Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of oral contraceptive (OC) use, khat chewing, and their combined effect on telomerase level and tumor suppressor genes, p53 and p21 in breast cancer (BC) patients and normal volunteers. 140 Yemeni women aged 25–40 years old enrolled, 60 newly diagnosed pretreated BC patients, and 80 control subjects. Venous blood (5 ml) was collected and the results showed BC patients to have significantly raised levels of telomerase, p53, and p21 compared to the control group. The use of OCs significantly raised telomerase in control group with no effect in BC patients; whereas p53 and p21 were significantly increased in BC patients. On the other hand, khat chewing significantly increased p53 in controls and BC patients, whereas p21 was significantly raised in BC patients. The combined use of OCs and khat chewing significantly increased telomerase and p53 in control group, and significantly increased p53 and p21 in BC patients. Telomerase was shown to be a risk factor (OR 4.4) for BC, and the use of OCs was a high-risk factor for increasing telomerase (OR 27.8) in normal subjects. In contrast, khat chewing was shown to be protective (OR 0.142), and the combined use of OCs and khat chewing decreased the risk factor of telomerase from OR 27.8 to 2.1.
Keywords: Khat, Catha edulis, Oral contraceptives, Breast cancer, Telomerase, Tumor suppresser gene, P53, P21
Subject terms: Biomarkers, Oncology, Risk factors
Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer deaths in women, with an estimated 2.3 million new BC cases in 20201,2, and is expected to reach 3 million by 20403. The incidence is highest in developed countries such as Australia, New Zealand, Western and Northern Europe; and lowest in developing countries such as Central America, Eastern and Middle Africa1. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and has significant variability according to ethnicity and race with respect to incidence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis4,5. The main risk factors for BC are early menarche before the age of 12 years, late menopause above 55 years of age, nulliparity, miscarriages before the first full-term pregnancy, late age at first birth, shorter breastfeeding periods, use of menopausal hormone-replacement therapy or oral contraceptives (OCs), and family history of breast cancer6,7. Breast cancer is also related to environmental factors that include high socio-cultural levels, smoking, obesity, and low physical activity8,9. Despite major advancements in its early diagnosis and treatment, conventional therapeutic strategies have shown limitations in effectively treating BC. However, the advent of antibody–drug conjugates, a new class of drug designed to specifically deliver high-potent chemotherapeutic agents directly to cancer cells, has made a breakthrough in the treatment of BC patients10–12.
Oral contraceptives, which contain both levonorgestrel (a progestin) and ethinyl estradiol (an estrogen), adjust normal reproductive function by mimicking the action of estrogen. The role of estrogens in BC development is long-established by the reduction of BC risk among women treated with selective estrogen receptor modulators or by inhibiting the production of estrogens with aromatase inhibitors13. Several meta-analysis studies concluded that the use of OCs significantly increased the risk of BC when compared with never-users, regardless of contraceptive pill type5,14–17. The risk of BC was higher among women who currently or recently used OCs and this risk increased with longer durations of use18–20 or before the first full-term pregnancy21, and was more pronounced in obese women. Other studies showed that the use of OCs was associated with a transiently increased risk of BC4 and that the duration of its use was not associated with increased BC risk22. In contrast, other studies reported no such association between the use of OCs and the risk of BC23–26.
Catha edulis (khat) is an evergreen shrub belonging to the family Celastraceae. The habit of khat chewing has prevailed for centuries among populations in the Horn of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, including Yemen. Although khat chewing is known to cause health issues in certain individuals, it is estimated that 20 million people worldwide are regularly chewing khat27. Khat has been a part of Yemeni culture for a long time and is used in virtually every social occasion. Nearly 90% of adult males and more than 50% of females chew khat for 3–4 h daily. The common adverse effects of Catha edulis are wide and variable28,29. Khat was reported to induce apoptotic cell death, mitochondria damage, reduced cell proliferation, and morphological features of autophagy in various leukemic cells30–32 and normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts33. khat also induces the tumor suppressor and cellular stress sensor p53 expression in normal human oral keratinocytes and oral fibroblasts34, human ovarian adenocarcinoma SKOV3 cell line35, and in human liver cell line L0236.
Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme that specifically maintains telomere integrity and restores its sequences lost during replication37. Telomerase is activated in most immortal cell lines in culture and most malignant tumors38 and is detected in 85–90% of human cancers including BC39–41. It also is increased in preinvasive lesions of the breast, such as ductal carcinoma in situ, suggesting that telomerase activity is activated early in breast carcinogenesis42–44. Several studies reported the involvement of p53 in the regulation of telomerase activity in mammary epithelial cells and BC45–47 via the down-regulation of hTERT transcription46. p53 is a cellular stress sensor protein that initiates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in response to DNA damage and oxidative stress48. The p53 protein induces apoptosis via transactivation of p21, which inhibits cell cycle progression by blocking the kinase activity of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDKs), leading to cell cycle arrest49. p21 is a downstream target of the p53 protein and the p53-p21 axis is an established central pathway for cell cycle inhibition and tumor suppression50.
This study aimed to examine the effects of OCs use, khat chewing, and the combined effect of OCs and khat chewing on the levels of telomerase enzyme and the tumor suppressor genes, p53 and p21 in both BC patients and normal volunteers.
Subjects and methods
Study design, subjects and data collection
This case-control study involved 140 Yemeni women aged 25–50 years old; 60 breast cancer patients and 80 control subjects. Breast cancer patients were selected based on referral by an oncologist after confirmation by ultrasound examination, mammography, and histopathology et al.-Kuwait Hospital and Al-Hayat Center for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. These patients were newly diagnosed pretreated cases of BC grade I, or II. All participating women in both groups had regular menstrual cycles, and pregnant women were excluded from both groups. The studied groups were subdivided according to whether the individual participants were: (1) using contraceptive pills [microgynon Fe-contain—levonorgestrel (synthesized progesterone) 0.15 mg and Ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg] daily for ≥ 1 year; (2) chewing khat 3 days a week for ≥ 3 years; (3) using contraceptive pills daily for ≥ 1 year and chewing khat 3 days a week for ≥ 3 years. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of the faculty of medicine and health sciences, Sana’a University, and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent form was obtained from all participants after explaining the purpose and nature of the study.
