Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2024 Apr 1;119(7):1276–1288. doi: 10.1111/add.16486

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Model-based change in the composite harm mitigation score between baseline and 7-month follow-up in neighborhood sites randomized to usual services or the integrated care van in Baltimore, Maryland. Composite scores range from 0 to 15, with lower scores indicating more favorable status. Vertical bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Compared with baseline, the composite harm mitigation score declined in both arms by the 7-month visit (indicating a favorable change in status): −1.93 and −1.63, in ICV and usual services arms, respectively. The difference between temporal score changes in the two arms (difference in difference) was not statistically significant (−0.31 in ICV versus usual services; 95% CI: −0.70, 0.08; P value 0.13)