Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 26;10(13):e33690. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33690

Table 3.

A multivariate Logistic regression model on the association of serum lipid with ApoE gene polymorphisms after adjustment for sex,age and the clinical characteristic factors.

Variables Adjusted Odd Ratio (OR) (95 % CI), p Value
High triglyceride High total cholesterol High LDL-C
ε3/ε4 vs ε4/ε4 0.638(0.404–1.005), P = 0.052 0.716(0.384–1.333), P = 0.292 0.840(0.535–1.318), P = 0.448
ε3/ε3 vs ε4/ε4 0.542(0.348–0.845), P = 0.007* 0.586(0.321–1.072), P = 0.083 0.661(0.426–1.025), P = 0.064
ε2/ε4 vs ε4/ε4 0.723(0.402–1.298), P = 0.277 0.511(0.206–1.266), P = 0.147 0.453(0.243–0.845), P = 0.013a
ε2/ε3 vs ε4/ε4 0.693(0.437–1.098), P = 0.118 0.359(0.186–0.693), P = 0.002a 0.329(0.206–0.525), P = 0.000a
ε2/ε2 vs ε4/ε4 2.237(1.070–4.675), P = 0.032* 1.190(0.453–3.123), P = 0.724 0.747(0.359–1.555), P = 0.435
ε3/ε4 vs ε3/ε3 1.175(1.031–1.341), P = 0.016* 1.221(0.997–1.494), P = 0.053 1.271(1.115–1.450), P = 0.000a
ε2/ε4 vs ε3/ε3 1.332(0.901–1.970), P = 0.151 0.872(0.437–1.740), P = 0.697 0.686(0.437–1.077), P = 0.101
ε2/ε3 vs ε3/ε3 1.277(1.100–1.482), P = 0.001* 0.612(0.456–0.822), P = 0.001a 0.498(0.414–0.598), P = 0.000a
ε2/ε2 vs ε3/ε3 4.124(2.276–7.472), P = 0.000* 2.029(0.944–3.361), P = 0.070 1.130(0.624–2.046), P = 0.686
ε3/ε4 vs ε2/ε2 0.285(0.156–0.521), P = 0.000* 0.602(0.276–1.312), P = 0.201 1.125(0.616–2.053), P = 0.701
ε2/ε4 vs ε2/ε2 0.323(0.159–0.655), P = 0.002* 0.430(0.155–1.193), P = 0.105 0.607(0.289–1.272), P = 0.186
ε2/ε3 vs ε2/ε2 0.310(0.169–0.568), P = 0.000* 0.302(0.134–0.677), P = 0.004a 0.440(0.238–0.815), P = 0.009a
ε2/ε4 vs ε3/ε4 1.133(0.757–1.698), P = 0.544 0.714(0.352–1.448), P = 0.351 0.539(0.340–0.856), P = 0.009a
ε2/ε3 vs ε3/ε4 1.086(0.908–1.300), P = 0.367 0.502(0.361–0.698), P = 0.000a 0.391(0.318–0.482), P = 0.000a
ε2/ε3 vs ε2/ε4 0.958(0.636–1.444), P = 0.839 0.702(0.336–1.470), P = 0.348 0.726(0.449–1.172), P = 0.190
a

Indicates p < 0.05. LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.