TABLE 1.

Mean of the absolute difference in five connectivity measures between the individual subject connectomes and the age‐specific average connectomes. Results are shown separately for three connection strength weightings. An asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference ($p=.05$) between the proposed method and length‐preserved connectome averaging method.

	Proposed method					Length‐preserved connectome averaging
	$\mid \mathrm{\Delta GE}\mid$	$\mid \mathrm{\Delta LE}\mid$	$\mid \mathrm{\Delta CPL}\mid$	$\mid \mathrm{\Delta CC}\mid$	$\mid \mathrm{\Delta SWI}\mid$	$\mid \mathrm{\Delta GE}\mid$	$\mid \mathrm{\Delta LE}\mid$	$\mid \mathrm{\Delta CPL}\mid$	$\mid \mathrm{\Delta CC}\mid$	$\mid \mathrm{\Delta SWI}\mid$
FA	0.047	0.045*	0.630*	0.055	0.007	0.047	0.050	0.685	0.056	0.007
NDI	0.046*	0.048*	0.611*	0.064	0.007	0.051	0.053	0.679	0.067	0.008
1‐ODI	0.090*	0.092*	0.739*	0.096	0.008	0.130	0.144	0.772	0.101	0.008