Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 19;7(7):e2422454. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.22454

Table 2. Comparing Performance of Endoscopists With or Without AI Assistance.

Metrics Expert endoscopists (n = 2) Senior endoscopists (n = 4) Novice endoscopists (n = 6)
Without AI With AIa P value Without AI With AI P value Without AI With AI P value
Sensitivity (95% CI) 0.88 (0.75-0.95) 0.80 (0.58-0.92) >.99 0.72 (0.61-0.82) 0.78 (0.67-0.86) .39 0.61 (0.51-0.70) 0.91 (0.83-0.95) <.001
Specificity (95% CI) 0.88 (0.69-0.96) 0.85 (0.58-0.96) >.99 0.84 (0.71-0.92) 0.84 (0.71-0.92) >.99 0.81 (0.70-0.89) 0.88 (0.77-0.94) .34
PPV (95% CI) 0.92 (0.80-0.97) 0.89 (0.67-0.97) .66 0.88 (0.77-0.94) 0.88 (0.78-0.94) .89 0.84 (0.74-0.91) 0.92 (0.85-0.96) .10
NPV (95% CI) 0.80 (0.62-0.91) 0.73 (0.48-0.89) .58 0.66 (0.53-0.77) 0.71 (0.58-0.82) .57 0.56 (0.46-0.66) 0.85 (0.74-0.92) <.001
Accuracy (95% CI) 0.88 (0.78-0.94) 0.82 (0.66-0.91) >.99 0.77 (0.68-0.84) 0.80 (0.72-0.87) .23 0.69 (0.61-0.76) 0.90 (0.83-0.94) <.001

Abbreviations: AI, artificial intelligence; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value

a

With AI: expert (n = 1).