Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 10;15:1408700. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1408700

Table 4.

The HR for OS and PFS of LMR was pooled in subgroup analyses.

Subgroup PFS OS
Study HR [95%CI] P value I2 Study HR [95%CI] P value I2
Country
China 3 0.58 (0.42,0.80) P<0.001 0 3 0.61 (0.44,0.84) 0.003 0
Japan 1 0.96 (0.63,1.44) 0.845 NA 2 0.62 (0.38,1.02) 0.06 2.3
Sample size
<100 3 0.80 (0.60,1.07) 0.137 0 4 0.65 (0.47,0.90) 0.009 0
≥100 1 0.48 (0.29,0.78) 0.004 NA 1 0.52 (0.30,0.87) 0.014 NA
cut-off
≥3 2 0.49 (0.31,0.77) 0.002 0 3 0.50 (0.34,0.73) P<0.001 0
<3 1 0.96 (0.63,1.44) 0.845 NA 1 0.77 (0.41,1.45) 0.42 NA
Follow-up
≤15 1 0.96 (0.63,1.44) P<0.001 NA 2 0.62 (0.38,1.02) 0.06 2.3
>15 3 0.58 (0.42,0.80) 0.01 0 3 0.61(0.44,0.84) 0.003 0
Combined medication
Monotherapy 1 0.69 (0.44,1.08) 0.105 NA 2 0.64(0.43,0.97) 0.036 5.7
Combined therapy 3 0.71 (0.52,0.96) 0.126 57.1 3 0.59(0.41,0.85) 0.005 0

NA, Not Applicable.