Skip to main content
MedComm logoLink to MedComm
. 2024 Jul 24;5(8):e657. doi: 10.1002/mco2.657

Regulation of bone homeostasis: signaling pathways and therapeutic targets

Zebin Wu 1,#, Wenming Li 1,#, Kunlong Jiang 1,#, Zhixiang Lin 1, Chen Qian 1, Mingzhou Wu 1, Yu Xia 1, Ning Li 2, Hongtao Zhang 1, Haixiang Xiao 1,3,, Jiaxiang Bai 2,, Dechun Geng 1,
PMCID: PMC11266958  PMID: 39049966

Abstract

As a highly dynamic tissue, bone is continuously rebuilt throughout life. Both bone formation by osteoblasts and bone resorption by osteoclasts constitute bone reconstruction homeostasis. The equilibrium of bone homeostasis is governed by many complicated signaling pathways that weave together to form an intricate network. These pathways coordinate the meticulous processes of bone formation and resorption, ensuring the structural integrity and dynamic vitality of the skeletal system. Dysregulation of the bone homeostatic regulatory signaling network contributes to the development and progression of many skeletal diseases. Significantly, imbalanced bone homeostasis further disrupts the signaling network and triggers a cascade reaction that exacerbates disease progression and engenders a deleterious cycle. Here, we summarize the influence of signaling pathways on bone homeostasis, elucidating the interplay and crosstalk among them. Additionally, we review the mechanisms underpinning bone homeostatic imbalances across diverse disease landscapes, highlighting current and prospective therapeutic targets and clinical drugs. We hope that this review will contribute to a holistic understanding of the signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms sustaining bone homeostasis, which are promising to contribute to further research on bone homeostasis and shed light on the development of targeted drugs.

Keywords: bone cells, bone homeostasis, signal crosstalk, signaling pathway, skeletal disease, therapeutic targets


Bone homeostasis is regulated by complex signaling pathways involving osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes, which coordinate bone formation and resorption. Disruption of this signaling network can lead to bone diseases. Additionally, the disease‐specific microenvironments in various bone conditions can further disrupt the signaling network and exacerbate disease progression. Consequently, targeting key molecules in these pathways offers promising therapeutic strategies for the treatment of skeletal diseases.

graphic file with name MCO2-5-e657-g002.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Bone is a highly dynamic and homeostatic tissue that supports body's weight, effectively maintaining sports functions and shielding our soft internal organs, safeguarding them from external forces. 1 To maintain skeletal health, the process of bone remodeling occurs continuously throughout an individual's lifespan. Bone remodeling is a process that involves the resorption of worn or degraded bone by osteoclasts and the replacement of new bone formed by osteoblasts. 2 The coordinated action of bone resorption and bone formation forms the basis of bone homeostasis, which contributes to healthy bone in the adult population.

However, an imbalance between bone formation and bone resorption will disturb bone homeostasis, resulting in various diseases. For example, an overabundance of bone resorption facilitated by mature osteoclasts can result in osteoporosis, which in turn lead to fragility fractures. 3 Collagen type I Alpha 1/Alpha 2 (COL1A1/COL1A2) mutations in osteoblasts are responsible for osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). 4 In addition, many inflammatory conditions, such as periprosthetic osteolysis (PPO), osteoarthritis (OA),  rheumatic arthritis(RA), osteonecrosis of the femoral head(ONFH), Paget's disease of bone (PDB) and bone tumors, lead to excessive bone resorption as well as impaired bone formation. 5 It has been approximated that more than 200 million people are impacted by osteoporosis globally, 6 and bone loss‐related diseases have become a global burden on our aging society. 7 Thus, maintaining homeostatic balance and ensuring the health of bone tissue are of paramount importance.

In recent decades, both fundamental and clinical studies have revealed that many signaling pathways are pivotal contributors to maintaining bone homeostasis. The maintenance of bone homeostasis is intricately governed by various signaling pathways, such as the receptor activator of nuclear factor‐kappa B (NF‐κB) ligand (RANKL)/receptor activator ofNF‐κB (RANK)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) (RANKL/RANK/OPG) signaling system, growth factor, parathyroid hormone (PTH), NF‐κB, phosphoinositide 3‐kinase AKT (PI3K/AKT), Janus kinase/signal transduction and transcription activation (JAK/STAT), mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK), adenosine 5′‐monophosphate‐activated protein kinase (AMPK), Hedgehog (Hh), and Notch signaling pathways. For example, activation of the Hh signaling pathway increases the expression of RUNX Family Transcription Factor 2 (RUNX2) in osteoblastic cells. 8 Conversely, Notch signaling serves as a suppressor of osteoblast differentiation. 9 Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling regulates preosteoblast proliferation, osteoblast fate, and the function of mature osteoblasts. 10 Furthermore, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and canonical Wnt signaling induces osteoblast differentiation. 11 Additionally, the RANKL/RANK/OPG signaling system and NF‐κB pathways, which are traditionally associated with osteoclasts, have been shown to also regulate osteoblast differentiation and function. 12

These pathways interconnect, forming a vast and intricate network that collaborates to maintain bone homeostasis. Consequently, inhibiting only one signaling pathway might not guarantee lasting remission across all patients with bone homeostasis disorders. Several researchers are pioneering approaches for combination therapy, employing two or more agents, and are achieving promising results. 13 Moreover, the focus on modulating intracellular pathways that target multiple shared signals has been emphasized. 14 Therefore, it is crucial to comprehensively investigate the interrelationships between these signaling pathways and bone homeostasis. Additionally, although there are similarities in bone homeostatic imbalances in some diseases, the bone microenvironment varies in different bone disease conditions. 15 Hence, delineating imbalances in bone homeostasis within particular microenvironmental contexts is pivotal for deciphering disease origins and advancing drug treatment. This enhanced understanding of signaling pathways across different bone homeostasis conditions has paved the way for the application of drugs from other disciplines for bone disease management, thereby broadening the spectrum of therapeutic possibilities for individuals suffering from bone loss.

This review summarizes recent advances in understanding the signaling pathways involved in bone homeostasis, including the development, differentiation, and physiological functions of osteoclasts and osteoblasts. It then concentrates on key signaling pathways that regulate bone homeostasis and highlights the pathophysiology of bone homeostasis disorders in various diseases. Based on this, we review the present therapeutic approaches in clinical use or in clinical trials that target key molecules of these signaling pathways. Finally, we discuss the remaining challenges and future research perspectives in targeting bone homeostasis. This review seeks to provide a thorough understanding of the underlying mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in bone homeostasis. This novel viewpoint on bone research has the potential to extend the current knowledge of the regulatory mechanisms of bone homeostasis and may facilitate the development of new therapeutic strategies for related disorders.

2. BIOLOGY OF BONE HOMEOSTASIS

The maintenance of bone homeostasis is a complex regulatory mechanism influenced by various factors and the surrounding microenvironment. Ongoing bone tissue remodeling is primarily facilitated by osteoblasts and osteoclasts, 16 with the differentiation and function of these cell types being crucial for the upkeep of the adult skeleton through the synchronization of bone resorption and formation processes. 17

2.1. Osteoblastogenesis

Osteoblasts, which are derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), are responsible for bone formation 18 (Figure 1). The development and differentiation of osteoblasts are regulated by a series of signaling pathways and the activation of transcription factors. 7 Given the multilineage differentiation potential of BMSCs, their initial differentiation step involves committing to a common osteochondroprogenitor cell, triggered by the activation of key osteogenic transcription factors, including drosophila distal‐less 5 (DLX5), Osterix (OSX) and RUNX2. This commitment leads to the formation of an osteoprogenitor cell, which then progresses to a preosteoblast through the expression of initial osteogenic genes, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and COL1A1, and the expression of these genes is maintained throughout the lifespan of mature osteoblasts. Moreover, mature osteoblasts secrete several extracellular proteins essential for bone formation, including COL1, osteocalcin (OCN), bone sialoprotein II (BSP II), and osteopontin (OPN). The extracellular matrix (ECM), which is initially produced as a nonmineralized osteoid, eventually undergoes mineralization through the accumulation of calcium phosphate to form hydroxyapatite. After osteoblasts deposit bone where necessary, they can end up in one of three states: 60–80% of osteoblasts undergo apoptosis; transform into bone lining cells; or become osteocytes. 19

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Biology of osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. Osteoblasts originate from BMSCs, maturing through transcription factors like RUNX2 and Osterix. Osteoclasts originate from hematopoietic progenitors that give rise to monocytes and macrophages, which eventually fuse to form the multinucleated cells that resorb bone. The balanced action of these two cell types is vital for skeletal health and ensuring the continuous renewal and repair of bone tissue (created with BioRender.com).

2.2. Osteoclastogenesis

Osteoclasts, which originate from hematopoietic progenitors within the monocyte lineage, exhibit a distinctive capacity for bone resorption, rendering them essential for the maintenance of bone homeostasis 20 (Figure 1). Osteoclast precursors (pOCs) are guided to the bone resorption surface from the bone marrow and circulation through sphingosine 1‐phosphate signaling. Subsequently, pOCs fuse into multinucleated osteoclasts (mOCs), which are associated with the availability of RANKL and macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF). 21 Upon these stimuli, a wide array of signaling cascades, including both canonical and noncanonical NF‐κB pathways, MAPK pathways, calcium signaling pathways, and PI3K/AKT pathways, are activated. 22 These signaling cascades mobilize a complex transcriptional network that upregulates osteoclast‐promoting factors such as NF‐κB, activator protein 1 (AP‐1), cAMP‐response element binding protein (CREB), and B‐lymphocyte‐induced maturation protein 1, and downregulating osteoclast differentiation suppressors such as interferon regulatory factor 8, MAF BZIP transcription factor B, and B‐cell lymphoma 6 (BCL‐6), which coordinately induces the expression of nuclear factors that are the “master regulators” of activated T‐cell c1 (NFATc1). As a crucial transcription factor, NFATc1 enhances osteoclast formation by increasing the transcription of genes associated with bone resorption, including matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), cathepsin K (CTSK), acid phosphatase 5, and tartrate‐resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP). 21 In addition, mOCs are specialized cells that exhibit polarity and adhere to the bone surface, creating resorption lacuna by secreting lysosomal proteases, including MMPs, CTSK, and TRAP, in which hydrochloric acid is actively secreted, leading to the dissolution of bone mineral hydroxyapatite. 23 In addition to RANK/RANKL and M‐CSF, other factors, such as the Wnt pathway, FGF signaling pathway, and transforming growth factor beta (TGF‐β) pathway, have been shown to participate in osteoclastogenesis. 24

2.3. Osteocytes

Osteocytes, matured from OBs, are the main component of the skeleton that maintains the bone tissue environment and contributes to the osteoblasts and osteoclasts regulation during bone remodeling. 25 Osteocytes release RANKL to induce osteoclast differentiation and OPG to inhibit osteoclast formation. 26 In addition, osteocytes also release FGF‐23, BMP, and sclerostin (SOST) to regulate osteoblast activity. These functions largely depend on endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine mechanisms to regulate bone homeostasis. 27 In addition, as mechanosensors of bone, osteocytes sense mechanical signals and transduce them into specific ion channel signaling. 28 Osteocytes embed in bone tissues, forming a complex network within the bone structure and maintaining close communication with the bloodstream and other bone cells. The recently identified signaling pathway of osteocytes presents numerous possibilities for treating different bone disorders.

2.4. Equilibrium and communication of bone homeostasis

The equilibrium between bone anabolism and catabolism is crucial to the maintenance of bone homeostasis. 29 Bone resorption and formation normally follow each other rather than mutually independent processes. The switch between the osteoblastic and osteoclastic phases is regulated by direct cell‐to‐cell contact. 30 EphrinB2–EphB4 signaling involves communication between osteoblasts and osteoclasts. 31 EphrinB2, a transmembrane protein on osteoclasts, which can bind with the receptor EphB4 on osteoblast membranes, activating signaling pathways in both osteoblasts and osteoclasts. 21 In osteoblasts, EphB4 promotes osteogenic differentiation and suppresses osteoblast apoptosis. In osteoclasts, reversing EphrinB2 signaling can inhibit osteoclastogenesis by downregulating AP‐1 and NFATc1 expression. 32

Furthermore, FAS (CD95) and FAS ligand (FAS–FASL) signaling has recently been shown to be involved in postmenopausal osteoporosis. 33 FAS is a death domain‐containing member of the TNFR superfamily, and FASL mediate apoptosis upon binding to FAS. Estrogen deficiency decreases FASL expression in osteoblasts, leading to decreased osteoclast apoptosis and increased bone resorption. Estrogen deficiency decreases FASL expression in osteoblasts, resulting in reduced osteoclast apoptosis and increased bone resorption. In addition, cell vesicle communication has been shown to contribute to this transition. 2

In addition, extracellular vesicles (EVs) are also involved in communication between osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Small osteoclast vesicles are osteoblast‐derived EVs that inhibit osteoblast differentiation by inhibiting RUNX2 and enhancing RANKL expression, which induces osteoclast differentiation. 34 Although direct modes of conversation, such as cell‐to‐cell direct contact or cell vesicle communication between osteoblasts and osteoclasts, already exist locally to regulate bone homeostatic balance, several signaling pathways are involved in more complex bone homeostatic homeostasis, as we will discuss in the next section.

3. SIGNALING PATHWAYS AND MOLECULES IN BONE HOMEOSTASIS

Bone remodeling is regulated by a complex signaling pathway network. The functions of osteoblasts and osteoclasts depend on several distinct but interactive genetic programs, among which the RANKL/RANK/OPG signaling system, TGF‐β, BMP, Notch, and Wnt are associated with genetic bone diseases. 35 Multiple signaling pathways are involved in the disease progression of bone homeostasis‐related diseases. Moreover, abnormal signals are often targets for drug discovery.

3.1. RANKL/RANK/OPG signaling system

The RANKL/RANK/OPG signaling system function as pivotal molecules in bone homeostasis. 21 Produced by osteocytes, osteoblasts, and BMSCs, RANKL is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family and is characterized as a trimeric transmembrane protein. 36 RANK, a type I transmembrane protein, is found on osteoclast progenitors, mature osteoclasts, and some immune cells. The interaction between RANKL in osteoblasts and RANK on osteoclast progenitors triggers a series of intracellular signals via TNF receptor associated factor 6 (TRAF6), which engages pathways such as the MAPK, NF‐κB, and PI3K pathways. This cascade amplifies NFATc1 expression, fostering osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. Interestingly, while RANK was traditionally viewed as the exclusive receptor for RANKL, research by Luo et al. 37 revealed that leucine‐rich repeat‐containing G‐protein‐coupled receptor 4 (LGR4) is another receptor for RANKL. This receptor competes with RANK for RANKL, hindering the typical RANK signaling pathway involved in osteoclast differentiation. The interaction of RANKL with LGR4 stimulates the G protein subunit alpha Q (Gαq) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK‐3β) pathways, consequently diminishing NFATc1 expression and function in osteoclastogenesis. 37

Furthermore, RANKL is also a receptor in osteoblasts and activates an intracellular “reverse” signaling pathway upon binding with RANK‐RANKL, which further promotes osteoblast differentiation and mineralization. It was suggested that the activation of the PI3K/AKT/mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (mTOR) pathway through the interplay between RANKL and Src family kinases leads to the entry of RUNX2 into the nucleus and increases the expression of markers of early differentiation. By acting as a decoy receptor for RANKL, OPG is produced by osteoblasts and blocks the interaction between RANKL and RANK, thus preventing the formation of osteoclasts and the subsequent breakdown of bone. OPG is regulated by many factors. For example, in vitro studies have demonstrated that estrogen increases OPG production by osteoblasts, 38 suggesting a link between estrogen withdrawal postmenopause and the development of osteoporosis due to increased OPG levels. In addition to estrogen, several signaling pathways and molecules, including cytokines such as IL‐1β, IL‐11, TNF‐α, 1α,25‐dihydroxyvitamin D3, PTH, and prostaglandin (PG), play indirect roles in bone metabolism by influencing the RANK/RANKL/OPG signaling cascade, primarily by promoting the expression of RANKL on the cell membrane, which in turn stimulates bone resorption 39 (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

RANKL/RANK/OPG signaling system in bone homeostasis. (1) RANKL, produced by osteoblasts, binds to its receptor RANK on osteoclast progenitors, initiating intracellular signaling cascades such as MAPK, NF‐κB, and PI3K/AKT signaling pathway via TRAF6, culminating in the enhancement of NFATc1 expression. (2) RANKL binding with LGR4 suppress NFATc1 by GSK‐3β pathways. (3) Upon binding RANK, RANKL activates the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and promotes nuclear translocation of RUNX2 in osteoblast. (4) OPG is a decoy receptor for RANKL and blocks RANK–RANKL binding (created with BioRender.com).

