Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 13;18:1713. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1713

Table 4. Barriers to cervical cancer screening among WRA in rural Kisumu County.

Variable Intervention Control
Baseline
(n = 138)
Endline
(n = 113)
p-value Baseline
(n = 136)
Endline
(n = 132)
p-value
Barriers
Lack of awareness about screening 89 (64.5) 19 (16.8) <0.0001 69 (50.7) 68 (51.5) 0.898
Don't know where to get screened 14 (10.1) 31 (27.4) <0.0001 28 (20.6) 29 (22.0) 0.782
Lack of awareness about cervical 23 (16.7) 44 (38.9) <0.0001 28 (20.6) 33 (25.0) 0.389
Not feeling sick 3 (2.2) 8 (7.1) 0.059 12 (8.8) 16 (12.1) 0.378
Fear of embarrassment 9 (6.5) 17 (15.0) 0.027 26 (19.1) 31 (23.5) 0.382
Not feeling at risk 21 (15.2) 53 (46.9) <0.0001 23 (16.9) 31 (23.5) 0.180
Violation of ones' privacy 7 (5.1) 26 (23.0) <0.0001 3 (2.2) 18 (13.6) <0.0001
Lack of spousal support 11 (8.0) 31 (27.4) <0.0001 15 (11.0) 24 (18.2) 0.097
Societal stigma 8 (5.8) 11 (9.7) 0.241 9 (6.6) 10 (7.6) 0.760
Waiting time at the health facility 16 (11.6) 31 (27.4) 0.001 43 (31.6) 44 (33.3) 0.764
Attitude of the health providers 4 (2.9) 21 (18.6) <0.0001 2 (1.5) 8 (6.1) 0.047
Cost of transport to the facility 12 (8.7) 37 (32.7) <0.0001 9 (6.6) 24 (18.2) 0.004
Cultural beliefs 1 (0.7) 5 (4.4) 0.056 2 (1.5) 2 (1.5) 0.976
Male healthcare provider 27 (19.6) 32 (28.3) 0.104 3 (2.2) 11 (8.3) 0.024

Data are numbers (proportion). Denominator is the number of respondents who reported to have not been screened for cervical cancer. Statistical significance is reported at p ≤ 0.05. Bold is statistically significant.