Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 13;2015(1):CD005397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005397.pub4

Horak 1992.

Methods Design: randomised controlled trial
Participants Number: 25
Age: not reported
 Gender: not reported
 Setting: not reported
Eligibility criteria: peripheral vestibular dysfunction diagnosed by neuro‐otologist for BPPV, inner ear concussion syndrome, reduced unilateral vestibular function, 18 to 60 years of age
Exclusion criteria: CNS involvement, spontaneous fluctuating vestibular symptoms, significant orthopaedic or cardiac problems, or non‐compliance with the treatment programme
Baseline characteristics: no differences reported
Interventions Intervention group: VR (n = 14)
Comparator group 1: general conditioning exercises (n = 4)
Comparator group 2: medication (meclizine or Valium) (n = 8)
VR versus control (sham) versus other non‐VR (medication)
Outcomes Primary outcome: DI
 Secondary outcomes: posturography, SOOL, questionnaire, positional vertigo ‐ number of positions, DI and duration
Notes Number of participants available for post intervention assessments not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information about the sequence generation process
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information about the method of allocation
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participants, physicians and outcome assessors were all blinded to group allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All participants were available for follow‐up assessments
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Some outcome data not reported for meta‐analysis
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias