Dorsal and Median Raphe (DR and MR) and on for the Cholinergic system using the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert (NBM). Third, we investigated the relationship between biological brain maintenance – BrainPAD (73) and the neuromodulatory subcortical system to explore a possible relationship between Vo2max and BrainPAD. Our final aim was to investigate the relationship between LC and a measure of high order cognitive control assessed with the test of strategic learning (TOSL) (72).

Methods

Participants, Neuropsychological tests and Vo2Max assessment

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, University of Texas at Dallas, and The Cooper Institute. All study experiments were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and other relevant guidelines and regulations. All participants provided informed consent.

Data were provided by the Center of BrainHealth the University of Dallas Texas by Sandra Chapman and colleagues (72). Participants were healthy older adults, 15 males and 26 females with age ranging from 57 to 71 years old. All participants underwent a preliminary screening, therefore none of them had no history of neurological or psychological illness and scored below 14 at the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). In addition, all subjects were right-handed, not exceeded 40 of body mass index (BMI) and had as minimum education level a high school diploma. Lastly all participants’ IQ level was within the normative ranges, and they scored above 26 at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). After the screening, participants underwent 3T high-res MRI and a neuropsychological battery which included the Test of Strategic Learning (TOSL) as primary measure for high order executive functioning. Indeed, TOSL is a tool sensitive to complex attention, memory and abstract reasoning. Subsequently, Vo2max and maximum heart rate (MHR) were evaluated via electrocardiogram, a “Lode—Excalibur Sport cycle ergometer, (Groningen, Netherlands) and a Jaeger Oxycon Pro, (Hoechberg, Germany)” for Vo2max assessment. For detailed info please refer to (72) and see table 1.

Table 1.

shows the key sociodemographic, neural indices and neuropsychological characteristics of the sample tested. Key: TIV, total intracranial volume; MaxVo2 (maximal oxygen consumption); MaxHR (maximum heart rate); BrainPAD (Brain predicted age discrepancy (biological maintenance index); TOSL (test of strategic learning).

Descriptive Statistics
age education TIV Vo2Max MaxHR BrainPAD TOSL
female male female male female male female male female male female male female male
n. 26 15 26 15 26 15 26 15 26 15 26 15 26 15
Mean 63.846 64.000 16.692 16.667 1356.84 1561.87 18.478 23.491 158.000 146.133 −1.800 −2.090 5.346 4.733
SD 3.552 3.140 2.035 1.447 91.432 110.200 2.972 4.380 13.345 14.352 7.878 11.245 1.832 2.374
Min. 57.000 58.000 12.000 14.000 1195.16 1401.53 14.350 14.050 125.000 125.000 −3.04 −30.20 2.000 1.000
Max. 71.000 70.000 18.000 18.000 1535.43 1792.00 23.000 29.630 181.000 169.000 12.398 16.243 10.000 10.000

Neuroimaging acquisition, processing and analyses

Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) were acquired using a 3 Tesla MR system (Philips Medical System, Best, Netherlands). A body coil was used for radiofrequency (RF) transmission and an 8-channel head coil with parallel imaging capability was used for signal reception. The MRI scans of participants were performed at rest with their eyes open. The parameters of high resolution T1 weighted MPRAGE sequence were Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition of Gradient Echo (MPRAGE) sequence, TR/TE = 8.3/3.8 ms, shot interval = 2100 ms, inversion time = 1100 ms, flip angle = 12°, 160 sagittal slices, voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm3, FOV = 256 × 256 × 160 mm3, and duration 4 min.

41 3T T1-weighted high-res MRI images of healthy older adults (age range 57–71 - 15 males, 26 females) were processed using the standard CAT12 pipeline with a voxel size of 1mm3. The scans were modulated and oriented in MNI template and then whole brain images (MNI grey matter + white matter) were used for the formal analyses. In CAT12 a voxel-based morphometry (VBM) multiple regression model was built in order to assess the relationship between Vo2max and LC signal intensity. Age in years, gender, education, maxHR and total intracranial volume (TIV) were included as covariates and the positive relationship was tested in keeping with the main hypothesis, predicting that greater LC signal intensity would be related with higher scores Vo2 max. As a control procedure, the opposite, negative relationship was also tested. As additional control procedure, the same analyses were repeated for the neuromodulatory seed regions of the serotoninergic, dopaminergic and cholinergic systems, in order to contrast them with the noradrenergic hypothesis. The VBM analyses investigating the relationship between LC and BrainPAD and the TOSL test followed the same pipeline with the only exception being maxHR, which was not entered as a covariate.

BrainPAD methodology

Brain Predicted Age Discrepancy (BrainPAD), calculated following Boyle et al. 2020 (73), is an objective measure reflecting how the brain is ageing. It is similar to the previously developed indices such as Brain Gap Estimation—BrainAGE by Gaser et al. 2013 (74), but it is computed only based on grey matter rather than white (WM) and grey matter (GM) together since GM is linearly associated with aging (75, 73). BrainPAD is obtained by calculating the discrepancy between the chronological age and the biological age of the brain defined on a healthy brain ageing trajectory of typical subjects. Boyle and colleagues defined the normal trajectory of GM ageing in healthy subjects. Then, they trained an algorithm to predict the degree of GM deterioration in relation to the chronological age in three further populations of healthy individuals. BrainPAD provides a candidate measure of brain maintenance in terms of years of accelerated or reduced brain degeneration. Higher discrepancies between the biological brain age and chronological age are indices of abnormal ageing and poorer brain maintenance.

In the current study we also aimed to replicate and extend the findings reported in Plini et al. 2021 (31) and Plini et al. 2023 where LC signal intensity was related to better brain maintenance (lower BrainPAD scores) across 686 participants of the ADNI (healthy controls, mild cognitive impairments, and demented subjects) and 398 healthy controls of BASE-II.

Neuromodulatory subcortical system ROI definition and rationale

Accurate MRI localization of the Locus Coeruleus (LC) in the human brain is still lacking of a single, commonly accepted methodology (76). In the last few years, several probabilistic maps of the LC have been released (79, 80, 81, 82, 36, 76, 77, 78, 83, 16, 84), however, these probabilistic maps, by using neuromelanin sensitive MRI sequences (neuromelanin is a pigment found in catecholaminergic neurons), described inconsistent localization and spatial extent of the LC within the MNI space. These differences reflect a relatively large anatomical variability suggesting that the LC varies across the general population both during the lifespan and in response to neurodegeneration as wells as depending how neuromelanin signal is processed (85, 76, 79). With increasing age, the LC neuromelanin signal intensity tends to shift from the rostral to the caudal portion (76, 78, 79). This process might be influenced by ageing, the degree of biological brain maintenance and even dementia progression, which is likely to exacerbate this “caudal- shifting” process. Indeed, it is acknowledged that the LC-NA system is susceptible to compensatory changes involving the caudal portion of the LC and peri- coeruleus/LC-peri-dendritic regions (Epi-coeruleus and Sub-coeruleus) extending even towards the serotoninergic nuclei (65, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92). Therefore, as outlined by Yeo-Jin Yi et al. (85), because of these dynamics, different MRI atlases (particularly the ones developed on young populations) might not reflect the actual LC extent because of the lower strength of neuromelanin signals in young subjects. In other words, the actual LC might be underestimated because not all the LC cells (voxels) would be “sufficiently labelled yet” (85). Conversely, the atlases made on older populations might exclude rostral regions more likely to be labelled in younger populations. Indeed, as observed by Yeo-Jin Yi et al. (85), the combined LC spatial localization across different subjects and conditions exceeded the typical spatial localization of an individual LC.

Therefore, focusing only on one of the previously published LC atlases or on a “conservative one” might be misleading in terms of generalisation of the LC spatial localization, since LC-neuromelanin signal is documented as a “transient measure” dependent on age, individual variability, MRI scanner and neuroimaging processing (79, 80, 81, 82, 14, 36, 76, 77, 83, 16, 84). Lastly, there is also controversy regarding the real neurobiological parameter that neuromelanin signal should mirror (93, 94, 95). It is unclear whether neuromelanin can be used as a parameter of tissue density (integrity). As a matter of fact, as recently reviewed (93) neuromelanin accumulation around the noradrenergic cells appears to act as a pro-inflammatory stimulus triggering cytokine secretion. Accordingly, the neuromelanin signal itself may reflect the degree of LC inflammation rather than its cellular integrity. Indeed, “in human and rat microglial cultures, neuromelanin is quickly phagocytosed by microglia and associated with a dose-dependent overexpression of pro-inflammatory cytokines” (93, 96, 97, 98, 47, 99). It remains unclear whether or not neuromelanin can be used as a parameter of cellular integrity, or just a technical proxy to spatially localise catecholaminergic cells at certain age (93 - https://www.alzforum.org/news/research-news/waning-locus-coeruleus-early-sign-alzheimers-disease).

For these reasons, in the current study were used MPRAGE clinical scans, and the isolation of the LC was achieved using the “omni-comprehensive” LC mask (31) which solves the inconsistent LC spatial localization reported by previous studies (79, 80, 81, 82, 36, 76, 77, 83, 16, 84) without encroaching upon other pontine and cerebellar regions, and without crossing the walls of the 4th ventricles. In figure 3c in the result section the different LC atlases can be visualized in comparison with the LC-omni-comprehensive mask. Further details can be found in supplementary materials of Plini et al. 2021 (31) and at this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90bsA6Jqxs4). The MRI LC omni-comprehensive mask was manually developed (voxel by voxel in FSL eyes – edit mode) to carefully define a common space that included all the previous maps as to increase the likelihood of inclusion of the entirety of the LC rostro-caudal extent, and to properly account for the large individual variability documented in literature. By doing so, voxel-wise structural analyses isolating the LC-NA system were made possible in CAT12 using MPRAGE clinical scans. As already performed in several other relevant studies on the matter (27, 28, 31, 100, 34), this methodology offers several advantages in terms of assessing brain’s tissue density (integrity) of the subcortical nuclei, since it results in greater clinical transfer while overcoming the limitations of neuromelanin-sensitive scans.

Figure 3 –

Figure 3 –

a) shows the relationship between Vo2max and locus coeruleus signal intensity in a sample of 41 healthy subjects (age range 60–72). Results are covaried for Age, Gender, Education, Total Intracranial Volume and max heart rate for P<0.001*. b) The significant LC voxels for P<0.01 and P<0.001 clusters are displayed in a 3D-reconstruction of the brain from a midline frontal point of view. c) The LC clusters associated with Vo2max are shown in comparison with the previously published LC atlases and masks displayed on the LC omni-comprehensive mask by Plini et al. 2021.

