Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 10;15:1408700. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1408700

Table 3.

The HR for OS and PFS of NLR was pooled in subgroup analyses.

Subgroup PFS OS
Study HR [95%CI] P value I2 Study HR [95%CI] P value I2
Country
China 8 1.75 (1.46,2.11) P<0.001 7.2 9 2.08 (1.71,2.55) P<0.001 7.8
Japan 4 1.28 (1.00,1.65) 0.049 0 4 1.90 (1.41,2.54) P<0.001 0
South Korea 1 2.17 (1.04,4.51) 0.038 NA 2 1.84 (1.16,2.93) 0.009 0
Sample size
<100 10 1.53 (1.30,1.79) P<0.001 17.2 10 2.04 (1.69,2.47) P<0.001 0
≥100 3 1.96 (1.37,2.8) P<0.001 0 5 1.91 (1.45,2.52) P<0.001 0
cut-off
≥3 6 1.66 (1.33,2.07) P<0.001 0 6 2.06 (1.65,2.57) P<0.001 0
<3 6 1.69 (1.37,2.10) P<0.001 17 6 2.22 (1.69,2.92) P<0.001 29.5
Study design
Retrospective 11 1.51 (1.29,1.77) P<0.001 2.9 11 1.90 (1.61,2.25) P<0.001 0
Prospective 2 2.16 (1.46,3.17) P<0.001 0 2 2.82 (1.84,4.32) P<0.001 56.4
Follow-up
≤15 6 1.62 (1.33,197) P<0.001 33.1 5 2.25 (1.77,2.85) P<0.001 19.7
>15 7 1.55 (1.25,1.93) P<0.001 0 10 1.83 (1.49,2.25) P<0.001 0
Combined medication
Monotherapy 8 1.52 (1.28,1.81) P<0.001 21.1 9 1.95 (1.59,2.39) P<0.001 19.7
Combined therapy 5 1.76 (1.35,2.31) P<0.001 0 6 2.08 (1.63,2.65) P<0.001 0

NA, Not Applicable.