Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 15;10(13):e33156. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33156

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Study Date Country Group Patient Sex (M/F) Age (range or SD) Pancreatic Texture (S/F) Primary Outcome Definition
Chou et al. [21] 1996 China D-M 47 23/24 60 ± 11 NM NM Non-ISGPF
Invagination 46 27/19 56 ± 12
Bassi et al. [22] 2003 Italy D-M 72 40/32 62 ± 10 72/0 NM Non-ISGPF
Invagination 72 46/26 61 ± 12 72/0
Langrehr et al. [23] 2005 Germany D-M 56 34/22 59 (28–86) NM NM Non-ISGPF
Invagination 57 32/25 60 (35–79)
Beger et al. [24] 2009 America D-M 97 45/52 68 (32–84) 50/47 Incidence of POPF ISGPF 2005
Invagination 100 54/46 68 (41–90) 51/49
Han et al. [25] 2009 China D-M 32 20/12 59 ± 11 32/0 Incidence of POPF ISGPF 2005
Invagination 32 24/8 56 ± 11 32/0
Nakeeb et al. [26] 2015 Egypt D-M 53 34/19 54 (12–73) 25/28 Incidence of POPF ISGPF 2005
Invagination 54 33/21 54 (20–75) 27/27
Xu et al. [27] 2015 China D-M 153 82/71 58.17 ± 11.72 95/58 Incidence of POPF ISGPF 2005
Invagination 155 84/71 58.19 ± 10.7 104/51
Bai et al. [28] 2016 China D-M 64 38/26 62 (32–79) 36/28 Incidence of POPF ISGPF 2005
Invagination 68 39/29 64 (21–78) 44/24
Senda et al. [29] 2018 Japan D-M 61 36/25 66(36–84) 31/30 Grade B/C POPF ISGPF 2005
Invagination 59 36/23 68(22–81) 30/29
Singh et al. [30] 2018 India D-M 97 63/34 53.4 (12.1) 42/55 Incidence of POPF ISGPF 2005
Dunking 96 63/33 51.5 (14.2) 48/48

D-M, duct-to-mucosa; POPF, postoperative pancreatic fistula; ISGPF, International Study Group definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula; NM, not mentioned; S, soft; F, firm; M, male; F, female; SD, standard deviation.