The other neuromodulatory seeds were based on previously published atlases: the MR and DR ROIs were provided by Beliveau et al. 2015 (101), and the VTA mask was obtained by downloading the VTA MNI probabilistic map by Pauli et al. 2018 (102) from the NeuroVault website (https://neurovault.org/ accessed on 15 December 2018). The NMB was developed on the basis of the probabilistic MNI maps of the acetylcholine cells of the Forebrain, which are provided by SPM Anatomy Toolbox 2.2c (https://www.fzjuelich.de/inm/inm1/EN/Forschung/_docs/SPMAnatomyToolbox/SPMAnatomyToolbox_node.html accessed on 15 December 2018) and others (103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108). These other neuromodulatory seeds were chosen on the base on their cortical and cerebellar projections. Consequently, the DR and the MR were chosen over the other raphe nuclei because they vastly project to the cortex and the cerebellum being the main serotoninergic nuclei of the CNS. Similarly, the VTA was chosen over the substantia nigra (SN) because the VTA is the main brain nucleus responsible of the cortical irroration of Dopamine (while the SN projects subcortically but not in the cerebellum which does not shows relevant dopaminergic projections). Regarding the Cholinergic system, the NBM was chosen over the Tegmental Cholinergic Neurons, because it has the largest number of cholinergic neurons, and it projects diffusely to whole brain’s cortex (65). Figure 2 shows the 3D MRI reconstruction of the five neuromodulators’ seeds.

Figure 2 –

Figure 2 –

The neuromodulatory subcortical system: the main nuclei synthetizing and projecting to the cortex the main neuromodulators involved in cognition. The figure shows a 3D MRI reconstruction of the five neuromodulators’ seeds within the whole brain.

Bayesian modelling, multiple regression, ANCOVA and mediation analyses

Pearson’s and Bayesian correlation matrices were built in JASP to explore the different relationships between Vo2max, neuropsychological measures and BrainPAD with the five neuromodulators’ seeds. The average signal intensity of the clusters of voxels identified by the VBM analyses was used to better isolate each neuromodulators’ effect. The average values were extracted applying the 1mm3 binary masks of the 5 ROIs on whole brain images using FSL. In FSL the flags of “fslstats” “-k” (mask) and “-m” (output mean) were used to gather the average voxel intensities. The average signal intensity was then calculated subject-by-subject for each ROI and computed in each of the following models performed in JASP (https://jasp-stats.org/).

In the Bayesian multiple regression model Vo2max was treated as dependent variable and the five neuromodulators entered as independent covariates, in order to compare their different effects against the “null model”. Age, gender, education, TIV and maxHR were treated as covariates and added to the “null model”. The analyses followed the default JASP setting with the exception being that Bayesian information criteria (BIC) was selected in the advanced option of JASP interface.

To test whether LC signal intensity variations were congruently associated with Vo2max level, in a ANCOVA model was conducted. Vo2max was treated as a factor divided in 2 levels (Vo2max above 20 [n.22) and Vo2max below 20 [n.19]). A 20 cut-off was decided on the basis of previous literature referring to the same age range of the current sample – 70, 56, 109, 55). The average LC signal intensity was entered as a dependent variable and the model was controlled for age, gender, education, TIV and maxHR. Post-hoc analyses were then Bonferroni corrected with 10000 bootstrapping.

Finally, to test potential mediation effects between Vo2max and brain maintenance, a mediation analysis with parallel multiple mediators was performed using Vo2max as a predictor (Y) and BrainPAD (X) as outcome. As multiple mediators, the average signal intensity of the five neuromodulators’ seeds were entered in parallel. The model was covaried for age, gender, education, TIV and maxHR. Standard model was set with 95% confidence intervals and 5000 bootstrap samples.

Results

Vo2max and Locus Coeruleus MRI signal intensity

As shown in table 2, the analyses confirmed a relationship between Vo2max and LC signal intensity after controlling for age, gender, TIV, education and maxHR. 92 voxels within the LC region significantly related with Vo2max, i.e., greater LC signal intensity was associated with greater Vo2max values. We note that a portion of the significant LC voxels in our findings overlaps the core of the previously published LC atlases and masks (79, 80, 81, 82, 36, 76, 77, 83, 16, 84) as shown in figure 3 (the nifti file of LC results are available to download in the supplementary materials). The LC cluster survived when the statistical threshold was increased to p<0.01 and p<0.001 with a maximal Bayesian factor (BF10) of 55.98. Other weaker but relevant associations were observed between the DR and VTA signal intensity. A cluster of 32 voxel within the serotoninergic DR region and a cluster of 30 voxels within dopaminergic VTA region, which did not survive when the statistical threshold was raised to p<0.001. Minor associations were found for the MR and NBM nuclei (the other neuromodulators’ clusters of voxels can be displayed in Figure 3d in the supplementary materials). When the inverse relationships were tested, negligible results were found, and none survived at p<0.01 threshold.

Table 2.

shows the results for the VBM multivariate linear regression analyses testing the positive relationship between the five ROIs and vo2max. The results across the n.41 healthy subjects are covaried for age, gender, total intracranial volume, education and maximal heart rate (maxHR). The table reports the significant clusters of voxels predicting vo2max values for the statistical threshold of p<0.05. Bayesian Factors (BF10) are reported as parameter of strength in brackets.

Neuromodulatory system side MNI coordinates peak T valuea peak Z scoreb peak cluster Kec p value uncorrd FWEe FDRf total number of voxels for p<0.05 with max BF10g
x y Z
Vo2Max
Locus Coeruleus** right 4 −38 −22 3.72 3.39 65 0.000 1.000 1.005 92 (BF10 52.98)
Dorsal Raphe* / 0 −28 −10 2.77 2.61 5 0.009 1.000 1.005 32 (BF10 9.173)
Median Raphe right 2 −34 −20 2.01 1.95 6 0.043 1.000 1.005 6 (BF10 2.233)
Ventral Tegmental Area* right −2 −24 −18 2.61 2.47 3 0.003 1.000 1.005 30 (BF10 80.35)
Nucleus Basalis of Meynert left −16 −8 −8 1.91 1.86 3 0.015 1.000 1.005 3 (BF10 0.150)
*

Cluster of voxels surviving p<0.01 are marked with.

**

Cluster of voxels surviving p<0.001 are marked with.

No clusters survived multiple comparison corrections (FWE).

a)

Peak T value: T value of the most significant cluster of contiguous voxels

b)

Peak Z-score: Z-score of the most significant cluster of contiguous voxels

c)

Peak cluster Ke: number of voxels of the most significant cluster of contiguous voxels

d)

P value uncorrected

e)

FWE = family wise error correction value

f)

FDR = false discovery rate correction value (q)

g)

Total number of voxels outcoming in the ROI including all clusters of contiguous voxels (in brackets are reported Bayes Factors)

Factorial analysis – ANCOVA

When Vo2max values were treated as a factor divided in 2 levels (Vo2max above 20 VS Vo2max below 20), the LC average signal intensity differently variated between groups. Indeed, individuals with Vo2max below 20 had significantly lower LC signal intensity in comparison with individuals with Vo2max above 20 (about 1.2 standard deviations - Cohens’d 1.21). This difference remained significant after Bonferroni correction (P=0.004 – refer to table 4 and figure 4b) while controlling for age, gender, education, TIV and maxHR. This analysis is consistent with the previous multiple regression model proposing the same pattern of associations.

Table 4.

reporting the results of the ANCOOVA model treating Vo2max as factor divided in 2 levels (above 20, below 20) and Locus Coeruleus average signal intensity as a dependent variable while controlling for age, gender, education, TIV and MaxHR. Locus Coeruleus signal intensity significantly differs(Cohens’s d – 1.21) between the 2 groups (P<0.01 Bonferroni corrected).

ANCOVA – Locus Coeruleus signal intensity and VO2Max level

Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
Vo2Max Level 0.011 1 0.011 9.847 0.004
gender 0.001 1 0.001 1.123 0.297
age 6.902e −4 1 6.902e −4 0.599 0.444
education 4.150e −6 1 4.150e −6 0.004 0.953
TIV 0.001 1 0.001 1.067 0.309
MaxHR 4.896e −4 1 4.896e −4 0.425 0.519
Residuals 0.039 34 0.001
Bootstrapped Post Hoc Comparisons - Vo2Max level

99% bca† CI
SE
Mean Difference Lower Upper bias t Cohen’s d p bonf
Above 20 0.039 0.014 0.079 0.012 −2.687e −4 3.138 1.212 0.004***
**

p < .01

Note. Type III Sum of Squares

Note. The model is controlled for the effect of age, gender, education, TIV and maxHR.

Note. Mean Difference estimate is based on the median of the bootstrap distribution.

Note. Cohen’s d does not correct for multiple comparisons.

Note. Bootstrapping based on 10000 successful replicates.

Note. Results are averaged over the levels of: gender

†

Bias corrected accelerated.

Figure 4 –

Figure 4 –

a) Bayesian sequential analyses for the association between locus coeruleus signal intensity and Vo2max. The sequential analyses reports “very strong” evidence supporting H1 (BF10 52.98). b) ANCOVA scattered box plot displays the mean difference between the 2 levels of Vo2max (individuals above Vo2max of 20 VS individual below Vo2max of 20).

Brain Maintenance (BrainPAD) and Locus Coeruleus MRI signal intensity

The VBM analyses investigating the relationship between LC and biological brain maintenance revealed a similar pattern of findings. A significant relationship was found between LC signal intensity and BrainPAD; an LC cluster of 153 voxels was associated with greater biological brain maintenance. Weaker findings were observed for the NBM (52 voxels) and the DR (33 voxels). This pattern of findings replicate our previous findings relating biological brain maintenance primarily to the noradrenergic system in a larger sample of 686 subjects (31) and another of 398 (34). The LC cluster survived the statistical threshold of p<0.001. All the other ROIs showed a weaker pattern not surviving the p<0.01 threshold (see table 4 and figure 4 in the supplementary materials).