In addition, osteocytes, the major source of RANKL, produce RANKL in a membrane‐bound and possibly soluble form and transmit RANKL signals in the bone matrix through their dendritic projections, 40 thereby communicating with pOCs in the bone marrow and periosteal regions to further promote osteoclast differentiation and activity. Mechanical stress enhances RANKL expression in osteoblasts through the NF‐κB pathway. 41 PTH also upregulates RANKL expression in osteoblasts. In addition, osteocytes secrete OPG, which inhibits osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. Thus, osteocytes regulate osteoclast activity and bone resorption directly through RANKL and indirectly through OPG. 42 In addition, osteocytes detect microdamage in bone and initiate bone remodeling through signaling. Apoptotic osteocytes in the damaged area release ATP signals that activate the release of RANKL from nearby healthy osteocytes, a process that involves the activation of pannexin‐1 (Panx1) and P2X7 receptors, which transmit signals to attract remodeling units. 43

3.2. Hormone and growth factor signaling pathways

3.2.1. PTH signaling pathway

PTH, the main secretory hormone, regulating calcium and phosphorus metabolism, and it is crucial for regulating bone homeostasis by influencing the activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. 44 Binding of PTH to PTH‐receptor 1 (PTH1R) activates the G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathway, which promotes the production of cAMP, which acts as a second messenger and activates protein kinase A (PKA) in osteoblast lineage cells. The cAMP/PKA signaling pathway increases RUNX2 and OSX activity and expression, thereby promoting the differentiation and maturation of osteoblasts. In addition, it coordinates the activity of BMP, thereby promoting bone formation. 45 Specifically, the interaction between PTH and its receptor PTH1R triggers endocytosis of the PTH1R‐low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein 6 (LRP6) complex, resulting in enhanced downstream BMP/SMAD family member 1 (SMAD1) signaling. This cascade ultimately promotes the differentiation of BMSCs into osteoblasts. 46

PTH also indirectly activates the Wnt signaling pathway, increasing β‐catenin stability and intranuclear aggregation and promoting osteoblast differentiation. This is achieved by inhibiting the SOST, a protein that inhibits Wnt signaling, expression. Furthermore, PTH increases RANKL expression in osteoblasts and BMSCs and decreases the expression of OPG, which promotes osteoclasts survival and differentiation, enhances osteoclast activity, and indirectly results in bone resorption. 47 Furthermore, PTH has also been shown to be associated with insulin‐like growth factor 1 (IGF‐1), 48 which is induced by PTH in mature osteoblasts and enables PTH to induce RANKL and M‐CSF, promoting osteoclastogenesis. In addition, it has been shown that PTH exerts dual effects on bone formation and bone resorption, which depend on its mode of action. 49 Under sustained high doses of PTH, osteoclast activity exceeds that of osteoblasts, ultimately leading to greater bone loss than bone formation. 50

In addition to osteoblasts and osteoclasts, PTH significantly influences osteocytes. PTH targets osteocytes to regulate the expression of key genes such as SOST and RANKL. The expression of SOST, which encodes SOST, an inhibitor of bone formation, is downregulated by PTH, leading to increased bone formation. Moreover, PTH upregulates RANKL expression in osteocytes, which is essential for bone resorption by promoting osteoclast activity. 51 Additionally, PTH affects osteocyte morphology and function, including perilacunar remodeling, which helps mobilize calcium from the bone matrix, particularly during physiological states like lactation. Osteocytes also exhibit rapid changes in response to PTH, indicating their role in immediate calcium regulation and bone remodeling dynamics 52 (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

A simplified view of PTH, IGF, and FGF signaling. (1) PTH signaling: PTH activates the PTH1R receptor and then influences intracellular cAMP levels and subsequently engaging PKA and mTOR signaling, with downstream effects on osteoblast activity. (2) IGF‐1 signaling pathway: IGF‐1 signaling can promote the survival and differentiation of osteoblasts through synergistic interactions with PTH or PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. IGF‐2 indirectly increases the activity of BMP‐9 and promotes the nuclear translocation of SMAD1/5/8, thereby promoting the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs. (3) FGF signaling pathway: FGF can cross‐regulate the function of osteoblasts through PLCγ, JAK, PI3K, and RAS and regulate the activity of osteoclasts through MAPK pathway. (4) Indirect effect: PTH, IGF, and FGF also can indirectly regulate gene expression in osteoclast via RANK/RANKL (created with BioRender.com).

3.2.2. FGF signaling pathways

The FGF signaling pathway is composed of FGFs, FGF receptors (FGFRs) and downstream signaling molecules, and FGF signaling is essential for bone homeostasis by influencing the activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. 53 The binding of ligands to FGFR triggers FGFR autophosphorylation, leading to the activation of docking proteins such as FGFR substrate 2 and phospholipase C‐γ (PLCγ), which in turn activate downstream pathways such as the MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways to regulate transcription factors. 54

Notably, the effects of FGF/FGFR signaling on osteoblastogenesis are complex because they are dependent on the type of FGF and the FGFR expressed and the stage of cell differentiation. 55 In mesenchymal progenitor cells, FGFR1/2 are important for maintaining BMSCs by inhibiting cellular senescence. 56 During osteogenic differentiation, FGF‐2 predominantly stimulated the ERK signaling pathway in cells resembling osteoblasts. In more mature osteoblasts, increased FGFR2, FGFR3, and FGFR4 expression and decreased FGFR1 expression correlate with an inability to maintain FGF2 responses. 57 FGF‐2 signaling engages the inositol polyphosphate cascade, which involves inositol hexakisphosphate kinase, a regulator of RUNX2 and osteoblast gene expression. 58 Moreover, E11/podoplanin is important in the early stages of osteoblast‐to‐osteocyte transformation, and FGF‐2 enhances the expression of E11 or promotes the acquisition of an osteocyte phenotype. 59 Furthermore, other FGFs, including 8, 9, 18, and 23, are mainly associated with osteoblast differentiation and bone regeneration. 60 FGF‐8 stimulates osteoblast proliferation via a MAPK‐independent pathway. 61 FGF‐9 expressed in the periosteum and surrounding tissues also interacts with FGFR1 and FGFR2. FGF‐18 stimulates the PI3K/ERK pathway and BMP‐2/SMAD pathway by blocking noggin, a BMP‐2 antagonist that is essential for bone formation. 62 , 63 FGF‐23 indirectly regulates OPN secretion by reducing ALP transcription and phosphate generation in osteoblasts, functioning through FGFR3 without Klotho. 64 Similarly, FGFR1 signaling is required for osteocyte survival. Mice lacking FGFR1 in osteoblasts exhibit heightened β‐cyclin signaling and elevated trabecular bone density, resulting from enhanced bone formation and reduced bone resorption. FGFR1 suppresses β‐catenin expression and diminishes the activity of Wnt/β‐catenin. 65 , 66 In summary, these pathways activated by the FGF/FGFR signaling pathway control osteoblast formation and osteocyte survival.

Different FGFs/FGFRs also have different effects on osteoclasts. FGF‐2 directly targets osteoclasts through FGFRs such as FGFR1 and FGFR3 to promote bone resorption. 67 FGF‐2 can activate autophosphorylation of FGFR1 and subsequent phosphorylation of the p42/p44 to activate the MAPK pathway. 68 Additionally, CREB phosphorylation is activated by FGF‐2, enhancing the association of p‐CREB with the promoter region of the RANKL gene. 69 In addition, FGFR3 also participates in the regulatory role of FGF‐2 in bone resorption, boosting osteoclast adherence and elevating osteoclastic enzyme levels related to resorption. 70 FGF‐6 prompts pOC fusion into larger cells by activating MAPK signaling pathways induced by RANKL. 71 FGF‐18 can also indirectly induce osteoclast formation by stimulating the expression of RANKL and osteoblast cyclooxygenase‐2. 72 However, FGF‐8a inhibits osteoclastogenesis via a RANKL/OPG‐independent mechanism. 61

Similarly, FGFs play a significant role in osteocyte function and morphology. 73 FGF‐7 enhances the expression of connexin 43 (Cx43) in osteocytes, which is crucial for gap junction formation, thus facilitating cell‐to‐cell communication. This regulation is mediated through the β‐catenin signaling pathway, where FGF‐7 induces the accumulation and nuclear translocation of beta‐catenin, promoting the formation and elongation of osteocyte cell processes. 74 These changes help osteocytes maintain their interconnected network, which is crucial for sensing mechanical and hormonal signals and regulating bone remodeling​. (Figure 3)

3.2.3. IGF signaling pathways

IGF, which is genetically structured with high homology to insulinogen, regulates a variety of biological activities. 75 The IGF signaling pathway is composed of two ligands (IGF‐1 and IGF‐2), two corresponding receptors (IGFR1 and IGFR2), and six IGF‐binding proteins (IGFBP‐1 to 6) with high affinity for IGF. 76 Among them, IGF‐1 is the primary ligand and binds to IGFR1 with 20‐fold greater affinity than does IGF‐2, which hardly binds to IGFR2. 77 IGFR1, a receptor possessing tyrosine kinase activity, exhibits a significant degree of similarity to the insulin receptor, 78 whereas IGFR2 is a single‐channel transmembrane receptor without kinase activity. 79 In addition, IGFBP is an endocrine regulator of IGF activity. 80 The IGF system is present in many human tissues, and it promotes cell proliferation and differentiation through paracrine, endocrine, and autocrine mechanisms. 81 When IGF‐1 binds to IGFR1, it initiates downstream signal transduction pathways, including the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways, to induce IGF‐1‐mediated functions. 77

IGF‐1 signaling plays a crucial role in the proper development and functioning of osteoblasts by promoting the viability, growth, specialization, and ECM synthesis of cultured osteoblast cells. 82 IGF‐1 can stimulate the osteogenic differentiation of osteoblast precursors through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. 83 IGF‐1 can induces osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs and maintains bone microarchitecture and bone quality by activates mTOR. 84 In addition, IGF‐1 signaling directly enhances osteoblast differentiation and indirectly enhances osteoblast differentiation through the stabilizing effect of IGF‐1 on β‐catenin. 85 Furthermore, IGF‐1 interacts with PTH, inducing the activation of downstream signaling molecules, thereby promoting osteoblast differentiation and maturation. 46 PTH stimulates osteoblast formation by activating the adenylyl cyclase/cAMP/PKA signaling pathway. 86 IGF‐1 promotes osteoclast differentiation and maturation mainly by stimulating the expression of RANKL and M‐CSF in osteoblasts. 87 , 88 , 89 IGF‐2 increases the activity of BMP‐9 and facilitates the nuclear translocation of SMAD1/5/8 via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, which enhances the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs. 90 Moreover, reprogramming from glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) in chondrocytes is critical for long bone growth. IGF‐2 maintains the balance between glycolysis and OxPhos during chondrocyte maturation. This careful regulation precisely controls maturation from proliferation to hypertrophy during endochondral ossification. 7

In conclusion, IGF‐1 is mostly derived from osteocytes and acts as an important mediator of bone mechanosensitivity, influencing the osteogenic response to mechanical loading. IGF‐1 expression in osteocytes is upregulated in response to mechanical strain, facilitates communication with other osteocytes, promotes bone formation and inhibits bone resorption. 91 In addition, osteocyte‐derived IGF‐1 is essential for developmental bone growth and contributes to the regulation of bone turnover in response to mechanical stimuli and calcium stress. 92 (Figure 3)

3.2.4. BMP signaling pathways

BMP, a member of the TGF‐β superfamily, plays a crucial role in the control of bone formation, embryonic development and various other physiological processes. 93 It has been identified that over 20 BMP family members exist in humans, and they have diverse functions in regulating cellular processes. BMP signaling can be categorized simply into SMAD‐dependent and SMAD‐independent pathways. 94 BMPs interact with homomeric type II receptors, which leads to the transphosphorylation of homomeric type I receptors and triggers both SMAD‐dependent and non‐SMAD‐dependent signaling pathways. 95

In SMAD‐dependent signaling, phosphorylated SMAD (SMAD1, 5, or 8) is complexed with SMAD4 and cotransported into the nucleus to regulate the expression of osteogenic genes such as RUNX2, DLX5, myocyte enhancer factor 2c, old astrocyte specifically induced substance, KLF transcription factor 4, osteomodulin (OMD), and OSX in osteoblasts. 96 In addition, studies have demonstrated that RUNX2 and OMD are influenced not only by the BMP signaling pathway, which is a downstream target of BMP but also regulate the expression of BMPs reversely. RUNX2 regulates the BMP4 pathway by inhibiting the transcription of chordin like 1, an antagonist of BMPs. 97 OMD can promote BMP/SMAD signal transduction through binding to BMP‐2 and its membrane receptors. Thus, RUNX2 and OMD create a positive feedback loop in the BMP/SMAD signaling pathway. 98 In the non‐SMAD‐dependent pathway, activated TGFβ‐activated kinase 1 (TAK1) recruits TAK1‐binding protein 1 to trigger the MKK–ERK1/2 or MKK–p38 MAPK signaling cascade. This cascade results in the phosphorylation of the transcription factors RUNX2, DLX5, and OSX, enhancing their transcriptional activity. 99

Among the 14 types of BMPs, BMP‐2, BMP‐4, BMP‐5, BMP‐6, and BMP‐7 demonstrate significant osteogenic properties. Conversely, BMP‐3, which is primarily produced by osteoblasts and osteocytes, is a “noncanonical” BMP variant that triggers SMAD2/3 activation to counteract the osteogenic effects associated with other BMPs. 100 BMP also promotes the osteogenic program by affecting the Wnt signaling pathway. BMP‐2 induces an increase in the LDL receptor‐related protein 5 (LRP5) level and suppresses the expression of beta‐transducin repeat containing e3 ubiquitin protein ligase that facilitates the degradation of β‐catenin. This process leads to the stabilization of β‐catenin and activation of the canonical Wnt pathway, ultimately facilitating osteogenic differentiation. 101 Moreover, the SMAD complex can physically interact with the transcription factor 4 (TCF4)/β‐catenin complex at specific DNA‐binding sites. 102 Deletion of Smad4 leads to the cleavage of β‐catenin and a reduction in the expression of the LRP5. 103 LGR4 is stimulated by BMP2, which is an orphan receptor and regulator of the Wnt pathway. 104 In addition, the BMP inhibitor dorsomorphin hinders osteoclast formation and bone resorption. 105 At the molecular level, BMP signaling facilitates the upregulation or enhancement of osteoblast associate transcription factors. BMP receptor type II (BMPRII) interacts with RANK and activates both p‐SMAD1/5/8 and NF‐κB signaling. 106 In addition, BMP may be essential for promoting osteoblast‐osteoclast coupling in bone, and BMP can promote osteoclast formation by increasing the RANKL/OPG ratio. 107 In conclusion, BMP signaling can promote osteoclast differentiation through direct and indirect pathways. (Figure 4)

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Overview of Wnt, BMP, and TGF‐β signaling pathways. (1) In the active Wnt signaling pathway, Wnt ligands bind to FZD and LRP5/6 receptors, leading to GSK‐3β degradation. β‐catenin enters the nucleus to drive gene transcription and can indirectly regulate the RANKL/RANK and BMP signaling pathways. In the inhibited Wnt signaling pathway, β‐catenin is degraded by protein complexes, resulting in ubiquitin‐mediated proteolysis and no gene transcription. (2) BMP interacts with type II receptors, leading to phosphorylation and activation of R‐SMADs (SMAD1, 5, 8), which then complex with SMAD4 and are cotransported into the nucleus to regulate the expression of osteogenic genes such as RUNX2 and DLX5 in osteoblasts. (3) TGF‐β binds to its receptors, leading to the activation of SMAD2/3, which then associates with Smad4. This complex enters the nucleus and affects the expression of genes that regulate osteoclasts and osteoblasts. (4) In the nonclassical pathway, BMP activates TRAF6/TAK1, triggering MAPK pathways and leading to the phosphorylation of transcription factors like RUNX2, promoting bone formation. TGF‐β can also activate downstream factors like MAPK and PI3K, which regulate transcription factors for bone formation and resorption (created with BioRender.com).

3.2.5. TGF‐β signaling pathway

TGF‐β is crucial for bone metabolism by intricately influencing the functions of osteoclasts and osteoblasts, primarily through the activation of SMAD signaling pathways, which in turn regulate critical transcription factors. 108 The TGF‐β superfamily consists of three subfamilies: activin, TGF‐β and BMP. 109 In the classical signaling pathway, TGF‐β‐specific receptor‐regulated SMAD (SMAD2/3) is activated through phosphorylation at the Ser–Ser–X–Ser structural domain and forms a complex with SMAD4. Subsequently, the activated SMAD complex is regulated by the LEM domain nuclear envelope protein and translocates to the nucleus, where it modulates the transcription of specific target genes. 110 , 111

According to previous studies, the TGF‐β signaling pathway is important in bone remodeling in a stage‐dependent manner and through interactions with other pathways. 112 In the early stage of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation, TGF‐β initiates the osteogenic process by promoting the proliferation of osteoprogenitor cells. 113 It does this by activating the SMAD2/3 signaling pathway. Once activated, SMAD2 and SMAD3 translocate to the nucleus, where they influence the transcription of key osteogenic genes. For instance, through SMAD activation, TGF‐β upregulates the RUNX2 expression, which is a master transcription factor critical for osteoblast differentiation. The activated SMAD proteins directly interact with RUNX2, enhancing its transcriptional activity and promoting the expression of genes essential for osteoblast maturation and function. 114 However, at further stages of maturation, it inhibits osteoblast maturation, mineralization, and conversion to osteocytes. 115 In addition, TGF‐β also exerts regulatory effects on osteoblasts through its interaction with other pathways, such as the Hh and Wnt pathways, providing a complex regulatory network for bone formation. For example, the TGF‐β‐induced activation of SMADs can intersect with Wnt signaling, further modulating Runx2 activity and osteoblast differentiation. 116

While TGF‐β directly promotes osteoblast function, it indirectly affects osteoclasts by modulating the expression of RANKL and OPG, key regulators of osteoclast differentiation and activity. This modulation is believed to occur through TGF‐β‐induced changes in osteoblasts and stromal cells that, in turn, alter their expression of RANKL and OPG, thus impacting osteoclasts. 117 However, a continuous increase in TGF‐β downregulated the expression of RANK and weakened the RANK‐RANKL signaling pathway, thereby inhibiting the generation of osteoclasts. 118

In conclusion, TGF‐β orchestrates a sophisticated regulatory network that balances bone formation and resorption, acting through the SMAD signaling pathway to control the activity of key transcription factors such as RUNX2. Ultimately, TGF‐β achieves stage‐specific regulation that promotes the early differentiation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts and limits their late maturation. 119 (Figure 4)

3.3. Wnt signaling pathway

The Wnt signaling pathway is evolutionarily preserved and controls the maintenance of tissue homeostasis. The Wnt signaling pathway can be categorized into two main pathways: the canonical pathway (also termed the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway), which relies on the activity of β‐catenin, and the noncanonical pathway (consisting of the Wnt/PCP pathway and Wnt/Ca2+ pathway), which operates independently of the activity of β‐catenin. 120 In the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway, upon binding of Wnt ligands to frizzled class receptor (FZD) and LRP5/6, the multiprotein complex known as the β‐catenin “destruction complex” is mobilized to the cellular membrane through its interaction with FZD. Consequently, the complex undergoes a loss of function in degrading β‐catenin. Subsequently, β‐catenin is translocated to the nucleus where it facilitates the activation of target genes by engaging with T‐cell factor/lymphoid enhancer‐binding factor (TCF/LEF). 121 The canonical Wnt signaling pathway is crucial for osteoblast differentiation, bone development, bone homeostasis, and bone remodeling in living organisms. 122 When different types of Wnt ligands (such as Wnt‐1, Wnt‐3a, Wnt‐10a, and Wnt‐10b 123 ) interact with receptors on the cell membrane, they initiate downstream gene expression and determine the specificity of the Wnt pathway. 116 Traditionally, Wnt‐10a, Wnt‐10b, Wnt‐1, and Wnt‐6 suppress the differentiation of BMSCs to adipocytes and facilitate the differentiation of BMSCs to osteoblasts through the canonical Wnt pathway. 124 Wnt‐3a, Wnt‐4, and Wnt‐7b activate osteoblast differentiation and mineralization through the Gαq/phospholipase C‐β/protein kinase c delta (Gαq/11/PLCβ/PKCδ) pathway. 7 Wnt‐7a modulates osteoblast proliferation by influencing RUNX2 expression. 125 These Wnt ligands collectively establish a regulatory framework indispensable for the proper formation and functionality of osteoblasts.

