Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2024 Jun 13;43(6):114359. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114359

Figure 4. Computational evidence for cholinergic deepening of attractor wells.

Figure 4.

(A) Graphical representation of the neural mass model with adaptation manipulation.

(B) Plot of the down-sampled time series of the two neural mass populations.

(C) Graphical representation of role of the cholinergic system in facilitating deepened attractor landscapes.

(D) A plot of attractor landscape averaged across time as adaptation is decreased (the dashed line represents d = 0.25, and green represents d = 0.05).

(E) A plot of attractor landscape averaged across time as excitability is increased (the dashed line represents a = 0.9, and green represents a = 1.1).

(F) A plot of attractor landscape averaged across time as excitability is increased and adaptation is decreased (the dashed line represents a = 0.9, d = 0.25, and green represents a = 1.1, d = 0.05).