Neuropsychological Performance (TOSL) and Locus Coeruleus MRI signal intensity

In a similar vein, we observed a disproportionate link between LC and TOSL. Greater LC signal intensity related to higher scores on the TOSL, namely greater LC signal intensity was related with greater levels of high order cognitive control. A cluster of 101 voxels significantly predicted high order cognitive control performances, but did not survive multiple comparison corrections. Weaker and negligible results were observed for the other nuclei and none of them survived when the statistical threshold was increased to P<0.01 (see table 2 and figure 4 in the supplementary materials). These findings are consistent with previous work relating LC signal intensity to better cognitive performances (35, 36, 27, 28, 31, 32, 34, 37, 33).

Multiple regressions, mediation analyses and correlation matrices

Correlation analysis revealed no relationship between the key variables investigated. As shown in table 3, the Bayesian multiple regression model including the group of five neuromodulators, showed that the combined effect of LC and VTA signal intensity is the best model relating to Vo2max, followed by LC+VTA+DR. As stand-alone variable, LC is strongest predictor of Vo2max followed by the VTA. These findings corroborate the VBM analyses and are consistent with our theoretical hypothesis linking the catecholaminergic involvement in physical activity to the subcortical neuromodulator’s MRI signal intensity.

Table 3.

reporting the results of the Bayesian multiple regression model investigating the associations between the five ROIs of the neuromodulatory subcortical system and Vo2max by covaring for age, gender, education, total intracranial volume (TIV) and max hearth rate (MaxHR).

Bayesian Multiple Regression Model Comparison – Vo2Max and the neuromodulatory subcortical system

Models P(M) P(M|data) BFM BF10 R²
Null model (incl. age, education, gender, TIV, MaxHR) 0.167 8.737e-4 0.004 1.000 0.414
LC + VTA 0.017 0.162 11.381 1850.837 0.661
LC + DR + VTA 0.017 0.109 7.232 1249.826 0.685
DR + VTA 0.017 0.101 6.617 1154.276 0.653
LC 0.033 0.082 2.596 470.274 0.604
VTA 0.033 0.063 1.964 362.961 0.599
LC + VTA + NBM 0.017 0.056 3.477 637.007 0.674

Note. All models include age, education, gender, TIV, MaxHR. Table displays only a subset of models; to see all models, select “No” under “Limit No. Models Shown”.

Mediation analyses showed no mediation effect for the five neuromodulators and Vo2max / BrainPAD, however, a significant direct effect between Vo2max and BrainPAD was observed, leading us to infer that physical fitness might affect biological brain maintenance directly (see table 3 in supplementary materials). No other significant effects were observed for TOSL.

Discussion

In the current study we aimed to investigate a sample of 41 healthy adults to see whether Vo2max was related to LC MRI signal intensity. As a secondary aim we investigated whether LC signal intensity could be related to a measure of biological brain maintenance (BrainPAD) and to higher order cognitive functions (TOSL) as already documented in literature (31, 34). To this end, we tested the relationship between LC-NA system MRI signal intensity and Vo2max values and contrasted this hypothesis against the other main neuromodulatory systems. As we anticipated, greater Vo2max values were related with greater LC signal intensity. We also observed weaker but significant relationships between Vo2max and VTA and DR signal intensity. Compared to the other neuromodulatory nuclei, greater LC signal intensity disproportionally related with higher physical fitness level, better biological brain maintenance (BrainPAD) and greater cognitive control abilities (TOSL). These findings are consistent with our proposal that Vo2max might be used as a proxy index of the upregulation of the LC-NA system and (possibly) its related integrity, albeit it should be noted that other unknown confounding factors may affect the nature of this relationship. In our view, the findings support the Noradrenergic theory of Reserve suggesting that greater physical activity, as indexed by higher oxygen uptake, may contribute reserve via the integrity of the LC/NA system. However, we also demonstrated a direct effect of greater Vo2max upon biological brain maintenance independent of LC involvement.

Nevertheless, these preliminary findings linking Vo2max and the LC-NA system are suggestive that greater fitness levels can affect LC integrity contributing to overall LC and brain health. Given the importance of LC integrity for predicting brain maintenance and cognition, Vo2max should be further considered among the resilience factors to neurodegenerative diseases and possibly a key variable to target for curtailing or preventing LC-NA degeneration across the lifespan (11, 13, 14, 15, 16). Our interpretation of these findings is that greater noradrenergic tone elicited by greater physical fitness can contribute to the integrity (maintenance) of the LC-NA system via diverse mechanisms. One mechanism might involve the anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties of NA, namely, increased NA release following physical exercise (38, 42) could reduce overall LC and brain inflammation (17, 18, 24, 19, 20). Indeed, NA mediates powerful regulation of metabolism in astrocytes (110), which may be impaired due to reduced levels of NA in neurodegenerative diseases, as demonstrated directly in an animal model of Alzheimers disease, where the levels of noradrenaline were measured in vivo in awake mice (111). Conversely, increased NA while protecting brain cells can also increase the level of BDNF while reducing biomarkers of neurodegeneration within the LC and across the brain (112, 22, 23, 24, 25, 9, 10).

These neurobiological mechanisms might also explain the short- and long-term repercussion of physical activity on cognitive performances (113, 114, 115, 68, 67, 42), as several studies described enhanced cognitive functions immediately after physical exercise and better cognitive performances in well trained individuals (56, 57, 58, 2, 3). In a work from Nilsson and colleagues (67), the increased BDNF plasma levels following acute exercise were associated with greater cognitive training gains over a period of 12 weeks. Furthermore, another study by Engerof and colleagues (116) found the regular physical activity led to greater bioavailability of BDNF resulting in greater brain volumes. These neurobiological processes are mediated by the LC-NA system which both underpin adaptation to physical stress and cognitive functioning (38, 42, 39, 40, 117, 41, 9, 10, 12). This interconnection was well presented empirically in a multimodal MRI study by Mather and colleagues (118), where several sets of isometric handgrip contractions for 18 seconds before cognitive tests were related to greater LC phasic activity during an fMRI attentional task, resulting in faster reaction times compared to control condition. In addition, Mather and colleagues, also reported that greater structural LC MRI contrast was related to better attentional control. Moreover, a previous study by Segal and colleagues (119) showed that 6 minutes of physical activity at 70% of Vo2max enhanced memory consolidation of stimuli presented earlier both in MCI and healthy individuals. In parallel with enhanced memory, the groups which trained after stimuli presentation showed also significantly higher NA levels relative to controls. This interdependence between physical activity, cognition, catecholamines and BDNF levels was earlier demonstrated by Winter and colleagues (42) on a study on 27 healthy young subjects. Winter and colleagues measured catecholamines and BDNF plasma levels at baseline, after physical exercise and after a subsequent learning task. They found that, compared to rest- and moderate physical activity-conditions, only intense physical activity (6 min. running) elicited greater catecholamine and BDNF release and that these levels predicted greater immediate learning, and greater retention both at intermediate (1week) and long term (8–10months) stages. These studies, corroborate preceding evidence revealing 5-fold NA increase for 2 hours following exercise (120, 121, 122, 123, 38), and well support the concept that enhanced NA release due physical activity might subsequently influence cognitive performance via LC-NA activity. In addition, from the reserve/resilience point of view, the long-term beneficial effect of PA on LC-NA system might also involve the chronic over-expression of neuropeptide Galanin (124, 125,126). Indeed, it has been reported a dose-dependent PA-Galanin expression within the noradrenergic neurons (124, 126, 127, 128), which ameliorated stress-induced anxiety-like behaviour in murine models (129). Other studies also reported a protective role PA-Galanin over-expression in maintenance of dendritic density and neurite outgrowth (130, 131, 126, 127, 132). Similarly, this effect might be combined with PA-BDNF levels, which were associated with increased LC dendrite density (133,134) as well as promoting neurogenesis in key brain structures such as the hippocampus (135).

The above extant literature might suggest that Vo2max variations can affect LC-NA integrity (maintenance) in humans, possibly influencing the degree of LC-NA resilience to neurodegeneration via several pathways including NA and following BDNF and Galanin metabolism (133, 134, 126, 127, 130, 136 – in figure 5 we summarise this proposed neurobiological model). Our preliminary findings show that Vo2max varies with signal intensity, disproportionately within the structure of the LC, and highlights a potential mechanism in which physical fitness builds Reserve through the neuroprotective role of NA metabolism across the central nervous system (9). However, it is worth mentioning that, as emerged both from VBM analyses and Bayesian modelling, our findings outline how other main neuromodulators can have a relevant role in relationship to Vo2max and PA. Indeed, the observed associations between the dopaminergic VTA and serotoninergic DR and MR with Vo2max are suggestive that greater physical fitness might be related with greater structural integrity of such nuclei. Indeed, in a similar way to NA but in minor extent, evidence shown increased 5-HT and DA following physical training (137, 138, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42). Consistently, animal studies also shown greater concentrations both of 5-HT and DA within the cortex and the brainstem immediately after exercise (137, 139, 140, 141, 142) implying greater integrity and functionality of such neuromodulatory systems might result in chronic exposure to exercise (142, 137, 140, 141, 139). These findings together with our results are indicative that Vo2max levels might affect 5-HT and DA nuclei integrity in humans for the same mechanisms discussed above. Nevertheless, the overall monoaminergic involvement in response to PA might be considered as factor capable to shape brain and cognitive health, and that greater Vo2max level can simultaneously stimulate brainstem nuclei, possibly resulting in greater integrity via the neuroprotective role of NA as described by Robertson (9, 10). It is possible that the neuroprotective role of NA on dopaminergic and cholinergic neurons as described in literature may also partially explain the nature of the association between Vo2max and other neuromodulatory nuclei (143, 17, 18, 19, 20; 21; 22, 23, 24, 25). However, it is worth mentioning the described noradrenaline-mediated mechanisms might interact with other neurochemical dynamics, or even that the observed associations may be entirely dependent on different neurobiological domains related to physical activity, such as lactate metabolism for example (144, 145, 53).

Figure 5 –

Figure 5 –

proposed neurobiological mechanisms between Vo2Max, LC-NA system and brain and cognitive health. Based on the Noradrenergic theory of Cognitive Reserve (Robertson 2013 & 2014). Physical activity (measured with Vo2Max), by up-regulating the LC-NA system, would support brain and cognitive health via NA, BDNF and Galanin metabolism. In this framework, the neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of NA may act in combination with Galanin and BDNF levels elicited by Physical activity. Galanin, particularly in the LC, would be protective against stress promoting dendrite density. Similarly, greater BDNF levels would contribute maintaining LC dendrites while promoting overall brain plasticity.