According to traditional views, the Wnt signaling pathway also exerts a significant influence on energy metabolism within osteoblasts. Wnt/β‐catenin regulates fatty acid β‐oxidation through the activation of β‐catenin, which is dependent on the activation of mTORC2 and mTORC1. These factors in turn regulate the use of glucose and glutamine, respectively. 126

In addition, extensive evidence supports the interplay between the Wnt signaling pathway and other signaling pathways, such as the BMP, TGF‐β, FGF, Hh, Notch, and PDGF pathways, in regulating the gene network responsible for controlling osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. 116 Activation of the canonical pathway leads to the transcription of BMP‐2. 127 BMP‐2 serves as a significant autocrine and paracrine growth factor, and its TCF/LEF‐responsive component governs signals that initiate specific transcriptional programs necessary for bone formation. This mechanism facilitates the differentiation of mesenchymal precursor cells into mature osteoblasts. 128 Furthermore, stabilized β‐catenin can enhance the activation of BMP‐9‐induced ALP and the expression of OCN and OPN in osteoblasts. 129 Similarly, the noncanonical pathways also play crucial roles in osteocyte migration and osteoblast differentiation. 7 Wnt‐1 accelerates bone fracture healing and enhances bone formation by activating the yes‐associated protein (YAP)/BMP signaling pathway. 130 Wnt5a was shown to promote BMP‐2‐mediated osteoblast differentiation via a SMAD‐independent pathway by activating nonclassical Wnt signaling through ROR2. 131 Furthermore, the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway in osteoblasts and osteocytes indirectly inhibits the differentiation of osteoclasts and the resorption of bone by promoting the secretion of OPG. 132

In osteoclasts, the Wnt pathway has been shown to indirectly influence osteoclast formation by controlling the production of RANKL and OPG under normal physiological conditions. 133 Primarily, the classical pathway plays a pivotal role in osteoclastogenesis via β‐catenin, which has varying impacts at different developmental stages. The activation of β‐catenin in early precursors promotes their proliferation, yet at advanced stages, it impedes osteoclast formation. 134 In contrast to the spatial and temporal regulation of β‐catenin by the nonclassical pathway, the nonclassical pathway has been shown to promote the differentiation of pOCs. 135 It also plays a crucial role in blocking NFATc1 transcription factor activation by RANKL. The administration of Wnt‐3a triggers a rapid increase in cAMP levels, which leads to the phosphorylation and subsequent activation of PKA, culminating in the increased phosphorylation (and thus inactivation) of NFATc1 136 (Figure 4).

3.4. NF‐κB signaling pathway

The NF‐κB family, encompassing transcription factors crucial for skeletal cell differentiation, is pivotal for skeletal health. 137 , 138 The NF‐κB signaling pathway can be categorized as the canonical and noncanonical pathways. In the canonical pathway, upon exposure to RANKL, TNF‐α, IGF signaling, IκB kinase β (IKKβ) and IκB kinase γ (IKKγ, also known as NEMO) phosphorylate and degrade IκB kinase α (IKKα), resulting in the nuclear translocation of the NF‐κB1 (p50) and RelA (p65) complex. 139 Conversely, in the noncanonical route, cytokine stimulation leads to TNF receptor associated factor 3 (TRAF3) degradation after binding to the cytokine receptor, stabilizing NF‐κB‐inducing kinase (NIK), continuously degraded through the TRAF3 interaction. This stabilization activates IKKα, prompting the conversion of NF‐κB2 (p100) into its active RelB (p52) form and enabling RelB/p52 complexes to enter the nucleus. 140 However, not all TNF family cytokines can initiate this pathway; RANKL does, but TNF‐α does not. 141

In osteoclasts, activation of both pathways is instrumental for differentiation, longevity, and functionality. 142 Mice lacking NF‐κB p50 and p52 exhibit notable dwarfism, thickened hypertrophic chondrocyte layers, severe osteopetrosis, and a lack of osteoclasts. 143 Whereas NF‐κB activation in osteoblasts can either stimulate or inhibit osteogenesis. For example, TNF‐induced NF‐κB activation suppresses bone formation by obstructing RUNX2, thus interfering with BMP signaling. 144 The activity of the IKK complex also hampers osteoblast functionality. A study involving IKKalpha knockdown in OSX+ cells reported no impact on osteolineage cells. 145 Conversely, inhibiting NIK increases p100 levels, enhancing bone creation and osteoblast count, while disrupting RelB bolsters bone formation. 146 Early osteogenesis is promoted by NF‐κB activation, and p65/RelA is crucial for osteoblast functionality and survival. At low doses, TNF‐α can promote osteogenesis through NF‐κB activation. 147 These findings highlight that the role of NF‐κB in osteoblast differentiation is complex and dependent on context.

Crosstalk between the noncanonical NF‐κB pathway and other signaling pathways also plays an important regulatory role in osteoblasts and osteoclasts. TRAF3 serves to restrict the activation of GSK‐3β induced by TGF‐β1 (via phosphorylation at Tyr216) and the degradation of β‐catenin in mesenchymal progenitor cells. This mechanism enables β‐catenin to sustain osteoblast differentiation and promote the expression of OPG, thereby mitigating bone degradation. RelA and RelB enhance osteoblastic RANKL expression, promoting osteoclastogenesis and a self‐sustaining cycle of bone destruction, TGF‐β release, TRAF3 degradation, and NF‐κB activation. 148

In osteocytes, NF‐κB responds to mechanical stress by mediating the cellular response to bone loading and unloading. 149 Mechanical stress induces the activation of NF‐κB in osteocytes, leading to the expression of genes such as RANKL, which is crucial for osteoclastogenesis. This process facilitates communication between osteocytes and other bone cells, coordinating bone remodeling. NF‐κB activation in osteocytes also plays a role in regulating bone resorption and formation and maintaining bone homeostasis. 41 Additionally, the interaction of NF‐κB with other signaling molecules in osteocytes is critical for adapting bone structure to mechanical demands 150 (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

A simplified view of Hedgehog, JAK/STAT, AMPK, Notch, NF‐κB, MAPK, and PI3K/AKT pathways. (1) Hedgehog pathway: Hh proteins relieve the inhibitory effect of Ptch on Smo by binding to Ptch on target cells, leading to Smo activation, followed by further activation of Glis and regulation of downstream target genes. (2) JAK/STAT pathway: JAK/STAT pathway is activated by IL‐6, leading to the phosphorylation of STAT3, which then impacts gene expression related to osteoblast activity. (3) AMPK pathway activation through LKB1 phosphorylation inhibits mTORC1 via TSC1/2, affecting osteoblast function. (4) Notch pathway: binding of ligands expressed by neighboring cells to Notch receptors results in the release of NICD from the membrane and translocation to the nucleus, thereby activating transcription of specific genes. (5) NF‐κB pathway: divided into classical and nonclassical branches, shows how different stimuli lead to the activation of distinct NF‐κB subunits, which then translocate to the nucleus influencing both osteoclast and osteoblast gene expression. (6) MAPK pathway: MAPK is activated by various extracellular signals leading to the sequential activation of MAPKKK and MAPKK, further activating downstream molecules such as ERK, JNK, and p38 MAPK. (7) PI3K/AKT pathway: activation of PIP 3 by binding of activated PI3K to PIP2 leads to Akt phosphorylation, linking to NF‐κB and mTOR signaling, pivotal for osteoclast survival and function (created with BioRender.com).

3.5. PI3K/AKT signaling pathway

The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway regulates cellular biological processes, such as cell proliferation and metabolism, by activating PI3K and causing AKT phosphorylation. 151 The major components of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway include PI3K family and the AKT family (also known as protein kinase B family; PKB). 152 PI3Ks are an important class of kinases that include three classes of molecules (I, II, III). 153 PI3K Class I includes two isoforms (IA and IB), which use phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylinositol‐4‐phosphate (PIP), and phosphatidylinositol‐4,5‐bisphosphate (PIP2) as substrates, phosphorylating inositol ring position 3 of the substrate. PI3K Class I can be activated by both receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and non‐RTKs on the cell surface. 154 PI3K Class II has a C2 structural domain and mainly phosphorylates PI and PIP, 155 while Class III involves vacuolar protein sorting 34 homolog (Vps34) and p150, targeting PI and primarily concerned with cell growth and survival regulation. 156 AKT, a serine/threonine kinase, consists of approximately 480 amino acid residues, which is one of the major downstream effector molecules of PI3K and can be involved in the regulation of a variety of life activity processes by directly phosphorylating various transcription factors, such as NF‐κB and mTOR. 157 The AKT molecule consists of a short carboxy‐terminal regulatory domain, a PH domain and a central catalytic domain. 158 Among them, the PH structural domain mediates the process of membrane translocation after AKT activation 159 ; the catalytic structural domain contains an ATP‐binding site 160 ; and the C‐terminal regulatory domain is proline‐rich and contains another phosphorylation site, Ser473. 161 AKT family members include AKT1/PKBα, AKT2/PKBβ, and AKT3/PKBγ. 162

The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway is regulated by various factors, including RTK and PI3K for upstream regulation 163 ; phosphatase and tensin homolog and PKB for internal regulation 164 ; and mTORC1, GSK3, and BCL‐2 for downstream regulation. 165 In recent years, studies have supported the involvement of the PI3K/AKT pathway in regulating bone homeostasis through various cells. 166 In osteoblasts, PI3K inhibits osteoblast apoptosis through the activation of AKT and further activates PI3K/AKT through Wnt‐3a. 167 The PI3K/AKT pathway also plays an important role in osteoclast formation. Recently, several researchers have reported that Akt activation can limit osteoclast differentiation by activating the GSK‐3β/NFATc1 signaling cascade. 168 Moreover, Karkache et al. 169 reported that AKT, a downstream target of PI3K, can mediate the proliferation and survival of RANKL‐ and/or M‐CSF‐stimulated osteoclast lineage cells. Similarly, Wang et al. 170 demonstrated that the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway is closely related to bone homeostasis through a network pharmacological study of the antiosteoporotic effect of dulcolax cyclen ether terpene glycosides, which is also in line with previously reported results. In conclusion, the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway can promote osteoclast differentiation and facilitate osteoblast apoptosis.

In addition, the PI3K signaling pathway in osteocytes is essential for their survival and function, particularly in response to mechanical loading. Mechanical stress activates the PI3K/Akt pathway in osteocytes, promoting their survival by inhibiting apoptosis. 171 This activation also enhances the release of signaling molecules such as BMP‐7, which protects osteocytes from glucocorticoid‐induced apoptosis 172 (Figure 5).

3.6. JAK/STAT signaling pathway

The JAK/STAT signaling pathway is involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, survival, and apoptosis and mediates immune dysregulation and tumorigenesis in organisms. 173 It consists of ligand‒receptor complexes, the JAK family and the STAT family. 174 Canonical JAK/STAT signaling is activated when cytokines (e.g., interferon, IL, etc.) bind to the plasma membrane receptor. It triggers a conformational change in the receptor and leads to dimerization, which further activates the activity of JAK. 175 Activated JAK further phosphorylates the receptor to create a docking site for STAT. JAK‐phosphorylated STAT detaches, forming homodimers or heterodimers through SH2 domain‐phosphotyrosine interactions, which then regulate target gene transcription. 176 In addition, previous studies have demonstrated that the JAK/STAT signaling pathway is also involved in complex nonclassical signaling pathways, interconjugating with other signaling pathways, such as the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways, to mediate a series of biological effects. 177 Increasing evidence indicates that JAKs and STATs are responsible for signaling via multiple hormones, growth factors, and cytokines. 178 Therefore, they are associated with the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, which is crucial for skeletal development and bone homeostasis. 179

First, osteoclast formation is usually stimulated indirectly through multiple pathways via the actions of JAK1 and STAT3 in inflammatory and subsidiary cells. 180 Additionally, osteoblast differentiation is secondary to stimulated osteoclast formation through IL‐6 family cytokines. 181 IL‐6 can activate STAT3 signaling within osteoblasts, leading to the upregulation of various factors, including RANKL and C‐X‐C motif chemokine ligand 1. These factors play a crucial role in initiating pOC cells to differentiate into osteoclasts and initiate the process of bone resorption. 182 In addition, STAT3 signaling also promotes bone formation through direct signaling in osteocytes, mainly by stimulating the expression of transcription factors (e.g., C/EBPδ and C/EBPβ) to induce osteoblast differentiation. 183 In conclusion, normal bone remodeling and bone homeostasis depend on the JAK1/STAT3/suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) signaling pathway. 180 Moreover, the JAK2/STAT5B pathway is also fundamental for osteoblast formation, 184 as it acts on important transcription factors, such as T box transcription factor 3, RUNX2, and BMP‐7, 185 which further illustrates the role of JAKs and STATs in bone conversion under inflammatory conditions. JAK inhibition increases the expression of OCN and the Wnt signaling pathway (by stabilizing β‐catenin). 186

Furthermore, osteocytes are regulated by factors such as LIF and subsequent activation of LIFR, which are modulated by the JAK/STAT pathway. This pathway supports the expression of SOST and other osteocyte‐specific genes that control bone mineral density and structural integrity. Through miR‐30 and its effect on RUNX2, the pathway indirectly influences osteocyte maturation and function, highlighting its critical role in skeletal biology and disease processes such as osteoporosis 187 , 188 (Figure 5).

3.7. MAPK signaling pathway

MAPK, a member of the Ser/Thr kinase family, 189 plays a crucial role in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration. 190 The MAPK pathway consists of at least three cascade reactions involving three enzymes MAPK, MAPK kinase (MAPKK), and MAPK kinase kinase (MAPKKK). 191 Each cascade reaction is initiated by specific extracellular signals and leads to the activation of a specific MAPK upon sequential activation of MAPKKK and MAPKK. 192 The MAPK family is composed of three kinases: ERK, JNK, and p38 MAPK (MAPK14). 193 The RAF–MEK–ERK pathway is the most representative MAPK signaling pathway, and its important upstream regulators include cell surface receptors such as RTKs, GPCRs, and integrins, as well as GTPases, Ras, and Rap. 194 ERKs can translocate to the nucleus and phosphorylate different transcription factors, including Elk‐1, Sap‐1a, and c‐Myc, altering gene expression to promote growth, differentiation, or mitosis. 195

According to several studies, MAPKs have been demonstrated to have significant implications in regulating bone density and bone homeostasis through their influence on the differentiation processes of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. 196 First, mechanical stimuli can increase the expression of Focal adhesion kinase (Fak), which is an important member of integrin‐mediated signal transduction, thereby activating the Fak–MAPK pathway by activating Erk, Jnk, and p38–MAPK during distraction osteogenesis. 197 In addition, the activation of the ERK, p38, and JNK signaling pathways can expedite osteoclast differentiation by modulating the activity of AP‐1, which serves as a critical regulator of osteoclast formation. 198 In osteoblasts, TNF stimulates the activation of SHN3 through ERK MAPK‐mediated phosphorylation. Subsequently, phosphorylated SHN3 suppresses Wnt/β‐catenin signaling while increasing the expression of RANKL. Consequently, introducing a mutation in Shn3 that hinders its binding with ERK MAPK enhances bone formation in mice that overexpress human TNF‐α by boosting Wnt/β‐catenin signaling. 199 In addition, the ERK signaling pathway plays a crucial role in regulating various phases of osteoblast differentiation through the phosphorylation of essential transcription factors, including RUNX2, and activation of transcription factor 4. 200 Similarly, activation of the p38 signaling pathway facilitates the differentiation of osteoblasts through the phosphorylation of DLX5, OSX, and RUNX2. 201 In addition, in a study by Xu et al., 202 endothelial progenitor cells were found to have a significant effect on BMSC differentiation and osteogenesis through the MAPK pathway. In accordance with prior research findings, the p38 signaling pathway has been shown to play a role in the regulation of ALP activity during the process of osteoblast differentiation. 203 Moreover, this pathway is essential for the expression of BSP and OPN through the activation of p38MAPK–RUNX2 signaling. 204 The absence of p38α in pre‐osteoblasts has been shown to lead to impaired osteoblast differentiation, as indicated by decreased levels of collagen 1, ALP, BSP, and OCN. 205 Furthermore, Luo et al. 198 discovered that the increased expression of disintegrin‐like and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin and MMPs through the activation of the ERK signaling pathway is significantly involved in the initial stages of OA progression.

In osteocytes, MAPK signaling is essential for regulating autophagy and protecting osteocytes from oxidative stress and other cytotoxic insults. It also responses to mechanical stimuli and interacts with other signaling pathways, such as the ERK, JNK, and p38–MAPK pathways, to maintain bone homeostasis 206 (Figure 5).

3.8. AMPK signaling pathway

AMPK, a serine–threonine kinase, 207 is a heterotrimeric complex consisting of an α‐subunit, a β‐subunit, and a γ‐subunit, 208 of which the α‐subunit plays a catalytic role, while the β‐ and γ‐subunits play important roles in maintaining trimeric stability and substrate specificity. 209 The AMPK signaling pathway functions as a detector of cellular energy levels and is triggered by elevated cellular AMP/ATP ratios resulting from metabolic stress, including interference with ATP production (e.g., glucose or oxygen deprivation) or accelerated ATP consumption (e.g., muscle contraction). 210 Upon activation, AMPK simultaneously suppresses energy‐expending biosynthetic processes, including glycogen, protein and fatty acid synthesis, while stimulating ATP‐generating catabolic pathways such as glycolysis and fatty acid oxidation. 211 In essence, AMPK regulates cellular energy allocation by suppressing protein synthesis and cell growth, as well as modulating cell cycle arrest by reducing the activity of mTOR, a protein that is overactive in many cancer cells. 212 Consequently, AMPK has emerged as a promising target for the treatment of metabolic disorders and cancer. 213 In addition, according to many studies, the activation of AMPK has the potential to influence the promotion of bone formation and bone density, indicating the significance of AMPK signaling as a crucial pathway in skeletal physiology. 209

Initially, the regulatory impact of AMPK on osteoblasts primarily occurs via the activation of the osteoblast‐specific transcription factor RUNX2. 214 Furthermore, AMPK can influence bone formation by promoting osteoblastogenesis through the down‐regulation of AGEs and the activation of IR deformation. 215 Conversely, the AMPK signaling pathway suppresses RANKL by reducing the expression of peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma 1 (PPARγ1), NFATc1, PTH‐related protein (PTHrP), and mevalonate, consequently impeding the process of osteoclast formation. 216 Notably, adipocytes and osteoblasts share a lineage with BMSCs as common progenitors. 217 PPARγ2 inhibits osteoblast differentiation, promoting the differentiation of BMSCs into adipocytes, 218 whereas the differentiation of BMSCs into osteoblasts is regulated by AMPK through the modulation of RUNX2 and a newly identified pathway, the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway. 219 In addition, the mevalonate pathway, which is involved in the prenylation of regulatory proteins such as Ras and Rho GTPase, has been found to have a detrimental impact on bone tissue. 216 AMPK has been shown to modulate the mevalonate pathway by inhibiting 3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl‐coa reductase. 220

Furthermore, AMPK signaling in osteocytes is vital for protecting against oxidative stress, regulating bone remodeling, and interacting with glucose metabolism. By modulating the expression of RANKL and SOST, AMPK helps maintain a balance between bone formation and resorption. 221 Additionally, its role in enhancing OCN expression links bone metabolism with systemic glucose homeostasis, highlighting its importance in both skeletal and metabolic health 222 (Figure 5).

3.9. Hh signaling pathway

The Hh signaling pathway consists of the Hh ligand, patched receptor (Ptch), smoothened receptor (Smo), suppressor of fused (Sufu), and the transcription factor glioma‐associated oncogene (Gli). 223 There are three subtypes of Hh genes in mammals: Indian Hh, sonic Hh (Shh) and desert Hh, of which Ihh plays a major role in skeletal development. Ptch represents a transmembrane receptor consisting of 12 passes that interact with Hh ligands, encompassing two similar genes known as Ptch1 and Ptch2. 227 Smo is a seven‐transmembrane protein that functions as a signal sensor and is inhibited by Ptch. Generally, the Hh protein relieves the inhibitory effect of Ptch on Smo by binding to Ptch on target cells, leading to Smo activation. Sufu is a negative regulator of the Hh pathway. However, activated Glis with a zinc finger structure dissociates from the Sufu‐containing repressor complex and contributes to the regulation of certain downstream target genes of cell‐active Hh signaling. Typically, Gli1 and Gli2 function primarily as transcriptional activators, whereas Gli3 acts as a repressor of Hh signaling. 224

According to many studies, Hh signaling inhibits the differentiation of BMSCs into adipocytes while stimulating their differentiation into chondrocytes and osteoblasts, further maintaining bone homeostasis and promoting endochondral bone formation. 225 In the process of embryonic development, the Hh signaling pathway triggers the upregulation of PTHrP in chondrocytes, thereby controlling the rate of chondrocyte hypertrophy within the developing growth plates. 8 Apart from that, it is essential for the differentiation of osteoblasts through the regulation of RUNX2 expression. However, in postnatal bone remodeling, it has been shown that Hh signaling serves dual roles in regulating bone mass. A partial enhancement of Hh signaling due to Ptch1 haploinsufficiency leads to an increase in bone mass, while a widespread elevation of Hh signaling particularly in mature osteoblasts stimulates both bone formation and bone resorption. The non‐cell‐autonomous function of Hh signaling in the process of osteoclast differentiation is facilitated through the release of PTHrP from fully developed osteoblasts, leading to the stimulation of RANKL expression. 226 The information presented indicates that Hh signaling in bones utilizes both intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms to intricately oversee bone remodeling. In addition, the Hh signaling pathway also has key functions in synergistic cascades with other signaling pathways, such as the Wnt/β‐catenin, BMP, and PThrP pathways. 227 , 228 In osteocytes, the Hh pathway is integral for maintaining bone homeostasis and responding to mechanical stimuli. It plays a non‐cell‐autonomous role by affecting the differentiation and activity of other bone cells through the modulation of signaling molecules and pathways. 229

In summary, once activated, the Hh pathway promotes the differentiation of stem cells to osteoblasts and the deposition of bone matrix and inhibits the apoptosis and destruction of osteoblasts through a complex of direct actions and interactions with other pathways. This is corroborated by current studies on osteoporosis, where inhibition of the Hh signaling pathway leads to inhibition of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation, thereby affecting bone formation and reducing bone density (Figure 5).

3.10. Notch signaling pathway

The Notch signaling pathway is a crucial intercellular communication mechanism playing a pivotal role in cell differentiation, proliferation and fate determination. 230 The pathway includes four receptors, Notch1 to Notch4, which are transmembrane proteins capable of receiving external signals on the cell surface. The activation of Notch receptors is dependent on direct binding with ligands from two main families: the Jagged family (Jagged1 and Jagged2) and the Delta‐like family (including Delta‐like 1, Delta‐like 3, etc.). These ligands are also cell surface proteins that are expressed on neighboring cells and trigger Notch signal transduction. The binding of ligands to Notch receptors triggers a series of cleavage events, resulting in the release of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) from the membrane. The NICD is a key executor of Notch signaling. The released NICD subsequently translocates to the cell nucleus, where it acts as a transcription factor to activate the transcription of specific genes. The primary target genes include the Hes families (hairy and Enhancer of split E(spl) homologs) and Hey families (Hes‐related proteins containing the YRPW motif). 231 The expression of these genes affects cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Recent studies have emphasized the role of Notch signaling in regulating bone homeostasis, particularly its inhibitory effect on osteoblasts. 232

The Notch pathway's activation hinders the differentiation of osteoblastic cells and results in impaired bone formation. Notch inhibits early osteoblast differentiation, preventing the maturation of matrix‐synthesizing cells, while in mature cells, it blocks further differentiation, causing an accumulation of dysfunctional osteoblasts. NICD binds to RUNX2, obstructing Bglap transactivation, and Hes and Hey proteins inhibit osteoblastogenesis by suppressing RUNX2 function. 233 , 234 , 235 Additionally, in cells overexpressing Notch, cytosolic β‐catenin levels and Wnt‐3‐induced ALP activity are reduced. Hes1 complexes with Groucho and T‐cell‐specific factors, inhibiting the interaction between T‐cell factors and β‐catenin, which is essential for the transcription of Wnt‐dependent genes. 236 Thus, osteoblastic differentiation was inhibited. Notch also regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone homeostasis via antiapoptotic actions. Jagged1 (JAG1), a notch activator, enhances the activation of antiapoptotic factor BCL‐2 and reduces the proapoptotic factor Caspase3 in osteoblasts. 237 In osteocytes, the presence of Notch1 leads to specific outcomes, including the suppression of bone resorption through the upregulation of OPG and downregulation of SOST, ultimately resulting in increased activation of Wnt signaling. 231 Moreover, Notch1 increases Wnt/β‐catenin activity in osteocytes by downregulating SOST and Dkk1 (Dickkopf Wnt signaling pathway inhibitor 1). 238 There is a degree of overlap between Notch and Wnt activation in osteocytes. Notch receptors are induced in mice expressing a constitutively active β‐catenin mutant, and Notch further activates the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway in osteocytes, which creates a positive feedback loop. 233

The roles of Notch1 and Notch2 in osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption are distinctly different. Stimulation of Notch1 receptors in pOCs leads to direct suppression of osteoclast formation. 239 Concurrently, Notch1 activation in mature osteoblasts and osteoclasts stimulates OPG production, which hinders bone resorption. 240 Conversely, Notch2 NICD interacts with NF‐κB, promoting the transcription of NFATc1, a key gene for osteoclastogenesis, thus enhancing osteoclastogenesis through both direct and indirect pathways. Furthermore, Notch2 activation in osteoblasts indirectly triggers RANKL, boosting osteoclastogenesis 241 (Figure 5).

3.11. Ion channel signaling pathways

Cellular mechanotransduction plays a crucial role in the development and maintenance of bone tissue, with mechanical stimuli playing a key role in promoting bone formation and preventing bone loss. 242 BMSCs, osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts, which are the primary cell types found in bone tissue, respond to various mechanical cues such as matrix stiffness, fluid shear stress, tension, and compression across the lifespan of an individual. 243 Physiological mechanotransduction activates relevant signaling pathways and maintains bone homeostasis. However, aberrant cellular mechanotransduction may lead to a variety of bone diseases, including osteoporosis and OA. 244 Recent studies have revealed that certain ion channels, such as Piezo1, TMEM16A, P2X7, TRPV4, and other ion channels, which are closely related to skeletal homeostasis, play key roles in cellular mechanotransduction. 245

3.11.1. Piezo1

Piezo1 is a type of molecular receptor that mediates the perception of mechanical forces in the human body. 246 It plays a crucial role in mechanotransduction within osteoblasts and osteocytes. Mechanical stimuli, such as compression and fluid shear stress, activate Piezo1 channels, inducing BMP2 expression and triggering intracellular calcium flux. This process promotes osteoblast differentiation by regulating the expression of bone‐related genes like RUNX2. 247 Additionally, Piezo1 controls the expression of bone matrix proteins, including type II and type IX collagen, by regulating the intranuclear translocation of YAP1. 243 In osteocytes, Piezo1 is involved in the Wnt1 and AKT signaling pathways. It promotes Wnt1 expression in osteocytes through the activation of YAP1 and TAZ. 248 Furthermore, the activation of Piezo1 in osteocytes inhibits the expression of SOST via the Akt signaling pathway, thereby promoting bone formation. 249

3.11.2. Chloride channels: ClC‐7 and TMEM16A

Chloride channels play important roles in osteoclasts. During bone resorption, osteoclasts continue to secrete H+ ions into the lacunae and dissolve the bone matrix. In osteoblasts, there is a significant presence of chloride channel 7 (ClC‐7) in the ruffled membrane, which is created through the merging of vesicles containing H+‐ATPase. These vesicles release protons into the lumen. Destruction of ClC‐7 in mice leads to severe petrosalmia due to the inability of osteoclasts to secrete acid. 250

Recently, studies have shown that the calcium‐activated chloride channel TMEM16A (also known as Anoctamin 1, ANO1) is another chloride channel related to bone resorption. Deletion of the TMEM16A gene can decreases H+ secretion, increases the intracellular Cl concentration and reduces bone resorption. In addition, TMEM16A physically binds to RANK and copromotes RANKL‐induced downstream signaling pathways. 251

3.11.3. P2X7

The purinergic P2X7 ion channel receptors are ATP‐regulated, cell‐surface, trimeric ligand‐gated cation channels regulating inflammatory responses and bone metabolism. 252 Recent research has shown that the receptor is significantly involved in the anabolic reactions triggered by mechanical loading on bone. Additionally, in conjunction with the Panx1 hemi‐channel, it plays a crucial role in the initiation of bone remodeling in response to micro‐damage. 253 In osteoblasts, P2X7 receptors play a role in the subsequent production and discharge of lysophosphatidic acid and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and in the stimulation of ERK1/2. This process facilitates osteoblast differentiation and the formation of bone tissue. 254 In addition, P2X7 receptors are key factors in the inflammatory response; inflammatory factors promote the development of osteoporosis, and inhibition of P2X7 receptors reduces TNF‐α‐induced osteoclast differentiation. 255

3.11.4. TRPV4

The transient receptor potential (TRP) calcium channel is a prototypical mechanosensitive channel that plays a role in detecting diverse stimuli across a range of tissues and cellular environments. 256 Among them, TRP vanilloid (TRPV) channel subfamily member 4 (TRPV4) regulates inflammation, mechanosensation, and energy homeostasis. In response to oscillatory fluid shear stress, TRPV4 channels induce calcium influx and activate CaMKII, which enhances cytoskeletal stiffness and affects osteoblast function by regulating genes such as OPN. 257 TRPV4 mediates basolateral Ca2+ influx when Ca2+ oscillations are attenuated, especially in large osteoblasts. 258 TRPV4‐mediated Ca2+ influx ensures the intracellular Ca2+ concentration, ensures NFATc1‐regulated gene transcription, and regulates terminal differentiation and activity of osteoblasts. 259 In addition, fluid shear stress can activate NADPH oxidase 2‐generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) through the microtubule network, and ROS target the Ca2+ channel TRPV4, leading to Ca2+ inward flow. This pathway links fluid shear stress to ROS and Ca2+ signaling, leading to reduced SOST abundance in cultured osteoblasts. 260

3.12. Noncoding RNA signaling pathways

Noncoding RNA refers to RNA that does not encode proteins, including microRNAs (miRNAs), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs, and other RNAs with known functions. 261 It is well recognized that miRNAs are small noncoding RNAs that can recognize cognate sequences and interfere with transcriptional, translational, or epigenetic processes. 262 LncRNAs are defined as RNA transcripts >200 nucleotides that do not encode proteins. 263 There is accumulating evidence that these RNAs are transcribed from the genome, and although they cannot encode proteins, they can exert their biological functions at the RNA level as regulatory factors, affecting various biological processes such as bone metabolism. 264

In general, miRNAs can induce gene silencing by binding to mRNAs, while competing endogenous RNAs may modulate gene expression through competitive combining to miRNA response elements. 265 , 266 In contrast, both circRNAs and lncRNAs have miRNA‐binding sites, which bind to miRNAs in cells, thus counteracting the inhibitory effect of miRNAs on their target genes and thus increasing the level of target gene expression. 267 , 268

Some noncoding RNAs, such as lncRNAs ORLNC1, 269 lncRNA‐POIR, 270 miRNA‐433‐3p, 271 circRNA‐0016624, 272 and circRNA‐AFF4, 273 have been shown to promote osteoblast differentiation by regulating substances associated with their differentiation. Moreover, some noncoding RNAs can also affect the differentiation of other cells, such as osteoclasts, thus promoting bone destruction. 274 , 275 , 276 Notably, the corresponding biological functions of these noncoding RNAs need to be targeted by genes or pathways to produce indirect effects.

For instance, miRNA‐214, an important regulator of musculoskeletal metabolism and disease, 277 can be expressed in human osteoporotic bone tissue to prevent osteoporosis by effectively regulating bone metabolism bidirectionally, promoting osteoblasts but inhibiting osteoclast activity, reducing bone loss, and effectively delaying osteoporosis pathology. 278 Moreover, lncRNA KCNQ1OT1 can silence this gene to promote BMP2 expression to regulate osteogenic differentiation. 279 Therefore, these RNAs play important regulatory roles in various signaling pathways through their interactions with each other, thus affecting the differentiation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Finally, they can regulate the balance of bone homeostasis. 280

And noncoding RNAs have been implicated in many orthopedic diseases in which they play important roles. 281 , 282 , 283 , 284 For instance, lncRNA AC006064.4‐201 disrupts the stability of CDKN1B mRNA through interaction with PTBP1, thereby alleviating cartilage aging and protecting against OA. 285 It has also been reported that the lncRNAs MALAT1, 286 TUG1, 287 and DANCR 288 play different roles in OA by targeting different miRNAs. For instance, miR‐214‐3p can downregulate IKK‐β expression and lead to dysfunction of the NF‐κB signaling pathway, thus relieving the damage caused by OA. 289

In addition, noncoding RNAs can also reach other cells via EVs and act as significant messengers in cellular crosstalk and biological activities. 30 For example, EVs derived from BMSCs can deliver the lncRNA NEAT1 to relieve arthritis. 290 EVs can be encapsulated by miR‐206, 291 miRNA‐208a, 292 the lncRNA PVT1, 291 and other noncoding RNAs, and transported to osteosarcoma cells, leading to the proliferation, migration and invasion of cancer cells. However, EVs can regulate Wnt/β‐catenin signaling by decreasing TCF/LEF activity to further inhibit the proliferation and induce the apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells. 293

4. THE ROLE OF BONE HOMEOSTASIS IN SKELETAL DISEASE

Since bone homeostasis is important contributor to bone development, repair, and remodeling, dysfunction of osteoblasts and osteoclasts is involved in the initiation and development of many diseases, such as OA, osteoporosis, OI, RA, PDB, bone cancer and metastases, ONFH, and PPO. It is becoming increasingly clear that the homeostasis of osteoblasts and osteoclasts plays important roles in the progression or remission of diseases. Here, we primarily discuss the pathology of various skeletal diseases and the biological effect of bone homeostasis on their occurrence and development. Moreover, we also introduce the various modulators and signaling pathways that affect skeletal cells either positively or negatively. Therapeutic interventions focused on the elements and controllers of signaling pathways in osteoblasts and osteoclasts exhibit significant promise and represent a promising avenue for addressing these conditions. (Figure 6)

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Overview of bone homeostasis disorders in skeletal diseases. (1) Osteoporosis: the main types of osteoporosis: postmenopausal osteoporosis and senile osteoporosis. Estrogen withdrawal leads to increased osteoclast activity, and senility decreases osteoblast differentiation and increases lipogenic differentiation. (2) Osteogenesis imperfecta: gene mutations and abnormal signaling pathways lead to impaired osteogenesis and mineralization. (3) Osteoarthritis: the interaction between stress changes and inflammatory environment activates dysfunction in osteoclast and osteoblast. (4) Rheumatoid arthritis: excessive activation of FLS with inflammatory factors is conducive to bone resorption by osteoclasts and impairs bone formation by osteoblasts, which leads to dysregulation of bone homeostasis and joint erosion. (5) Paget's disease of bone: due to the excessive activation of osteoclasts, the bone remodeling cycle is disrupted, resulting in excessive bone resorption and abnormal bone formation. (6) Bone cancer and metastases: bone metastatic cancer cells and osteoclasts enhance each other's activity, exacerbating the “vicious cycle” of bone degradation and tumor growth. (7) Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: it is caused by a variety of factors that affect bone health, such as the impacts of glucocorticoids, the role of the RANKL pathway, and the contributions of osteoclastogenic and osteoblastogenic cytokines. (8) Periprosthetic osteolysis: Ti wear particles will disrupt bone homeostasis by binding to immune cells and altering the activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts (created with BioRender.com).

