Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 23;14:16942. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67897-8

Table 1.

Comparison of the energy barrier ΔG and Gibbs free energy change ΔG, measured in kcal/mol, for the C–C bond cleavage reaction using classical and quantum computational methods.

HF CASCI VQE DFT
ΔG with solvent 13.1 11.8 7±5 8.3
ΔG with solvent -41.1 -49.5 -51±11 -10.8
ΔG w/o solvent 2.6 1.4 -4±7
ΔG w/o solvent -59.3 -68.0 -65±9

HF and CASCI are calculated on classical computers, while VQE energies are obtained on a superconducting quantum computer. Both CASCI and VQE calculations are based on a (2e, 2o) active space. For the VQE energy, the mean and standard deviation from 4 independent experiments is reported. The DFT energies are obtained from previous work using M06-2X functional.