Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 22;6(3):100497. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100497

Table 3.

Methodological quality of eligible studies (n ​= ​61).

Study (Author; Year) R-AMSTAR Items
R-AMSTAR
Grade
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Score (11–44) (A–D)
Ahmad et al. [43] 3 4 4 2 4 4 2 3 2 1 3 32 B
Al-Mhanna et al. [44] 3 4 1 2 1 3 4 4 1 1 4 28 B
Antonelli et al. [45] 3 4 4 2 1 3 4 1 2 1 3 28 B
Anwer et al. [46] 3 4 4 2 1 4 2 3 2 1 3 29 B
Avendano-Coy et al. [47] 3 4 4 2 2 4 4 3 4 2 4 36 A
Chen et al. [48] 4 2 4 3 2 4 3 2 4 1 3 32 B
Chen et al. [49] 4 4 4 3 1 4 3 2 1 1 4 31 B
Chen et al. [50] 3 4 4 2 1 4 3 2 4 1 4 32 B
Chen et al. [51] 3 4 3 3 1 3 3 2 3 3 4 32 B
Chu et al. [52] 3 1 4 2 1 3 3 3 1 1 2 24 B
Dantas et al. [53] 3 4 3 3 1 4 4 1 1 1 4 29 B
Dantas et al. [54] 3 4 4 2 1 3 4 4 2 1 4 32 B
Dong et al. [55] 3 4 3 2 1 3 3 1 2 1 4 27 B
Goff et al. [56] 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 2 4 37 A
Gong et al. [57] 3 2 3 2 1 3 3 1 2 2 4 26 B
Grantham et al. [58] 4 1 4 2 2 4 4 4 3 1 4 33 A
Guo et al. [59] 3 2 2 2 1 4 3 2 3 1 4 27 B
Hall et al. [60] 3 4 4 3 2 4 4 3 3 2 2 34 A
Heddon et al. [61] 3 2 3 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 4 22 C
Hou et al. [62] 2 4 3 2 1 2 3 1 2 2 4 26 B
Hu et al. [63] 3 4 3 2 1 3 4 2 2 1 4 29 B
Jiménez-del-Barrio et al. [64] 4 4 4 2 1 4 4 3 1 2 4 33 A
Kus and Yeldan [65] 3 2 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 1 1 23 B
Lauche et al. [66] 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 1 1 2 32 B
Li et al. [67] 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 4 23 B
Li et al. [68] 3 4 4 3 2 4 4 1 1 2 2 30 B
Liao et al. [69] 3 4 4 3 2 4 3 3 3 3 1 33 A
Liao et al. [70] 3 4 4 3 1 3 3 1 4 2 4 32 B
Liao et al. [71] 3 4 2 2 1 4 2 2 2 2 4 28 B
Lin et al. [72] 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 2 2 2 4 34 A
Liu et al. [73] 2 4 3 2 1 4 3 1 1 1 2 24 B
Long et al. [74] 3 2 1 3 1 3 3 1 2 2 1 22 C
Lu et al. [75] 3 4 4 2 1 4 3 2 3 1 4 31 B
Ma et al. [76] 3 4 4 2 1 3 3 2 2 1 4 29 B
Melese et al. [77] 3 4 3 2 1 3 4 1 1 1 3 26 B
Neelapala et al. [78] 3 3 4 2 2 4 3 3 1 1 1 27 B
Novak et al. [79] 3 2 2 2 1 3 3 1 1 1 2 21 C
Pirayeh et al. [80] 3 4 2 2 1 4 4 1 1 1 2 25 B
Pitsillides et al. [81] 2 1 4 2 4 4 2 3 1 1 3 27 B
Qiu et al. [82] 3 4 2 2 1 3 3 2 1 1 4 26 B
Runge et al. [83] 3 2 4 3 1 3 4 4 3 1 2 30 B
Safari et al. [84] 4 4 4 2 4 2 4 2 1 1 4 32 B
Stausholm et al. [85] 2 4 3 3 3 4 3 2 2 1 2 29 B
Sun et al. [86] 2 4 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 4 24 B
Thomas et al. [87] 4 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 3 1 4 31 B
Thorlund et al. [88] 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 2 4 3 4 39 A
Tong et al. [89] 3 2 3 2 1 1 3 1 2 2 4 24 B
Tsokanos et al. [90] 2 1 2 3 1 3 3 1 1 1 4 22 C
Turner et al. [91] 3 4 4 3 1 4 3 2 1 1 3 29 B
Ughreja and Prem [92] 2 4 4 2 4 4 3 3 2 1 4 33 A
Uritani et al. [93] 4 4 4 3 2 4 3 2 1 1 4 32 B
Wang et al. [94] 3 4 4 2 1 4 4 4 3 3 3 35 A
Weleslassie et al. [95] 4 2 2 2 1 4 3 2 1 1 2 24 B
Wu et al. [96] 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 2 3 2 4 36 A
Wu et al. [97] 3 2 2 3 1 4 3 2 2 1 4 27 B
Wu et al. [98] 4 3 2 2 1 4 4 3 2 2 4 31 B
Xie et al. [99] 4 3 4 2 1 3 3 2 2 1 4 29 B
Yang et al. [100] 4 4 3 2 1 3 4 1 2 1 4 29 B
Ye et al. [101] 3 2 3 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 4 24 B
You et al. [102] 1 4 4 2 1 3 4 2 3 1 4 29 B
Zeng et al. [103] 3 4 4 3 2 4 3 4 2 2 4 35 A
Average 3 3.3 3.3 2.3 1.6 3.4 3.2 2.1 2.0 1.4 3.3 29.1 B

R-AMSTAR items: 1 – Was an ‘‘a priori’’ design provided?; 2 – Was there duplicate study selection and data extraction?; 3 – Was a comprehensive literature search performed?; 4 – Was the status of publication used as an inclusion criterion?; 5 – Was a list of studies provided?; 6 – Were the characteristics of the included studies provided?; 7 – Was the scientific quality of the included studies assessed and documented?; 8 – Was the scientific quality of the included studies used appropriately in formulating conclusions?; 9 – Were the methods used to combine the findings of studies appropriate?; 10 – Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed?; 11 – Was the conflict of interest included?.