Data was collected for cases and control subjects by in-person interview using a questionnaire that includes sociodemographic, reproductive history, and family history of cancers. The subjects’ height and weight were measured and BMI, defined as weight (kg)/height squared (m2), was calculated.
Blood collection and biochemical analysis
Venous blood (5 ml) was collected from each woman into plain tubes for biochemical assay. The serum from each sample was separated within 30 min, aliquoted into three Eppendorf tubes, and immediately kept at − 20 °C for biochemical analysis. Enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) kits were used to measure telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), tumor protein p53 (p53), and antioncogene p21 protein (Blue Gene, China).
Statistical analysis
The statistical analyses were performed on social package of social sciences (SPSS) version 11.5 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). T-test was used to compare two groups and ANOVA was used for comparing more than two groups. Logistic regression was used to assess the risk factors for changes in telomerase in control subjects. The accepted level of significance was set below 0.05 (P < 0.05).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana`a University. The study was in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki for clinical research. All the recruited participants provided written informed consent before participating in the study.
Results
Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study population. The mean age of BC patients was non-significantly (P = 0.163) lower as compared to the control group. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly (P = 0.001) lower in BC patients by 9.4% as compared to the control group. In contrast, smoking was significantly (P = 0.007) higher in BC patients with respect to the control group by two-fold. Family history of BC was significantly (P = 0.001) higher among BC patients by 5.3-fold than the control group, all of whom were first-degree relatives. The levels of telomerase, p53, and p21 in BC patients were significantly (P = 2.60 × 10−6, P = 5.10 × 12−8, p = 1.5 × 10−7) higher by 16.3%, 42.3%, and 49.5% respectively as compared to the control group.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the study population.
| Control (n = 80) | Breast cancer patients (n = 60) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Socio-demographic character | |||
| Age (years) | 51.47 ± 11.86 | 47.68 ± 10.81 | 0.163 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.14 ± 4.72 | 21.87 ± 4.06 | 0.001 |
| Smoking (%) | 17.4 | 35 | 0.007 |
| Menstrual and reproductive characters | |||
| Menarche age (years) | 13.15 ± 0.79 | 13.0 ± 1.2 | 0.444 |
| Menopause (%) | 61.6 | 55.0 | 0.378 |
| Menopausal age (years) | 49. 54 ± 4.1 | 48.08 ± 3.9 | 0.069 |
| No. of full-term pregnancy (years) | 6.81 | 5.73 | 0.025 |
| No. of miscarriage (years) | 1.31 | 1.34 | 0.894 |
| Family history of breast cancer | |||
| First-degree relative (%) | 1.25 | 6.6 | 0.001 |
| Biochemical analysis | |||
| Telomerase (ng/mL) | 3.31 ± 0.63 | 3.85 ± 0.66 | 2.6 × 10−6 |
| p53 (pg/mL) | 111.00 ± 44.60 | 158.00 ± 51.40 | 5.12 × 10−8 |
| p21 (ng/mL) | 2.99 ± 0.66 | 4.47 ± 2.28 | 1.5 × 10−7 |
Data presented as mean ± SD.
Significant values are given in bold.
The levels of telomerase were significantly (P = 6.3 × 10−9) higher in the OC users of the control by 27.2% as compared to their corresponding non-OC users, with no significant difference in p53 and p21 levels (Table 2). In contrast, both p53 and p21 were significantly (P = 0.044, P = 2.8 × 10−6) higher in the OC users of the BC patients by 17.2% and 51.6% as compared to their respective non-OC users, with no significant difference in telomerase level. Similarly, p53 and p21 were significantly (P = 1.1 × 10−5, P = 2.2 × 10−9) higher in the OC users of the BC group by 44.1% and 71.3% with respect to the OC users of the control group; with the telomerase being non-significantly different.
Table 2.
Effect of oral contraceptives on telomerase, p53 and p21 levels in breast cancer patients and control group.
| Control | P value | Breast cancer patients | P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No OCs (n = 40) |
With OCs (n = 40) |
No OCs (n = 30) |
With OCs (n = 30) |
|||
| Telomerase (ng/mL) | 2.91 ± 0.52 | 3.70 ± 0.48 | 6.3 × 10−9 | 3.89 ± 0.63 | 3.80 ± 0.70 | 0.563 |
| p53 (pg/mL) | 103.00 ± 42.40 | 118.00 ± 45.90 | 0.157 | 145.00 ± 56.20 | 170.00 ± 46.10* | 0.044 |
| p21 (ng/mL) | 2.84 ± 0.56 | 3.14 ± 0.61 | 0.361 | 3.55 ± 1.33 | 5.38 ± 2.67* | 2.8 × 10−6 |
*Significant on comparing contraceptive pill users between groups (breast cancer vs. control) for p53 (P = 1.1 × 10−5), p21 (P = 2.2 × 10−9).
Significant values are given in bold.
The levels of p53 were significantly (P = 0.0003) higher in the khat chewers of the control group by 39.6% as compared to their corresponding non-khat chewer group, with no significant difference in telomerase and p21 (Table 3). However, both p53 and p21 were significantly (P = 0.001, P = 4.9 × 10−5) higher in the khat chewers of the BC patients by 27.3% and 43.6% as compared to their corresponding non-khat chewers BC patients, with no significant difference in telomerase level. However, telomerase, p53, and p21 were significantly (P = 0.001, P = 1.8 × 10−5, P = 2.2 × 10−8) higher in khat chewers of BC group than khat chewers of the control group by 16%, 37.2%, and 67.3% respectively.
Table 3.
