Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD005472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005472.pub3

Suen 2002.

Methods Design: parallel‐group 
 Randomisation method: information not available
Method of allocation concealment: information not available 
 Blinding: double‐blind (patients and assessors)
Stratification: not used
Participants Inclusion: age >= 60, suffering from sleep disturbances, sleeping poorly on at least 3 nights per week, insomnia lasted for a minimum 6 months, actigraph monitoring of sleep efficiency of < 85% 
 Exclusion: patients with serious physical and psychological illness, such as stroke, mental illness, dementia, major depression and impairment such as being bedridden, sleep apnoea, regular use of a hypnotic medication or other psychotropic medication with an inability or unwillingness to discontinue medication, wearing pacemaker, or implanted electrical device, having a sleep partner, infection or abscess of external ear were excluded
Number of participants: intervention 1 (magnetic acupressure): 68; intervention 2 (acupressure): 36; control (placebo acupressure): 35 
 Number of males: overall 10
Age: overall mean 81.66 (SD 5.8) 
 Specific diagnoses/diagnostic subtypes: "Excess" syndrome and "Deficiency" syndrome based on Traditional Chinese Medicine theory 
 Associated disease: 96% reported having good or acceptable health condition. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension, which were under control by regular treatment, were most commonly reported among the participants 
 Duration of disorder: range 6 months to > 20 years 
 Previous treatments: information not available
Interventions Intervention group 1 (magnetic acupressure): auricular acupressure using magnetic pearl with a magnetic flux densities ranging from 0.01 mT to 2 T were stick to seven sterilised auricular points: Shenmen, heart, kidney, liver, spleen, occiput and subcortex areas. The pearls were applied to the most sensitive area of each selected auricular point. The sensitive point was detected by means of an electrical detector (Potentiometer). The pearls were replaced every 3 days. 
 Intervention group 2 (acupressure): auricular acupressure using Semen vaccariae. The procedure and acupoints used were the same as the intervention group 1. 
 Control (placebo acupressure): placebo acupressure using Junci Medulla (placebo), the procedure and acupoints used were the same as the intervention group 1. Junci Medulla is a soft material that does not induce any pressure on the acupoints. 
 Duration of treatment: 3 weeks
Outcomes 1. Total sleep duration by actigraphy
2. Sleep onset latency by actigraphy
3. Total wake time by actigraphy
4. Wake after sleep onset by actigraphy
5. Number of awakenings by actigraphy
6. Sleep efficiency by actigraphy
Notes Duration of follow‐up: 3 weeks 
 Dropouts: 8 in intervention group 1, 11 in intervention group 2 and control group. Reasons were home leave (n = 8), refusal to wear an actigraph as a monitoring device (n = 3), admission to hospital (n = 2), being treated for influenza (n = 3), unreported reasons (n = 3). Dropouts were replaced.
Comparability of groups at baseline: no significant differences between the groups in exercise level, anxiety level, depression level, or sleep parameters at baseline
Risk of bias: high
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Sequence generation was not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment was not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Both the patients and assessors were blind to treatment allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Distribution of reasons for dropouts among the treatment groups were not clearly described
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Trial protocol was not available to judge whether there was selective reporting
Other bias Low risk No other bias was apparent