Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Placenta. 2023 Aug 21;142:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2023.08.067

The human placenta project: Funded studies, imaging technologies, and future directions

Christina L Herrera a,b,*, Meredith J Kim c, Quyen N Do d, David M Owen a,b, Baowei Fei d,e,f, Diane M Twickler a,d, Catherine Y Spong a
PMCID: PMC11257151  NIHMSID: NIHMS2006637  PMID: 37634371

Abstract

The placenta plays a critical role in fetal development. It serves as a multi-functional organ that protects and nurtures the fetus during pregnancy. However, despite its importance, the intricacies of placental structure and function in normal and diseased states have remained largely unexplored. Thus, in 2014, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development launched the Human Placenta Project (HPP). As of May 2023, the HPP has awarded over $101 million in research funds, resulting in 41 funded studies and 459 publications. We conducted a comprehensive review of these studies and publications to identify areas of funded research, advances in those areas, limitations of current research, and continued areas of need. This paper will specifically review the funded studies by the HPP, followed by an in-depth discussion on advances and gaps within placental-focused imaging. We highlight the progress within magnetic reasonance imaging and ultrasound, including development of tools for the assessment of placental function and structure.

Keywords: Human placenta project, Pregnancy, Imaging, Magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasound, Placental function, Placental structure

1. Introduction

The human placenta functions as a unique multiorgan, simultaneously fulfilling respiratory, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, endocrinologic, and immunologic functions. This multifunctional nature modulates both normal pregnancy as well as pathological states that affect both mother and fetus. Consequences of dysfunction include not only immediate sequalae such as insulin resistance, preeclampsia, and growth restriction with concomitant maternal and fetal morbidity, but also longer-term implications for adult neuropsychiatric and cardiovascular health [1-4]. Yet despite its critical role, the human placenta remains one of the least understood organs.

In 2014, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) recognized this lack of understanding and launched the Human Placenta Project (HPP) [5]. Prior to this initiative, existing placental research focused on evaluation at delivery; therefore, the principal goal of the HPP was to better understand human placental structure, development, and function in real time across gestation [6]. Other goals identified included development of noninvasive biomarkers for disease prediction, improved understanding of placental implications for long-term health, development of intervention for abnormal placental development, and improved pregnancy outcomes [6]. To achieve such goals, the NIH has held an annual meeting from 2014 to 2018 and then in 2021 to foster multidisciplinary discussion and review progress to date.

Since the founding of the HPP, the NIH has released several funding opportunities via Requests for Applications (RFAs) and Program Announcements (PAR). The purpose of this article is to summarize the studies and resulting publications funded by the HPP as of May 2023. Our goal was to synthesize published data to identify areas of funded research, advances in those areas, gaps in current published research, and future directions. Given the extensive nature of the HPP, this article will give a broad overview of HPP-funded research categories and then focus more specifically on studies with application in placental imaging.

2. Materials and methods

A review of all studies and resultant publications funded through the HPP was conducted. Eligible studies were identified via the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) on May 3rd, 2023. Studies were considered eligible if they received funding under a known HPP RFA or PAR. These included the following funded announcements: RFA-HD-15-034, RFA-HD-15-030, RFA-HD-15-031, RFA-HD-16-036, RFA-HD-16-037, RFA-HD-17-004, RFA-HD-17-005, RFA-HD-18-003, RFA-HD-18-004, PAR-18-884, and PAR-18-885. The RFA or PAR was used as the search criteria under Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) in RePORT. Search results for both studies and publications were extracted separately into Excel using the RePORT export feature.

Studies were first grouped according to research category. These included imaging, specimen collection, and assays performed (omics). Additional data extracted included: source of data (retrospective or prospective, existing data set), participant (e.g. human, non-human primate, mouse, etc.), cohort (uncomplicated pregnancy, pregnancy exposure), and outcomes (e.g. preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction). Further sub-categorization was then performed (Table 1). For imaging studies, these subcategories included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), and use of other imaging modalities. For each study, it was determined if placental function and/or structure were assessed. Placental MRI function studies were subcategorized into technical development, perfusion, oxygenation, diffusion, and metabolism. Placental MRI structure studies were divided among technical development and anatomic assessment. Placental US function studies received the following subcategories: Doppler, technical development, and Power Doppler. Lastly, placental US structure studies were organized as follows: qualitative assessment and quantitative automated analyses.

Table 1.

Study categorization strategy.

Category Subcategory Purpose Imaging
Subcategory
Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) placental function technical development
perfusion
oxygenation
metabolism
placental structure technical development
anatomic
assessment
Ultrasound (US) placental function Doppler
technical development
Power Doppler
placental structure qualitative
assessment
quantitative
automated analyses
Other
Specimen Blood/extracellular vesicles
Peripheral cells
Tissue
Urine
Amniotic fluid
Omics Epigenome (e.g DNA, cfDNA)
Transcriptome (e.g RNA)
Proteome (e.g Mass spectrometry, Antibody-based)
Metabolome (e.g Mass spectrometry)
Lipidome (e.g Mass spectrometry, profiling)
Microbiome

Publications were categorized similarly after determining if the study focus was placental or non-placental. Placental focus was defined as imaging of the placenta in vivo or ex vivo for functional or structural information, use of placental tissue for analysis, and/or correlation of expression with placental tissue. Article type as well as two additional categories were collected. Article type was defined as original research, expert review, systematic review, and case report. The two additional categories were technical development and other to accommodate associated literature of funded studies that were not placental-specific in nature. Technical development encompassed work in other analytic procedures that could be used for placental analysis, particularly on the microscopic to nanoscopic level. Imaging publications that were not placental-focused were excluded from this review. Each original research publication was reviewed by at least two of the authors (C.L.H. and M.J.K.) and assessed for purpose, principle finding, major advance, and identified areas of need. Expert consultation and summative review were then performed (D.M.T., B.F., C.Y.S.).

3. Results

A total of 41 studies were funded by the Human Placenta Project with $101.7 million dollars awarded. There were 459 resultant publications as of May 3rd, 2023 (Table 2). Studies were: imaging only (12, 29%) totaling $32.5 million in funding; imaging and specimen collection with or without planned assay application (11, 27%) with $32 million in funding; or specimen collection with planned assay application (18, 44%) with $37.2 million in funding (Fig. 1). Publications typically focused on either imaging (164, 36%) or specimen collection with assay application (177, 39%) as opposed to combined data together (29, 6%). Slightly less than half of the publications (205, 45%) were specifically focused on the placenta. Those not directly related to the placenta were primarily focused on imaging and analytic techniques to enhance understanding of the placenta or validate techniques that could be applied to the placenta. Examples include MR technical development for metabolism, perfusion, oxygenation, diffusion and segmentation in phantoms and nonpregnant adults and work on acoustofluidics, exosome isolation, DNA or miRNA extraction.

Table 2.

HPP studies, funding, and resultant publications by research category.

Research
Category
Number of
Studies
Funded
Amount
Allocated
(millions)
Number of
Resultant
Publications
Placental
Publications
Imaging 12 (29%) $32.5 (32%) 165 (37%) 75 (37%)
Imaging + Specimen 6 (15%) $18.8 (18%) 23 (5%) 15 (7%)
Imaging + Specimen + Omics 5 (12%) $13.2 (13%) 8 (2%) 8 (4%)
Specimen + Omics 18 (44%) $37.2 (37%) 179 (39%) 86 (42%)
Technical Developmenta 43 (9%) 1 (0%)
Other 41 (9%) 20 (10%)
Total 41 $101.7 459 205
a

Technical Development encompasses work in acoustofluidics, 3D simulation, and other non-omic analytic procedures that could be used for placental analysis, particularly on the microscopic to nanoscopic level.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Pie chart representations of funding and resultant publications by research category.