Effect of khat chewing on telomerase, p53 and p21 levels in breast cancer patients and control group.
| Control | P value | Breast cancer patients | P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No khat (n = 40) | Khat chewers (n = 40) | No khat (n = 30) | Khat chewers (n = 30) | |||
| Telomerase (ng/mL) | 3.37 ± 0.71 | 3.25 ± 0.55 | 0.408 | 3.92 ± 0.80 | 3.77 ± 0.48# | 0.365 |
| p53 (pg/mL) | 92.40 ± 37.70 | 129.00 ± 43.50 | 0.0003 | 139.00 ± 52.70 | 177.00 ± 43.10# | 0.001 |
| p21 (ng/mL) | 2.84 ± 0.60 | 3.15 ± 0.57 | 0.35 | 3.67 ± 2.00 | 5.27 ± 2.30# | 4.9 × 10−5 |
#Significant on comparing khat chewers between groups (breast cancer vs. control) for telomerase (P = 0.001), p53 (P = 1.8 × 10−5), p21 (P = 2.2 × 10−8).
Significant values are given in bold.
The levels of telomerase, p53, and p21 in all the subgroups studied in both the control group and BC patients as compared to their corresponding non-OC user, non-khat chewer group are shown in Table 4. In the control group, telomerase in both OC users and those OC users + khat chewers were significantly (P = 2.8 × 10−7, P = 0.0002) higher by 33.7% and 23.6% as compared with the respective non-OC users non-khat chewers; whereas it was non-significantly different in the khat chewer of the control group. In contrast, telomerase was non-significantly higher in both OC users and the khat chewers groups of the BC patients by 6% and 4.2%; and non-significantly lower in the OC users + khat chewers group by 6.3% as compared with the respective non-OC users non-khat chewers.
Table 4.
Effect of oral contraceptives, khat chewing and their combined use in breast cancer patients and control group.
| Control | P value vs. no OCs & non-khat chewers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No OCs & non-khat chewers (n = 20) | OC users (n = 20) | Khat chewers (n = 20) | OC users & khat chewers (n = 20) | OC users | Khat chewers | OCs & khat chewers | |
| Telomerase (ng/mL) | 2.88 ± 0.49 | 3.85 ± 0.55 | 2.94 ± 0.53 | 3.56 ± 0.36 | 2.8 × 10−7 | 0.775 | 0.0002 |
| p53 (pg/mL) | 84.30 ± 25.10 | 100.00 ± 46.40 | 123.00 ± 47.90 | 136.00 ± 38.70 | 0.25 | 0.006 | 0.0002 |
| p21 (ng/mL) | 2.63 ± 0.65 | 3.04 ± 0.48 | 3.05 ± 0.36 | 3.24 ± 0.72 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.16 |
| Breast cancer patients | P value vs. no OCs & non-khat chewers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No OCs & non-khat chewers (n = 15) | OC users (n = 15) | Khat chewers (n = 15) | OC users & khat chewers (n = 15) | OC users | Khat chewers | OCs & khat chewers | |
| Telomerase (ng/mL) | 3.81 ± 0.73 | 4.04 ± 0.88 | 3.97 ± 0.52 | 3.57 ± 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.42 | 0.25 |
| p53 (pg/mL) | 125.00 ± 56.30 | 152.00 ± 46.90 | 166.00 ± 45.40 | 188.00 ± 39.00# | 0.09 | 0.012 | 0.0001 |
| p21 (ng/mL) | 2.99 ± 1.05 | 4.35 ± 2.49 | 4.12 ± 1.37 | 6.41 ± 2.50# | 0.007 | 0.023 | 8.0 × 10−6 |
#Significant on comparing khat chewers + contraceptive pill between groups for p53 (P = 0.001), p21 (P = 2.2 × 10−10).
Significant values are given in bold.
P53 in both khat chewers and those that were OC users and khat chewers of the control group were significantly (P = 0.006, P = 0.0002) higher by 45.9% and 61.3% as compared with the respective non-OC users non-khat chewers; whereas it was non-significantly higher in the OC user group by 18.6%. Similarly, p53 in khat chewers and those that were OC users and khat chewers of the BC patients were significantly (P = 0.012, P = 0.0001) higher by 32.8% and 50.4% as compared with the respective non-OC users non-khat chewers group; whereas it was borderline-significantly higher in the OC user group by 21.6% (Table 4).
The levels of p21 were non-significantly higher in all the tested subgroups of the control group by 15.6%, 16%, and 23.2% as compared with the respective non-OC users non-khat chewers group. In contrast, the three tested subgroups: OC users, khat chewers, and the combined OC users and khat chewers groups of the BC patients were significantly (P = 0.007, P = 0.023, P = 8.0 × 10−6) higher by 45.5%, 37.8% and 2.1-folds as compared with the respective non-OC users non-khat chewers group (Table 4). However, p53 and p21 were significantly (P = 0.001, P = 2.2 × 10−10) higher in the OC users + khat chewers of the BC patients than the corresponding subgroup of the control group by 38.2% and 97.8%, respectively.
Using logistic regression showed telomerase to be a risk factor (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.1–9.4, P = 0.0001) for BC. Furthermore, the use of OCs was a high-risk factor for increasing telomerase (OR 27.8, P = 0.002); whereas khat chewing seemed to be protective (OR 0.142, P = 0.012). Moreover, the combined use of OCs and khat chewing decreased the risk factor of high telomerase from OR 27.8 to OR 2.1 (P = 0.015) (Table 5). Furthermore, khat chewing is associated with a higher likelihood of p53 expression than that of OC users (OR 5.2, P = 0.004 vs. OR 2.2, P = 0.22), whereas the combined use of OCs and khat chewing was no different from that of the OC user group.
Table 5.
Risk factor for changes in telomerase levels in control group.
| OR | 95% CI | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral contraceptive | 27.8 | 3.20–240 | 0.002 |
| Khat chewing | 0.142 | 0.03–0.66 | 0.012 |
| Oral contraceptive + khat chewing | 2.1 | 1.2–4.0 | 0.015 |
Significant values are given in bold.
