Table 2.
Pros and cons of primary angioplasty* compared with thrombolysis
| Advantages |
| • High patency rates (> 90%) with brisk, antegrade flow |
| • Lower mortality |
| • Better residual left ventricular function |
| • More rapid electrocardiographic normalisation |
| • Less recurrent ischaemia (angina, reinfarction, exercise induced ischaemia) |
| • No systemic fibrinolysis, therefore bleeding problems avoided |
| • Improved risk stratification by angiography with identification of patients suitable for coronary artery bypass surgery |
| Disadvantages |
| • Higher procedural cost than streptokinase or alteplase (although long term costs lower) |
| • Can be performed only when cardiac catheterisation facilities and experienced staff available |
| • Recanalisation more rapid than thrombolysis only if 24 hour on-call team available |
| • Risks and complications of cardiac catheterisation and percutaneous intervention |
| • Reperfusion arrhythmias probably more common because of more rapid recanalisation |
With or without stenting