Table 1.
Elements of implementation fidelity for FCM administration adapted from Carroll et al. elements and modified by Hasson Henna
| Elements and sub-elements of implementation fidelity | Definition | Method/measurement for Implementation fidelity |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Adherence | The degree to which FCM is delivered as intended | Quantitative |
| Content | The necessary steps (active ingredients) in administering FCM | Number of FCM administration with complete adherence to the active ingredient of FCM administration (the essential (n = 10) components) / total number of FCM administration observed (n = 254) |
| Coverage | The proportion of eligible participants who actually received FCM administration | Total number of FCM administration observed/ Number of participants eligible for FCM administration |
| Dose | Amount of FCM administered as intended | Number of FCM administrations that adhered to the right amount (20 mg/kg) / total number of FCM observed |
| Duration | Regularity of the time to monitor for adverse events post-FCM administration | Number of FCM administered that adhered to the right duration of time (30 min) for monitoring post-administration / total number of FCM observed |
| 2. Influencers of fidelity | Factors that influence the degree of implementation fidelity | Qualitative |
| Intervention complexities | The comprehensiveness of FCM description and the complexity associated with its administration | In-depth interviews (IDI) |
| Facilitation strategies | Strategies provided to optimise and standardise implementation fidelity, | |
| Quality of delivery | The degree to which FCM is delivered in a way appropriate to achieving its desired outcome | |
| Participant’s responsiveness | The acceptance and engagement of the SHP to FCM administration | |
| Context | Structural, cultural, organisational / group factors that influence FCM administration |
SHP Skilled health personnel, FCM ferric carboxymaltose