4. Imaging

There were 23 studies and 196 publications that utilized imaging, comprising 56% and 43% of all HPP studies and publications, respectively. Studies were MR only (12, 52%) with $32.4 million in funding; MRI combined with another modality (4, 17%) with $15.8 million in funding; and ultrasound only (7, 30%) with $16.3 million in funding. Publications mirrored this funding application (Table 3). Ninety-eight of the 196 imaging publications (50%) were placental-focused with the majority either MR (53, 54%) or ultrasound alone (25, 26%). Eighty-eight of these publications were original research articles [7-94]; 3 were systematic reviews on ultrasound [95-97]; 4 were expert reviews on MR oxygenation, MR quantitative susceptibility mapping, US-guided photoacoustic imaging of the placenta, and multimodal placental imaging respectively [98-101]; 2 were corrections to previously published articles [102,103]; and 1 was a case report [104].

Table 3.

HPP studies, funding, and resultant publications in imaging. Examples of other imaging include cystoscopy, positron emission tomography, color power angiography, contrast-enhanced and micro computed topography. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, US = ultrasound.

Imaging Number
of
Studies
Funded
Amount
Allocated
(Millions)
Number of
Resultant
Publications
Placental
Publications
Placental
Original
Research
MRI 12 (52%) $ 32.4 (50%) 119 (61%) 53 (54%) 49
MRI + US 2 (9%) $ 8.3 (13%) 9 (5%) 7 (7%) 6
MRI + US +other 1 (4%) $ 4.3 (7%) 2 (1%) 1 (1%) 0
MRI + other 1 (4%) $ 3.2 (5%) 7 (4%) 3 (3%) 3
US 7 (30%) $ 16.3 (25%) 43 (22%) 25 (26%) 22
US + other 4 (2%) 3 (3%) 3
Other 12 (6%) 6 (6%) 5
Total 23 $64.5 196 98 88

5. Magnetic resonance imaging

There were 58 original research articles that utilized MRI [7-64], all but six [59-64] of which characterized aspects of placental function and 34 aspects of placental structure [7-18,29-39,47-51,59-64] (Table 4). Within placental function, 19 studies covered aspects of technical development [7-25], 15 placental perfusion [26-40], 19 placental oxygenation [12,36-53], 5 placental diffusion [34,41,47,51,54], and 4 placental metabolism [55-58]. Within placental structure, 8 studies focused on aspects of technical development [13-18,59-61] and 28 anatomic assessment [7-13,29-39,47-51,62-64].

Table 4.

Original research publications in imaging by subcategory. 14 studies included more than one modality: 7 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US), 3 US and other, and 4 MRI and other.

Category Modality Purpose Subcategory
Imaging (88) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (58) placental function (52) technical development (19)
perfusion (15)
oxygenation (19)
diffusion (5)
metabolism (4)
placental structure (34) technical development (9)
anatomic assessment (26)
Ultrasound (32) placental function (24) Doppler (17)
technical development (2)
power Doppler (6)
placental structure (13) qualitative assessment (5)
quantitative automated analyses (9)
Other (12)

6. MR advances

6.1. Placental function

6.1.1. Technical development

MR technical development from the HPP has worked with animals, retrospective data sets, and prospective recruitment of pregnant people to assist in the development of novel techniques for assessment of placental function. In animals, work has been done in pregnant mice to characterize angiogenesis at implantation [7], biotin transporter activity [8], and placental blood volumes [23]. Feasibility and proof-of-principle studies of ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI at the maternal-fetal interface were found to have minimal effects on placenta or fetus [9], correlate oxygenation with spiral arteries [10], and evaluate placental inflammation in pregnant rhesus macques [11,25].

Human characterization worked toward assessment with uterine activity during pregnancy [14], motion correction [15-17,24], placental flattening [18], and automated segmentation of the placenta to obtain functional imaging data [19]. Other studies investigated prospective in vivo assessment of placental dysfunction via hemoglobin dissociation curves [20] and blood hemodynamics [12]. Assessment of in-vivo fetal-blood oximetry was accomplished by utilizing a calibration equation obtained from T2 and HbO2 values of ex-vivo fetal blood from umbilical cord blood samples [21]. Further human feasibility data has included assessment of diffusion using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) [12,13] and ex-vivo assessment of perfusion of the umbilical artery and intervillous space [22].

6.1.2. Perfusion

Multiple HPP investigators have worked to develop in vivo animal and human models for assessment of placental perfusion. In animals, these include application of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-MRI) with gadoteridol [28,29,37-40] and ferumoxytol [31,35], arterial spin labeling (ASL) via flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) [31], and 4D flow MRI [32] for assessment of perfusion in pregnant macaques. DCE-MRI was found to demonstrate significantly reduced perfusion in pregnant macaques with fetal growth restriction (FGR) [38], chronic first trimester alcohol exposure [37,40], and with pathology due to Zika virus [35,39]. In addition, DCE-MRI demonstrated significantly reduced perfusion in pregnant macaques on a chronic western-style diet, but this reduction could be ameliorated with diet reversal [28]. DCE-MRI also demonstrated reduced perfusion with aberrant uterine contractility in pregnant rats [36] and mouse models of preeclampsia and growth-restriction [34]. Based on current modeling [28,29,37-39] and the large molecular size of ferumoxytoxl [31,35], DCE-MRI primarily reflects the maternal side of placental blood flow.

Various methods have been explored for the assessment of perfusion measurement in uncomplicated human pregnancy. These include a free-breathing pseudocontinous (pCASL) ASL technique [26] and a velocity-selective method (VS-ASL) [27]. In the setting of ischemic placental disease (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and FGR), pCASL-based perfusion was found to significantly decrease when measured at 16 weeks [30,33]. pCASL reflects maternal-side placental blood flow, while VS-ASL reflects both maternal and fetal blood flow.

6.1.3. Oxygenation

Similar to perfusion, animal and human models of placental oxygenation have also been developed by HPP investigators. Overlap can be seen among groups assessing perfusion and oxygenation metrics [36-39,47]. Oxygenation has been assessed using blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) imaging via relaxometry with T2* and R2* (1/T2*) mapping [36-39,41,43,46-52]. Others used BOLD to assess oxygen kinetics and have assessed time to plateau (TTP) [42,44]. Oxygenation has also been measured through quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) [12,45]. Combined T1 and T2-mapping has also been explored for representation of oxygenation, as T2 is not impacted by local magnetic field inhomogeneities like T2* [53].

Similar to effects on perfusion, reduced oxygenation was also observed in pregnant macaques with FGR [38] and chronic first trimester alcohol exposure [37,40] as well as with aberrant uterine contractility in pregnant rats [36]. In Zika-infected pregnant macaques, higher-than-expected oxygenation of maternal blood was found within the placenta, which the authors suggested may reflect decreased oxygen permeability or decreased fetal demand in affected placentas [39].

In humans, global placental T2* has been shown to decrease over gestation. Recently T2* has been further described as decreasing continuously from a high plateau level early in gestation, through an inflection point at 30 weeks, and approaching a second, lower plateau in late gestation, based off a cohort of 316 pregnancies [50]. In a study that included anterior and fundal placentas, there was a decline in T2* from center to periphery in each individual placental lobule, thought to represent oxygen exchange between maternal and fetal circulation within the intervillous space [47]. Regarding clinical correlation, T2*is significantly reduced in placentas with adverse outcomes [48,50], maternal chronic hypertension [41], and congenital heart disease [52] compared to unaffected placentas. Variation in R2* has been suggested based on placental location, with lower values in anterior compared to posterior placentas derived from 3D volumetric analysis [43]. Maternal position and contractions have also been found to cause variation, with global and regional differences in T2*/R2* and regional time to plateau (TTP) [44,46,49]. Moreover, decreases in placental T2* with contractions have been found to correlate with decreased in T2* in the fetal liver and brain [46]. In addition, with maternal hypoxemia, longer TTP has been observed in the smaller of discordant monozygotic twin pairs [42].

