Skip to main content
. 2024 May 20;67(7):2297–2315. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00028

Table 5.

Group differences in finiteness marking on all morphosyntactic structures combined on Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Fifth Edition (CELF-5) Formulated Sentences and Recalling Sentences (Wiig et al., 2013).

Variable Autism without language impairment
(n = 16)
Autism plus language impairment (n = 15)
t df p
M SD Range M SD Range
CELF-5 Formulated Sentences
n productions of structures 15 4.07 11–23 15.13 11.87 1–51 −0.04 25 .971
 % overt 99.4 2.06 92.86–100 92.69 16.57 40–100 1.5 13.47 .156
 % omission of overt 0.6 2.06 0–7.14 6.38 16.58 0–60 −1.29 13.47 .217
 % other 0 0 0 0.93 2.11 0–7.14 −1.64 13 .124
CELF-5 Recalling Sentences
n productions of structures 22.92 6.23 18–41 18.93 9.6 1–38 0.84 25 .408
 % overt 98.8 2.17 95–100 90.06 14.31 50–100 2.26 13.67 .041
 % omission of overt 0.4 1.37 0–4.76 5.23 9.09 0–33.33 −1.97 13.69 .070
 % other 0.78 1.82 0–5 4.71 7.08 0–18.18 −2 14.99 .064

Note. Significant differences at p < .05 in bolded text. Independent-samples t test used for CELF-5 Formulated Sentences and Recalling Sentences number of attempts. Welch's two-sample t test used for all other variables. Overt = overt finiteness marking across structures; Omission of overt = omission of overt finiteness marking across structures.