Table 5.
Dataset | Method | Classifier | Acc (%) | Sen (%) | Sp (%) | MCC | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVP105 | Hybrid features + BTG | Bagging | 76.26 | 74.57 | 77.96 | 0.52 | 0.91 |
ETC | 78.07 | 76.27 | 79.66 | 0.55 | 0.90 | ||
XGB | 71.15 | 79.66 | 62.71 | 0.42 | 0.78 | ||
CatBoost | 81.44 | 79.66 | 83.05 | 0.62 | 0.89 | ||
DNN | 96.09 | 94.83 | 97.33 | 0.92 | 0.98 | ||
AVP111 | Hybrid features + BTG | Bagging | 76.16 | 85.37 | 66.73 | 0.53 | 0.81 |
ETC | 75.00 | 66.67 | 83.31 | 0.50 | 0.82 | ||
XGB | 70.83 | 58.83 | 83.33 | 0.43 | 0.78 | ||
CatBoost | 79.16 | 66.67 | 91.67 | 0.60 | 0.85 | ||
DNN | 95.73 | 95.38 | 97.77 | 0.92 | 0.97 |