6.1.4. Diffusion

Diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI has been investigated for its complementary information, often used as part of a combined approach for functional data. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is sensitive to water motion which may include intra- and extra-cellular water diffusion and may be a marker for early perfusion while also reflecting in vivo morphology. In mouse models of preeclampsia and growth-restriction, similar to perfusion, diffusion was also decreased in these diseased states [34]. In human pregnancy, examples included combined relaxometry-diffusion using T2* and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping [47,51] and T1 and ADC mapping, with an acquisition time under 2 min [54]. These studies describe trends for decreases in T2* and diffusivity with increasing gestational age [47] and placental disease (preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction) [51,54]. Another combined MR examination (T2-weighted imaging, T2*, T1 and ADC mapping) recently demonstrated varying placental phenotypes in pregnant individuals with chronic hypertension; however, values overlapped with the control group of healthy pregnant individuals [41].

6.1.5. Metabolism

Work on placental metabolism within MR imaging is in its early stages. Preliminary work has been applied to look at hyperpolarized 13C MRI in animals for the metabolism of substrates such as pyruvate, lactate, and urea in the placenta [55-57]. Luo et al. demonstrated feasibility of glucose chemical saturation exchange transfer (CEST) in humans for non-invasive measurement of glucose transport in the placenta [58].

6.2. Placental structure

6.2.1. Technical development

Efforts to better delineate placental structure included some animal and many human pregnancies. Liposomal gadolinium was used in a pregnant mouse model to specify the retroplacental clear space as well as morphologic volume changes thorough gestation [59,61]. Algorithms for placental flattening [18,60] and motion correction [15,17] were used for structural assessment as well, with development of placental volume reconstruction using a dataset of human fetuses with minor and severe motion [16] and characterization of uterine activity during pregnancy [14]. Ansiotropic IVIM models were applied for assessment of human placental microvascular structure and tissue microstructure [13].

6.2.2. Anatomic assessment

Most studies relied on manual regions of interest (ROIs) for placental identification. Similarly, division of the placenta into anatomic units has occurred through manual and post-processing techniques. Manual ROIs with DCE-MRI have been applied for placental lobe and cotyledon specification [10-12,29,34,35,37-39], volume measurements [29,35], maternal and fetal tissue delineation [9], implantation site identification [7], and for delineation of uterine vasculature as well as the intervillous space [31,32]. Others have proposed dividing the placenta into various compartments via mathematical modeling [8]. In human placentas, manual segmentation has been used for volume quantification [30,33, 35,47-50] and anatomic division [12,13,36,47,51,64]. Recently, automated placental segmentation has begun and has been applied to placental volumes [62].

7. MR gaps

When considering the gaps remaining after advances from the HPP, it is useful to frame current knowledge in the context of Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) [105]. Diagnostic testing is most useful when a medical test is available that provides useful information on the health of the patient, a target condition is defined, there is an accepted clinical reference standard, the test has sufficient sensitivity and specificity, and testing results in a clear intention for use (diagnosis, screening, prediction, prognosis).

On this basis there are several current limitations in MR knowledge. Medical testing is available, but there is not yet an agreed upon best approach and much is needed in the manner of technical development prior to pursuit of diagnostic testing. For MR-based techniques challenges include the need for correction or adjustment due to maternal breathing, fetal motion, contractions, maternal position, placental position. Variation in maternal blood volume, blood flow, blood oxygenation, and blood glucose levels pose difficulty with functional data assessment. The optimal MR approaches for perfusion, oxygenation, and diffusion are not yet clear. There is also variation among 2D versus 3D measurement ascertainment and in determination of ROIs [19,53]. In addition, most ROIs previously were manually segmented. Movement towards automatic segmentation can remove inherent subjectivity in measurement [19,62]. Finally, current published studies primarily assessed global measurements, though evidence suggests that there is likely regional anatomic variation in placental function [22,33,46]. Whether the measurement needs to be cotyledon-specific, maternal--sided, fetal-sided, based out of the intervillous space, or a composite of these areas also remains to be determined. Due to these issues, further optimization and standardization of MR technique is needed to enable comparison of the literature and prior to clinical application for diagnostic testing.

There is also a need to establish a clinical reference standard for MR functional imaging, specifically gestationalage adjusted normal ranges [40,41,48]. Some headway has been made for T2* [50]. Larger sample size of uncomplicated human pregnancies are still needed, as small sample size is a limitation of much of the current published data [12,17, 21,26,27,43,45,49,51,52]. In addition, larger cohorts of disease states are also required, as the composites of adverse outcomes are not sufficiently predictive at present [50]. As these sample sizes grow, further work will elucidate if sufficient sensitivity and specificity can be found to aid prediction of and ultimately intervention for placental-mediated disease.

8. Ultrasound

There were 32 original research publications that utilized ultrasound [28-30,37-40, 65-89]: 24 covered aspects of placental function [28-30, 37-40, 65-81] and 13 placental structure [28,39,79-89]. Within placental function, 17 focused on Doppler [28-30,37-40,65-74], 3 on technical development [28,75], and 6 on Power Doppler [76-81]. For placental structure, 4 has components of general assessment [28,39,79, 80,82] and 9 ultrasound studies worked on automation [80,81,83-89].

9. US advances

9.1. Placental function

9.1.1. Doppler

Doppler has been used by many for attempted quantification of uteroplacental blood flow with limited association to clinical outcomes. Most commonly, Doppler has been used to assess uterine artery pulsatility index as a marker for impedance of uteroplacental circulation with mixed success [28,30]. Uterine artery pulsatility index does vary by fetal sex [71]. Another common method described has included calculated blood flow of both the uterine artery (maternal vessel, termed cQUA) and umbilical vein (fetal vessel, termed cQUV) [28,29,37,38,40]; however, measurements limited to these two major vessels seemingly lack sensitivity to detect placental dysfunction, likely as they are not completely reflective of the intervillous space [39,66].

Others have studied umbilical artery (UA) velocity wave reflections as a potential marker of dysfunction, hypothesizing that elevated placental vascular resistance may be observed as an elevated pulse wave from the fetal heart [65,70] Initial work was undertaken in mouse models [65,67] and found wave reflections more sensitive to changes in placental vascular resistance than UA pulsatility index [68] and correlated negative flow reflected waveforms with increased terminal impedance in the placenta [74]. Subsequent studies transitioned to human pregnancy [69,70], and have found significantly elevated wave reflections in pathologic outcomes of maternal vascular malperfusion and fetal vascular malperfusion [72].

Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) has been paired with color Doppler to determine resistive indices of the spiral arteries and intervillous space, which were significantly more elevated in the late third trimester for preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction [73]. However, the value added of this finding is limited, given the association is only with late gestational age and it has not yet been validated by larger studies.

9.1.2. Technical development

Work toward functional assessment in ultrasound included modeling of flow from the spiral arteries into the intervillous space throughout gestation based on pulsed wave Doppler ultrasound in uncomplicated pregnancies at 11-13 weeks [75]. The model found that villous structure appears under the influence of spiral artery blood flow, as free spaces must develop distal to spiral arteries to allow blood flow to penetrate among villous tree branching.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with microbubbles has been used in pregnant macaques to visualize individual spiral arteries and determine spiral artery transit time [28]. Transit time was found to be increased in those exposed to a chronic Western-style diet, correlating with decreased placental perfusion observed on MR imaging and decreased uterine arteiy blood flow as determined by Doppler [28].