OR odds ratio, 95% CI confident interval.
Discussion
The results presented in our study show BC patients to have raised levels of telomerase, p53, and p21. The significantly higher telomerase activity in our BC patients is in agreement with earlier studies reporting relative telomerase activity in malignant breast tumors when compared with benign ones51–53. Telomerase activity has been reported to be present in 59–93% of breast carcinomas, while it is not expressed in most normal cells39,43,51. A systematic review also showed that telomerase activity was significantly present in BC when compared with normal breast tissue or benign breast lesions54. This increase in telomerase activity could be attributed to its role in maintaining the telomere length which is required for the continuous growth of the tumor, especially in advanced tumors. Long telomeres may allow damaged cells to survive longer and continue to divide resulting in malignant transformation55. Several studies showed that longer leukocyte telomere length was positively associated with an increased risk of BC56–60. Accordingly, telomerase activity was suggested to be a potential diagnostic39,61,62 and prognostic marker of invasive ductal breast carcinomas40,44,63. Besides, telomerase was reported to correlate with tumor size and axillary lymph node status, and tumor stage51,52,64–66.
Moreover, both serum p53 and p21 were significantly raised in our BC patients. The significantly higher serum p53 level in BC patients is in line with previous studies reporting the presence of p53 in 30–69% of cases of ductal carcinoma of the breast, with a significant correlation between the p53 overexpression and histological grades of BC as well as with Bcl-267–71. This increase in p53 may be attributed to cellular stress and DNA damage in BC patients. Acting as a first-line tumor suppressor, p53 initiates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in response to DNA damage and oxidative stress48,72,73. The p53 protein induces apoptosis and exerts its growth inhibitory function via transactivation of particular cell cycle regulatory genes, such as p21, which leads to tumor growth arrest through inhibition of cyclin-kinase complex49. Consequently, the observed significantly higher serum p21 in our BC patients supports the findings that p21 expression may be p53-dependent and that it was up-regulated by p53 following DNA damage68,74,75. p21 is a downstream target of the p53 protein and the p53–p21 axis is an established central pathway for cell cycle inhibition and tumor suppression50.
On examining the effect of OC use on the tested parameters in both the control group and BC patients; telomerase was significantly higher in the control group who are on OCs, which is in agreement with earlier studies reporting sex hormones (androgen and estrogen) to be directly involved in telomerase activation by modulating the expression of genes involved in telomere maintenance, such as human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and telomerase RNA component (TERC) as well as the post-transcriptional modification by serine/threonine protein kinase-dependent phosphorylation of hTERT76–78. The finding that telomere length is longer in nulliparous women raised the question of whether telomerase is activated in these women and whether this activation is mediated by prolonged estrogen signaling79. Estrogen deficiency80 and shorter duration of reproductive years81 have been associated with shorter leukocyte telomere length in peripheral blood. Moreover, estrogens and progesterone play a key role in promoting the proliferation of breast tissue during normal breast development, pregnancy, and breast carcinogenesis82. Three major mechanisms are hypothesized to be involved in their carcinogenic effects: stimulation of cellular proliferation via their receptor-mediated hormonal activity, direct genotoxic effects by increasing mutation rates through a cytochrome P450-mediated metabolic activation, and induction of aneuploidy82. Activation of telomerase is an early event in the development of BC that may lead to cellular immortality, a critical and rate-limiting step in oncogenesis83.
In contrast, telomerase levels were not affected in the OC users of the BC patients; which may be in line with a study reporting telomerase to be slightly decreased in the estrogen/progesterone-treated immortalized human mammary epithelial cells (76N TERT cells)84. Thus, highlighting the moderate growth inhibitory effects of estrogen and progesterone on cancer cell growth in the 76N TERT cells. Other studies, however, suggested that OCs may increase the telomerase activity in BC cells and human endometrial cancer cells, which could promote their growth and survival85,86. Estrogen was reported to induce telomerase activity and hTERT mRNA expression through a Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) dependent pathway in endometrial cancer cell lines85. Moreover, an earlier study found that progesterone exerts a biphasic effect on hTERT expression, depending on the duration of exposure: hTERT mRNA is induced within 3 h but decreases after 12 h86. Exposure to progesterone for > 48 h antagonizes estrogen-induced activation of hTERT expression via the same mitogen-activated protein kinase-signaling pathway in breast and endometrial cancer cell lines expressing progesterone receptors86.
The discrepancy with our results might be attributed to either the combined estrogen and progesterone in the contraceptive pills used by our patients or the raised p53 in the BC patients using the OCs. Thus, supports the majority of the evidence, which suggests the involvement of p53 in the regulation of telomerase activity in mammary epithelial cells and BC45–47; although a few reports suggest that telomerase activity appears to be independent of p53 expression87. The molecular mechanisms of regulation of telomerase activity by p53 may involve the down-regulation of hTERT transcription or the interaction of p53 with Sp1 or other transcription factors46.
Unlike telomerase, p53 was non-significantly increased in the control group using OCs but significantly increased in BC patients using OCs. Our results are in agreement with other studies showing estrogen and progesterone to induce a persistent increase in p53-dependent apoptosis and suppress mammary tumors in BALB/c-Trp53+/− mice88 as well as in 76N TERT cells84. Strong p53 staining in mammary tissues of pre-irradiated estrogen and progesterone-treated mice was demonstrated88. However, the significant increase of p53 in the OC users of the BC patients could be a response to the damage produced by the cancer manifestation89 whereby p53-mediated responses to DNA damage in pre-γ-radiated mice increased dramatically following treatment with estrogen and progesterone through the TGF-β-dependent pathways. Moreover, progesterone has been reported to significantly inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in two ovarian carcinoma cell lines and markedly up-regulated p53 expression indicating involvement of p53 in progesterone-induced apoptosis90.
