Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 22;14:16787. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67076-9

Table 4.

Correlation coefficient (r) between each composite score (SPA, PRO, and KIN) obtained from the performance in the tablet-based ROCF copy task and study participants’ age as well as paper-and-pencil ROCF copy accuracy, ROCF copy strategy, Beery VMI, and BVSCO-3. Statistically significant p values are reported with an asterisk: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. A correlation coefficient of 0.10 represented a weak or small association62; a correlation coefficient of 0.30 was considered a moderate correlation62; and a correlation coefficient of 0.50 or larger represented a strong or large correlation62 (bold r values).

SPA AGE
(N = 94)
ROCF copy accuracy (N = 94) ROCF copy strategy (N = 94) Beery VMI
(N = 921)
BVSCO-31
(N = 922)
r = 0.29** r = 0.77*** r = 0.04 r = 0.33** r = 0.04 r = − 0.07 r = 0.08
PRO r = 0.16 r = 0.25* r = 0.64*** r = 0.18 r = − 0.09 r = − 0.14 r = − 0.15
KIN r = 0.19 r = − 0.17 r = 0.10 r = − 0.23* r = 0.12 r = 0.00 r = 0.17

1Scores obtained from participants’ performance in the three paper-and-pencil tests that are part of the BVSCO-3 battery are reported.

2For 92/94 study participants, performance in the conventional paper-and-pencil Beery VMI and BVSCO-3 tests was compared with each composite score (SPA, PRO, and KIN).