4.1. Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease characterized by reduced bone mineral density and structural deterioration, leading to an increased risk of fracture, functional limitations, and mortality. 7 It has emerged as a major global health challenge, affecting people of all ages, sexes, and races, with the greatest impact on postmenopausal women and the elderly. 294 Primary osteoporosis can generally be divided into postmenopausal and age‐related osteoporosis.

Menopause disrupts bone homeostasis due to estrogen withdrawal, which affects the activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Physiologically, estrogen protects osteoblasts by preventing apoptosis and promoting their growth, maturation, and mineralization through various signaling pathways. Chang et al. 295 reported that estrogen deficiency triggers NF‐κB activation in osteoblasts, inhibiting osteoblast function. For osteoclasts, estrogen depletion encourages osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption while deterring osteoclast apoptosis through various pathways. The absence of estrogen increases RANKL expression by the osteoblast lineage, including BMSCs, osteocytes, and bone lining cells, and diminishes OPG production, thereby intensifying osteoclast formation via the RANK–RANKL–OPG signaling system. Estrogen scarcity also curtails osteoclast apoptosis by inhibiting Fas/FasL signaling. 296 Moreover, estrogen scarcity also boosts T‐cell activity and elevates the levels of inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1, IL‐6, IL‐17, and TNF‐α, which indirectly stimulate osteoclast proliferation and differentiation by promoting RANKL and M‐CSF production. 297 In conclusion, studies have highlighted the role of estrogen in protecting osteoblasts and its absence in promoting osteoclastogenesis.

In age‐related osteoporosis, there is a notable shift from osteogenesis to adipogenesis within BMSCs, guided by signaling pathways such as the ERK 1/2, TGF‐β, and BMP2/4 pathways. 298 An increase in bone marrow adipocytes further exacerbates the development of osteoporosis, which not only impedes osteoblastogenesis but also favors osteoclastogenesis through the activation of PPARγ by free fatty acids (FFAs). 299 Palmitic acid, a specific FFA, notably hinders osteoblast development and mineralization by suppressing the Wnt/β‐catenin and BMP2/RUNX2/SMAD pathways and induces apoptosis and autophagy dysfunction in osteoblasts. 300 In addition, the interaction of PPARγ with specific promoter elements in hematopoietic stem cells promotes osteoclastogenesis, 301 highlighting the complex interplay between factors that drive the progression of osteoporosis.

4.2. Osteogenesis imperfecta

OI is a hereditary skeletal disorder characterized by mutations in the COL1A1/COL1A2 genes, leading to increased bone fragility and skeletal deformities. 302 Recent research has identified several signaling pathways, such as the Wnt, BMP, and TGF pathways, as significant contributors to the development of OI. 303 For instance, mutations in the Wnt1 gene can disrupt the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway, impacting osteoblast growth, differentiation, and function. 304 Studies by Grafe et al. 305 have shown that modulating TGF‐β signaling in an OI mouse model can correct bone abnormalities and improve lung function. Gene ontology analysis of human samples has highlighted the upregulation of SMAD phosphorylation in OI patients, with TGF‐β identified as a critical activation signal through genomic enrichment and pathway analyses. 306 FAM46A, a member of the nucleotidyltransferase folding protein superfamily, interacts with SMAD and promotes the transcription of BMP target genes, with mutations in FAM46A linked to autosomal recessive OI inheritance. 7 Additionally, BMP1 plays a crucial role in cleaving the C‐terminal propeptide of procollagen types I, II, and III, and defects in this process have been implicated in OI pathogenesis. 4

4.3. Osteoarthritis

OA is a degenerative condition of the joints marked by the gradual breakdown of articular cartilage, subchondral sclerosis, osteophyte development, varying levels of synovial inflammation, and meniscus degeneration. Persistent pain, swelling, deformity, limited joint function, and reduced mobility impose significant financial and emotional burdens on OA patients. 307 In OA, the subchondral bone experiences remodeling, with simultaneous increases in bone resorption and formation. 203 Abnormal mechanical strain disrupts osteoblast metabolism, leading to higher levels of IL‐6, PGE2, MMP, and RANKL, and lower levels of OPG. IL‐6 and PGE2 promote osteoclast formation by reducing OPG secretion and increasing RANKL production in osteoblasts or by elevating RANK expression in osteoclasts. PGE2 also triggers IL‐6 release, which in turn increases PGE2 secretion by osteoblasts. 308 This creates a positive feedback loop between PGE2 and IL‐6 signaling, enhancing osteoclast differentiation by modulating the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway. 309 Additionally, heightened mechanical stress causes osteocytes to influence osteoblast mineralization by increasing Wnt protein production and decreasing SOST secretion. In vitro studies indicate that osteoclastic bone resorption significantly raises active TGF‐β1 levels in OA subchondral bone, promoting osteoblast‐driven bone formation through the SMAD2/3 pathway in advanced OA. 7 Consequently, increased osteoblast activity results in spatial remineralization and osteosclerosis in late‐stage OA. Furthermore, TGF‐β can elevate neurofactors in OA via the ALK5–SMAD2/3 pathway and may contribute to joint pain in OA patients. 310

4.4. Rheumatoid arthritis

RA is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by a complex interplay of cellular activities and signaling pathways that leads to the deterioration of joints. 311 Synovial inflammation and irreversible bone destruction are prominent features of RA that lead to an imbalance in bone homeostasis. 312 Overactivated fibroblast‐like synoviocytes (FLSs) increase the expression of proangiogenic factors such as IL‐6 and chemokines and cause an imbalance between γδTreg and γδT17 cells. 313 This environment causes acidic and hypoxic conditions in arthritic joints, which fosters the activation of osteoclasts and the apoptosis of osteoblasts, contributing to bone degradation. 314 In detail, acidic and hypoxic conditions diminish the osteoblast production of ALP and impede mineralization. Moreover, hypoxia interferes with Wnt signaling by blocking β‐catenin transduction, and inflammatory factors such as TNF‐α disrupt this pathway further by inducing the overexpression of DKK‐1 in synovial fibroblasts. 315 TNF‐α also negatively affects the synthesis of collagen type I, ALP activity, and the expression of OCN in vitro. 7 In addition, peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) are thought to be the major source of osteoclasts in inflammatory environments, and osteoclasts derived from PBMCs show an enhanced bone resorption capacity. 316 Notably, the synovial fluid of RA patients contains mononuclear cells that express osteoclast‐related genes and can form osteoclasts spontaneously, indicating a heightened osteoclastogenic potential in RA. 7 These developments are further amplified by inflammatory cytokines such as TNF‐α and IL‐6, which activate the JAK–STAT signaling pathway and promote the differentiation of PBMCs into osteoclasts, leading to increased bone resorption and bone destruction. 317

4.5. Paget's disease of bone

PDB is a chronic focal disorder characterized by disturbed bone homeostasis, leading to asymmetric skeletal deformities. These deformities result from excessive bone resorption by abnormally large osteoclasts and disorganized bone formation by osteoblasts. 318 , 319 Pagetic osteoclasts, characterized by an increased number of nuclei, exhibit heightened responsiveness to osteoclastogenic factors, including RANKL and 1,25‐dihydroxyvitamin D3. This heightened responsiveness not only boosts their bone resorption capacity but also increases their resistance to apoptosis. 7 , 320 In response to the activity of these osteoclasts, coupling factors are released, increasing the number of immature osteoblasts at resorption sites. Notably, these immature osteoblasts produce more RANKL than their mature counterparts, exacerbating bone formation. 321 Additionally, individuals with PDB exhibit elevated levels of IL‐6, which promotes RANKL expression on osteoblasts and stromal cells, potentially leading to osteoclast hyperactivation. 322 This localized increase in RANKL is critical for disease progression. Although less is known about osteoblasts in the PDB, emerging research suggests that osteoclast‐osteoblast communication plays a vital role. For instance, the measles virus nucleocapsid protein can stimulate osteoclasts to upregulate IL‐6 and IGF‐1, enhancing EphrinB2–EphB4 coupling and thereby stimulating bone formation by osteoblasts. 323 , 324 Furthermore, pagetic phenotypes may boost osteoclast‐derived IGF‐1 expression, which, in turn, triggers additional RANKL production in osteocytes. This increase in RANKL production is a key factor in the development of pagetic lesions. 325 In conclusion, disordered osteoclast and osteoblast activity together contribute to the development of PDB.

4.6. Bone tumors

Bone is a frequent site of metastasis for many cancers, particularly breast and prostate cancers, aside from primary bone tumors like osteosarcoma. Cancer cells facilitate bone degradation by inducing osteoclast‐mediated bone resorption, leading to substantial structural damage and severe morbidity. This process results in significant pain, fractures, and reduced quality of life for patients. 326 Bone is a frequent site of metastasis for many cancers, particularly breast and prostate cancers, aside from primary bone tumors like osteosarcoma. Cancer cells facilitate bone degradation by inducing osteoclast‐mediated bone resorption, leading to substantial structural damage and severe morbidity. This process results in significant pain, fractures, and reduced quality of life for patients. 327 Tumor‐derived M‐CSF and RANKL on osteoblasts, BMSCs, and immune cells bind to c‐fms and RANK on pOCs, initiating their differentiation and activation. Consequently, cancer cells stimulate osteoclasts to break down bone tissue, releasing growth factors (TGF‐β, IGF‐1, PDGF, and FGF) stored within the bone matrix and enhancing tumor growth. 328 The interaction between cancer cells and the bone microenvironment creates a vicious cycle and induces bone tumor growth and bone metastasis. 329 RANKL secreted by osteoblasts attracts cancer cells expressing RANK and promotes their migration within the bone microenvironment. 107 Furthermore, osteoclasts contribute to this cycle by releasing factors that promote tumor growth and metastasis. Zuo and Wan 330 found that PDL1 on tumor cells can bind to PD‐1 on osteoclasts, affecting the function of osteoclasts and further promoting tumor growth. Anti‐PDL1 treatment inhibited bone metastasis in breast cancer and melanoma and did so by inhibiting osteoclast formation and enhancing the immune response within the bone. In addition, another study showed that PD‐1 blockade inhibited osteoclast formation and bone cancer pain in mice. 331 These findings suggest that although PD‐L1 is expressed on tumor cells primarily to inhibit T‐cell activity and help tumor cells evade immune surveillance, it also plays a significant role in bone metastasis and associated pain.

4.7. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head

ONFH is a prevalent orthopedic clinical condition marked by the demise of bone and marrow cells. This condition can be attributed to a range of factors including hip trauma, corticosteroid administration, alcohol misuse, hemoglobin disorders, bone marrow transplants, chemotherapy, and radiation exposure. 332 ONFH results in pain, restricted mobility, joint collapse, and subsequent development of secondary OA. 333 Glucocorticoids have a multifaceted impact, directly causing apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes, extending the lifespan of osteoclasts, and inducing the apoptosis of endothelial cells. 7 These actions contribute collectively to femoral head ischemia and bone marrow changes, illustrating the detrimental effects of corticosteroids on bone integrity. 334 The induction of osteonecrosis by glucocorticoids in animal models has been attributed to GSK3β‐mediated osteoblast apoptosis, highlighting a specific pathway through which corticosteroids may exert their harmful effects. 335 Necrotic osteocytes release macrophage C‐type lectin (Mincle) that induces osteoclast formation through ITAM‐based calcium signaling, leading to OxPhos and increased bone loss. 7 In addition, osteoclasts and osteoblasts may undergo apoptosis after prolonged treatment with glucocorticoids through the FASL/FAS pathway. In corticosteroid‐associated osteonecrosis, corticosteroids can stimulate bone loss through their action on the RANK/RANKL/OPG signaling system. Several potential signaling pathways are involved in osteocyte apoptosis mitigation, such as the mitochondrial, MAPK, PI3K/Ak, Wnt/β‐catenin, and HIF‐1 signaling networks. 7

4.8. Periprosthetic osteolysis

PPO, a critical complication after artificial joint replacement, jeopardizes prosthesis longevity and outcomes and increases treatment costs. 336 Titanium implants generate wear particles over time due to friction, disrupting bone homeostasis by engaging immune cells and altering osteoblast and osteoclast activity. These particles provoke macrophage activation and inflammatory cytokine release (IL‐6, PGE2, IL‐1β, TNF‐α), driving osteoclastogenesis and jeopardizing BMSC osteogenic differentiation, which contributes to osteolysis and aseptic prosthesis loosening. 337 Wear particles affect osteogenic differentiation through activating the NF‐κB signaling pathway and reducing the involvement of the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway in BMSC activation of the ERK signaling pathway. 338 Moreover, Ti particles inhibit the osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts via the BMP/SMAD signaling pathway. 339 Furthermore, we found that titanium particles lead to an aberrant increase in GSK‐3β activity, which inhibits the Hh/Gli1 signaling pathway, ultimately leading to an inhibition of the osteogenic process. 7 Furthermore, we demonstrated that up‐regulation of SIRT3 expression enhanced the osteogenic differentiation of PPO289 by decreasing NLRP3 inflammasome expression via the GSK‐3β/β‐catenin signaling pathway. 7 Wang et al. 340 found that Netrin‐1 promotes autophagy induced by Ti particles and enhances osteoblast formation via the ERK1/2 signaling pathway.

5. TARGETED THERAPIES FOR SKELETAL DISEASES

5.1. Anabolic agents

5.1.1. Teriparatide

Teriparatide, a recombinant human PTH (1−34) analog, is commonly used as an anabolic medication to help patients with osteoporosis avoid fractures. 341 Intermittent low‐dose teriparatide treatment was demonstrated to stimulate osteoblastic activity, mostly through the stimulation of Wnt signaling, inhibition of DKK‐1, and production of IL‐11. 342 A phase 4 clinical trial showed that teriparatide is a promising treatment for menopausal osteoporosis (NCT01293292). 343 However, teriparatide increases both bone formation and bone resorption, which results in reduced cortical bone volume and thickness, particularly in long bones with greater proportions of cortical bone. 341 , 344 A phase 4 clinical trial showed that 1 year of teriparatide treatment did not significantly reduce bone erosion in RA patients (NCT01400516). 345 In addition, due to the risk of osteosarcoma, teriparatide use is limited to those at a very high risk of fracture. 346

5.1.2. Abaloparatide

Abaloparatide, also known as PTHrP1–34, represents a synthetic version of the human PTH analog. It has been identified that PTH1R exists in at least two distinct conformations, named R0 and RG. 347 Abaloparatide preferentially binds to the RG conformation of PTH1R, similarly to PTH (1–34), which recruits the Gs protein, triggering a temporary spike in cellular cAMP levels. This differs from ligand interactions at the R0 site, where cAMP responses are notably sustained. 348 Due to its selective binding affinity, abaloparatide facilitates sharper and shorter signaling pathways compared with PTH (1–34), leading to increased bone‐anabolic effect with reduced bone resorption. This attribute is anticipated to surpass teriparatide in fostering bone anabolism. Consequently, abaloparatide promotes more transient signaling, leading to a greater with less enhancement of bone resorption than that of PTH (1–34). Thus, it is expected to induce a stronger anabolic effect than teriparatide. Clinical outcomes from a phase three study (NCT01343004) have demonstrated that abaloparatide significantly decreases the risk of new vertebral fractures by 86% and other types of nonvertebral fractures by 43% within an 18‐month trial period. 349 Furthermore, abaloparatide promoted an increase in the expression of serum bone formation markers at an early age, indicating its antifracture properties and safety in long‐term and severe osteoporosis (NCT01657162). 350

5.2. Antiresorptive agents

5.2.1. Denosumab

Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes RANKL, plays a critical role in managing bone‐related conditions by blocking the RANK/RANKL/OPG signaling pathway. 351 This inhibition effectively prevents the formation, function, and survival of osteoclasts, making denosumab a potent treatment for osteoporosis. Notably, in a phase 3 clinical trial (NCT00089791), administering denosumab biannually was shown to significantly reduce fracture risk in women with osteoporosis. 352 Further research into the efficacy of denosumab extends to erosive hand OA. A phase 2a clinical trial (NCT02771860) demonstrated that denosumab significantly lowers the development of new erosive joints compared with a placebo, demonstrating its potential to modify the structure of erosive hand OA. 353 Additionally, osteoporosis patients with RA who were treated with denosumab, calcium and vitamin D, experienced a notable increase in BMD, underscoring its therapeutic benefits. 354 Additionally, its efficacy extends to treating malignant bone metastases, where it not only aids in managing the disease but also exhibits direct or indirect antitumor effects in both preclinical models and clinical settings. 355

5.2.2. Bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates, a class of compounds like pyrophosphate, have a strong inhibitory impact on osteoclasts and are therefore potent antiresorptive agents. 356 , 357 This class of drugs, which includes alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronate, is extensively used in clinical settings to treat joint and bone illnesses such as multiple myeloma, advanced osteoporosis, bone metastatic cancer, PDB, and RA. 358 Although multiple studies have shown that bisphosphonates are effective in the treatment of osteoporosis (NCT03005678 and NCT00453492), their long‐term usage may be related to osteonecrosis; therefore, caution should be exercised when using these medications (NCT01526915). 359

5.2.3. Fresolimumab

Fresolimumab (GC1008) is a pan‐TGFβ neutralizing antibody 360 in clinical trials for OI and cancer. It effectively inhibits all three isoforms, particularly TGFβ1. 361 As there is no specific therapy for OI, drugs initially developed for osteoporosis are being tested for their effectiveness in treating adults with OI (NCT03064074). 362

5.2.4. Paroxetine

Paroxetine is a selective inhibitor of 5‐hydroxytryptamine reuptake, which is extensively employed for the treatment of depression, anxiety disorders, and Alzheimer's disease. 363 Recent studies have revealed that paroxetine can suppress pyroptosis and curtail the creation of osteoclasts by blocking the NF‐κB signaling pathway. This indicates its potential therapeutic benefits for individuals suffering from OA. 7 Furthermore, the applicability of paroxetine in treating RA is currently under investigation, as evidenced by ongoing research (NCT06231745).

