Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):810–816. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw237

Table 3.

Proportion of Women Who Reported Receiving Provider Education During Prenatal Carea

Smoking status in 3 months before pregnancy Provider education during prenatal careb
% (95% CI)c

Nondaily smokers (<1 cigarette/day) 71.1 (68.2–73.8)d
Daily smokers (cigarette(s)/day) 86.3 (85.5–87.1)
 1–5 82.2 (80.6–83.7)
 6–10 86.5 (85.1–87.9)
 11–20 88.9 (87.4–90.2)
 21–40 90.7 (87.8–93.0)
 >40 94.2 (89.4–96.9)

CI = confidence interval.

a

Included 31 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) states (AK, AR, CO, DE, GA, HI, IL, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MS, NE, NJ, NM, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI, WV, and WY) and New York City during 2009–2011.

b

PRAMS questionnaires asked: “During any of your prenatal care visits, did a doctor, nurse, or other health care worker talk with you about any of the things listed below? Please count only discussions, not reading materials or videos.” The option of interest read, “How smoking during pregnancy could affect my baby.”

c

Proportion (95% CIs) among all smokers before pregnancy who answered question on PRAMS (unweighted n = 29 185).

d

Statistically significant chi-square test (p < .001) of difference between nondaily smokers compared with all daily smokers.