Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 17;15(21):1646–1655. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15389

TABLE 3.

Treatment response of patients with limited stage by lipocalin‐2, NLR, and PMI.

Treatment response Lipocalin‐2 alone Lipocalin‐2 and NLR Lipocalin‐2 and PMI
Low lipocalin‐2 (n = 35) High lipocalin‐2 (n = 37) p‐value Group 1 (n = 25) Group 2 (n = 33) Group 3 (n = 14) p‐value Group 1 (n = 32) Group 2 (n = 31) Group 3 (n = 9) p‐value
CR 12 (34.3) 7 (18.9) 0.035 a 12 (48.0) 6 (18.2) 1 (7.1) 0.001 b 11 (34.4) 8 (25.8) 0 0.002 b
PR 22 (62.9) 24 (64.9) 12 (48.0) 24 (72.7) 10 (71.4) 20 (62.5) 22 (71.0) 4 (44.4)
SD, PD, or not evaluated 1 (2.9) 6 (16.2) 1 (4.0) 3 (9.1) 3 (21.4) 1 (3.1) 1 (3.2) 5 (55.6)
Objective response rate (CR + PR) 34 (97.1) 31 (83.8) 0.108 24 (96.0) 30 (90.9) 11 (78.6) 0.090 a 31 (96.9) 30 (96.8) 4 (44.4) <0.001 a

Note: The variables are presented as numbers (%).

Abbreviations: CR, complete response; NLR, neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio; PD, progressive disease; PMI, pectoralis muscle index; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

a

Cochrane‐Armitage trend test.

b

Cuzick's trend test.