Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 22;14(32):23023–23036. doi: 10.1039/d4ra04353g

Comparison of anode materials based on 3D structure design strategies.

Anode material Electrolyte Voltage hysteresis Cycling performance Ref.
Zn foil and Cu foam (RCZ) 2 M ZnSO4 ∼120 mV (1 mA cm−2) 1800 h (1 mA cm−2) 43
Carbon network NCL-Zn 2 M ZnSO4 71 mV (1 mA cm−2) 4000 h (1 mA cm−2) 44
Cu mesh 1 M ZnSO4 20 mV (1 mA cm−2) 340 h (1 mA cm−2) 45
Alloy network Cu@Cu3Zn 3 M Zn(CF3SO3)2 ∼100 mV (1 mA cm−2) 1900 h (1 mA cm−2) 46
Expanded graphite Zn@Cu-Ps/EG 3 M Zn(CF3SO3)2 ∼100 mV (10 mA cm−2) 3000 h (10 mA cm−2) 47
3D Zn@Cu-Sn@SSM 2 M ZnSO4 ∼95 mV (10 mA cm−2) 1050 h (10 mA cm−2) 48
Nanofiber Zn@PBI-Cu 2 M ZnSO4 + 0.1 M MnSO4 70 mV (10 mA cm−2) 300 h (10 mA cm−2) 49
3D AgNPs@CC 1 M Zn(CF3SO3)2 ∼56 mV (2 mA cm−2) 800 h (2 mA cm−2) 50
3D Zn@N-VG@CC 2 M ZnSO4 ∼6.2 mV (0.5 mA cm−2) 150 h (0.5 mA cm−2) 51
3D concave Zn 2 M ZnSO4 + 0.2 M MnSO4 ∼100 mV (2 mA cm−2) 1000 h (2 mA cm−2) 52