Limitations

The main limitation of the current preliminary study is the small sample size; a larger sample and a longitudinal design would provide more accurate casual relationships among these variables and would enable an understanding of possible trajectories across time. The number of participants may also explain why our significant associations did not survive multiple comparison corrections and the lack of mediation effects. However, our sample size is similar to other studies investigating Vo2max in relationship to brain and cognitive variables (66, 67, 68), and also matched the size of other relevant studies whose used the same methodology than ours (60, 69). Furthermore, we have also enhanced the validity of our design by performing thorough control analyses, contrasting 9 different hypotheses to the main hypothesis, and systematically covarying for relevant confounding factors such as age, gender, education, total intracranial volume, and max heart rate. These control analyses and the employment of both null hypothesis statistical testing and Bayesian modelling, strengthens the reliability of our observations.

Another constraint involves the methodological limitations of VBM analyses in retrospective studies which should be taken into account while considering these findings. Post-mortem histological investigations would offer more precise quantifications about the relationship between Vo2max and the integrity (maintenance) of the neuromodulatory subcortical system. However, within these limitations, our findings are consistent with previous in-vivo evidence using similar methodology (31, 27, 28, 60, 69; 34).

Lastly, it should be noted that the current study did not control for other potential confounding factors, such as genetic variables, ethnicity, body parameters (ratio between body fat and lean mass) and dietary behavior which can affect Vo2max level (146, 147, 148, 149, 150), LC variation and brain and cognitive health as well. It is important to note that this is a preliminary investigation based on a relatively small sample focused on VBM analysis of circumscribed areas of the brainstem. Although, many of these findings are consistent with the literature, further (longitudinal) investigations in larger samples are required. Nevertheless, the current findings show consistency between multiple regression and Bayesian approaches and have been replicated on a larger sample (manuscript in preparation).

Conclusions and clinical implications

This is the first preliminary evidence linking in vivo LC-NA system integrity to Vo2max in healthy older subjects. These findings provide a possible explanation behind the neurobiological mechanisms connecting physical fitness to improved cognitive functions and resilience to neurodegenerative diseases. These novel and unique results shed light on possible neurobiological dynamics underpinning the relationship between physical fitness and brain health, whilst being consistent with Robertson’s theoretical framework positing the noradrenergic system as a key neuromodulatory basis of Reserve. However, it should be noted that the integrity of the LC-NA system may be the factor which leads to a higher exercise capacity (greater Vo2max), and that the current study was not designed to address this. Therefore, future studies, using physical exercise to specifically target the LC-NA system, should aim to replicate the current findings, focusing particularly on prospective investigations including biomarkers, neuropsychological testing, body metrics and other life-style factors (including dietary behaviour). The current study provides additional evidence on the growing literature outlining the pivotal role of physical activity in matter of brain maintenance and cognitive health particularly in the face of neurodegenerative diseases (151, 152, 153, 1, 154). This study adds support for preventative strategies focused on physical training protocols as a practical tool for increasing brain and cognitive health and protecting against neurodegeneration (1; 155, 156, 136). Indeed, several studies reported that Vo2max is effectively trainable using various methodologies at different ages in healthy populations (157, 158, 159, 160, 161,162). Physical activity interventions also can significantly improve cognitive and brain health (72, 163, 67, 115, 164, 165, 166, 154), while evidence showed that in even MCI and early stages of dementia physical exercise can alleviate cognitive impairment, possibly slowing down disease progression (167, 119, 168, 169, 170, 153, 171).

Supplementary Material

Supinfo

Supplementary table 1 shows the results for the VBM multivariate linear regression analyses testing the positive relationship between the five ROIs and BrainPAD. The results across the n.41 healthy subjects are covaried for age, gender, total intracranial volume, education. The table reports the significant clusters of voxels predicting BrainPAD values for the statistical threshold of p<0.05. Bayesian Factors (BF10) are reported as parameter of strength in brackets. Cluster of voxels surviving p<0.01 are marked with *. Cluster of voxels surviving p<0.001 are marked with **. No clusters survived multiple comparison corrections (FWE).

Supplementary table 2 shows the results for the VBM multivariate linear regression analyses testing the positive relationship between the five ROIs and TOSL. The results across the n.41 healthy subjects are covaried for age, gender, total intracranial volume, education. The table reports the significant clusters of voxels predicting TOSL values for the statistical threshold of p<0.05. Bayesian Factors (BF10) are reported as parameter of strength in brackets. Cluster of voxels surviving p<0.01 are marked with *. Cluster of voxels surviving p<0.001 are marked with **. No clusters survived multiple comparison corrections (FWE).

Supplementary table 3– Mediation analyses reporting the mediation effect of the five ROIs of the neuromodulatory subcortical system between vo2max and BrainPAD

Supplementary figure 3d – shows the relationship between Vo2max and the neuromodulatory subcortical system signal intensity in a sample of 41 healthy subjects (age range 60–72). Results are covaried for Age, Gender, Education, Total Intracranial Volume and max heart rate for P<0.05. Significant clusters are displayed in a 3D-reconstruction of the brain from a midline frontal point of view. The Locus Coeruleus cluster is displayed in blue, in red is the Dorsal Raphe cluster, in green the Ventral Tegmental Area cluster and in purple the cluster within the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert.

Acknowledgements

Thanks are extended to Francesca Fabbricatore for the thoughtful comments and for proofreading the manuscript.

Funding

Project founded by the Irish Research Council-Irish Research Council Laureate Consolidator Award (2018-23) IRCLA/2017/306 to Paul Dockree.

We are grateful to Dr. Laura Defina for assistance with collection and interpretation of the physical fitness measures. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (RC1-AG035954)

This work was also supported by ProApto funded the study (for more info: https://www.proapto-camouflage.com/)

Footnotes

DECLARATIONS

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This is not applicable since the study is based on already acquired data shared by Chapman et al. 2016 as stated in the manuscript and in the following sections

Consent for publication

All authors give consent to publish the current manuscript in this form.

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from author Jeffrey S. Spence, Center for BrainHealth, University of Texas at Dallas, on reasonable request.

The Locus Coeruleus omni-comprehensive mask is available on request. Contact Dr. Emanuele RG Plini (plinie@tcd.ie / emanuele.rg.plini@gmail.com)

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Availability of data and materials

The study was approved by the ethical review board of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, University of Texas at Dallas and The Cooper Institute. All participants were informed about the study protocol and provided informed written consent prior to scanning.”

