Table 1.
Study | Date | Country | Group | Patient | Sex (M/F) | Age (range or SD) | Pancreatic Texture (S/F) | Primary Outcome | Definition |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chou et al. [21] | 1996 | China | D-M | 47 | 23/24 | 60 ± 11 | NM | NM | Non-ISGPF |
Invagination | 46 | 27/19 | 56 ± 12 | ||||||
Bassi et al. [22] | 2003 | Italy | D-M | 72 | 40/32 | 62 ± 10 | 72/0 | NM | Non-ISGPF |
Invagination | 72 | 46/26 | 61 ± 12 | 72/0 | |||||
Langrehr et al. [23] | 2005 | Germany | D-M | 56 | 34/22 | 59 (28–86) | NM | NM | Non-ISGPF |
Invagination | 57 | 32/25 | 60 (35–79) | ||||||
Beger et al. [24] | 2009 | America | D-M | 97 | 45/52 | 68 (32–84) | 50/47 | Incidence of POPF | ISGPF 2005 |
Invagination | 100 | 54/46 | 68 (41–90) | 51/49 | |||||
Han et al. [25] | 2009 | China | D-M | 32 | 20/12 | 59 ± 11 | 32/0 | Incidence of POPF | ISGPF 2005 |
Invagination | 32 | 24/8 | 56 ± 11 | 32/0 | |||||
Nakeeb et al. [26] | 2015 | Egypt | D-M | 53 | 34/19 | 54 (12–73) | 25/28 | Incidence of POPF | ISGPF 2005 |
Invagination | 54 | 33/21 | 54 (20–75) | 27/27 | |||||
Xu et al. [27] | 2015 | China | D-M | 153 | 82/71 | 58.17 ± 11.72 | 95/58 | Incidence of POPF | ISGPF 2005 |
Invagination | 155 | 84/71 | 58.19 ± 10.7 | 104/51 | |||||
Bai et al. [28] | 2016 | China | D-M | 64 | 38/26 | 62 (32–79) | 36/28 | Incidence of POPF | ISGPF 2005 |
Invagination | 68 | 39/29 | 64 (21–78) | 44/24 | |||||
Senda et al. [29] | 2018 | Japan | D-M | 61 | 36/25 | 66(36–84) | 31/30 | Grade B/C POPF | ISGPF 2005 |
Invagination | 59 | 36/23 | 68(22–81) | 30/29 | |||||
Singh et al. [30] | 2018 | India | D-M | 97 | 63/34 | 53.4 (12.1) | 42/55 | Incidence of POPF | ISGPF 2005 |
Dunking | 96 | 63/33 | 51.5 (14.2) | 48/48 |
D-M, duct-to-mucosa; POPF, postoperative pancreatic fistula; ISGPF, International Study Group definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula; NM, not mentioned; S, soft; F, firm; M, male; F, female; SD, standard deviation.