5.3. Anabolic–antiresorptive agents

5.3.1. Romosozumab

Romosozumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting SOST, a protein secreted by osteocytes that plays a critical role in the regulation of bone homeostasis. SOST inhibits the Wnt signaling pathway in osteoblasts. 364 , 365 By neutralizing SOST, romosozumab enhances the Wnt pathway, leading to increased bone formation and, to a lesser extent, decreased bone resorption. 366 , 367 Clinical studies have demonstrated that treatment with romosozumab significantly improves BMD at key sites such as the spine and hip and reduces the risk of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (NCT00896532, NCT01575834). 368 , 369 Moreover, while romosozumab triggers an early and transient boost in bone formation, it more importantly results in a sustained decrease in bone resorption, thereby reducing overall bone turnover. 370 Romosozumab may be more effective than other drugs for bone formation. In a phase 3 clinical trial, romosozumab showed superior efficacy in increasing BMD compared with other treatments, such as alendronate and teriparatide (NCT01631214). 371 Alongside romosozumab, other anti‐SOST monoclonal antibodies, such as Blosozumab (NCT02109042) and BPS804 (NCT01406548), are currently under development, indicating a growing interest and recognition of the therapeutic potential of targeting SOST in bone disease management.

5.3.2. Adalimumab

TNF‐α antagonists, such as adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and golimumab, can promote a reverse signal that blocks the NF‐κB pathway. 372 , 373 TNF‐α is an important pathological mediator in both OA and RA. It can induce bone resorption directly by inducing osteoclastogenesis or indirectly by affecting RANKL, OPG, and PG production by osteoblasts. 374 Therefore, numerous studies have been conducted to establish that adalimumab can inhibit these pathways to treat OA and RA (NCT00686439, NCT02035800, and NCT01585064). 375

5.3.3. Menatetrenone

Menatetrenone (vitamin K2, VK2) is a fat‐soluble vitamin. Recent studies have found that VK2 may improve osteoporosis in individuals with type 2 diabetes by inhibiting ferritin deposition through activation of the AMPK/SIRT1 signaling pathway. 376 In a phase 4 clinical trial, menatetrenone increased OCN secretion and gamma‐carboxylation, with significant but modest increases in bone resorption and bone formation indices (NCT00548509).

5.3.4. Curcumin

Over the last half‐century, extensive studies have demonstrated that curcumin (diferuloylmethane), a component of the yellow spice turmeric, may alter various cell signaling pathways. 377 Curcumin has shown favorable results in terms of its antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and anticancer properties. 378 , 379 Therefore, it has been developed for the treatment of several cancers. However, studies have also begun to explore the use of curcumin for the treatment of RA because it is also a potent inhibitor of Notch1 (NCT00752154).

5.4. Anti‐inflammatory agents

5.4.1. Sulfasalazine

The IKK complex, which consists of IKKα and IKKβ as kinase subunits and IKKγ as a regulatory subunit, is activated upon stimulation of the conventional NF‐κB pathway. Since IKKα and IKKβ are essential components of the NF‐κB pathway, blocking them essentially obstructs the entire pathway. 380 Sulfasalazine, a disease‐modifying antirheumatic medication developed for RA and other autoimmune diseases, directly inhibits IKKα and IKKβ by blocking ATP binding. 381 , 382 Many nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, inhibitors of the NF‐κB pathway, can inhibit ATP binding to IKKβ, thereby preventing the activation and translocation of NF‐κB to the nucleus. 383 Furthermore, patients suffering from symptomatic OA in the knee might be treated with intra‐articular injection of SAR113945, which is an IKK inhibitor. 384 However, this drug has not been further validated in a three‐phase clinical trial (NCT01113333, NCT01463488).

5.4.2. Tofacitinib

Tofacitinib (CP‐690,550) is an innovative oral inhibitor of Janus kinase, currently being studied as a specific immunomodulator and therapy for modifying disease in RA. It impedes RANKL‐mediated osteoclastogenesis by blocking the activation of STAT3 and NF‐κB pathways. 385 Tofacitinib primarily targets JAK1 and JAK3, with some effect on JAK2 and tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2). In addition, tofacitinib can restore the γδ Treg/γδT17 cell balance, which effectively ameliorates RA progression. 386 In individuals with active RA, tofacitinib monotherapy has been linked to a decrease in RA signs and symptoms and better physical function (NCT00814307). 387 The combination of tofacitinib and iguratimod has been found to alleviate RA and secondary osteoporosis in a mouse model. 388 However, a clinical study revealed that tofacitinib promotes bone marrow adipocyte differentiation in RA patients (NCT04175886). 389 Consequently, more research is necessary to explore tofacitinib's impact on osteoporosis.

5.4.3. Baricitinib

Baricitinib is an orally administered small‐molecule JAK inhibitor that is used to treat moderate‐to‐severe RA. 361 Compared with placebo and adalimumab, baricitinib significantly improved clinical outcomes in RA patients who had not respond well to methotrexate treatment (NCT01710358). 390

5.4.4. Tocilizumab

Tocilizumab, which can be used in combination with methotrexate, is an IL‐6 receptor antagonist approved in many countries around the world. 391 It can be used to treat adults with moderately to severely active RA by inhibiting IL‐6 and blocking the jak/stat signaling pathway. 392 The long‐term efficacy and safety of tocilizumab have been established through extensive clinical experience in patients with both early and severe RA (NCT03781310, NCT02031471). 393 (Table 1)

TABLE 1.

Targeted therapeutic drugs for skeletal diseases in clinical trials.

Agent type Therapeutic target Agent Source Phase Enrollment Disease
Anabolic PTH1R Teriparatide NCT03002428 Phase 3 181 OP
NCT01293292 Phase 4 19 OP
NCT01400516 Phase 4 26 RA
Abaloparatide NCT03710889 Phase 3 23 OP
NCT01343004 Phase 3 2463 OP
Antiresorptive RANKL Denosumab NCT00089791 Phase 3 7808 OP
NCT01799798 Phase 2 10 OI
NCT02771860 Phase 2 100 OA
NCT01973569 Phase 3 679 RA
NCT02470091 Phase 2 56 OS
NCT00286091 Phase 3 1435 BM
NCT02299817 Phase 2 20 PPO
TGFβ1 Fresolimumab NCT03064074 Phase 1 11 OI
OCs Alendronate NCT03005678 Phase 4 140 OP
Risedronate NCT00453492 Phase 4 246 OP
Ibandronate NCT00683163 Phase 2/3 44 OP
Zoledronate NCT03183557 Phase 2 100 OP
NF‐κB Paroxetine NCT06231745 Phase 3 100 RA
Anabolic–antiresorptive TNF‐α Adalimumab NCT00686439 Phase 1/2 20 OA
NCT02035800 Phase 4 120 RA
Sclerostin Romosozumab NCT01588509 Phase 1 60 OP
NCT01575834 Phase 3 7180 OP
NCT04545554 Phase 1 25 OI
Blosozumab NCT02109042 Phase 1 15 OP
Setrusumab (BPS804) NCT01406548 Phase 2 44 OP
NCT03118570 Phase 2 112 OI
NCT05125809 Phase 2/3 219 OI
Notch‐1 Curcumin NCT00752154 Phase 1 40 RA
AMPK Menatetrenone NCT00548509 Phase 4 131 OP
Anti‐inflammatory NGF Tanezumab NCT02697773 Phase 3 698 OA
IKKα/IKKβ Sulfasalazine NCT01113333 Phase 1 40 OA
NCT01463488 Phase 1 24 OA
NF‐κB Cyclophosphamide NCT02693210 Phase 2 161 RA
NF‐κB/AP‐1 Corticosteroids NCT01724268 Phase 3 80 RA
JAK1/3 Tofacitinib NCT00814307 Phase 3 200 RA
JAK1/2 Baricitinib NCT01710358 Phase 2 120 RA
IL‐6/JAK1 Tocilizumab NCT03781310 Phase 4 80 RA
NCT02031471 Phase 3 57 RA

Abbreviations: BM, bone metastases; NGF, nerve growth factor.; OA, osteoarthritis; OCs, osteoclasts; OI, osteogenesis imperfecta; ONFH, osteonecrosis of the femoral head; OP, osteoporosis; OS, osteosarcoma; RA, rheumatic arthritis.

Source: Clinical Registration website https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

6. CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE

A deep comprehension of the intricate regulatory processes governing signaling pathways in bone maintenance is essential for the effective management and mitigation of bone‐related disorders. In this review, we focused on bone homeostasis and its signaling pathway mechanisms in various bone disease states. By modulating these signaling pathways, either through activation or inhibition, we can uncover new pathways for bone disease research and treatment.

Although current drugs targeting bone homeostasis, such as denosumab, teriparatide, and tofacitinib, have been very successful in the clinic, nonspecific targets can result in severe side effects. Recent years have seen a significant widening of research horizons in signaling pathways across multiple fields. Researchers have investigated novel targeted treatment strategies, including the use of peptides (WP9QY and OP3‐4) that block the interaction between RANKL and RANK 394 , 395 and the development of an innovative vaccine (mRANKL‐MT3) designed to activate LGR4. These approaches aim to suppress osteoclast activation by interfering with the RANK‐RANKL‐OPG signaling pathway. 396 Chen et al. 397 used the highly selective JAK3 inhibitor Z583 for treating RA, which avoids adverse events and side effects. In addition, Xu et al. 398 established BMP2 immune complexes (BMP2‐ICs) that can bind to osteoblast‐ and osteoclast‐lineage cells through the BMP2‐conjugated domain and Fc domain, respectively, facilitating communication between osteoblasts and osteoclasts and activating EphrinB2–EphB4 signaling to promote osteoblastogenesis and inhibit osteoclastogenesis. In addition, some traditional natural Chinese medicines have been found to target signaling pathways and are also used to treat skeletal diseases. 399 This diversification has enabled the repurposing of drugs originally designed for nonorthopedic conditions for bone disease treatment, leveraging their role in the regulation of bone homeostasis. To overcome the cardiac ischemia induced by the SOST inhibitor romosozumab, Wang et al. 400 developed a novel SOST inhibitor, Apc001PE, that promotes bone formation in OI mice by targeting loop3 to recognize recombinant SOST and SOST in the serum of OI patients without increasing cardiovascular risk.

However, the specificity and safety of these therapeutics warrant further in‐depth analysis. Ongoing investigations into the cellular and molecular foundations of bone homeostasis hold promise for pioneering enhanced therapeutic strategies for tackling bone‐related diseases. To decipher the complex molecular mechanisms and interactions within signaling pathway networks that control bone homeostasis, it is imperative to thoroughly explore the convergence points within these pathways. Such exploration could be key to unlocking novel and effective strategies for bone health management.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Zebin Wu, Wenming Li, and Kunlong Jiang conceived and drafted the manuscript. Zhixiang Lin and Chen Qian made the figures. Mingzhou Wu, Ning Li, and Yu Xia made the tables. Hongtao Zhang, Jiaxiang Bai, and Haixiang Xiao edited and revised the manuscript. Dechun Geng supervised and revised the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ETHICS STATEMENT

No ethical approval was required for this study.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX20230350), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2024M753130, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82002321, 82072425, 82272567 and 82072498), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK2021650 and BE2020666), the Jiangsu Medical Research Project (ZD2022014), the Special Project of Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Key Clinical Diseases in Suzhou (LCZX202003), the Program of Suzhou Health Commission (GSWS2022002), the National and Local Engineering Laboratory of New Functional Polymer Materials (SDGC2205), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), the Research Funds of Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM (2023IHM02007), the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX243339), and the Cross‐Innovation Program of Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University (2023).

Wu Z, Li W, Jiang K, et al. Regulation of bone homeostasis: signaling pathways and therapeutic targets. MedComm. 2024;5:e657. 10.1002/mco2.657

Contributor Information

Haixiang Xiao, Email: xiaohaixiang100@126.com.

Jiaxiang Bai, Email: jxbai1995@ustc.edu.cn.