References

  • 1.Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, Brayne C, Burns A, Cohen-Mansfield J, Cooper C, Costafreda SG, Dias A, Fox N, Gitlin LN, Howard R, Kales HC, Kivimäki M, Larson EB, Ogunniyi A, Orgeta V, Ritchie K, Rockwood K, Sampson EL, Samus Q, Schneider LS, Selbæk G, Teri L, Mukadam N. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020. Aug 8;396(10248):413–446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wallace LMK, Theou O, Godin J, Andrew MK, Bennett DA, Rockwood K. Investigation of frailty as a moderator of the relationship between neuropathology and dementia in Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Rush Memory and Aging Project. Lancet Neurol. 2019. Feb;18(2):177–184. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30371-5. Erratum in: Lancet Neurol. 2019 Mar;18(3):e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Erickson KI, Hillman C, Stillman CM, Ballard RM, Bloodgood B, Conroy DE, Macko R, Marquez DX, Petruzzello SJ, Powell KE; FOR 2018 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE*. Physical Activity, Cognition, and Brain Outcomes: A Review of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019. Jun;51(6):1242–1251. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stern Y. Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:2015–2028. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stern Y. Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:1006–1012. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70191-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stern Y, Urquiljo EMA, Bartrés-Faz D, Belleville S, Cantillon M, Chetelat G, Ewers M, Franzmeier N, Kempermann G, Kremen WS, et al. Whitepaper: Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020;16:1305–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cabeza R, Albert M, Belleville S, Craik FIM, Duarte A, Grady CL, Lindenberger U, Nyberg L, Park DC, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Rugg MD, Steffener J, Rajah MN. Maintenance, reserve and compensation: the cognitive neuroscience of healthy ageing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018. Nov;19(11):701–710. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0068-2. Erratum in: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Dec;19(12):772. Erratum in: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Dec;19(12):772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Song S, Gaynor AM, Gazes Y, Lee S, Xu Q, Habeck C, Stern Y, Gu Y. Physical activity moderates the association between white matter hyperintensity burden and cognitive change. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience - 14–2022-ISSN: 1663–4365 DOI= 10.3389/fnagi.2022.945645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Robertson IH A noradrenergic theory of cognitive reserve: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2013, 34, 298–308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Robertson IH A right hemisphere role in cognitive reserve. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 1375–1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Braak H, Thal DR, Ghebremedhin E, Del Tredici K. Stages of the pathologic process in Alzheimer disease: age categories from 1 to 100 years. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011. Nov;70(11):960–9. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e318232a379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mather M, Harley CW The Locus Coeruleus: Essential for Maintaining Cognitive Function and the Aging Brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2016;20:214–226. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ehrenberg AJ, Nguy AK, Theofilas P, Dunlop S, Suemoto CK, Alho ATDL, Leite RP, Rodriguez RD, Mejia MB, Rüb U, et al. Quantifying the accretion of hyperphosphorylated tau in the locus coeruleus and dorsal raphe nucleus: The pathological building blocks of early Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2017;43:393–408. doi: 10.1111/nan.12387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Betts MJ, Kirilina E, Otaduy MCG, Ivanov D, Acosta-Cabronero J, Callaghan MF, Lambert C, Cardenas-Blanco A, Pine K, Passamonti L, et al. Locus coeruleus imaging as a biomarker for noradrenergic dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. Brain. 2019;142:2558–2571. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Satoh A, Iijima KM Roles of tau pathology in the locus coeruleus (LC) in age-associated pathophysiology and Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis: Potential strategies to protect the LC against aging. Brain Res. 2019;1702:17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dahl MJ, Mather M, Werkle-Bergner M, Kennedy BL, Guzman S, Hurth K, Miller CA, Qiao Y, Shi Y, Chui HC, Ringman JM. Locus coeruleus integrity is related to tau burden and memory loss in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2022. Apr;112:39–54. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Dec 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Heneka MT, Galea E, Gavriluyk V, Dumitrescu-Ozimek L, Daeschner J, O’Banion MK, Weinberg G, Klockgether T, Feinstein DL. Noradrenergic depletion potentiates beta -amyloid-induced cortical inflammation: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2002. Apr 1;22(7):2434–42. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02434.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Heneka MT, Carson MJ, El Khoury J, Landreth GE, Brosseron F, Feinstein DL, Jacobs AH, Wyss-Coray T, Vitorica J, Ransohoff RM, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:388–405. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)70016-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Troadec JD, Marien M, Darios F, Hartmann A, Ruberg M, Colpaert F, Michel PP Noradrenaline provides long-term protection to dopaminergic neurons by reducing oxidative stress. J. Neurochem. 2001;79:200–210. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00556.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Feinstein DL, Heneka MT, Gavrilyuk V, Russo CD, Weinberg G, Galea E. Noradrenergic regulation of inflammatory gene expression in brain. Neurochem. Int. 2002;41:357–365. doi: 10.1016/S0197-0186(02)00049-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Giorgi FS, Biagioni F, Galgani A, Pavese N, Lazzeri G, Fornai F. Locus Coeruleus Modulates Neuroinflammation in Parkinsonism and Dementia. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. Nov 16;21(22):8630. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Counts SE, Mufson EJ Noradrenaline activation of neurotrophic pathways protects against neuronal amyloid toxicity. J. Neurochem. 2010;113:649–660. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06622.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hassani OK, Rymar VV, Nguyen KQ, Huo L, Cloutier J-F, Miller FD, Sadikot AF The noradrenergic system is necessary for survival of vulnerable midbrain dopaminergic neurons: Implications for development and Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 2020;85:22–37. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Traver S, Salthun-Lassalle B, Marien M, Hirsch E, Colpaert F, Michel PP The Neurotransmitter Noradrenaline Rescues Septal Cholinergic Neurons in Culture from Degeneration Caused by Low-Level Oxidative Stress. Mol. Pharmacol. 2005;67:1882–1891. doi: 10.1124/mol.104.007864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mannari C, Origlia N, Scatena A, Del Debbio A, Catena M, Dell’Agnello G, Barraco A, Giovannini L, Dell’Osso L, Domenici L, et al. BDNF Level in the Rat Prefrontal Cortex Increases Following Chronic but Not Acute Treatment with Duloxetine, a Dual Acting Inhibitor of Noradrenaline and Serotonin Re-uptake. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2008;28:457–468. doi: 10.1007/s10571-007-9254-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wilson RS, Nag S, Boyle PA, Hizel L, Yu L, Buchman AS, Schneider JA, Bennett DA Neural reserve, neuronal density in the locus ceruleus, and cognitive decline. Neurology. 2013;80:1202–1208. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182897103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dutt S, Li Y, Mather M, Nation DA; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Brainstem Volumetric Integrity in Preclinical and Prodromal Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;77(4):1579–1594. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dutt S, Li Y, Mather M, Nation DA; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Brainstem substructures and cognition in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Imaging Behav. 2021. Oct;15(5):2572–2582. doi: 10.1007/s11682-021-00459-y. Epub 2021 Mar 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Elman JA, Puckett OK, Beck A, Fennema-Notestine C, Cross LK, Dale AM, Eglit GML, Eyler LT, Gillespie NA, Granholm EL, Gustavson DE, Hagler DJ Jr, Hatton SN, Hauger R, Jak AJ, Logue MW, McEvoy LK, McKenzie RE, Neale MC, Panizzon MS, Reynolds CA, Sanderson Cimino M, Toomey R, Tu XM, Whitsel N, Williams ME, Xian H, Lyons MJ, Franz CE, Kremen WS. MRI-assessed locus coeruleus integrity is heritable and associated with multiple cognitive domains, mild cognitive impairment, and daytime dysfunction. Alzheimers Dement. 2021. Jun;17(6):1017–1025. doi: 10.1002/alz.12261. Epub 2021 Feb 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jacobs HIL, Becker JA, Kwong K, Engels-Domínguez N, Prokopiou PC, Papp KV, Properzi M, Hampton OL, d’Oleire Uquillas F, Sanchez JS, Rentz DM, El Fakhri G, Normandin MD, Price JC, Bennett DA, Sperling RA, Johnson KA. In vivo and neuropathology data support locus coeruleus integrity as indicator of Alzheimer’s disease pathology and cognitive decline. Sci Transl Med. 2021. Sep 22;13(612):eabj2511. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj2511. Epub 2021 Sep 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Plini ERG, O’Hanlon E, Boyle R, Sibilia F, Rikhye G, Kenney J, Whelan R, Melnychuk MC, Robertson IH, Dockree PM. Examining the Role of the Noradrenergic Locus Coeruleus for Predicting Attention and Brain Maintenance in Healthy Old Age and Disease: An MRI Structural Study for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Cells. 2021. Jul 20;10(7):1829. doi: 10.3390/cells10071829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dahl MJ, Kulesza A, Werkle-Bergner M, Mather M. Declining locus coeruleus-dopaminergic and noradrenergic modulation of long-term memory in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023. Oct;153:105358. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105358. Epub 2023 Aug 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Galgani A, Lombardo F, Martini N, Vergallo A, Bastiani L, Hampel H, Hlavata H, Baldacci F, Tognoni G, De Marchi D, Ghicopulos I, De Cori S, Biagioni F, Busceti CL, Ceravolo R, Bonuccelli U, Chiappino D, Siciliano G, Fornai F, Pavese N, Giorgi FS. Magnetic resonance imaging Locus Coeruleus abnormality in amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment is associated with future progression to dementia. Eur J Neurol. 2023. Jan;30(1):32–46. doi: 10.1111/ene.15556. Epub 2022 Oct 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Plini ERG, Melnychuk MC, Harkin A. et al. Dietary Tyrosine Intake (FFQ) Is Associated with Locus Coeruleus, Attention and Grey Matter Maintenance: An MRI Structural Study on 398 Healthy Individuals of the Berlin Aging Study-II. J Nutr Health Aging (2023). 10.1007/s12603-023-2005-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Clewett DV, Lee TH, Greening S, Ponzio A, Margalit E, Mather M. Neuromelanin marks the spot: identifying a locus coeruleus biomarker of cognitive reserve in healthy aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2016. Jan;37:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.09.019. Epub 2015 Oct 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dahl MJ, Mather M, Düzel S., Bodammer NC., Lindenberger U, Kühn S, Werkle-Bergner M. Rostral locus coeruleus integrity is associated with better memory performance in older adults. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2019;3:1203–1214.doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0715-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Prokopiou PC, Engels-Domínguez N, Papp KV, Scott MR, Schultz AP, Schneider C, Farrell ME, Buckley RF, Quiroz YT, El Fakhri G, Rentz DM, Sperling RA, Johnson KA, Jacobs HIL. Lower novelty-related locus coeruleus function is associated with Aβ-related cognitive decline in clinically healthy individuals. Nat Commun. 2022. Mar 23;13(1):1571. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28986-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kjær M, Secher N, Galbo H. Physical stress and catecholamine release. Baillieres Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1987;1:279–298. doi: 10.1016/S0950-351X(87)80064-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bekar LK, Wei HS, Nedergaard M. The locus coeruleus-norepinephrine network optimizes coupling of cerebral blood volume with oxygen demand. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012. Dec;32(12):2135–45. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.115. Epub 2012 Aug 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Green HJ, Duhamel TA, Foley KP, Ouyang J, Smith IC, Stewart RD. Glucose supplements increase human muscle in vitro Na+-K+-ATPase activity during prolonged exercise. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007. Jul;293(1):R354–62. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00701.2006. Epub 2007 Apr 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Escourrou P, Johnson DG, Rowell LB. Hypoxemia increases plasma catecholamine concentrations in exercising humans. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984. Nov;57(5):1507–11. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1984.57.5.1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Winter B, Breitenstein C, Mooren FC, Voelker K, Fobker M, Lechtermann A, Krueger K, Fromme A, Korsukewitz C, Floel A, Knecht S. High impact running improves learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2007. May;87(4):597–609. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Dec 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Melnychuk MC, Dockree PM, O’Connell RG, Murphy PR, Balsters JH, Robertson IH. Coupling of respiration and attention via the locus coeruleus: Effects of meditation and pranayama. Psychophysiology. 2018. Sep;55(9):e13091. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13091. Epub 2018 Apr 22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Melnychuk MC, Robertson IH, Plini ERG, Dockree PM. A Bridge between the Breath and the Brain: Synchronization of Respiration, a Pupillometric Marker of the Locus Coeruleus, and an EEG Marker of Attentional Control State. Brain Sci. 2021. Oct 6;11(10):1324. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Biancardi V, Bicego K, Almeida MC, Gargaglioni LH Locus coeruleus noradrenergic neurons and CO2 drive to breathing. Pflügers Arch.-Eur. J. Physiol. 2007;455:1119–1128. doi: 10.1007/s00424-007-0338-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Froese L, Dian J, Gomez A, Unger B, Zeiler FA. The cerebrovascular response to norepinephrine: A scoping systematic review of the animal and human literature. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020. Oct;8(5):e00655. doi: 10.1002/prp2.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang Q, Roche M, Gheres KW et al. Cerebral oxygenation during locomotion is modulated by respiration. Nat Commun 10, 5515 (2019). 10.1038/s41467-019-13523-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bola RA, Kiyatkin EA. Inflow of oxygen and glucose in brain tissue induced by intravenous norepinephrine: relationships with central metabolic and peripheral vascular responses. J Neurophysiol. 2018. Feb 1;119(2):499–508. doi: 10.1152/jn.00692.2017. Epub 2017 Nov 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Crowley E, Powell C, Carson BP, Davies RW, “The Effect of Exercise Training Intensity on VO2max in Healthy Adults: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses”, Translational Sports Medicine, vol. 2022, Article ID 9310710, 10 pages, 2022. 10.1155/2022/9310710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Milanović Z, Sporiš G, Weston M. Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIT) and Continuous Endurance Training for VO2max Improvements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. Sports Med. 2015. Oct;45(10):1469–81. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0365-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Strasser B, Burtscher M. Survival of the fittest: VO2max, a key predictor of longevity? Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2018. Mar 1;23(8):1505–1516. doi: 10.2741/4657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hanscombe KB, Persyn E, Traylor M, Glanville KP, Hamer M, Coleman JRI, Lewis CM. The genetic case for cardiorespiratory fitness as a clinical vital sign and the routine prescription of physical activity in healthcare. Genome Med. 2021. Nov 9;13(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00994-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xu C, Hou Y, Si K, Cao Z. Cardiorespiratory fitness, genetic susceptibility, inflammation and risk of incident type 2 diabetes: A population-based longitudinal study. Metabolism. 2022. Jul;132:155215. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155215. Epub 2022 May 16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Babu AS, Arena R, Myers J. Post-COVID era: Time to re-introduce “cardiorespiratory fitness” as a vital sign. EClinicalMedicine. 2022. Jul 9;51:101546. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kodama S, Saito K, Tanaka S, et al. Cardiorespiratory Fitness as a Quantitative Predictor of All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Events in Healthy Men and Women: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301(19):2024–2035. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wendell CR, Gunstad J, Waldstein SR, Wright JG, Ferrucci L, Zonderman AB. Cardiorespiratory fitness and accelerated cognitive decline with aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014. Apr;69(4):455–62. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glt144. Epub 2013 Nov 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hwang J, Castelli DM, Gonzalez-Lima F. The positive cognitive impact of aerobic fitness is associated with peripheral inflammatory and brain-derived neurotrophic biomarkers in young adults. Physiol Behav. 2017. Oct 1;179:75–89. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pantzar A, Jonasson LS, Ekblom Ö, Boraxbekk CJ, Ekblom MM. Relationships Between Aerobic Fitness Levels and Cognitive Performance in Swedish Office Workers. Front Psychol. 2018. Dec 20;9:2612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Erickson KI, Hillman C, Stillman CM, Ballard RM, Bloodgood B, Conroy DE, Macko R, Marquez DX, Petruzzello SJ, Powell KE; FOR 2018 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY GUIDELINES ADVISORY COMMITTEE*. Physical Activity, Cognition, and Brain Outcomes: A Review of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019. Jun;51(6):1242–1251. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Olivo G, Nilsson J, Garzón B. et al. Higher VO2max is associated with thicker cortex and lower grey matter blood flow in older adults. Sci Rep 11, 16724 (2021). 10.1038/s41598-021-96138-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.d’Arbeloff T, Elliott ML, Knodt AR, Sison M, Melzer TR, Ireland D, Ramrakha S, Poulton R, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Hariri AR. Midlife Cardiovascular Fitness Is Reflected in the Brain’s White Matter. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021. Apr 6;13:652575. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.652575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Maleki S, Hendrikse J, Chye Y, Caeyenberghs K, Coxon JP, Oldham S, Suo C, Yücel M. Associations of cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise with brain white matter in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Imaging Behav. 2022. Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s11682-022-00693-y. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wittfeld K, Jochem C, Dörr M, Schminke U, Gläser S, Bahls M, Markus MRP, Felix SB, Leitzmann MF, Ewert R, Bülow R, Völzke H, Janowitz D, Baumeister SE, Grabe HJ. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Gray Matter Volume in the Temporal, Frontal, and Cerebellar Regions in the General Population. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020. Jan;95(1):44–56. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Palomero-Gallagher N, Amunts K, Zilles K. Transmitter Receptor Distribution in the Human Brain. Brain Mapp. 2015:261–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mai JK, Paxinos G. The Human Nervous System. 3rd ed. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2012 [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Manning JR, Notaro GM, Chen E, Fitzpatrick PC. Fitness tracking reveals task-specific associations between memory, mental health, and physical activity. Sci Rep. 2022. Aug 15;12(1):13822. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17781-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nilsson J, Ekblom Ö, Ekblom M, Lebedev A, Tarassova O, Moberg M, Lövdén M. Acute increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor in plasma following physical exercise relates to subsequent learning in older adults. Sci Rep. 2020. Mar 10;10(1):4395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60124-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Marin Bosch B, Bringard A, Logrieco MG, Lauer E, Imobersteg N, Thomas A, Ferretti G, Schwartz S, Igloi K. Effect of acute physical exercise on motor sequence memory. Sci Rep. 2020. Sep 18;10(1):15322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72108-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Petkus AJ, Jarrahi B, Holschneider DP, Gomez ME, Filoteo JV, Schiehser DM, Fisher BE, Van Horn JD, Jakowec MW, McEwen SC, Petzinger G. Thalamic volume mediates associations between cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max) and cognition in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021. May;86:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.03.019. Epub 2021 Mar 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kurl S, Laukkanen JA, Lonnroos E, Remes AM, Soininen H. Cardiorespiratory fitness and risk of dementia: a prospective population-based cohort study. Age Ageing. 2018. Jul 1;47(4):611–614. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ding K, Tarumi T, Zhu DC, Tseng BY, Thomas BP, Turner M, Repshas J, Kerwin DR, Womack KB, Lu H, Cullum CM, Zhang R. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and White Matter Neuronal Fiber Integrity in Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(2):729–739. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chapman SB, Aslan S, Spence JS, Keebler MW, DeFina LF, Didehbani N, Perez AM, Lu H, D’Esposito M. Distinct Brain and Behavioral Benefits from Cognitive vs. Physical Training: A Randomized Trial in Aging Adults. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016. Jul 18;10:338. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Boyle R, Jollans L, Rueda-Delgado LM, Rizzo R, Yener GG, McMorrow JP, Knight SP, Carey D, Robertson IH, Emek-Savaş DD, et al. Brain-predicted age difference score is related to specific cognitive functions: A multi-site replication analysis. Brain Imaging Behav. 2021;15:327–345. doi: 10.1007/s11682-020-00260-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gaser C, Franke K, Klöppel S, Koutsouleris N, Sauer H; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. BrainAGE in Mild Cognitive Impaired Patients: Predicting the Conversion to Alzheimer’s Disease. PLoS One. 2013. Jun 27;8(6):e67346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ge Y, Grossman RI, Babb JS, Rabin ML, Mannon LJ, Kolson DL. Age-related total gray matter and white matter changes in normal adult brain. Part I: volumetric MR imaging analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002. Sep;23(8):1327–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liu KY, Marijatta F, Hämmerer D, Acosta-Cabronero J, Düzel E, Howard RJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the human locus coeruleus: A systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017;83:325–355. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Liu KY, Marijatta F, Hämmerer D, Acosta-Cabronero J, Düzel E, Howard RJ Magnetic resonance imaging of the human locus coeruleus: A systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017;83:325–355. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Liu KY, Kievit RA, Tsvetanov KA et al. Noradrenergic-dependent functions are associated with age-related locus coeruleus signal intensity differences. Nat Commun 11, 1712 (2020). 10.1038/s41467-020-15410-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Keren NI, Lozar CT, Harris K, Morgan P, Eckert MA In vivo mapping of the human locus coeruleus. NeuroImage. 2009;47:1261–1267. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Keren NI, Taheri S, Vazey EM, Morgan P, Granholm A-CE, Aston-Jones GS, Eckert MA Histologic validation of locus coeruleus MRI contrast in post-mortem tissue. NeuroImage. 2015;113:235–245. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tona KD, Keuken M, De Rover M, Lakke E, Forstmann BU, Nieuwenhuis S, Van Osch MJP In vivo visualization of the locus coeruleus in humans: Quantifying the test–retest reliability. Brain Struct. Funct. 2017;222:4203–4217.doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1464-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Betts MJ, Cardenas-Blanco A, Kanowski M, Jessen F, Düzel E. In vivo MRI assessment of the human locus coeruleus along its rostrocaudal extent in young and older adults. Neuroimage. 2017. Dec;163:150–159. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.042. Epub 2017 Sep 22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Rong Y, Rua C, O’Callaghan C, Jones PS, Hezemans F, Kaalund SS, Tsvetanov KA, Rodgers CT, Williams G, Passamonti L, et al. An in vivo Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Locus Coeruleus at Ultra-high Field. bioRxiv. 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.02.03.932087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.García-Gomar MG, Videnovic A, Singh K, Stauder M, Lewis LD, Wald LL, Rosen BR, Bianciardi M. Disruption of Brainstem Structural Connectivity in REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Using 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Mov Disord. 2022. Apr;37(4):847–853. doi: 10.1002/mds.28895. Epub 2021 Dec 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yi Yeo-Jin, sebrink Falk, Maaβ Anne, Ziegler Gabriel, Yakupov Renat, Kreiβl Michael C., Betts Matthew, Speck Oliver, Düzel Emrah, Hämmerer Dorothea bioRxiv 2021.10.01.462807; doi: 10.1101/2021.10.01.462807 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Szot P, Leverenz JB, Peskind ER, Kiyasu E, Rohde K, Miller MA, Raskind MA Tyrosine hydroxylase and norepinephrine transporter mRNA expression in the locus coeruleus in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Brain Res. 2000;84:135–140.doi: 10.1016/S0169-328X(00)00168-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Szot P, White S, Greenup J, Leverenz J, Peskind E, Raskind M. Changes in adrenoreceptors in the prefrontal cortex of subjects with dementia: Evidence of compensatory changes. Neuroscience. 2007;146:471–480.doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.01.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Szot P, White SS, Greenup JL, Leverenz J, Peskind ER, Raskind MA Compensatory Changes in the Noradrenergic Nervous System in the Locus Ceruleus and Hippocampus of Postmortem Subjects with Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia with Lewy Bodies. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:467–478. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4265-05.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hoogendijk WJ, Feenstra MG, Botterblom MH, Gilhuis J, Sommer IE, Kamphorst W, Eikelenboom P, Swaab DF Increased activity of surviving locus ceruleus neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 1999;45:82–91.doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199901)45:1&lt;82::AID-ART14&gt;3.0.CO;2-T [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Matchett BJ, Grinberg LT, Theofilas P, Murray ME The mechanistic link between selective vulnerability of the locus coeruleus and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2021;141:631–650. doi: 10.1007/s00401-020-02248-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ishimatsu M, Williams JT Synchronous Activity in Locus Coeruleus Results from Dendritic Interactions in Pericoerulear Regions. J. Neurosci. 1996;16:5196–5204. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-16-05196.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Janitzky K. Impaired Phasic Discharge of Locus Coeruleus Neurons Based on Persistent High Tonic Discharge—A New Hypothesis with Potential Implications for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Neurol. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Beardmore R, Hou R, Darekar A, Holmes C, Boche D. The Locus Coeruleus in Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Postmortem and Brain Imaging Review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;83(1):5–22. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Priovoulos N, van Boxel SC, Jacobs HI, Poser BA, Uludag K, Verhey FR, Ivanov D. Unraveling the contributions to the neuromelanin-MRI contrast. Brain Struct Funct. 2020. Dec;225(9):2757–2774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Trujillo P, Summers PE, Ferrari E, Zucca FA, Sturini M, Mainardi LT, Cerutti S, Smith AK, Smith SA, Zecca L, Costa A. Contrast mechanisms associated with neuromelanin-MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2017. Nov;78(5):1790–1800. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26584. Epub 2016 Dec 26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Wilms H, Rosenstiel P, Sievers J, Deuschl G, Zecca L, Lucius R (2003) Activation of microglia by human neuromelanin is NF-κB dependent and involves p38 mitogen- activated protein kinase: Implications for Parkin- son’s disease. FASEB J 17, 500–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zecca L, Wilms H, Geick S, Claasen J-H, Brandenburg L-O, Holzknecht C, Panizza ML, Zucca FA, Deuschl G, Sievers J (2008) Human neuromelanin induces neuroin- flammation and neurodegeneration in the rat substantia nigra: Implications for Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neu- ropathol 116, 47–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Zecca L, Zucca F, Albertini A, Rizzio E, Fariello R (2006) A proposed dual role of neuromelanin in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 67, S8–S11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Mann D, Yates P, Hawkes J (1982) The noradrenergic system in Alzheimer and multi- infarct dementias. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 45, 113–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Tang Y, Cao M, Li Y, Lin Y, Wu X, Chen M; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Altered structural covariance of locus coeruleus in individuals with significant memory concern and patients with mild cognitive impairment. Cereb Cortex. 2023. Jun 20;33(13):8523–8533. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Beliveau V, Svarer C, Frokjaer V, Knudsen GM, Greve DN, Fisher PM Functional connectivity of the dorsal and median raphe nuclei at rest. NeuroImage. 2015;116:187– 195. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Pauli WM, Nili AN, Tyszka JM. A high-resolution probabilistic in vivo atlas of human subcortical brain nuclei. Sci Data. 2018. Apr 17;5:180063. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zaborszky L, Hoemke L, Mohlberg H, Schleicher A, Amunts K, Zilles K. Stereotaxic probabilistic maps of the magnocellular cell groups in human basal forebrain. Neuroimage. 2008;42:1127–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.George S, Mufson E, Leurgans S, Shah R, Ferrari C, Detoledo-Morrell L. MRI-based volumetric measurement of the substantia innominata in amnestic MCI and mild AD. Neurobiol. Aging. 2011;32:1756–1764. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Schulz J, Pagano G, Bonfante JAF, Wilson H, Politis M. Nucleus basalis of Meynert degeneration precedes and predicts cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2018;141:1501–1516. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kilimann I, Grothe M, Heinsen H, Alho EJL, Grinberg L, Jr EA, Dos Santos GAB, Da Silva RE, Mitchell AJ, Frisoni GB, et al. Subregional Basal Forebrain Atrophy in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Multicenter Study. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2014;40:687–700. doi: 10.3233/JAD-132345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Koulousakis P, Andrade P, Visser-Vandewalle V, Sesia T. The Nucleus Basalis of Meynert and Its Role in Deep Brain Stimulation for Cognitive Disorders: A Historical Perspective. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019;69:905–919. doi: 10.3233/jad-180133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Liu AKL, Chang RC-C, Pearce RKB, Gentleman SM Nucleus basalis of Meynert revisited: Anatomy, history and differential involvement in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;129:527–540. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1392-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Myers J, Kaminsky LA, Lima R, Christle JW, Ashley E, Arena R. A Reference Equation for Normal Standards for VO2 Max: Analysis from the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise National Database (FRIEND Registry). Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017. Jun-Jul;60(1):21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Apr 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zorec R, Vardjan N. Adrenergic regulation of astroglial aerobic glycolysis and lipid metabolism: Towards a noradrenergic hypothesis of neurodegeneration. Neurobiol Dis. 2023. Jun 15;182:106132. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106132. Epub 2023 Apr 23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Åbjørsbråten KS, Skaaraas GHES, Cunen C, Bjørnstad DM, Binder KMG, Bojarskaite L, Jensen V, Nilsson LNG, Rao SB, Tang W, Hermansen GH, Nagelhus EA, Ottersen OP, Torp R, Enger R. Impaired astrocytic Ca2+ signaling in awake-behaving Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice. Elife. 