9.1.3. Power Doppler

Power Doppler (PD) can used as a measure of vascularity in tissue. 3-dimensional PD (3D PD) has been applied in the first trimester (11-13 weeks) in human pregnancy for assessment of placental vascularity. Published assessments include a diagnostic marker for placenta accreta spectrum along the uteroplacental interface, termed the largest area of confluent 3D PD signal (Acon). In PAS, Acon is quantitatively increased, in keeping with known neovascularization along the bladder-serosal interface [76]. This measurement was found to be best achieved with a filled bladder as opposed to unfilled [77]. Another PD-derived metric is 3D fractional moving blood volume (3D-FMBV), a validated method for estimating tissue perfusion using ultrasound [80]. Applied at the uteroplacental interface, pregnancies that develop preeclampsia have reduced 3D-FMBV whereas pregnancies with small for gestational age (SGA) pregnancies resulted in similar vascularity to normotensive appropriate for gestational age (AGA) pregnancies [80]. This technique was recently automated [81]. Also using automated 3D PD, spiral artery jet number, area, and PD area close to the uteroplacental interface (2-3 mm) was found to be smaller in preeclampsia and some pregnant individuals with SGA pregnancies as compared to those with normotensive AGA pregnancies [79].

In contrast to 3D approaches, others have used a 2D approach and demonstrated that placental vascular pulsatility varies throughout the maternal cardiac cycle [78]. As pulsatility can reflect vascular modeling and resistance, this method holds promise as a potential marker for abnormal spiral artery remodeling that enables inter-subject comparison, as patients can serve as their own controls. Such insight is important as this cycle variation is not yet well accounted for in 3D techniques.

9.2. Placental structure

9.2.1. Qualitative assessment

Some features of placental structure were also assessed in US studies. In animals, contrast-enhanced ultrasound has been used for spiral artery identification [28,39]. Similar to vascularity, 3D-derived placental volume has been used in the assessment of the first trimester placenta in human pregnancy. Placentas of those who go on to develop pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age pregnancies had smaller placentas than normotensive AGA pregnancies [80]. Number of spiral arteries and size (cross-sectional area) have also been determined using 3D PD ultrasound data [79]. Ultrasound has also been used to aid in the application of optical spectroscopy (see Other Imaging) for delineation of placental oxygenation to provide tissue layer morphology (e.g. adipose, rectus/uterus, and placental tissue) and physiologic properties [82],

9.2.2. Quantitative automated analyses

A move toward automated tools for standardized structural evaluation was observed in many of the ultrasound studies. Described in the literature are algorithms for semi-automated 3D placental volume assessment [80,88], structural detection of the placenta, myometrium, and subcutaneous tissue [83], automated lacunae localization in PAS [84], knowledge-guided pretext learning for the uteroplacental interface in PAS [85], and now fully automated placental volumes using deep learning [81,86,87,89]. The value added in prediction for small for gestational age by first trimester volume is potentially promising. While the area under the curve for first trimester volumes has ranged from 0.61 to 0.78,86,89 this improved significantly to 0.897 when added to additional clinical modeling [89].

10. US gaps

Similar limitations as outlined for MR exist within US data. The ideal US test for placental disease is unknown and there remain several technical limitations. There is a need to standardize US machine settings, determine the best method for measurement and of which space (maternal, fetal, and intervillous), and automate measurement ascertainment. Reduction of operator dependency will be necessary prior to larger clinical trials given limited reproducibility or replication. Additional consideration for 3D PD includes the pulsatile nature of the vascular bed [78]. Techniques must also be developed that account for variation in placental location [78] and impact of fetal sex given recently discovered differences [71].

For development of diagnostic testing, larger sample sizes will be needed to create a reference standard that is distinguishable from diseases states, as most studies are limited to small sample sizes [72,73,81, 83,86] and/or in uncomplicated human pregnancy [67,68,81]. Larger and newer data sets are need for automation [87,89] given the rapid evolution of technology and for disease association.

11. Other imaging

There were 12 studies that utilized other imaging techniques aside from MR and US for evaluation of the placenta [8,23,61,63,67,74,82, 90-94]. X-ray micro-computed tomography (CT) [67,74,90-92] has been used for elucidation of placenta vasculature in animal models. A combination of micro-CT and scanning electron microscopy has been used to assess placental adaptations to chronic fetal hypoxia in mice [91]. Pre-operative cystoscopy for the assessment of PAS severity when placentation is over the prior scar and in proximity to the bladder wall has also been investigated [93].

Often additional imaging techniques were used to complement or validate MR findings. For example, in pregnant mice, contrast-enhanced CT has been used to validate placental fractional blood volume [23], retroplacental clear space [61], and placental margins [63] as determined by contrast-enhanced MR with liposomal gadolinium, and positron emission topography was used to correlate with biotin transporter activity [8]. Use of such imaging in human pregnancy remains limited to due ionizing radiation exposure.

An evolving field for placenta evaluation is optical imaging, with many preclinical investigations reported. More recent clinical applications have included optic spectroscopy [82] coupled with ultrasound imaging and photoacoustic imaging [94] for monitoring of placental oxygenation.

12. Limitations

We herein report on all placental-focused imaging publications resulting from HPP funding, though we recognize that this does not encompass all placenta research and advancement. Pre-clinical studies not directly applied to the placenta are not included. All publications were reviewed based on the NIH Reporter system. It is possible that manuscripts not yet associated within this system but published are not included in this review.

13. Future directions

The HPP has enhanced our real-time knowledge of the placenta, but numerous gaps remain. Next steps include determining the most effective non-invasive methods for assessment of placental function. The technical changes faced by current imaging methods must be addressed, including determining the appropriate regions of interest for measurement. Translation of MR and US to clinical application for diagnostic testing at present is likely hindered by the inter-observer variability and different institutional protocols. Therefore, working toward reproducible standardized ascertainment, automated analyses, and reporting is paramount. This includes creating an environment that fosters encouragement of shared algorithms, machine software, calculations, and methods. More systemic issues must also be acknowledged that limit current innovation – profit-driven obstacles at the manufacturer level including machine-specific software and current and historical under-funding for women’s health research [106].

As processes become better defined, an additional step will be to reliably and reproducibly correlate imaging metrics with normal placental function throughout gestation and with placental disease pathology. Only then can clear associations with disease be solidified and the ultimate goal of understanding the placental disease achieved – a clinically useful tool for disease prediction that enables intervention for such pathology.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. CLH is supported by K23HD103876 and L30HD109864 and QND by K25HD104004 for placental research.

Abbreviation guide

HPP

Human Placenta Project

NICHD

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

FGR

Fetal growth restriction

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

US

Ultrasound

DCE-MRI

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI – MR acquisition obtained during the passage of a contrast agent

ASL

Arterial spin labeling: noninvasive perfusion technique in which endogenous water in labeled upon a selected plane via radiofrequency and magnetic field gradient pulses

pCASL

Pseudocontinuous ASL: ASL method with enhanced signal and reduced signal-to-noise ratio compared to pulsed labeling

VSASL

Velocity-selective ASL: noninvasive perfusion technique in which blood is labeled based on velocity

FAIR

Flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery: noninvasive ASL perfusion technique in which pulse sequences generate tagged and control images

BOLD-MRI

Blood oxygen level-dependent MRI: noninvasive technique that when applied in the placenta reflects oxygenation based on changes in the ratio of oxyhemoglobin to deoxyhemoglobin

QSM

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: MRI measurements of the magnetic susceptibility of a tissue. For oxygenation, it is directly related to the hemoglobin saturation

ROI

Region of interest

T2*

Time constant for the decay of transverse magnetization caused by a combination of spin-spin relaxation and magnetic field inhomogeneity. For oxygenation, based on changes between paramagnetic deoxyhemoglobin and non-paramagnetic oxyhemoglobin

