Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 19;19:460. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02897-3

Table 2.

Comparison of lymph node metastasis rate, metastasis degree in each group

Lymph node groups Number of positive cases (cases) Number of cleaning cases (cases) Lymph node metastasis rate (%) Number of positive lymph nodes(pcs) Number of lymph nodes cleared(pcs) Lymph node metastasis degree(%)
Upper middle mediastinum 0 33 0.0 0 141 0.0
inferior mediastinum 5 93 5.4 10 207 4.8
Perigastric + Suprapancreatic 69 112 61.6 401 1485 27.0
Perigastric + hepatoduodenal 13 76 17.1 32 457 7.0
P-value - - < 0.001 - - < 0.001

Lymph node metastasis rate: mid-upper mediastinal cluster vs. lower mediastinal cluster, P = 0.325; mid-upper mediastinal cluster vs. perigastric + supra pancreatic cluster, P < 0.001; mid-upper mediastinal cluster vs. lower perigastric + hepatoduodenal cluster, P = 0.009; lower mediastinal cluster vs. perigastric + supra pancreatic cluster, P < 0.001; lower mediastinal cluster vs. lower perigastric + hepatoduodenal cluster, P = 0.014; upper perigastric + supra pancreatic cluster vs. inferior perigastric + hepatoduodenal cluster, P < 0.001

Degree of lymph node metastasis: mid-upper mediastinal cluster vs. lower mediastinal cluster, P = 0.007; mid-upper mediastinal cluster vs. upper perigastric + supra pancreatic cluster, P < 0.001; mid-upper mediastinal cluster vs. lower perigastric + hepatoduodenal cluster, P = 0.001; lower mediastinal cluster vs. upper perigastric + supra pancreatic cluster, P < 0.001; lower mediastinal cluster vs. lower perigastric + hepatoduodenal cluster P = 0.287; upper perigastric + supra pancreatic cluster vs. inferior perigastric + hepatoduodenal cluster, P < 0.001