Like p53, p21 was non-significantly higher in the control group using OCs and significantly higher in BC patients using the OCs. This is in agreement with earlier findings reporting both p53 and p21 protein expression to be induced following the estrogen/progesterone and retinoid treatment in immortalized human mammary epithelial cells84 and in both rats and mice upon carcinogen challenge91. The p21 gene expression is usually induced and tightly controlled by the tumor suppressor protein p5350,68,75. Moreover, radiation-induced expression of p21 was increased progressively by treatment with estrogen and progesterone89, and radiation-induced p21 was also undetectable in BALB/c-Trp53−/− mice treated with estrogen and progesterone confirming that p21 expression was p53-dependent.
On the other hand, khat non-significantly reduced the telomerase level in both the control group and BC patients, which may be attributed to its reported apoptotic effect30,31 suggesting that khat induces caspase-dependent apoptotic cell death, mitochondria damage, reduced proliferation, and morphological features of autophagy in various leukemic cells32. Khat was also reported to inhibit cell proliferation in normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts preceded by oxidative stress characterized by a rapid increase in intracellular ROS and depletion of GSH33, as well as having an inhibitory growth effect which is dependent on the concentration of khat, and the duration of exposure to khat. Furthermore, Khat extract induced protein phosphorylation of signal transducers p38 MAPK and p53, followed by reduced cell proliferation and cell death31. p38 is activated upstream of p53 and may be pivotal in khat-induced abnormal differentiation of in vitro-reconstructed human normal buccal mucosa92.
Our results also show khat chewing to significantly increase p53 in both the control group and BC patients, which is in line with those results reporting khat to induce the tumor suppressor and cellular stress sensor p53 expression in normal human oral keratinocytes and oral fibroblasts34 and human ovarian adenocarcinoma SKOV3 cell line35 and facilitate apoptosis by a p53-dependent manner34. p53 accumulation was also demonstrated in leukocytes following khat-extract treatment31, whereas cathinone and its derivatives generally reduced total p53 levels, p53 Ser15 phosphorylation. Experiments using p53 knock-down and knock-out cells confirmed that p53 was mostly redundant in khat-mediated cell death in vitro. Khat was reported to induce phosphorylation and acetylation of p53 in both khat-treated acute myeloid leukemia cell lines sensitive (MOLM-13) or resistant (MV4-11) to khat-induced apoptosis, but an accumulation of the p53 full-length isoform was only seen in MOLM-1393. Khat-induced apoptosis may involve the induction of reactive oxygen species33, which is described to function upstream of p53 and p38 in some model systems. The generation of intracellular ROS by Khat induces the sustainable activation of JNK, which subsequently decreases cell viability and increases cell apoptosis36.
Moreover, p53 is highly sensitive to low levels of DNA damage and is therefore also upregulated in response to genotoxic stress94. Khat has been reported to be genotoxic in both human and animal studies95, as well as inhibiting cell growth. This genotoxic stress damage leads to the activation of kinases such as CHK1, CHK2, ATM, or ATR which in turn leads to phosphorylation of p5396. An earlier study reported that the cell cycle arrest observed by khat could be linked to increased p53 and p16 in response to its oncogenic and genotoxic stress34. It has been suggested that p53 and p21 mediate cell cycle arrest and senescence primarily in response to DNA damage, whereas p16 mediates senescence in response to oncogenic and mitogenic stress97. In normal unstressed cells, p53 is continuously synthesized, and its levels are kept low by ubiquitin-dependent degradation72. On exposure to cellular stress, p53 is stabilized and its transcriptional activity is induced. The p53 protein then activates signaling pathways involved in cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, or apoptosis72, hence preventing the propagation of defective genes or mutations that could have the potential for tumorigenesis.
In contrast, p21 was non-significantly increased in the control group and significantly raised in BC patients. Our results differ from earlier studies reporting a p21 increase with p53 in normal human oral keratinocytes and oral fibroblasts34. Moreover, an in vitro study using reconstructed human oral mucosa showed an early abnormal expression of p21 within the khat-treated samples when compared with controls that weakly expressed p21 suprabasally only, confirming the premature differentiation suggested by the histological changes92. p21 is thought to play a role in the induction of an irreversible cell cycle arrest and terminal differentiation, and normally it is expressed above the basal compartment only in oral squamous epithelium98. However, our results of the BC patients are in agreement with those reported in breast, prostate, cervical, and squamous cell carcinomas whereby p21 increased with p5350,68.
The effect of the combined use of OCs and khat chewing showed telomerase and p53 to be significantly increased in the control group, whereas p53 and p21 were significantly increased in BC patients. In the control group, the increased telomerase may largely be attributed to the effect of estrogen and progesterone in the contraceptive pills51,87; whereas the increase in p53 may be a response to the genotoxic stress of khat94,96. In BC patients, the increased p53 and p21 could be due to the additive effect of both the use of OCs and khat chewing.
Using logistic regression showed telomerase to be a risk factor (OR 4.4) for BC, and that the use of the OCs was a high-risk factor for increasing telomerase (OR 27.8). This is in agreement with many studies showing women taking OCs have a higher risk of BC than women who have never used the contraceptive pill5,17. In contrast, our results showed khat chewing to be protective (OR 0.142), and the combined use of OCs and khat chewing decreased the risk factor of high telomerase from OR 27.8 to 2.1. This protective effect was further highlighted by the higher likelihood of p53 expression with khat chewing, which may lead to induce a defense mechanism against DNA damage to improve repairing or via cell cycle arrest31,34.
In general, due to the adverse events of conventional therapeutic strategies, the identification of new therapeutic targets and anticancer agents is imperative. Natural products and their derivatives have emerged as promising sources for the development of new drugs due to their wide availability, diverse biological activities, and low toxicity and side effects99. Natural products and their derivatives applied to anti-cancer treatment have demonstrated reduced BC-related mortality and improved outcomes by modulating various cellular processes including the inhibition of DNA synthesis, angiogenesis, induction of cell apoptosis, increase in chemotherapy sensitivity, regulation of immune function, and reversal of drug resistance100. Nonetheless, sustained research efforts are still required to overcome their limitations for full therapeutic potential as the clinical application of natural products in treating BC is hampered by challenges such as low bioavailability and stability.