R2*

Apparent proton relaxation rate, equivalent to 1/T2*

TTP

Time to Plateau: time that the signal change due to regional oxygenation reaches to the plateau

DWI

Diffusion-weighted imaging: MRI acquisition based on measuring the random Brownian motion of water protons within a voxel of tissue

IVIM

Intravoxel incoherent motion: characterizing the microscopic motions of water in each image voxel, using diffusion-weighted imaging

ADC

Apparent diffusion coefficient: measure of the magnitude of diffusion of water protons within tissue, calculated using diffusion-weighted imaging

CEST

Chemical exchange saturation transfer: MRI contrast approach in which endogenous or exogenous compounds with exchangeable protons are selectively saturated and, after transfer of this saturation, detected through an attenuated water signal

3D-FMBV

3-dimensional fractional moving blood volume

Footnotes

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Part of this work was presented as a poster at the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

References

  • [1].Rees S, Inder T, Fetal and neonatal origins of altered brain development, Early Hum. Dev 81 (9) (2005) 753–761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Barker DJ, Thornburg KL, Placental programming of chronic diseases, cancer and lifespan: a review, Placenta 34 (10) (2013) 841–845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Amaral LM, Cunningham MW Jr., Cornelius DC., LaMarca B., Preeclampsia: long-term consequences for vascular health, Vasc. Health Risk Manag 11 (2015) 403–415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Kratimenos P, Penn AA, Placental programming of neuropsychiatric disease, Pediatr. Res 86 (2) (2019) 157–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Guttmacher AE, Maddox YT, Spong CY, The Human Placenta Project: placental structure, development, and function in real time, Placenta 35 (5) (2014) 303–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Guttmacher AE, Spong CY, The human placenta project: it’s time for real time, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 213 (4 Suppl) (2015) S3–S5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Cohen G, Hadas R, Stefania R, Pagoto A, Ben-Dor S, Kohen F, Longo D, Elbaz M, Dekel N, Gershon E, Aime S, Neeman M, Magnetic resonance imaging reveals distinct roles for tissue transglutaminase and factor XIII in maternal angiogenesis during early mouse pregnancy, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 39 (2019) 1602–1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Noam BE, Marina L, Inbal BE, Ofra G, Jennifer BL, Solana FR, A Tolulope A, Nicholas CA, Rebecca B, Suzanne LE, Joel GR, Michal N, Novel multimodal molecular imaging of Vitamin H (Biotin) transporter activity in the murine placenta, Sci. Rep 10 (1) (2020), 20767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Nguyen SM, Wiepz GJ, Schotzko M, Simmons HA, Mejia A, Ludwig KD, Zhu A, Brunner K, Hernando D, Reeder SB, Wieben O, Johnson K, Shah D, Golos TG, Impact of ferumoxytol magnetic resonance imaging on the rhesus macaque maternal-fetal interface, Biol. Reprod 102 (2) (2020) 434–444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Schabel MC, Roberts VHJ, Lo JO, Platt S, Grant KA, Frias AE, D Kroenke C, Functional imaging of the nonhuman primate Placenta with endogenous blood oxygen level-dependent contrast, Magn. Reson. Med 76 (5) (2016) 1551–1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Zhu A, Reeder SB, Johnson KM, Nguyen SM, Fain SB, Bird IM, Golos TG, Wieben O, Shah DM, Hernando D, Quantitative ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI in pregnancy: a feasibility study in the nonhuman primate, Magn. Reson. Imaging 65 (2020) 100–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Dellschaft NS, Hutchinson G, Shah S, Jones NW, Bradley C, Leach L, Platt C, Bowtell R, Gowland PA, The haemodynamics of the human placenta in utero, PLoS Biol. 18 (5) (2020), e3000676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Slator PJ, Hutter J, McCabe L, Gomes ADS, Price AN, Panagiotaki E, Rutherford MA, Hajnal JV, Alexander DC, Placenta microstructure and microcirculation imaging with diffusion MRI, Magn. Reson. Med 80 (2) (2018) 756–766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Martin T, Janzen C, Li X, Del Rosario I, Chanlaw T, Choi S, Armstrong T, Masamed R, Wu HH, Devaskar SU, Sung K, Characterization of uterine motion in early gestation using MRI-based motion tracking, Diagnostics 10 (10) (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Hutter J, Christiaens DJ, Schneider T, Cordero-Grande L, Slator PJ, Deprez M, Price AN, Tournier JD, Rutherford M, Hajnal JV, Slice-level diffusion encoding for motion and distortion correction, Med. Image Anal 48 (2018) 214–229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Uus A, Zhang T, Jackson LH, Roberts TA, Rutherford MA, Hajnal JV, Deprez M, Deformable slice-to-volume registration for motion correction of fetal body and placenta MRI, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag 39 (9) (2020) 2750–2759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Liao R, Turk EA, Zhang M, Luo J, Grant PE, Adalsteinsson E, Golland P, Temporal registration in in-utero volumetric MRI time series, Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 9902 (2016) 54–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Abulnaga SM, Turk EA, Bessmeltsev M, Grant PE, Solomon J, Golland P, Placental flattening via volumetric parameterization, Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 11767 (2019) 39–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Pietsch M, Ho A, Bardanzellu A, Zeidan AMA, Chappell LC, Hajnal JV, Rutherford M, Hutter J, APPLAUSE: automatic prediction of PLAcental health via U-net segmentation and statistical evaluation, Med. Image Anal 72 (2021), 102145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Avni R, Golani O, Akselrod-Ballin A, Cohen Y, Biton I, Garbow JR, Neeman M, MR imaging-derived oxygen-hemoglobin dissociation curves and fetal-placental oxygen-hemoglobin affinities, Radiology 280 (1) (2016) 68–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Rodríguez-Soto AE, Langham MC, Abdulmalik O, Englund EK, Schwartz N, Wehrli FW, MRI quantification of human fetal O(2) delivery rate in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, Magn. Reson. Med 80 (3) (2018) 1148–1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Stout JN, Rouhani S, Turk EA, Ha CG, Luo J, Rich K, Wald LL, Adalsteinsson D, Barth WH Jr., Grant PE, Roberts DJ, Placental MRI: development of an MRI compatible ex vivo system for whole placenta dual perfusion, Placenta 101 (2020) 4–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Badachhape AA, Devkota L, Stupin IV, Sarkar P, Srivastava M, Tanifum EA, Fox KA, Yallampalli C, Annapragada AV, Ghaghada KB, Nanoparticle contrast-enhanced T1-mapping enables estimation of placental fractional blood volume in a pregnant mouse model, Sci. Rep 9 (1) (2019), 18707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Turk EA, Luo J, Gagoski B, Pascau J, Bibbo C, Robinson JN, Grant PE, Adalsteinsson E, Golland P, Malpica N, Spatiotemporal alignment of in utero BOLD-MRI series, J. Magn. Reson. Imag 46 (2) (2017) 403–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Zhu A, Reeder SB, Johnson KM, Nguyen SM, Golos TG, Shimakawa A, Muehler MR, Francois CJ, Bird IM, Fain SB, Shah DM, Wieben O, Hernando D, Evaluation of a motion-robust 2D chemical shift-encoded technique for R2* and field map quantification in ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI of the placenta in pregnant rhesus macaques, J. Magn. Reson. Imag 51 (2) (2020) 580–592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Shao X, Liu D, Martin T, Chanlaw T, Devaskar SU, Janzen C, Murphy AM, Margolis D, Sung K, Wang DJJ, Measuring human placental blood flow with multidelay 3D GRASE pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling at 3T, J. Magn. Reson. Imag 47 (6) (2018) 1667–1676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Harteveld AA, Hutter J, Franklin SL, Jackson LH, Rutherford M, Hajnal JV, van Osch MJP, Bos C, De Vita E, Systematic evaluation of velocity-selective arterial spin labeling settings for placental perfusion measurement, Magn. Reson. Med 84 (4) (2020) 1828–1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Salati JA, Roberts VHJ, Schabel MC, Lo JO, Kroenke CD, Lewandowski KS, Lindner JR, Grove KL, Frias AE, Maternal high-fat diet reversal improves placental hemodynamics in a nonhuman primate model of diet-induced obesity, Int. J. Obes 43 (4) (2019) 906–916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Lo JO, Schabel MC, Roberts VH, Morgan TK, Rasanen JP, Kroenke CD, Shoemaker SR, Spindel ER, Frias AE, Vitamin C supplementation ameliorates the adverse effects of nicotine on placental hemodynamics and histology in nonhuman primates, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 212 (3) (2015), 370.e371–378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Janzen C, Lei MYY, Lee BR, Vangala S, DelRosario I, Meng Q, Ritz B, Liu J, Jerrett M, Chanlaw T, Choi S, Aliabadi A, Fortes PA, Sullivan PS, Murphy A, Vecchio GD, Thamotharan S, Sung K, Devaskar SU, A description of the imaging innovations for placental assessment in response to environmental pollution study, Am. J. Perinatol (2022), 10.1055/a-1961-2059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Ludwig KD, Fain SB, Nguyen SM, Golos TG, Reeder SB, Bird IM, Shah DM, Wieben OE, Johnson KM, Perfusion of the placenta assessed using arterial spin labeling and ferumoxytol dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the rhesus macaque, Magn. Reson. Med 81 (3) (2019) 1964–1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Macdonald JA, Corrado PA, Nguyen SM, Johnson KM, Francois CJ, Magness RR, Shah DM, Golos TG, Wieben O, Uteroplacental and fetal 4D flow MRI in the pregnant rhesus macaque, J. Magn. Reson. Imag 49 (2) (2019) 534–545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Liu D, Shao X, Danyalov A, Chanlaw T, Masamed R, Wang DJJ, Janzen C, Devaskar SU, Sung K, Human placenta blood flow during early gestation with pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling MRI, J. Magn. Reson. Imag 51 (4) (2020) 1247–1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Bao Q, Hadas R, Markovic S, Neeman M, Frydman L, Diffusion and perfusion MRI of normal, preeclamptic and growth-restricted mice models reveal clear fetoplacental differences, Sci. Rep 10 (1) (2020), 16380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Seiter DP, Nguyen SM, Morgan TK, Mao L, Dudley DM, O’Connor DH, D Murphy M, Ludwig KD, Chen R, Dhyani A, Zhu A, Schotzko ML, Brunner KG, Shah DM, Johnson KM, Golos TG, Wieben O, Ferumoxytol dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging identifies altered placental cotyledon perfusion in rhesus macaques†, Biol. Reprod 107 (6) (2022) 1517–1527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Palanisamy A, Giri T, Jiang J, Bice A, Quirk JD, Conyers SB, Maloney SE, Raghuraman N, Bauer AQ, Garbow JR, Wozniak DF, In utero exposure to transient ischemia-hypoxemia promotes long-term neurodevelopmental abnormalities in male rat offspring, JCI Insight 5 (10) (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Lo JO, Schabel MC, Roberts VH, Wang X, Lewandowski KS, Grant KA, Frias AE, Kroenke CD, First trimester alcohol exposure alters placental perfusion and fetal oxygen availability affecting fetal growth and development in a non-human primate model, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 216 (3) (2017), 302.e301–302.e308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Lo JO, Roberts VHJ, Schabel MC, Wang X, Morgan TK, Liu Z, Studholme C, Kroenke CD, Frias AE, Novel detection of placental insufficiency by magnetic resonance imaging in the nonhuman primate, Reprod. Sci 25 (1) (2018) 64–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Hirsch AJ, Roberts VHJ, Grigsby PL, Haese N, Schabel MC, Wang X, Lo JO, Liu Z, Kroenke CD, Smith JL, Kelleher M, Broeckel R, Kreklywich CN, Parkins CJ, Denton M, Smith P, DeFilippis V, Messer W, Nelson JA, Hennebold JD, Grafe M, Colgin L, Lewis A, Ducore R, Swanson T, Legasse AW, Axthelm MK, MacAllister R, Moses AV, Morgan TK, Frias AE, Streblow DN, Zika virus infection in pregnant rhesus macaques causes placental dysfunction and immunopathology, Nat. Commun 9 (1) (2018) 263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Lo JO, Schabel MC, Roberts VHJ, Morgan TK, Fei SS, Gao L, Ray KG, Lewandowski KS, Newman NP, Bohn JA, Grant KA, Frias AE, Kroenke CD, Effects of early daily alcohol exposure on placental function and fetal growth in a rhesus macaque model, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 226 (1) (2022), 130.e131–130.e111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Ho A, Hutter J, Slator P, Jackson L, Seed PT, McCabe L, Al-Adnani M, Marnerides A, George S, Story L, Hajnal JV, Rutherford M, Chappell LC, Placental magnetic resonance imaging in chronic hypertension: a case-control study, Placenta 104 (2021) 138–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Luo J, Abaci Turk E, Bibbo C, Gagoski B, Roberts DJ, Vangel M, Tempany-Afdhal CM, Barnewolt C, Estroff J, Palanisamy A, Barth WH, Zera C, Malpica N, Golland P, Adalsteinsson E, Robinson JN, Grant PE, In vivo quantification of placental insufficiency by BOLD MRI: a human study, Sci. Rep 7 (1) (2017) 3713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Armstrong T, Liu D, Martin T, Masamed R, Janzen C, Wong C, Chanlaw T, Devaskar SU, Sung K, Wu HH, 3D R2* mapping of the placenta during early gestation using free-breathing multiecho stack-of-radial MRI at 3T, J. Magn. Reson. Imag 49 (1) (2019) 291–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Abaci Turk E, Abulnaga SM, Luo J, Stout JN, Feldman HA, Turk A, Gagoski A, Wald LL, Adalsteinsson E, Roberts DJ, Bibbo C, Robinson JN, Golland P, Grant PE, Barth WH Jr., Placental MRI: effect of maternal position and uterine contractions on placental BOLD MRI measurements, Placenta 95 (2020) 69–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Zun Z, Kapse K, Quistorff J, Andescavage N, Gimovsky AC, Ahmadzia H, Limperopoulos C, Feasibility of QSM in the human placenta, Magn. Reson. Med 85 (3) (2021) 1272–1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Abaci Turk E, Stout JN, Feldman HA, Gagoski B, Zhou C, Tamen R, Manhard MK, Adalsteinsson E, Roberts DJ, Golland P, Grant PE, Barth WH Jr., Change in T2* measurements of placenta and fetal organs during Braxton Hicks contractions, Placenta 128 (2022) 69–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Hutter J, Slator PJ, Jackson L, Gomes ADS, Ho A, Story L, O’Muircheartaigh J, Teixeira R, Chappell LC, Alexander DC, Rutherford MA, Hajnal JV, Multi-modal functional MRI to explore placental function over gestation, Magn. Reson. Med 81 (2) (2019) 1191–1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Ho AEP, Hutter J, Jackson LH, Seed PT, McCabe L, Al-Adnani M, Marnerides A, George S, Story L, Hajnal JV, Rutherford MA, Chappell LC, T2* placental magnetic resonance imaging in preterm preeclampsia: an observational cohort study, Hypertension 75 (6) (2020) 1523–1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Hutter J, Kohli V, Dellschaft N, Uus A, Story L, Steinweg JK, Gowland P, Hajnal JV, Rutherford MA, Dynamics of T2* and deformation in the placenta and myometrium during pre-labour contractions, Sci. Rep 12 (1) (2022), 18542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Schabel MC, Roberts VHJ, Gibbins KJ, Rincon M, Gaffney JE, A Streblow A, Wright AM, Lo JO, Park B, Kroenke CD, Szczotka K, Blue NR, Page JM, Harvey K, Varner MW, Silver RM, Frias AE, Quantitative longitudinal T2* mapping for assessing placental function and association with adverse pregnancy outcomes across gestation, PLoS One 17 (7) (2022), e0270360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Slator