2022. Jul 14;11:e75055. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Omoluabi T, Torraville SE, Maziar A, Ghosh A, Power KD, Reinhardt C, Harley CW, Yuan Q. Novelty-like activation of locus coeruleus protects against deleterious human pretangle tau effects while stress-inducing activation worsens its effects. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021. Dec 31;7(1):e12231. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Basso JC, Suzuki WA. The Effects of Acute Exercise on Mood, Cognition, Neurophysiology, and Neurochemical Pathways: A Review. Brain Plast. 2017. Mar 28;2(2):127–152. doi: 10.3233/BPL-160040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.van Dongen EV, Kersten IHP, Wagner IC, Morris RGM, Fernández G. Physical Exercise Performed Four Hours after Learning Improves Memory Retention and Increases Hippocampal Pattern Similarity during Retrieval. Curr Biol. 2016. Jul 11;26(13):1722–1727. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.071. Epub 2016 Jun 16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Blomstrand P, & Engvall J. (2021). Effects of a single exercise workout on memory and learning functions in young adults—A systematic review. Translational Sports Medicine, 4(1), 115–127. 10.1002/tsm2.190 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Engeroff T, Füzéki E, Vogt L, Fleckenstein J, Schwarz S, Matura S, Pilatus U, Deichmann R, Hellweg R, Pantel J, Banzer W. Is Objectively Assessed Sedentary Behavior, Physical Activity and Cardiorespiratory Fitness Linked to Brain Plasticity Outcomes in Old Age? Neuroscience. 2018. Sep 15;388:384–392. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.07.050. Epub 2018 Aug 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Jimenez C, Melin B, Savourey G, Launay JC, Alonso A, Mathieu J. Effects of passive hyperthermia versus exercise-induced hyperthermia on immune responses: hormonal implications. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2007. Sep;18(3):154–61. doi: 10.1684/ecn.2007.0101. Epub 2007 Sep 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Mather M, Huang R, Clewett D, Nielsen SE, Velasco R, Tu KP, Han S, Kennedy B. Isometric exercise facilitates attention to salient events in women via the noradrenergic system. NeuroImage. 2020;210:116560. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Segal SK, Cotman CW, Cahill LF Exercise-Induced Noradrenergic Activation Enhances Memory Consolidation in Both Normal Aging and Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2012;32:1011–1018. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-121078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Chatterton RT Jr, Vogelsong KM, Lu YC, Ellman AB, Hudgens GA. Salivary alpha-amylase as a measure of endogenous adrenergic activity. Clin Physiol. 1996. Jul;16(4):433–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1996.tb00731.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Brenner I, Shek PN, Zamecnik J, Shephard RJ. Stress hormones and the immunological responses to heat and exercise. Int J Sports Med. 1998. Feb;19(2):130–43. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-971895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Brenner IK, Zamecnik J, Shek PN, Shephard RJ. The impact of heat exposure and repeated exercise on circulating stress hormones. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;76(5):445–54. doi: 10.1007/s004210050274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Urhausen A, Gabriel H, Kindermann W. Blood hormones as markers of training stress and overtraining. Sports Med. 1995. Oct;20(4):251–76. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199520040-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.O’Neal HA, Van Hoomissen JD, Holmes PV, Dishman RK, Preprogalanin mRNA levels are increased in rat locus coeruleus after treadmill exercise training, Neurosci. Lett. 299 (2001) 69–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Van Hoomissen JD, Holmes PV, Zellner AS, A.M. Poudevigne AM., R.K. Dishman RK, The effect of B-adrenergic blockade during chronic exercise on contextual fear conditioning and mRNA for galanin and brain-derived neurotrophic factor, Behav. Neurosci. 118 (2004) 1378–1390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Holmes PV, Yoo HS, Dishman RK. Voluntary exercise and clomipramine treatment elevate prepro-galanin mRNA levels in the locus coeruleus in rats. Neurosci Lett. 2006. Nov 6;408(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.04.057. Epub 2006 Sep 22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Holmes PV. Trophic Mechanisms for Exercise-Induced Stress Resilience: Potential Role of Interactions between BDNF and Galanin. Front Psychiatry. 2014. Jul 28;5:90. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Murray PS; Groves JL; Pettett BJ; Britton SL; Koch LG; Dishman RK; Holmes PV Locus coeruleus galanin expression is enhanced after exercise in rats selectively bred for high capacity for aerobic activity. Peptides 2010, 31, 2264–2268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Tillage RP; Wilson GE; Liles LC; Holmes PV; Weinshenker D. Chronic Environmental or Genetic Elevation of Galanin in Noradrenergic Neurons Confers Stress Resilience in Mice. J. Neurosci. 2020, 40, 7464–7474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Nowacka-Chmielewska M, Grabowska K, Grabowski M, Meybohm P, Burek M, Małecki A. Running from Stress: Neurobiological Mechanisms of Exercise-Induced Stress Resilience. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(21):13348. 10.3390/ijms232113348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Sciolino NR; Smith JM; Stranahan AM; Freeman KG; Edwards GL; Weinshenker D; Holmes PV Galanin mediates features of neural and behavioral stress resilience afforded by exercise. Neuropharmacology 2015, 89, 255–264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Hobson SA, Vanderplank PA, Pope RJ, Kerr NC, Wynick D. Galanin stimulates neurite outgrowth from sensory neurons by inhibition of Cdc42 and Rho GTPases and activation of cofilin. J Neurochem. 2013. Oct;127(2):199–208. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12379. Epub 2013 Aug 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Nakai S, Matsunaga W, Ishida Y, Isobe K, Shirokawa T. Effects of BDNF infusion on the axon terminals of locus coeruleus neurons of aging rats. Neurosci Res. 2006. Mar;54(3):213–9. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Jan 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Matsunaga W, Shirokawa T, Isobe K. BDNF is necessary for maintenance of noradrenergic innervations in the aged rat brain. Neurobiol Aging. 2004. Mar;25(3):341–8. doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00093-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Liu PZ, Nusslock R. Exercise-Mediated Neurogenesis in the Hippocampus via BDNF. Front Neurosci. 2018. Feb 7;12:52. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Gibbons TD, Cotter JD, Ainslie PN, Abraham WC, Mockett BG, Campbell HA, Jones EMW, Jenkins EJ, Thomas KN. Fasting for 20 h does not affect exercise-induced increases in circulating BDNF in humans. J Physiol. 2023. Jan 11. doi: 10.1113/JP283582. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Heijnen S, Hommel B, Kibele A, Colzato LS. Neuromodulation of Aerobic Exercise-A Review. Front Psychol. 2016. Jan 7;6:1890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Cordeiro LMS, Rabelo PCR, Moraes MM, Teixeira-Coelho F, Coimbra CC, Wanner SP, Soares DD. Physical exercise-induced fatigue: the role of serotonergic and dopaminergic systems. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2017. Oct 19;50(12):e6432. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20176432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Dey S, Singh RH, Dey PK. Exercise training: significance of regional alterations in serotonin metabolism of rat brain in relation to antidepressant effect of exercise. Physiol Behav. 1992. Dec;52(6):1095–9. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90465-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Meeusen R Exercise and the brain: insight in new therapeutic modalities. Ann Transplant. 2005;10(4):49–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Meeusen R, De Meirleir K. (1995). Exercise and brain neurotransmission. Sports Med. 20, 160–188. 10.2165/00007256-199520030-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Foley TE, Fleshner M. Neuroplasticity of dopamine circuits after exercise: implications for central fatigue. Neuromolecular Med. 2008;10(2):67–80. doi: 10.1007/s12017-008-8032-3. Epub 2008 Feb 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Zhu MY. Noradrenergic Modulation on Dopaminergic Neurons. Neurotox Res. 2018. Nov;34(4):848–859. doi: 10.1007/s12640-018-9889-z. Epub 2018 Mar 23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Hashimoto T, Tsukamoto H, Ando S, Ogoh S. Effect of Exercise on Brain Health: The Potential Role of Lactate as a Myokine. Metabolites. 2021. Nov 29;11(12):813. doi: 10.3390/metabo11120813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Cai M, Wang H, Song H, Yang R, Wang L, Xue X, Sun W, Hu J. Lactate Is Answerable for Brain Function and Treating Brain Diseases: Energy Substrates and Signal Molecule. Front Nutr. 2022. Apr 28;9:800901. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.800901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Santisteban KJ, Lovering AT, Halliwill JR, Minson CT. Sex Differences in VO2max and the Impact on Endurance-Exercise Performance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. Apr 19;19(9):4946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Williams CJ, Williams MG, Eynon N, Ashton KJ, Little JP, Wisloff U, Coombes JS. Genes to predict VO2max trainability: a systematic review. BMC Genomics. 2017. Nov 14;18(Suppl 8):831. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4192-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Nightingale CM, Donin AS, Kerry SR, Owen CG, Rudnicka AR, Brage S, Westgate KL, Ekelund U, Cook DG, Whincup PH. Cross-sectional study of ethnic differences in physical fitness among children of South Asian, black African-Caribbean and white European origin: the Child Heart and Health Study in England (CHASE). BMJ Open. 2016. Jun 20;6(6):e011131. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Bacon AP, Carter RE, Ogle EA, Joyner MJ. VO2max trainability and high intensity interval training in humans: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013. Sep 16;8(9):e73182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Muoio DM, Leddy JJ, Horvath PJ, Awad AB, Pendergast DR. Effect of dietary fat on metabolic adjustments to maximal VO2 and endurance in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994. Jan;26(1):81–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Matta Mello Portugal E, Cevada T, Sobral Monteiro-Junior R, Teixeira Guimarães T, da Cruz Rubini E, Lattari E, Blois C, Camaz Deslandes A. Neuroscience of exercise: from neurobiology mechanisms to mental health. Neuropsychobiology. 2013;68(1):1–14. doi: 10.1159/000350946. Epub 2013 Jun 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Tyndall AV, Clark CM, Anderson TJ, Hogan DB, Hill MD, Longman RS, Poulin MJ. Protective Effects of Exercise on Cognition and Brain Health in Older Adults. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2018. Oct;46(4):215–223. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Barnes JN, Corkery AT. Exercise Improves Vascular Function, but does this Translate to the Brain? Brain Plast. 2018. Dec 12;4(1):65–79. doi: 10.3233/BPL-180075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Basso JC, Oberlin DJ, Satyal MK, O’Brien CE, Crosta C, Psaras Z, Metpally A, Suzuki WA. Examining the Effect of Increased Aerobic Exercise in Moderately Fit Adults on Psychological State and Cognitive Function. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. Jul 12;16:833149. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.833149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Batouli SAH, Saba V. At least eighty percent of brain grey matter is modifiable by physical activity: A review study. Behav Brain Res. 2017. Aug 14;332:204–217. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Freberg E, Taglialatela G. Exercise as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy to Target the Clinical Link Between Depression and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Narrative Review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;89(3):759–767. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Gormley SE, Swain DP, High R, Spina RJ, Dowling EA, Kotipalli US, Gandrakota R. Effect of intensity of aerobic training on VO2max. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008. Jul;40(7):1336–43. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31816c4839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Ozaki H, Loenneke JP, Thiebaud RS et al. Resistance training induced increase in VO2max in young and older subjects. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 10, 107–116 (2013). 10.1007/s11556-013-0120-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Murawska-Cialowicz E, Wojna J, Zuwala-Jagiello J. Crossfit training changes brain-derived neurotrophic factor and irisin levels at rest, after wingate and progressive tests, and improves aerobic capacity and body composition of young physically active men and women. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2015. Dec;66(6):811–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Scribbans TD, Vecsey S, Hankinson PB, Foster WS, Gurd BJ. The Effect of Training Intensity on VO2max in Young Healthy Adults: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis. Int J Exerc Sci. 2016. Apr 1;9(2):230–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Menz V, Marterer N, Amin SB, Faulhaber M, Hansen AB, Lawley JS. Functional Vs. Running Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training: Effects on VO2max and Muscular Endurance. J Sports Sci Med. 2019. Aug 1;18(3):497–504. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Wen D, Utesch T, Wu J, Robertson S, Liu J, Hu G, Chen H. Effects of different protocols of high intensity interval training for VO2max improvements in adults: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Sci Med Sport. 2019. Aug;22(8):941–947. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Jan 29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Kovacevic A, Fenesi B, Paolucci E, Heisz JJ. The effects of aerobic exercise intensity on memory in older adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020. Jun;45(6):591–600. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2019-0495. Epub 2019 Oct 30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Zhu L, Yu Q, Herold F, Cheval B, Dong X, Cui L, Xiong X, Chen A, Yin H, Kong Z, Mueller N, Kramer AF, Zou L. Brain Structure, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Executive Control Changes after a 9-Week Exercise Intervention in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Life (Basel). 2021. Mar 30;11(4):292. doi: 10.3390/life11040292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Liu J, Tao J, Xia R, Li M, Huang M, Li S, Chen X, Wilson G, Park J, Zheng G, Chen L, Kong J. Mind-Body Exercise Modulates Locus Coeruleus and Ventral Tegmental Area Functional Connectivity in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021. Jun 14;13:646807. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.646807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Upadhyay N, Schörkmaier T, Maurer A, Claus J, Scheef L, Daamen M, Martin JA, Stirnberg R, Radbruch A, Attenberger U, Stöcker T, Boecker H. Regional cortical perfusion increases induced by a 6-month endurance training in young sedentary adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022. Aug 9;14:951022. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.951022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Anderson HS, Kluding PM, Gajewski BJ, Donnelly JE, Burns JM. Reliability of peak treadmill exercise tests in mild Alheimer disease. Int J Neurosci. 2011. Aug;121(8):450–6. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2011.574762. Epub 2011 May 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Arcoverde C, Deslandes A, Moraes H, Almeida C, Araujo NB, Vasques PE, Silveira H, Laks J. Treadmill training as an augmentation treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot randomized controlled study. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2014. Mar;72(3):190–6. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20130231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Reiter K, Nielson K, Smith T, Weiss L, Alfini A, & Smith J. (2015). Improved Cardiorespiratory Fitness Is Associated with Increased Cortical Thickness in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 21(10), 757–767. doi: 10.1017/S135561771500079X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Varma VR, Watts A. Daily Physical Activity Patterns During the Early Stage of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;55(2):659–667. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Yu F, Salisbury D, Mathiason MA. Inter-individual differences in the responses to aerobic exercise in Alzheimer’s disease: Findings from the FIT-AD trial. J Sport Health Sci. 2021. Jan;10(1):65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jun 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supinfo

