Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD005472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005472.pub3

Lu 1998.

Methods Design: parallel‐group 
 Randomisation method: information not available
Method of allocation concealment: information not available 
 Blinding: information not available
Stratification: not used
Participants Inclusion: insomnia characterised by difficulty initiating sleep, shallow sleep, lots of dreams, early awakening, difficulty reinitiating sleep after awakening, sleep efficiency below 40%, tired and sleepy at daytime with anxiety, impaired memory or attention affecting work efficiency, duration of insomnia more than 3 months 
 Exclusion: nil
Number of participants: intervention: 35; control: 23 
 Number of males: intervention: 14; control: 10
Age (years): overall range 16 to 60 
 Specific diagnoses/diagnostic subtypes: information not available 
 Associated disease: information not available 
 Duration of disorder: intervention: range 3 months to 5 years; control: range 3 months to 5 years 
 Previous treatments: 80% participants had used hypnotics
Interventions Intervention group (needle acupuncture + Chinese herb): acupuncture to Neiguan bilaterally. Needles were left in place for 30 minutes. Treatment was applied daily for 30 days. Qi Ye Shen An Pian 100 mg was given 3 times daily for 30 days. 
 Control group (Chinese herb alone): Qi Ye Shen An Pian as in intervention group
Outcomes Frequency of improvement in sleep quality: Cure was defined as sleep efficiency more than 70%. Moderate improvement was defined as sleep efficiency 60% to 70%. Some improvement was defined as sleep efficiency 50% to 60%. No improvement was defined as sleep efficiency below 40%.
Notes Duration of follow‐up: 30 days 
 Dropouts: none
Comparability of groups at baseline: no significant differences between the groups in gender distribution or duration of insomnia at baseline
Risk of bias: high
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Sequence generation was not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment was not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Blinding was not described. Since the intervention involves acupuncture, it is highly likely that the treating physicians and patients were not blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk There were no dropouts
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Trial protocol was not available to judge whether there was selective reporting
Other bias High risk No placebo or sham control was used and hence there might be a placebo effect