Conclusion
Breast cancer is associated with a high level of telomerase and the use of OCs is a risk factor for increasing telomerase in normal subjects, whereas the combined use of OCs and khat chewing decreased the risk factor of high telomerase. The protective effect of khat chewing decreases the risk of high telomerase probably through increasing p53 expression suggesting that the stress sensor protein p53 and inhibitors of cyclin-dependent pathways could play a role in cell cycle arrest. Khat chewing appears to pose general stress, which could affect cell cycle regulation, differentiation, and even cell death by increasing the expression of p53 and p21, and the increase in p21 could be p53-dependent. While the study provides valuable insights including increased awareness of lifestyle factors affecting cancer risk, further research is needed to explore the mechanism underlying these effects.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all the study participants.
Author contributions
MA designed the study, participated in the interpretation of data, wrote the manuscript, and gave the final approval of the version to be published. RS participated in the analysis, interpretation of data, and revised manuscript. FA collected the samples and carried out the biochemical analysis. EA Supervised the biochemical analysis All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data availability
The data set generated and analyzed during this study is included in this submitted manuscript and is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;73(1):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lei S, et al. Global patterns of breast cancer incidence and mortality: A population-based cancer registry data analysis from 2000 to 2020. Cancer Commun. 2021;41:1183–1194. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arnold M, et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast. 2022;66:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bardaweel SK, Akour AA, Al-Muhaissen S, AlSalamat HA, Ammar K. Oral contraceptive and breast cancer: Do benefits outweigh the risks? A case-control study from Jordan. BMC Women Health. 2019;19:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0770-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baranska A, et al. Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies, 2009–2020. Cancers. 2021;13(22):5654. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: Individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(11):1141–1151. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70425-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Britt KL, Cuzick J, Phillips KA. Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2020;20:417–436. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0266-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kuzhan A, Adli M. The effect of socio–economic–cultural factors on breast cancer. J. Breast Health. 2015;11(1):17–21. doi: 10.5152/tjbh.2014.2293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee K, Kruper L, Dieli-Conwright CM, Mortimer JE. The impact of obesity on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0787-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rizzo A, et al. Immune-based combinations for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in clinical trials: Current knowledge and therapeutic prospects. Expert Opin. Investig. Drug. 2022;31(6):557–565. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2022.2009456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gadaleta-Caldarola G, et al. Safety evaluation of datopotamab deruxtecan for triple-negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Cancer Treat. Res. Commun. 2023;37:100775. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Caputo R, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan for the treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer patients: A multi-center real-world analysis. Front. Oncol. 2024 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1362641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Begam AJ, Jubie S, Nanjan MJ. Estrogen receptor agonists/antagonists in breast cancer therapy: A critical review. Bioorg. Chem. 2017;71:257–274. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group Sex hormones and breast cancer risk in premenopausal women: Collaborative reanalysis of seven prospective studies. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(10):1009–1019. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70301-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kahlenborn C, Modugno F, Potter DM, Severs WB. Oral contraceptive use as a risk factor for premenopausal breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2006;81(10):1290–1302. doi: 10.4065/81.10.1290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhu H, Lei X, Feng J, Wang Y. Oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care. 2012;17(6):402–414. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2012.715357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Del Pup L, Codacci-Pisanelli G, Peccatori F. Breast cancer risk of hormonal contraception: Counselling considering new evidence. Crit. Rev. Oncol/Hematol. 2019;137:123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Beaber EF, et al. Recent oral contraceptive use by formulation and breast cancer risk among women 20 to 49 years of age. Cancer Res. 2014;74(15):4078–4089. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bethea TN, et al. A case-control analysis of oral contraceptive use and breast cancer subtypes in the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Consortium. Breast Cancer Res. 2015 doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0535-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mørch LS, et al. Contemporary hormonal contraception and the risk of breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:2228–2239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kanadys W, et al. Use of oral contraceptives as a potential risk factor for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies up to 2010. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18(9):4638. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Urban M, et al. Injectable and oral contraceptive use and cancers of the breast, cervix, ovary, and endometrium in black South African women: Case-control study. PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hannaford PC, et al. Cancer risk among users of oral contraceptives: Cohort data from the Royal College of general practitioner’s oral contraception study. BMJ. 2007;335:651. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39289.649410.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Marchbanks PA, et al. Oral contraceptive formulation and risk of breast cancer. Contraception. 2012;85(4):342–350. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vessey M, Yeates D. Oral contraceptive use and cancer: Final report from the Oxford-family planning association contraceptive study. Contraception. 2013;88(6):678–683. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Busund M, et al. Progestin-only and combined oral contraceptives and receptor-defined premenopausal breast cancer risk: The Norwegian women and cancer study. Int. J. Cancer. 2018;142(11):2293–2302. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.al’Absi M, et al. Concurrent tobacco and khat use is associated with blunted cardiovascular stress response and enhanced negative mood: A cross-sectional investigation. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 2014;29(4):307–315. doi: 10.1002/hup.2403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Al-Habori M. The potential adverse effects of habitual use of Catha edulis (khat) Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2005;4(6):1129–1138. doi: 10.1517/14740338.4.6.1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Al-Motarreb A, Al-Habori M, Broadley KJ. Khat chewing, cardiovascular diseases and other internal medical problems: The current situation and directions for future research. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010;132(3):540–548. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dimba EA, et al. Khat (Catha edulis)-induced apoptosis is inhibited by antagonists of caspase-1 and -8 in human leukemia cells. Br. J. Cancer. 2004;91:1726–1734. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bredholt T, et al. Distinct single-cell signal transduction signatures in leukocyte subsets stimulated with khat extract, amphetamine-like cathinone, cathine or norephedrine. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013 doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-14-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bredholt T, et al. Camptothecin and khat (Catha edulis Forsk.) induced distinct cell death phenotypes involving modulation of c-FLIP, Mcl-l, procaspase-8 and mitochondrial function in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol. Cancer. 2009 doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-8-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lukandu OM, Costea DE, Neppelberg E, Johannessen AC, Vintermyr OK. Khat (Catha edulis) induces reactive oxygen species and apoptosis in normal human oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Toxicol. Sci. 2008;103(2):311–324. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lukandu OM, et al. Khat induces G1-phase arrest and increased expression of stress-sensitive p53 and p16 proteins in normal human oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2008;116(1):23–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00508.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Abou-Elhamd AS, et al. Unraveling the Catha edulis extract effects on the cellular and molecular signaling in SKOV3 cells. Front. Pharmacol. 2021 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.666885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Abid MD, et al. Khat (Catha edulis) generates reactive oxygen species and promotes hepatic cell apoptosis via MAPK activation. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2013;32:389–395. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2013.1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shay JW, Wright WE. Telomeres and telomerase: Three decades of progress. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019;20(5):299–309. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0099-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kim NW, et al. Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science. 1994;266:2011–2015. doi: 10.1126/science.7605428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Herbert B-S, Wright WE, Shay JW. Telomerase and breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2001 doi: 10.1186/bcr288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kalogeraki A, et al. Telomerase activity as a marker of invasive ductal breast carcinomas on FNABs and relationship to other prognostic variables. Anticancer Res. 2005;25(3B):1927–1930. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lu L, et al. Telomerase expression and telomere length in breast cancer and their associations with adjuvant treatment and disease outcome. Breast Cancer Res. 2011 doi: 10.1186/bcr2893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shpitz B, et al. Telomerase activity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 1999;58:65–69. doi: 10.1023/A:1006394209922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Murillo-Ortiz B, Astudillo-De H, Castillo-Medina S, Malacara JM, Benitez-Bribiesca L. Telomerase activity, estrogen receptors (α, β), Bcl-2 expression in human breast cancer and treatment response. BMC Cancer. 2006 doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Simsek BC, Turk BA, Ozen F, Tuzcu M, Kanter M. Investigation of telomerase activity and apoptosis on invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast using immunohistochemical and western blot methods. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015;19:3089–3099. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Loveday RL, Greenman J, Drew PJ, Monson JR, Kerin MJ. Genetic changes associated with telomerase activity in breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 1999;84(5):516–520. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19991022)84:5<516::AID-IJC12>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kanaya T, et al. Adenoviral expression of p53 represses telomerase activity through down-regulation of human telomerase reverse transcriptase transcription. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000;6(4):1239–1247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stampfer MR, et al. Loss of p53 function accelerates acquisition of telomerase activity in indefinite lifespan human mammary epithelial cell lines. Oncogene. 2003;22:5238–5251. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bieging KT, Mello SS, Attardi LD. Unraveling mechanisms of p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2014;14:359–370. doi: 10.1038/nrc3711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Abbas T, Dutta A. p21 in cancer: Intricate networks and multiple activities. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9:400–414. doi: 10.1038/nrc2657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.El-Deiry WS. p21(WAF1) mediates cell-cycle inhibition, relevant to cancer suppression and therapy. Cancer Res. 2016;76(18):5189–5191. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hiyama E, et al. Telomerase activity in human breast tumors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1996;88(2):116–122. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.2.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Roos G, et al. Telomerase activity in relation to p53 status and clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 1998;79(4):343–348. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980821)79:4<343::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Swellam M, Smail M, Eissa S, Hamdy M, Mokhtar N. Emerging role of p53, Bcl-2 and telomerase activity in Egyptian breast cancer patients. IUBMB Life. 2004;56(8):483–490. doi: 10.1080/15216540400010834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Winnikow EP, et al. Accuracy of telomerase in estimating breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast. 2012;21(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.08.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Aviv A, Anderson JJ, Shay JW. Mutations, cancer and the telomere length paradox. Trends Cancer. 2017;3(4):253–258. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhang X, et al. The association of telomere length in peripheral blood cells with cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2017;26(9):1381–1390. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Samavat H, et al. Association between prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length and breast cancer risk: The Singapore Chinese health study. Breast Cancer Res. 2019 doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1133-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Svenson U, et al. Breast cancer survival is associated with telomere length in peripheral blood cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68(10):3618–3623. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gramatges MM, Telli ML, Balise R, Ford JM. Longer relative telomere length in blood from women with sporadic and familial breast cancer compared with healthy controls. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2010;19(2):605–613. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rode L, Nordestgaard BG, Bojesen SE. Long telomeres and cancer risk among 95 568 individuals from the general population. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2016;45(5):1634–1643. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shen J, et al. Telomere length, oxidative damage, antioxidants, and breast cancer risk. Int. J. Cancer. 2009;124(7):1637–1643. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Heaphy CM, Meeker AK. The potential utility of telomere-related markers for cancer diagnosis. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2011;15(6):1227–1238. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01284.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gay-Bellile M, et al. ERCC1 and telomere status in breast tumours treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and their association with patient prognosis. J. Pathol. Clin. Res. 2016;2(4):234–246. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hoos A, et al. Telomerase activity correlates with tumor aggressiveness and reflects therapy effect in breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 1998;79:8–12. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980220)79:1<8::AID-IJC2>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Umbricht CB, et al. Telomerase activity in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. Oncogene. 1999;18:3407–3414. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kulić A, et al. Telomerase activity in breast cancer patients: Association with poor prognosis and more aggressive phenotype. Med. Oncol. 