Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 19.
Published in final edited form as: Mem Cognit. 2020 Apr;48(3):370–389. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00976-8

Table 3.

Omnibus ANOVA and polynomial contrast results from Experiment 1

ANOVA Context Variable Contrast df MSE F h p 2 P Significance

Expected (No-PM) vs. Unexpected Age 1, 57 2.88 0.13 0.002 0.716 ns
Context Type 1, 57 0.74 107.91 0.654 <.001 *
Context Type × Age 1, 57 0.74 3.89 0.064 0.053 +
Trial Number Linear 1, 57 0.35 22.59 0.284 <.001 *
Trial Number Quadratic 1, 57 0.47 29.35 0.340 <.001 *
Trial Number × Age Linear 1, 57 0.39 0.02 0.000 0.893 ns
Trial Number × Age Quadratic 1, 57 0.47 0.68 0.012 0.414 ns
Trial Number × Context Type Linear 1, 57 0.26 5.49 0.088 0.023 *
Trial Number × Context Type Quadratic 1, 57 0.33 8.76 0.133 0.004 *
Trial Number × Context Type × Age Linear 1, 57 0.26 0.43 0.007 0.517 ns
Trial Number × Context Type × Age Quadratic 1, 57 0.33 0.36 0.006 0.551 ns
Expected (No-PM) vs. Expected (PM) Age 1, 57 1.23 1.01 0.017 0.320 ns
Context Type 1, 57 0.92 4.23 0.069 0.044 *
Context Type × Age 1, 57 0.92 5.57 0.089 0.022 *
Trial Number Linear 1, 57 0.50 0.30 0.005 0.583 ns
Trial Number Quadratic 1, 57 0.50 0.11 0.002 0.742 ns
Trial Number × Age Linear 1, 57 0.43 0.01 0.000 0.935 ns
Trial Number × Age Quadratic 1, 57 0.50 2.80 0.047 0.100 ns
Trial Number × Context Type Linear 1, 57 0.66 0.13 0.002 0.725 ns
Trial Number × Context Type Quadratic 1, 57 0.49 0.99 0.017 0.323 ns
Trial Number × Context Type × Age Linear 1, 57 0.67 0.32 0.006 0.576 ns
Trial Number × Context Type × Age Quadratic 1, 57 0.49 0.16 0.003 0.692 ns

Note. ns not significant

*

p < .05

+

p < .06