Supplementary table 1 shows the results for the VBM multivariate linear regression analyses testing the positive relationship between the five ROIs and BrainPAD. The results across the n.41 healthy subjects are covaried for age, gender, total intracranial volume, education. The table reports the significant clusters of voxels predicting BrainPAD values for the statistical threshold of p<0.05. Bayesian Factors (BF10) are reported as parameter of strength in brackets. Cluster of voxels surviving p<0.01 are marked with *. Cluster of voxels surviving p<0.001 are marked with **. No clusters survived multiple comparison corrections (FWE).

Supplementary table 2 shows the results for the VBM multivariate linear regression analyses testing the positive relationship between the five ROIs and TOSL. The results across the n.41 healthy subjects are covaried for age, gender, total intracranial volume, education. The table reports the significant clusters of voxels predicting TOSL values for the statistical threshold of p<0.05. Bayesian Factors (BF10) are reported as parameter of strength in brackets. Cluster of voxels surviving p<0.01 are marked with *. Cluster of voxels surviving p<0.001 are marked with **. No clusters survived multiple comparison corrections (FWE).

Supplementary table 3– Mediation analyses reporting the mediation effect of the five ROIs of the neuromodulatory subcortical system between vo2max and BrainPAD

Supplementary figure 3d – shows the relationship between Vo2max and the neuromodulatory subcortical system signal intensity in a sample of 41 healthy subjects (age range 60–72). Results are covaried for Age, Gender, Education, Total Intracranial Volume and max heart rate for P<0.05. Significant clusters are displayed in a 3D-reconstruction of the brain from a midline frontal point of view. The Locus Coeruleus cluster is displayed in blue, in red is the Dorsal Raphe cluster, in green the Ventral Tegmental Area cluster and in purple the cluster within the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert.

Data Availability Statement

The study was approved by the ethical review board of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, University of Texas at Dallas and The Cooper Institute. All participants were informed about the study protocol and provided informed written consent prior to scanning.”

RESOURCES