2016;33:23. doi: 10.1007/s12032-016-0736-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gursan N, Karakok M, Sari I, Gursan MS. The relationship between the expression of p53/ Bcl-2 and histopathological criteria in breast invasive ductal carcinomas. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2001;55(9):589–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2001.tb11134.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Jassim MM, Rasool KH, Mahmood MM. p53, p21, and cyclin d1 protein expression patterns in patients with breast cancer. Vet. World. 2021;14(10):2833–2838. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.2833-2838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li JP, et al. Association of p53 expression with poor prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast invasive ductal carcinoma. Medicine. 2019;98(18):e15449. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sadia H, et al. Determination of expression profile of p53 gene in different grades of breast cancer tissues by real-time PCR. Afr. Health Sci. 2020;20(3):1273–1282. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v20i3.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Balogh GA, et al. Mutant p53 protein in serum could be used as a molecular marker in human breast cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2006;28(4):995–1002. doi: 10.3892/ijo.28.4.995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Vousden KH, Lane DP. p53 in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007;8:275–283. doi: 10.1038/nrm2147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Jin MS, et al. New insight on the biological role of p53 protein as a tumor suppressor: Re-evaluation of its clinical significance in triple-negative breast cancer. Tumor Biol. 2016;37:11017–11024. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-4990-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Xiong Y, et al. P21 is a universal inhibitor of cyclin kinase. Nature. 1993;366:701–704. doi: 10.1038/366701a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wei C-Y, et al. Expression of CDKN1A/p21 and TGFBR2 in breast cancer and their prognostic significance. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015;8(11):14619–14629. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kyo S, et al. Estrogen activates telomerase. Cancer Res. 1999;59:5917–5921. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kimura A, et al. Induction of hTERT expression and phosphorylation by estrogen via akt cascade in human ovarian cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 2004;23:4505–4515. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Calado RT, et al. Sex hormones, acting on the TERT gene, increase telomerase activity in human primary hematopoietic cells. Blood. 2009;114(11):2236–2243. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-178871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sehl ME, Henry JE, Storniolo AM, Horvath S, Ganz PA. The impact of reproductive factors on DNA methylation-based telomere length in healthy breast tissue. Breast Cancer. 2022 doi: 10.1038/s41523-022-00410-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Shin Y-A, Lee K-Y. Low estrogen levels and obesity are associated with shorter telomere lengths in pre- and post-menopausal women. J. Exerc. Rehabil. 2016;12(3):238–246. doi: 10.12965/jer.1632584.292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Fagan E, et al. Telomere length is longer in women with late maternal age. Menopause. 2017;24(5):497–501. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Russo J, Russo IH. The role of estrogen in the initiation of breast cancer. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006;102(1–5):89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Artandi SE. Complex roles for telomeres and telomerase in breast carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Res. 2003;5:37–41. doi: 10.1186/bcr553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zhang J, Tu Y, Smith-Schneider S. Activation of p53, inhibition of telomerase activity and induction of estrogen receptor beta are associated with the anti-growth effects of combination of ovarian hormones and retinoids in immortalized human mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2005;5:6. doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-5-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zhou C, et al. Estrogen induction of telomerase activity through regulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) dependent pathway in human endometrial cancer cells. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wang Z, et al. Progesterone regulates human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene expression via activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Cancer Res. 2000;60(19):5376–5381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Mokbel K, et al. The association between telomerase activity and hormone receptor status and p53 expression in breast cancer. Int. J. Surg. Investig. 2000;1(6):509–516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Dunphy KA, Blackburn AC, Yan H, O'Connell LR, Jerry DJ. Estrogen and progesterone induce persistent increases in p53-dependent apoptosis and suppress mammary tumors in BALB/c-Trp53+/− mice. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:R43. doi: 10.1186/bcr2094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Becker KA, et al. Estrogen and progesterone regulate radiation-induced p53 activity in mammary epithelium through TGF-beta-dependent pathways. Oncogene. 2005;24:6345–6353. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Bu S-Z, et al. Progesterone induces apoptosis and up-regulation of p53 expression in human ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Cancer. 1997;79(10):1944–1950. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970515)79:10<1944::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sivaraman L, Conneely OM, Medina D, O'Malley BW. p53 is a potential mediator of pregnancy and hormone-induced resistance to mammary carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2001;98(22):12379–12384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.221459098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Lukandu OM, Neppelberg E, Vintermyr OK, Johannessen AC, Costea DE. Khat alters the phenotype of in vitro-reconstructed human oral mucosa. J. Dent. Res. 2010;89(3):270–275. doi: 10.1177/0022034509354980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Onyango TB, et al. A comparison of p53 isoform profiles and apoptosis induced by camptothecin or a herbal Khat extract (Catha edulis (Vahl) Forssk ex Endl) in leukemic cell lines: Exploring cellular responses in therapy development. Cancers. 2020;12(12):3596. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Vousden KH. Activation of the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2002;1602(1):47–59. doi: 10.1016/s0304-419x(02)00035-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Al-Zubairi A, Ismail P, Pei CP, Rahmat A. Genotoxic effect of Catha edulis (khat) crude extract after sub-chronic administration in rats. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008;25(3):298–303. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2007.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Appella E, Anderson CW. Post-translational modifications and activation of p53 by genotoxic stresses. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001;268(10):2764–2772. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02225.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Campisi J. Senescent cells, tumor suppression, and organismal aging: Good citizens, bad neighbors. Cell. 2005;120(4):513–522. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Weinberg WC, Denning MF. P21Waf1 control of epithelial cell cycle and cell fate. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 2002;13(6):453–464. doi: 10.1177/154411130201300603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Zhang J, et al. Natural products and derivatives for breast cancer treatment: From drug discovery to molecular mechanism. Phytomedicine. 2024;129:155600. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2024.155600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Andrijauskaite K, Wargovich MJ. Role of natural products in breast cancer-related symptomology: Targeting chronic inflammation. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022;80:370–378. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data set generated and analyzed during this study is included in this submitted manuscript and is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