Dechun Geng, Email: szgengdc@suda.edu.cn.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Not applicable.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Cheng L, Suresh KS, He H, et al. 3D printing of micro‐ and nanoscale bone substitutes: a review on technical and translational perspectives. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:4289‐4319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kim JM, Lin C, Stavre Z, Greenblatt MB, Shim JH. Osteoblast‐osteoclast communication and bone homeostasis. Cells. 2020;9(9):2073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cho E, Chen Z, Ding M, et al. PMSA prevents osteoclastogenesis and estrogen‐dependent bone loss in mice. Bone. 2021;142:115707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Jovanovic M, Guterman‐Ram G, Marini JC. Osteogenesis imperfecta: mechanisms and signaling pathways connecting classical and rare OI types. Endocr Rev. 2022;43(1):61‐90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wang J, Zhang Y, Cao J, et al. The role of autophagy in bone metabolism and clinical significance. Autophagy. 2023;19(9):2409‐2427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhang W, Li Y, Li S, et al. Associations of metabolic dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease and hepatic fibrosis with bone mineral density and risk of osteopenia/osteoporosis in T2DM patients. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1278505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lacey DL, Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, et al. Bench to bedside: elucidation of the OPG‐RANK‐RANKL pathway and the development of denosumab. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11(5):401‐419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Alman BA. The role of hedgehog signalling in skeletal health and disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(9):552‐560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zanotti S, Canalis E. Notch regulation of bone development and remodeling and related skeletal disorders. Calcif Tissue Int. 2012;90(2):69‐75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Shen J, Fu B, Li Y, et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase‐mediated regulation of osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:706395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Stewart S, Gomez AW, Armstrong BE, Henner A, Stankunas K. Sequential and opposing activities of wnt and BMP coordinate zebrafish bone regeneration. Cell Rep. 2014;6(3):482‐498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Arnst J, Jing Z, Cohen C, Ha SW, Viggeswarapu M, Beck GR. Bioactive silica nanoparticles target autophagy, NF‐κB, and MAPK pathways to inhibit osteoclastogenesis. Biomaterials. 2023;301:122238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lim DJ. Cross‐linking agents for electrospinning‐based bone tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(10):5444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhang J, Liu Z, Luo Y, et al. The role of flavonoids in the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:849513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Baum R, Gravallese EM. Bone as a target organ in rheumatic disease: impact on osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016;51(1):1‐15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zhang Y, Liang J, Liu P, Wang Q, Liu L, Zhao H. The RANK/RANKL/OPG system and tumor bone metastasis: potential mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:1063815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lee WC, Guntur AR, Long F, Rosen CJ. Energy metabolism of the osteoblast: implications for osteoporosis. Endocr Rev. 2017;38(3):255‐266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ponzetti M, Rucci N. Osteoblast differentiation and signaling: established concepts and emerging topics. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(13):6651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Marahleh A, Kitaura H, Ohori F, Noguchi T, Mizoguchi I. The osteocyte and its osteoclastogenic potential. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1121727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Arai F, Miyamoto T, Ohneda O, et al. Commitment and differentiation of osteoclast precursor cells by the sequential expression of c‐fms and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB (RANK) receptors. J Exp Med. 1999;190(12):1741‐1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Xu H, Wang W, Liu X, et al. Targeting strategies for bone diseases: signaling pathways and clinical studies. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Zhao B. Intrinsic restriction of TNF‐mediated inflammatory osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:583561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Stark Z, Savarirayan R. Osteopetrosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2009;4:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Narayanan A, Srinaath N, Rohini M, Selvamurugan N. Regulation of runx2 by MicroRNAs in osteoblast differentiation. Life Sci. 2019;232:116676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Chen D, Xie R, Shu B, et al. Wnt signaling in bone, kidney, intestine, and adipose tissue and interorgan interaction in aging. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019;1442(1):48‐60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Du Y, Zhang L, Wang Z, Zhao X, Zou J. Endocrine regulation of extra‐skeletal organs by bone‐derived secreted protein and the effect of mechanical stimulation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:778015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Aurilia C, Donati S, Palmini G, Miglietta F, Iantomasi T, Brandi ML. The involvement of long non‐coding RNAs in bone. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(8):3909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Li X, Han L, Nookaew I, et al. Stimulation of Piezo1 by mechanical signals promotes bone anabolism. eLife. 2019;8:e49631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lin H, Zhang W, Xu Y, et al. 4D label‐free quantitative proteomics analysis to screen potential drug targets of jiangu granules treatment for postmenopausal osteoporotic rats. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1052922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Li D, Liu J, Guo B, et al. Osteoclast‐derived exosomal miR‐214‐3p inhibits osteoblastic bone formation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Zhang Y, Kou Y, Yang P, et al. ED‐71 inhibited osteoclastogenesis by enhancing EphrinB2‐EphB4 signaling between osteoclasts and osteoblasts in osteoporosis. Cell Signal. 2022;96:110376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Piffko A, Uhl C, Vajkoczy P, Czabanka M, Broggini T. EphrinB2‐EphB4 signaling in neurooncological disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kovacic N, Grcevic D, Katavic V, Lukic IK, Marusic A. Targeting fas in osteoresorptive disorders. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2010;14(10):1121‐1134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Uenaka M, Yamashita E, Kikuta J, et al. Osteoblast‐derived vesicles induce a switch from bone‐formation to bone‐resorption in vivo. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Valenti MT, Marchetto G, Mottes M, Dalle Carbonare L. Zebrafish: a suitable tool for the study of cell signaling in bone. Cells. 2020;9(8):1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Nirala BK, Yamamichi T, Yustein JT. Deciphering the signaling mechanisms of osteosarcoma tumorigenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(14):11367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Luo J, Yang Z, Ma Y, et al. LGR4 is a receptor for RANKL and negatively regulates osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption. Nat Med. 2016;22(5):539‐546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. LaCroix AZ, Jackson RD, Aragaki A, et al. OPG and sRANKL serum levels and incident hip fracture in postmenopausal caucasian women in the women's health initiative observational study. Bone. 2013;56(2):474‐481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Marcadet L, Bouredji Z, Argaw A, Frenette J. The roles of RANK/RANKL/OPG in cardiac, skeletal, and smooth muscles in health and disease. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:903657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Honma M, Ikebuchi Y, Kariya Y, et al. RANKL subcellular trafficking and regulatory mechanisms in osteocytes. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(9):1936‐1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Sakamoto M, Fukunaga T, Sasaki K, et al. Vibration enhances osteoclastogenesis by inducing RANKL expression via NF‐κB signaling in osteocytes. Bone. 2019;123:56‐66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Bellido T. Osteocyte‐driven bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;94(1):25‐34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Robling AG, Bonewald LF. The osteocyte: new insights. Annu Rev Physiol. 2020;82:485‐506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Shen F, Huang X, He G, Shi Y. The emerging studies on mesenchymal progenitors in the long bone. Cell Biosci. 2023;13(1):105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Martin TJ. PTH1R actions on bone using the cAMP/protein kinase a pathway. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:833221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Xu X, Zheng L, Yuan Q, et al. Transforming growth factor‐β in stem cells and tissue homeostasis. Bone Res. 2018;6:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Babey M, Wang Y, Kubota T, et al. Gender‐specific differences in the skeletal response to continuous PTH in mice lacking the IGF1 receptor in mature osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(6):1064‐1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Oh YI, Kim JH, Kang CW. Protective effect of short‐term treatment with parathyroid hormone 1–34 on oxidative stress is involved in insulin‐like growth factor‐I and nuclear factor erythroid 2‐related factor 2 in rat bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Regul Pept. 2014;189:1‐10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kim JH, Kim AR, Choi YH, et al. Intermittent PTH administration improves alveolar bone formation in type 1 diabetic rats with periodontitis. J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Cheng J, Lv Y, Zhang L, Liu Y. Construction and validation of a predictive model for hypocalcemia after parathyroidectomy in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:1040264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Wein MN. Parathyroid hormone signaling in osteocytes. JBMR Plus. 2018;2(1):22‐30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Calvi LM, Bromberg O, Rhee Y, et al. Osteoblastic expansion induced by parathyroid hormone receptor signaling in murine osteocytes is not sufficient to increase hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2012;119(11):2489‐2499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Zhao X, Erhardt S, Sung K, Wang J. FGF signaling in cranial suture development and related diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1112890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Ornitz DM, Marie PJ. Fibroblast growth factor signaling in skeletal development and disease. Genes Dev. 2015;29(14):1463‐1486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Turner N, Grose R. Fibroblast growth factor signalling: from development to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(2):116‐129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Di Maggio N, Mehrkens A, Papadimitropoulos A, et al. Fibroblast growth factor‐2 maintains a niche‐dependent population of self‐renewing highly potent non‐adherent mesenchymal progenitors through FGFR2c. Stem Cells Dayt Ohio. 2012;30(7):1455‐1464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Haupt LM, Murali S, Mun FK, et al. The heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) glypican‐3 mediates commitment of MC3T3‐e1 cells toward osteogenesis. J Cell Physiol. 2009;220(3):780‐791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Niger C, Luciotti MA, Buo AM, Hebert C, Ma V, Stains JP. The regulation of runt‐related transcription factor 2 by fibroblast growth factor‐2 and connexin43 requires the inositol polyphosphate/protein kinase cδ cascade. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(6):1468‐1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Ikpegbu E, Basta L, Clements DN, et al. FGF‐2 promotes osteocyte differentiation through increased e11/podoplanin expression. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(7):5334‐5347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Montero A, Okada Y, Tomita M, et al. Disruption of the fibroblast growth factor‐2 gene results in decreased bone mass and bone formation. J Clin Invest. 2000;105(8):1085‐1093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Lin JM, Callon KE, Lin JS, et al. Actions of fibroblast growth factor‐8 in bone cells in vitro. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009;297(1):E142‐150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Murugaiyan K, Amirthalingam S, Hwang NS, Jayakumar R. Role of FGF‐18 in bone regeneration. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(1):36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Warren SM, Brunet LJ, Harland RM, Economides AN, Longaker MT. The BMP antagonist noggin regulates cranial suture fusion. Nature. 2003;422(6932):625‐629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Murali SK, Roschger P, Zeitz U, Klaushofer K, Andrukhova O, Erben RG. FGF23 regulates bone mineralization in a 1,25(OH)2 d3 and klotho‐independent manner. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(1):129‐142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Tang Y, Yang P, Jin M, et al. Fgfr1 deficiency in osteocytes leads to increased bone mass by enhancing wnt/β‐catenin signaling. Bone. 2023;174:116817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. McKenzie J, Smith C, Karuppaiah K, Langberg J, Silva MJ, Ornitz DM. Osteocyte death and bone overgrowth in mice lacking fibroblast growth factor receptors 1 and 2 in mature osteoblasts and osteocytes. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(9):1660‐1675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Li X. The FGF metabolic axis. Front Med. 2019;13(5):511‐530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Chikazu D, Hakeda Y, Ogata N, et al. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)‐2 directly stimulates mature osteoclast function through activation of FGF receptor 1 and p42/p44 MAP kinase. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(40):31444‐31450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Wen X, Hu G, Xiao X, et al. FGF2 positively regulates osteoclastogenesis via activating the ERK‐CREB pathway. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2022;727:109348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Su N, Li X, Tang Y, et al. Deletion of FGFR3 in osteoclast lineage cells results in increased bone mass in mice by inhibiting osteoclastic bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(9):1676‐1687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Bosetti M, Leigheb M, Brooks RA, Boccafoschi F, Cannas MF. Regulation of osteoblast and osteoclast functions by FGF‐6. J Cell Physiol. 2010;225(2):466‐471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Shimoaka T, Ogasawara T, Yonamine A, et al. Regulation of osteoblast, chondrocyte, and osteoclast functions by fibroblast growth factor (FGF)‐18 in comparison with FGF‐2 and FGF‐10. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(9):7493‐7500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Amblee A, Uy J, Senseng C, Hart P. Tumor‐induced osteomalacia with normal systemic fibroblast growth factor‐23 level. Clin Kidney J. 2014;7(2):186‐189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Liu XY, Li X, Bai MR, et al. FGF‐7 dictates osteocyte cell processes through beta‐catenin transduction. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):14792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Ragagnin AMG, Shadfar S, Vidal M, Jamali MS, Atkin JD. Motor neuron susceptibility in ALS/FTD. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Vella V, Lappano R, Bonavita E, et al. Insulin/IGF axis and the receptor for advanced glycation end products: role in meta‐inflammation and potential in cancer therapy. Endocr Rev. 2023;44(4):693‐723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Samsa WE, Zhou X, Zhou G. Signaling pathways regulating cartilage growth plate formation and activity. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017;62:3‐15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Kalantzakos TJ, Sebel LE, Trussler J, et al. MicroRNA associated with the invasive phenotype in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: let‐7c‐5p inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion by targeting insulin‐like growth factor 1 receptor. Biomedicines. 2022;10(10):2425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. García‐Mato Á, Cervantes B, Murillo‐Cuesta S, Rodríguez‐de la Rosa L, Varela‐Nieto I. Insulin‐like growth factor 1 signaling in mammalian hearing. Genes. 2021;12(10):1553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Janssen JAMJL, Smith TJ. Lessons learned from targeting IGF‐I receptor in thyroid‐associated ophthalmopathy. Cells. 2021;10(2):383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. LeRoith D, Holly JMP, Forbes BE. Insulin‐like growth factors: ligands, binding proteins, and receptors. Mol Metab. 2021;52:101245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Tahimic CGT, Wang Y, Bikle DD. Anabolic effects of IGF‐1 signaling on the skeleton. Front Endocrinol. 2013;4:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Chen L, Tian M, Yang J, Wu Z. Berberine‐encapsulated poly(lactic‐co‐glycolic acid)‐hydroxyapatite (PLGA/HA) microspheres synergistically promote bone regeneration with DOPA‐IGF‐1 via the IGF‐1R/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(20):15403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Sun Y, Li J, Xie X, et al. Recent advances in osteoclast biological behavior. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:788680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Yang YJ, Kim DJ. An overview of the molecular mechanisms contributing to musculoskeletal disorders in chronic liver disease: osteoporosis, sarcopenia, and osteoporotic sarcopenia. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(5):2604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Qiu T, Wu X, Zhang F, Clemens TL, Wan M, Cao X. TGF‐beta type II receptor phosphorylates PTH receptor to integrate bone remodelling signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12(3):224‐234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Fang J, Zhang X, Chen X, et al. The role of insulin‐like growth factor‐1 in bone remodeling: a review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;238:124125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Kitaura H, Marahleh A, Ohori F, et al. Osteocyte‐related cytokines regulate osteoclast formation and bone resorption. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14):5169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Ono T, Hayashi M, Sasaki F, Nakashima T. RANKL biology: bone metabolism, the immune system, and beyond. Inflamm Regen. 2020;40:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Chen L, Jiang W, Huang J, et al. Insulin‐like growth factor 2 (IGF‐2) potentiates BMP‐9‐induced osteogenic differentiation and bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(11). Accessed March 21, 2024 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20499340/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Metzger CE, Narayanan A, Zawieja DC, Bloomfield SA. Inflammatory bowel disease in a rodent model alters osteocyte protein levels controlling bone turnover. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(4):802‐813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Lau KHW, Baylink DJ, Sheng MHC. Osteocyte‐derived insulin‐like growth factor I is not essential for the bone repletion response in mice. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0115897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Guo X, Wang XF. Signaling cross‐talk between TGF‐β/BMP and other pathways. Cell Res. 2009;19(1):71‐88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Zaidi M, Kim SM, Mathew M, et al. Bone circuitry and interorgan skeletal crosstalk. eLife. 2023;12:e83142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Chen H, Tan XN, Hu S, et al. Molecular mechanisms of chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:664168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Yu S, Guo J, Sun Z, et al. BMP2‐dependent gene regulatory network analysis reveals klf4 as a novel transcription factor of osteoblast differentiation. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(2):197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Liu DD, Zhang CY, Liu Y, Li J, Wang YX, Zheng SG. RUNX2 regulates osteoblast differentiation via the BMP4 signaling pathway. J Dent Res. 2022;101(10):1227‐1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Lin W, Zhu X, Gao L, Mao M, Gao D, Huang Z. Osteomodulin positively regulates osteogenesis through interaction with BMP2. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(2):147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Ma L, He X, Wu Q. The molecular regulatory mechanism in multipotency and differentiation of wharton's jelly stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(16):12909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Wu M, Chen G, Li YP. TGF‐β and BMP signaling in osteoblast, skeletal development, and bone formation, homeostasis and disease. Bone Res. 2016;4:16009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Yang J, Ueharu H, Mishina Y. Energy metabolism: a newly emerging target of BMP signaling in bone homeostasis. Bone. 2020;138:115467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Naik AS, Lin JM, Taroc EZM, et al. Smad4‐dependent morphogenic signals control the maturation and axonal targeting of basal vomeronasal sensory neurons to the accessory olfactory bulb. Dev Camb Engl. 2020;147(8):dev184036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Manoharan I, Swafford D, Shanmugam A, et al. Genetic deletion of LRP5 and LRP6 in macrophages exacerbates colitis‐associated systemic inflammation and kidney injury in response to intestinal commensal microbiota. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950. 2022;209(2):368‐378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Carmon KS, Gong X, Lin Q, Thomas A, Liu Q. R‐spondins function as ligands of the orphan receptors LGR4 and LGR5 to regulate wnt/beta‐catenin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(28):11452‐11457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Tasca A, Stemig M, Broege A, et al. Smad1/5 and smad4 expression are important for osteoclast differentiation. J Cell Biochem. 2015;116(7):1350‐1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Wang CL, Wang H, Xiao F, et al. Cyclic compressive stress‐induced scinderin regulates progress of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;485(2):400‐408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Wang S, Wu W, Lin X, et al. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers of bone metastasis in breast cancer: current status and future directions. Cell Biosci. 2023;13(1):224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Zou ML, Chen ZH, Teng YY, et al. The smad dependent TGF‐β and BMP signaling pathway in bone remodeling and therapies. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:593310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Lu Y, Chen S, Yang N. Expression and methylation of FGF2, TGF‐β and their downstream mediators during different developmental stages of leg muscles in chicken. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Wu M, Wu S, Chen W, Li YP. The roles and regulatory mechanisms of TGF‐β and BMP signaling in bone and cartilage development, homeostasis and disease. Cell Res. 2024;34(2):101‐123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Hu Y, He J, He L, Xu B, Wang Q. Expression and function of smad7 in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. J Mol Med Berl Ger. 2021;99(9):1209‐1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Zhang J, Zhang X, Xie F, et al. The regulation of TGF‐β/SMAD signaling by protein deubiquitination. Protein Cell. 2014;5(7):503‐517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Loh HY, Norman BP, Lai KS, et al. Post‐transcriptional regulatory crosstalk between MicroRNAs and canonical TGF‐β/BMP signalling cascades on osteoblast lineage: a comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(7):6423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Chen G, Deng C, Li YP. TGF‐β and BMP signaling in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8(2):272‐288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Usategui‐Martín R, Rigual R, Ruiz‐Mambrilla M, Fernández‐Gómez JM, Dueñas A, Pérez‐Castrillón JL. Molecular mechanisms involved in hypoxia‐induced alterations in bone remodeling. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(6):3233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Vlashi R, Zhang X, Wu M, Chen G. Wnt signaling: essential roles in osteoblast differentiation, bone metabolism and therapeutic implications for bone and skeletal disorders. Genes Dis. 2023;10(4):1291‐1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Jura‐Półtorak A, Szeremeta A, Olczyk K, Zoń‐Giebel A, Komosińska‐Vassev K. Bone metabolism and RANKL/OPG ratio in rheumatoid arthritis women treated with TNF‐α inhibitors. J Clin Med. 2021;10(13):2905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Houde N, Chamoux E, Bisson M, Roux S. Transforming growth factor‐beta1 (TGF‐beta1) induces human osteoclast apoptosis by up‐regulating bim. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(35):23397‐23404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Tominaga K, Suzuki HI. TGF‐β signaling in cellular senescence and aging‐related pathology. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(20):5002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Oliveira LFS, Predes D, Borges HL, Abreu JG. Therapeutic potential of naturally occurring small molecules to target the wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway in colorectal cancer. Cancers. 2022;14(2):403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Yao Q, Wu X, Tao C, et al. Osteoarthritis: pathogenic signaling pathways and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Gao Y, Chen N, Fu Z, Zhang Q. Progress of wnt signaling pathway in osteoporosis. Biomolecules. 2023;13(3):483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Bao K, Jiao Y, Xing L, Zhang F, Tian F. The role of wnt signaling in diabetes‐induced osteoporosis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023;15(1):84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Maeda K, Yoshida K, Nishizawa T, et al. Inflammation and bone metabolism in rheumatoid arthritis: molecular mechanisms of joint destruction and pharmacological treatments. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(5):2871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Yang L, Li Q, Zhang J, et al. Wnt7a promotes the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Med. 2021;47(6):94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Moorer MC, Riddle RC. Regulation of osteoblast metabolism by Wnt signaling. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2018;33(3):318‐330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Qiu WX, Ma XL, Lin X, et al. Deficiency of macf1 in osterix expressing cells decreases bone formation by bmp2/smad/runx2 pathway. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(1):317‐327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Zhang R, Oyajobi BO, Harris SE, et al. Wnt/β‐catenin signaling activates bone morphogenetic protein 2 expression in osteoblasts. Bone. 2013;52(1):145‐156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Su XY, Zou X, Chen QZ, et al. Follicle‐stimulating hormone β‐subunit potentiates bone morphogenetic protein 9‐induced osteogenic differentiation in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118(7):1792‐1802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Haffner‐Luntzer M, Ragipoglu D, Ahmad M, et al. Wnt1 boosts fracture healing by enhancing bone formation in the fracture callus. J Bone Miner Res. 2023;38(5):749‐764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Wang Y, Fan X, Xing L, Tian F. Wnt signaling: a promising target for osteoarthritis therapy. Cell Commun Signal. 2019;17(1):97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Iolascon G, Liguori S, Paoletta M, Toro G, Moretti A. Anti‐sclerostin antibodies: a new frontier in fragility fractures treatment. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2023;15:1759720×231197094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Gebetsberger J, Schirmer M, Wurzer WJ, Streif W. Low bone mineral density in hemophiliacs. Front Med. 2022;9:794456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Boyce BF, Li J, Xing L, Yao Z. Bone remodeling and the role of TRAF3 in osteoclastic bone resorption. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Song D, Wu ZS, Xu Q, et al. LRRC17 regulates the bone metabolism of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from patients with idiopathic necrosis of femoral head through wnt signaling pathways: a preliminary report. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(1):666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Weivoda MM, Ruan M, Hachfeld CM, et al. Wnt signaling inhibits osteoclast differentiation by activating canonical and noncanonical cAMP/PKA pathways. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(8):1546‐1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Novack DV. Role of NF‐κB in the skeleton. Cell Res. 2011;21(1):169‐182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Guo Q, Jin Y, Chen X, et al. NF‐κB in biology and targeted therapy: new insights and translational implications. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):1‐37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Wang WJ, He JW, Fu WZ, Wang C, Zhang ZL. Genetic polymorphisms of nuclear factor‐κB family affect the bone mineral density response to zoledronic acid therapy in postmenopausal Chinese women. Genes. 2022;13(8):1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Eckhardt I, Roesler S, Fulda S. Identification of DR5 as a critical, NF‐κB‐regulated mediator of smac‐induced apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4(11):e936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Hou Y, Liang H, Rao E, et al. Non‐canonical NF‐κB antagonizes STING sensor‐mediated DNA sensing in radiotherapy. Immunity. 2018;49(3):490‐503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Lee MJ, Lim E, Mun S, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) attenuates TNF‐induced pathologic bone resorption and suppresses osteoclastogenesis by inducing A20 expression. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231(2):449‐458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Jiang T, Xia T, Qiao F, Wang N, Jiang Y, Xin H. Role and regulation of transcription factors in osteoclastogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(22):16175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Zhou BN, Zhang Q, Li M. Alzheimer's disease and its associated risk of bone fractures: a narrative review. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1190762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Davis JL, Pokhrel NK, Cox L, Rohatgi N, Faccio R, Veis DJ. Conditional loss of IKKα in osterix + cells has no effect on bone but leads to age‐related loss of peripheral fat. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):4915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Burley TA, Kennedy E, Broad G, et al. Targeting the non‐canonical NF‐κB pathway in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple myeloma. Cancers. 2022;14(6):1489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Swarnkar G, Chen THP, Arra M, Nasir AM, Mbalaviele G, Abu‐Amer Y. NUMBL interacts with TAK1, TRAF6 and NEMO to negatively regulate NF‐κB signaling during osteoclastogenesis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Li J, Ayoub A, Xiu Y, et al. TGFβ‐induced degradation of TRAF3 in mesenchymal progenitor cells causes age‐related osteoporosis. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Miyazaki T, Zhao Z, Ichihara Y, et al. Mechanical regulation of bone homeostasis through p130Cas‐mediated alleviation of NF‐κB activity. Sci Adv. 2019;5(9):eaau7802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Huang X, Xie M, Xie Y, et al. The roles of osteocytes in alveolar bone destruction in periodontitis. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Yang J, Nie J, Ma X, Wei Y, Peng Y, Wei X. Targeting PI3K in cancer: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Janku F, Yap TA. Meric‐Bernstam F. Targeting the PI3K pathway in cancer: are we making headway? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(5):273‐291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. He Y, Sun MM, Zhang GG, et al. Targeting PI3K/akt signal transduction for cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Yuan T, Cantley L. PI3K pathway alterations in cancer: variations on a theme. Oncogene. 2008;27(41):5497‐5510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Virbasius JV, Guilherme A, Czech MP. Mouse p170 is a novel phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase containing a c2 domain. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(23):13304‐13307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Backer JM. The intricate regulation and complex functions of the class III phosphoinositide 3‐kinase vps34. Biochem J. 2016;473(15):2251‐2271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Li GM, Liang CJ, Zhang DX, Zhang LJ, Wu JX, Xu YC. XB130 knockdown inhibits the proliferation, invasiveness, and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells and sensitizes them to TRAIL‐induced apoptosis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2018;131(19):2320‐2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Hua H, Zhang H, Chen J, Wang J, Liu J, Jiang Y. Targeting akt in cancer for precision therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Walkowski B, Kleibert M, Majka M, Wojciechowska M. Insight into the role of the PI3K/akt pathway in ischemic injury and post‐infarct left ventricular remodeling in normal and diabetic heart. Cells. 2022;11(9):1553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Shi X, Wang J, Lei Y, Cong C, Tan D, Zhou X. Research progress on the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in gynecological cancer (review). Mol Med Rep. 2019;19(6):4529‐4535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Tang T, Hasan M, Capelluto DGS. Phafins are more than phosphoinositide‐binding proteins. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(9):8096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Toulany M, Maier J, Iida M, et al. Akt1 and akt3 but not akt2 through interaction with DNA‐PKcs stimulate proliferation and post‐irradiation cell survival of K‐RAS‐mutated cancer cells. Cell Death Discov. 2017;3:17072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Haddadi N, Lin Y, Travis G, Simpson AM, Nassif NT, McGowan EM. PTEN/PTENP1: “regulating the regulator of RTK‐dependent PI3K/akt signalling”, new targets for cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Yu C, Zhang B, Li YL, Yu XR. SIX1 reduces the expression of PTEN via activating PI3K/AKT signal to promote cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in osteosarcoma. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;105:10‐17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Zhao KH, Zhang C, Bai Y, et al. Antiglioma effects of cytarabine on leptomeningeal metastasis of high‐grade glioma by targeting the PI3K/akt/mTOR pathway. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:1905‐1915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Wang J, Chen T, Li X, et al. A study on the anti‐osteoporosis mechanism of isopsoralen based on network pharmacology and molecular experiments. J Orthop Surg. 2023;18(1):304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Xie X, Hu L, Mi B, et al. SHIP1 activator AQX‐1125 regulates osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis through PI3K/akt and NF‐κb signaling. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:826023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Moon JB, Kim JH, Kim K, et al. Akt induces osteoclast differentiation through regulating the GSK3β/NFATc1 signaling cascade. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950. 2012;188(1):163‐169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Karkache IY, Damodaran JR, Molstad DHH, Bradley EW. Serine/threonine phosphatases in osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. Gene. 2021;771:145362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Wang T, Fan L, Feng S, et al. Network pharmacology of iridoid glycosides from eucommia ulmoides oliver against osteoporosis. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):7430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Zeng Y, Riquelme MA, Hua R, et al. Mechanosensitive piezo1 calcium channel activates connexin 43 hemichannels through PI3K signaling pathway in bone. Cell Biosci. 2022;12(1):191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Wang Z, Guo J. Mechanical induction of BMP‐7 in osteocyte blocks glucocorticoid‐induced apoptosis through PI3K/AKT/GSK3β pathway. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013;67(2):567‐574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Paes J, Silva GAV, Tarragô AM, de Mourão LP S. The contribution of JAK2 46/1 haplotype in the predisposition to myeloproliferative neoplasms. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(20):12582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang H, et al. Pathogenesis of allergic diseases and implications for therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Putz EM, Majoros A, Gotthardt D, et al. Novel non‐canonical role of STAT1 in natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5(9):e1186314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Fornari Laurindo L, Aparecido Dias J, Cressoni Araújo A, et al. Immunological dimensions of neuroinflammation and microglial activation: exploring innovative immunomodulatory approaches to mitigate neuroinflammatory progression. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1305933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Hu X, li J, Fu M, Zhao X, Wang W. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: from bench to clinic. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Johnson HM, Noon‐Song E, Ahmed CM. Noncanonical IFN signaling, steroids, and STATs: a probable role of V‐ATPase. Mediators Inflamm. 2019;2019:4143604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Sanpaolo ER, Rotondo C, Cici D, Corrado A, Cantatore FP. JAK/STAT pathway and molecular mechanism in bone remodeling. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47(11):9087‐9096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Sims NA. The JAK1/STAT3/SOCS3 axis in bone development, physiology, and pathology. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52(8):1185‐1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Bakker AD, Jaspers RT. IL‐6 and IGF‐1 signaling within and between muscle and bone: how important is the mTOR pathway for bone metabolism? Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2015;13(3):131‐139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Zastulka A, Clichici S, Tomoaia‐Cotisel M, et al. Recent trends in hydroxyapatite supplementation for osteoregenerative purposes. Mater Basel Switz. 2023;16(3):1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Shao M, Wang Q, Lv Q, Zhang Y, Gao G, Lu S. Advances in the research on myokine‐driven regulation of bone metabolism. Heliyon. 2024;10(1):e22547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Guo Y, Li P, Wang Z, Zhang P, Wu X. Sustained delivery of methylsulfonylmethane from biodegradable scaffolds enhances efficient bone regeneration. Int J Nanomedicine. 2022;17:4829‐4842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Godoi MA, Camilli AC, Gonzales KGA, et al. JAK/STAT as a potential therapeutic target for osteolytic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(12):10290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Adam S, Simon N, Steffen U, et al. JAK inhibition increases bone mass in steady‐state conditions and ameliorates pathological bone loss by stimulating osteoblast function. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(530):eaay4447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Deng T, Xu J, Wang Q, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of curcumin on macrophage polarization in rheumatoid arthritis. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1369337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Eguchi T, Watanabe K, Hara ES, Ono M, Kuboki T, Calderwood SK. OstemiR: a novel panel of microRNA biomarkers in osteoblastic and osteocytic differentiation from mesencymal stem cells. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Moustardas P, Aberdam D, Lagali N. MAPK pathways in ocular pathophysiology: potential therapeutic drugs and challenges. Cells. 2023;12(4):617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Geng H, Li R, Feng D, Zhu Y, Deng L. Role of the p38/AKT pathway in the promotion of cell proliferation by serum heat inactivation. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(22):16538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Xie C, Yang L, Gai Y. MAPKKKs in plants: multidimensional regulators of plant growth and stress responses. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(4):4117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Sinkala M, Nkhoma P, Mulder N, Martin DP. Integrated molecular characterisation of the MAPK pathways in human cancers reveals pharmacologically vulnerable mutations and gene dependencies. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Iyer AKV, Rojansakul Y, Azad N. Nitrosothiol signaling and protein nitrosation in cell death. Nitric Oxide Biol Chem. 2014;0:9‐18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Moon H, Ro SW. MAPK/ERK signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers. 2021;13(12):3026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Han CW, Jeong MS, Jang SB. Understand KRAS and the quest for anti‐cancer drugs. Cells. 2021;10(4):842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Majidinia M, Sadeghpour A, Yousefi B. The roles of signaling pathways in bone repair and regeneration. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(4):2937‐2948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197. Song J, Ye B, Liu H, et al. Fak‐mapk, hippo and wnt signalling pathway expression and regulation in distraction osteogenesis. Cell Prolif. 2018;51(4):e12453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198. Luo P, Yuan Q, ling YangM, Wan X, Xu P. The role of cells and signal pathways in subchondral bone in osteoarthritis. Bone Jt Res. 2023;12(9):536‐545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199. Stavre Z, Kim JM, Yang YS, et al. Schnurri‐3 inhibition suppresses bone and joint damage in models of rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120(19):e2218019120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. Greenblatt MB, Shim JH, Glimcher LH. Mitogen‐activated protein kinase pathways in osteoblasts. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2013;29:63‐79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201. Oh CD, Chang SH, Yoon YM, et al. Opposing role of mitogen‐activated protein kinase subtypes, erk‐1/2 and p38, in the regulation of chondrogenesis of mesenchymes. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(8):5613‐5619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202. Xu C, Liu H, He Y, Li Y, He X. Endothelial progenitor cells promote osteogenic differentiation in co‐cultured with mesenchymal stem cells via the MAPK‐dependent pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203. Pérez‐Lozano ML, Cesaro A, Mazor M, et al. Emerging natural‐product‐based treatments for the management of osteoarthritis. Antioxid Basel Switz. 2021;10(2):265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204. Kim M, Lim J, Lee JH, et al. Understanding the functional role of genistein in the bone differentiation in mouse osteoblastic cell line MC3T3‐e1 by RNA‐seq analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205. Chang W, Tu C, Chen TH, Bikle D, Shoback D. The extracellular calcium‐sensing receptor (CaSR) is a critical modulator of skeletal development. Sci Signal. 2008;1(35):ra1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206. Giardullo L, Altomare A, Rotondo C, Corrado A, Cantatore FP. Osteoblast dysfunction in non‐hereditary sclerosing bone diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15):7980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207. Kanagaki S, Tsutsui Y, Kobayashi N, et al. Activation of AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK) through inhibiting interaction with prohibitins. iScience. 2023;26(4):106293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208. Long S, Zhou Y, Bai D, et al. Fatty acids regulate porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection via the AMPK‐ACC1 signaling pathway. Viruses. 2019;11(12):1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209. Jeyabalan J, Shah M, Viollet B, Chenu C. AMP‐activated protein kinase pathway and bone metabolism. J Endocrinol. 2012;212(3):277‐290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210. Hardie DG. AMPK and SNF1: snuffing out stress. Cell Metab. 2007;6(5):339‐340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211. Penfold L, Woods A, Pollard AE, et al. AMPK activation protects against prostate cancer by inducing a catabolic cellular state. Cell Rep. 2023;42(4):112396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212. Liao XZ, Gao Y, Zhao HW, et al. Cordycepin reverses cisplatin resistance in non‐small cell lung cancer by activating AMPK and inhibiting AKT signaling pathway. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:609285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213. Hsu CC, Peng D, Cai Z, Lin HK. AMPK signaling and its targeting in cancer progression and treatment. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;85:52‐68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214. Hasanvand A. The role of AMPK‐dependent pathways in cellular and molecular mechanisms of metformin: a new perspective for treatment and prevention of diseases. Inflammopharmacology. 2022;30(3):775‐788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215. Guntur AR, Rosen CJ. Bone as an endocrine organ. Endocr Pract. 2012;18(5):758‐762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216. He M, Lu B, Opoku M, et al. Metformin prevents or delays the development and progression of osteoarthritis: new insight and mechanism of action. Cells. 2022;11(19):3012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217. Hardaway AL, Herroon MK, Rajagurubandara E, Podgorski I. Bone marrow fat: linking adipocyte‐induced inflammation with skeletal metastases. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2014;33(2‐3):527‐543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218. Takada I, Suzawa M, Matsumoto K, Kato S. Suppression of PPAR transactivation switches cell fate of bone marrow stem cells from adipocytes into osteoblasts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1116:182‐195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219. Kang S, Bennett CN, Gerin I, Rapp LA, Hankenson KD, MacDougald OA. Wnt signaling stimulates osteoblastogenesis of mesenchymal precursors by suppressing CCAAT/enhancer‐binding protein α and peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(19):14515‐14524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220. Lee MKS, Cooney OD, Lin X, et al. Defective AMPK regulation of cholesterol metabolism accelerates atherosclerosis by promoting HSPC mobilization and myelopoiesis. Mol Metab. 2022;61:101514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221. Sánchez‐de‐Diego C, Artigas N, Pimenta‐Lopes C, et al. Glucose restriction promotes osteocyte specification by activating a PGC‐1α‐dependent transcriptional program. iScience. 2019;15:79‐94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222. Kanazawa I. Interaction between bone and glucose metabolism [review. Endocr J. 2017;64(11):1043‐1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223. Zhou H, Zhang L, Chen Y, Zhu CH, Chen FM, Li A. Research progress on the hedgehog signalling pathway in regulating bone formation and homeostasis. Cell Prolif. 2022;55(1):e13162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224. Ohba S. Hedgehog signaling in skeletal development: roles of Indian hedgehog and the mode of its action. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225. Zhang L, Fu X, Ni L, et al. Hedgehog signaling controls bone homeostasis by regulating osteogenic/adipogenic fate of skeletal stem/progenitor cells in mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2022;37(3):559‐576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226. Zhang X, Cheng Q, Wang Y, Leung PS, Mak KK. Hedgehog signaling in bone regulates whole‐body energy metabolism through a bone‐adipose endocrine relay mediated by PTHrP and adiponectin. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24(2):225‐237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227. Thomas S, Jaganathan BG. Signaling network regulating osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Commun Signal. 2022;16(1):47‐61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228. Mak KK, Chen MH, Day TF, Chuang PT, Yang Y. Wnt/beta‐catenin signaling interacts differentially with ihh signaling in controlling endochondral bone and synovial joint formation. Dev Camb Engl. 2006;133(18):3695‐3707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229. Verbruggen SW, Nolan J, Duffy MP, Pearce OMT, Jacobs CR, Knight MM. A novel primary cilium‐mediated mechanism through which osteocytes regulate metastatic behavior of both breast and prostate cancer cells. Adv Sci Weinh Baden‐Wurtt Ger. 2024;11(2):e2305842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230. Saito T, Tanaka S. Molecular mechanisms underlying osteoarthritis development: notch and NF‐κB. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231. Zanotti S, Canalis E. Notch signaling and the skeleton. Endocr Rev. 2016;37(3):223‐253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232. Lee S, Remark LH, Josephson AM, et al. Notch‐wnt signal crosstalk regulates proliferation and differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells during intramembranous bone healing. NPJ Regen Med. 2021;6(1):29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233. Canalis E. Notch in skeletal physiology and disease. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(12):2611‐2621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234. Salhotra A, Shah HN, Levi B, Longaker MT. Mechanisms of bone development and repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(11):696‐711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235. Tao J, Jiang MM, Jiang L, et al. Notch activation as a driver of osteogenic sarcoma. Cancer Cell. 2014;26(3):390‐401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236. Lungu O, Toscani D, Burroughs‐Garcia J, Giuliani N. The metabolic features of osteoblasts: implications for multiple myeloma (MM) bone disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(5):4893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237. Xu Y, Shu B, Tian Y, et al. Notch activation promotes osteoblast mineralization by inhibition of apoptosis. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(10):6921‐6928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238. Peymanfar Y, Su YW, Xian CJ. Notch2 blockade mitigates methotrexate chemotherapy‐induced bone loss and marrow adiposity. Cells. 2022;11(9):1521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239. Bai S, Kopan R, Zou W, et al. NOTCH1 regulates osteoclastogenesis directly in osteoclast precursors and indirectly via osteoblast lineage cells. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(10):6509‐6518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240. Zhao B, Grimes SN, Li S, Hu X, Ivashkiv LB. TNF‐induced osteoclastogenesis and inflammatory bone resorption are inhibited by transcription factor RBP‐J. J Exp Med. 2012;209(2):319‐334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241. Canalis E, Schilling L, Yee SP, Lee SK, Zanotti S. Hajdu Cheney mouse mutants exhibit osteopenia, increased osteoclastogenesis, and bone resorption. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(4):1538‐1551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242. Shea CA, Murphy P. The primary cilium on cells of developing skeletal rudiments; distribution, characteristics and response to mechanical stimulation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:725018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243. Xu X, Liu S, Liu H, et al. Piezo channels: awesome mechanosensitive structures in cellular mechanotransduction and their role in bone. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(12):6429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244. Tsai TT, Cheng CM, Chen CF, