Horak 1992.
Methods | Design: randomised controlled trial | |
Participants |
Number: 25 Age: not reported Gender: not reported Setting: not reported Eligibility criteria: peripheral vestibular dysfunction diagnosed by neuro‐otologist for BPPV, inner ear concussion syndrome, reduced unilateral vestibular function, 18 to 60 years of age Exclusion criteria: CNS involvement, spontaneous fluctuating vestibular symptoms, significant orthopaedic or cardiac problems, or non‐compliance with the treatment programme Baseline characteristics: no differences reported |
|
Interventions |
Intervention group: VR (n = 14) Comparator group 1: general conditioning exercises (n = 4) Comparator group 2: medication (meclizine or Valium) (n = 8) VR versus control (sham) versus other non‐VR (medication) |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcome: DI Secondary outcomes: posturography, SOOL, questionnaire, positional vertigo ‐ number of positions, DI and duration | |
Notes | Number of participants available for post intervention assessments not stated | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information about the sequence generation process |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information about the method of allocation |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Participants, physicians and outcome assessors were all blinded to group allocation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants were available for follow‐up assessments |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Some outcome data not reported for meta‐analysis |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appears to be free of other sources of bias |