PJ, Hutter J, Palombo M, Jackson LH, Ho A, Panagiotaki E, Chappell LC, Rutherford MA, Hajnal JV, Alexander DC, Combined diffusion-relaxometry MRI to identify dysfunction in the human placenta, Magn. Reson. Med 82 (1) (2019) 95–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Steinweg JK, Hui GTY, Pietsch M, Ho A, van Poppel MP, Lloyd D, Colford K, Simpson JM, Razavi R, Pushparajah K, Rutherford M, Hutter J, T2* placental MRI in pregnancies complicated with fetal congenital heart disease, Placenta 108 (2021) 23–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Stout JN, Liao C, Gagoski B, Turk EA, Feldman HA, Bibbo C, Barth WH Jr., Shainker SA, Wald LL, Grant PE, Adalsteinsson E, Quantitative T(1) and T(2) mapping by magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) of the placenta before and after maternal hyperoxia, Placenta 114 (2021) 124–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Hutter J, Ho A, Jackson LH, Slator PJ, Chappell LC, Hajnal JV, Rutherford MA, An efficient and combined placental T1 -ADC acquisition in pregnancies with and without pre-eclampsia, Magn. Reson. Med 86 (5) (2021) 2684–2691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Markovic S, Fages A, Roussel T, Hadas R, Brandis A, Neeman M, Frydman L, Placental physiology monitored by hyperpolarized dynamic (13)C magnetic resonance, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 115 (10) (2018) E2429–e2436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Smith LM, Wade TP, Friesen-Waldner LJ, McKenzie CA, Optimizing SNR for multi-metabolite hyperpolarized carbon-13 MRI using a hybrid flip-angle scheme, Magn. Reson. Med 84 (3) (2020) 1510–1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Farkash G, Markovic S, Novakovic M, Frydman L, Enhanced hyperpolarized chemical shift imaging based on a priori segmented information, Magn. Reson. Med 81 (5) (2019) 3080–3093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Luo J, Abaci Turk E, Gagoski B, Copeland N, Zhou IY, Young V, Bibbo C, Robinson JN, Zera C, Barth WH Jr., Roberts DJ, Sun PZ, Grant PE, Preliminary evaluation of dynamic glucose enhanced MRI of the human placenta during glucose tolerance test, Quant. Imag. Med. Surg 9 (10) (2019) 1619–1627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Badachhape AA, Kumar A, Ghaghada KB, Stupin IV, Srivastava M, Devkota L, Starosolski Z, Tanifum EA, George V, Fox KA, Yallampalli C, Annapragada AV, Pre-clinical magnetic resonance imaging of retroplacental clear space throughout gestation, Placenta 77 (2019) 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Abulnaga SM, Turk EA, Bessmeltsev M, Grant PE, Solomon J, Golland P, Volumetric parameterization of the placenta to a flattened template, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag 41 (4) (2022) 925–936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Badachhape AA, Bhandari P, Devkota L, Srivastava M, Tanifum EA, George V, Fox KA, Yallampalli C, Annapragada AV, Ghaghada KB, Nanoparticle contrast-enhanced MRI for visualization of retroplacental clear space disruption in a mouse model of placental accreta spectrum (PAS), Acad. Radiol (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Liu Y, Zabihollahy F, Yan R, Lee B, Janzen C, Devaskar SU, Sung K, Evaluation of spatial attentive deep learning for automatic placental segmentation on longitudinal MRI, J. Magn. Reson. Imag 57 (5) (2023) 1533–1540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Ghaghada KB, Starosolski ZA, Bhayana S, Stupin I, Patel CV, Bhavane RC, Gao H, Bednov A, Yallampalli C, Belfort M, George V, Annapragada AV, Pre-clinical evaluation of a nanoparticle-based blood-pool contrast agent for MR imaging of the placenta, Placenta 57 (2017) 60–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Ho A, Chappell LC, Story L, Al-Adnani M, Egloff A, Routledge E, Rutherford M, Hutter J, Visual assessment of the placenta in antenatal magnetic resonance imaging across gestation in normal and compromised pregnancies: observations from a large cohort study, Placenta 117 (2022) 29–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Rahman A, Zhou YQ, Yee Y, Dazai J, Cahill LS, Kingdom J, Macgowan CK, Sled JG, Ultrasound detection of altered placental vascular morphology based on hemodynamic pulse wave reflection, Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol 312 (5) (2017) H1021–h1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Kuo K, Roberts VHJ, Gaffney J, Takahashi DL, Morgan T, Lo JO, L. Stouffer R, Frias AE, Maternal high-fat diet consumption and chronic hyperandrogenemia are associated with placental dysfunction in female rhesus macaques, Endocrinology 160 (8) (2019) 1937–1949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Cahill LS, Zhou YQ, Hoggarth J, Yu LX, Rahman A, Stortz G, L. Whitehead C, Baschat A, Kingdom JC, Macgowan CK, Serghides L, Sled JG, Placental vascular abnormalities in the mouse alter umbilical artery wave reflections, Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol 316 (3) (2019) H664–h672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Cahill LS, Whitehead CL, Hobson SR, Stortz G, Kingdom JC, Baschat A, E. Murphy K, Serghides L, Macgowan CK, Sled JG, Effect of maternal betamethasone administration on feto-placental vascular resistance in the mouse, Biol. Reprod 101 (4) (2019) 823–831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Sled JG, Stortz G, Cahill LS, Milligan N, Ayyathurai V, Serghides L, Morgen E, Seravalli V, Delp C, McShane C, Baschat A, Kingdom J, Macgowan CK, Reflected hemodynamic waves influence the pattern of Doppler ultrasound waveforms along the umbilical arteries, Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol 316 (5) (2019) H1105–h1112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Stortz G, Cahill LS, Chandran AR, Baschat A, Sled JG, Macgowan CK, Quantification of wave reflection in the human umbilical artery from asynchronous Doppler ultrasound measurements, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag 39 (11) (2020) 3749–3757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Paranavitana L, Walker M, Chandran AR, Milligan N, Shinar S, L. Whitehead C, Hobson SR, Serghides L, Parks WT, Baschat AA, Macgowan CK, Sled JG, Kingdom JC, Cahill LS, Sex differences in uterine artery Doppler during gestation in pregnancies complicated by placental dysfunction, Biol. Sex Differ 12 (1) (2021) 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Cahill LS, Stortz G, Ravi Chandran A, Milligan N, Shinar S, Whitehead CL, Hobson SR, Ayyathurai V, Rahman A, Saghian R, Jobst KJ, McShane C, Block-Abraham D, Seravalli V, Laurie M, Millard S, Delp C, Wolfson D, Baschat AA, Murphy KE, Serghides L, Morgen E, Macgowan CK, Parks WT, Kingdom JC, Sled JG, Wave reflections in the umbilical artery measured by Doppler ultrasound as a novel predictor of placental pathology, EBioMedicine 67 (2021), 103326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Odibo AO, Kayisli U, Lu Y, Kayisli O, Schatz F, Odibo L, Chen H, Bronsteen R, Lockwood CJ, Longitudinal assessment of spiral artery and intravillous arteriole blood flow and adverse pregnancy outcome, Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol 59 (3) (2022) 350–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Saghian R, Cahill L, Rahman A, Steinman J, Stortz G, Kingdom J, Macgowan C, Sled J, Interpretation of wave reflections in the umbilical arterial segment of the feto-placental circulation: computational modeling of the fetoplacental arterial tree, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 68 (12) (2021) 3647–3658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Saghian R, James JL, Tawhai MH, Collins SL, Clark AR, Association of placental jets and mega-jets with reduced villous density, J. Biomech. Eng 139 (5)(2017) 510011–5100110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Collins SL, Stevenson GN, Al-Khan A, Illsley NP, Impey L, Pappas L, Zamudio S, Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography for diagnosing abnormally invasive placenta and quantifying the risk, Obstet. Gynecol 126 (3) (2015) 645–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Maynard H, Zamudio S, Jauniaux E, Collins SL, The importance of bladder volume in the ultrasound diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders, Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet 140 (3) (2018) 332–337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Schwartz N, Siegal J, Rourke A, Sehgal CM, Placental pulsatility: quantitative assessment of placental bed vasculature by 2-dimensional Doppler cine imaging, J. Ultrasound Med 38 (2) (2019) 471–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Stevenson GN, Noble JA, Welsh AW, Impey L, Collins SL, Automated visualization and quantification of spiral artery blood flow entering the first-trimester placenta, using 3-D power Doppler ultrasound, Ultrasound Med. Biol 44 (3) (2018) 522–531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Collins SL, Welsh AW, Impey L, Noble JA, Stevenson GN, 3D fractional moving blood volume (3D-FMBV) demonstrates decreased first trimester placental vascularity in pre-eclampsia but not the term, small for gestation age baby, PLoS One 12 (6) (2017), e0178675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Yin Y, Looney P, Collins SL, Standardization of blood flow measurements by automated vascular analysis from power Doppler ultrasound scan, Proc. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng (2020), 11314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Wang L, Cochran JM, Ko T, Baker WB, Abramson K, He L, Busch DR, Kavuri V, Linn RL, Parry S, Yodh AG, Schwartz N, Non-invasive monitoring of blood oxygenation in human placentas via concurrent diffuse optical spectroscopy and ultrasound imaging, Nat. Biomed. Eng 6 (9) (2022) 1017–1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Qi H, Collins S, Noble A, Weakly supervised learning of placental ultrasound images with residual networks, in: Med Image Underst Anal Conf (2017), vol. 723, 2017, pp. 98–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Qi H, Collins S, Noble JA, Automatic lacunae localization in placental ultrasound images via layer aggregation, Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 11071 (2018) 921–929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Qi H, Collins S, Noble JA, Knowledge-guided pretext learning for uteroplacental interface detection, Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 12261 (2020) 582–593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Looney P, Stevenson GN, Nicolaides KH, Plasencia W, Molloholli M, Natsis S, Collins SL, Fully automated, real-time 3D ultrasound segmentation to estimate first trimester placental volume using deep learning, JCI Insight 3 (11) (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Looney P, Yin Y, Collins SL, Nicolaides KH, Plasencia W, Molloholli M, Natsis S, Stevenson GN, Fully automated 3-D ultrasound segmentation of the placenta, amniotic fluid, and fetus for early pregnancy assessment, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectrics Freq. Control 68 (6) (2021) 2038–2047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Oguz I, Yushkevich N, Pouch A, Oguz BU, Wang J, Parameshwaran S, Gee J, Yushkevich PA, Schwartz N, Minimally interactive placenta segmentation from three-dimensional ultrasound images, J. Med. Imaging 7 (1) (2020), 014004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Schwartz N, Oguz I, Wang J, Pouch A, Yushkevich N, Parameshwaran S, Gee J, Yushkevich P, Oguz B, Fully automated placental volume quantification from 3D ultrasound for prediction of small-for-gestational-age infants, J. Ultrasound Med 41 (6) (2022) 1509–1524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Rennie MY, Cahill LS, Adamson SL, Sled JG, Arterio-venous fetoplacental vascular geometry and hemodynamics in the mouse placenta, Placenta 58 (2017) 46–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Cahill LS, Rennie MY, Hoggarth J, Yu LX, Rahman A, Kingdom JC, Seed M, Macgowan CK, Sled JG, Feto- and utero-placental vascular adaptations to chronic maternal hypoxia in the mouse, J. Physiol 596 (15) (2018) 3285–3297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Saghian R, Cahill LS, Debebe SK, Rahman A, Serghides L, McDonald CR, Weckman AM, Kain KC, Sled JG, Allometric scaling relationships in mouse placenta, J. R. Soc. Interface 19 (196) (2022), 20220579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Al-Khan A, Guirguis G, Zamudio S, Alvarez M, Martimucci K, Luke D, Alvarez-Perez J, Preoperative cystoscopy could determine the severity of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: an observational study, J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res 45 (1) (2019) 126–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Yamaleyeva LM, Sun Y, Bledsoe T, Hoke A, Gurley SB, Brosnihan KB, Photoacoustic imaging for in vivo quantification of placental oxygenation in mice, Faseb. J 31 (12) (2017) 5520–5529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Roberts VH, Frias AE, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the assessment of placental development and function, Biotechniques 69 (5) (2020) 392–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Mathewlynn S, Collins SL, Volume and vascularity: using ultrasound to unlock the secrets of the first trimester placenta, Placenta 84 (2019) 32–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Diniz PHB, Yin Y, Collins S, Deep learning strategies for ultrasound in pregnancy, Eur Med J Reprod Health 6 (1) (2020) 73–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Abaci Turk E, Stout JN, Ha C, Luo J, Gagoski B, Yetisir F, Golland P, L. Wald L, Adalsteinsson E, Robinson JN, Roberts DJ, Barth WH Jr., Grant PE, Placental MRI: developing accurate quantitative measures of oxygenation, Top. Magn. Reson. Imag 28 (5) (2019) 285–297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Dimov AV, Li J, Nguyen TD, Roberts AG, Spincemaille P, Straub S, Zun Z, Prince MR, Wang Y, QSM throughout the body, J. Magn. Reson. Imag 57 (6) (2023) 1621–1640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Yamaleyeva LM, Brosnihan KB, Smith LM, Sun Y, Preclinical ultrasound-guided photoacoustic imaging of the placenta in normal and pathologic pregnancy, Mol. Imag 17 (2018), 1536012118802721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Slator P, Aughwane R, Cade G, Taylor D, David AL, Lewis R, Jauniaux E, Desjardins A, Salomon LJ, Millischer AE, Tsatsaris V, Rutherford M, Johnstone ED, Melbourne A, Placenta imaging workshop 2018 report: multiscale and multimodal approaches, Placenta 79 (2019) 78–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Abaci Turk E, Abulnaga SM, Luo J, Stout JN, Feldman HA, Turk A, Gagoski A, Wald LL, Adalsteinsson E, Roberts DJ, Bibbo C, Robinson JN, Golland P, Grant PE, Barth WH Jr., Corrigendum to "Placental MRI: effect of maternal position and uterine contractions on placental BOLD MRI measurements" [Placenta 95 (2020) 69-77], Placenta 100 (2020) 171–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Ho A, Chappell LC, Story L, Al-Adnani M, Egloff A, Routledge E, Rutherford M, Hutter J, Corrigendum to "Visual assessment of the placenta in antenatal magnetic resonance imaging across gestation in normal and compromised pregnancies: observations from a large cohort study" [117 January 2022 29-38], Placenta 119 (2022) 31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Jackson J, George V, McKinney J, Fox KA, Multimodal postpartum imaging of a severe case of Couvelaire uterus, Case Rep. Perinat. Med 11 (1) (2022), 20210013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies, BMJ 351 (2015) h5527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].Smith K, Women’s health research lacks funding - in a series of charts, Nature 617 (7959) (2023) 28–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES