Lu 1998.
Methods | Design: parallel‐group
Randomisation method: information not available Method of allocation concealment: information not available Blinding: information not available Stratification: not used |
|
Participants | Inclusion: insomnia characterised by difficulty initiating sleep, shallow sleep, lots of dreams, early awakening, difficulty reinitiating sleep after awakening, sleep efficiency below 40%, tired and sleepy at daytime with anxiety, impaired memory or attention affecting work efficiency, duration of insomnia more than 3 months
Exclusion: nil Number of participants: intervention: 35; control: 23 Number of males: intervention: 14; control: 10 Age (years): overall range 16 to 60 Specific diagnoses/diagnostic subtypes: information not available Associated disease: information not available Duration of disorder: intervention: range 3 months to 5 years; control: range 3 months to 5 years Previous treatments: 80% participants had used hypnotics |
|
Interventions | Intervention group (needle acupuncture + Chinese herb): acupuncture to Neiguan bilaterally. Needles were left in place for 30 minutes. Treatment was applied daily for 30 days. Qi Ye Shen An Pian 100 mg was given 3 times daily for 30 days. Control group (Chinese herb alone): Qi Ye Shen An Pian as in intervention group | |
Outcomes | Frequency of improvement in sleep quality: Cure was defined as sleep efficiency more than 70%. Moderate improvement was defined as sleep efficiency 60% to 70%. Some improvement was defined as sleep efficiency 50% to 60%. No improvement was defined as sleep efficiency below 40%. | |
Notes | Duration of follow‐up: 30 days
Dropouts: none Comparability of groups at baseline: no significant differences between the groups in gender distribution or duration of insomnia at baseline Risk of bias: high |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Sequence generation was not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Allocation concealment was not described |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Blinding was not described. Since the intervention involves acupuncture, it is highly likely that the treating physicians and patients were not blinded. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | There were no dropouts |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Trial protocol was not available to judge whether there was selective reporting |
Other bias | High risk | No placebo or sham control was used and hence there might be a placebo effect |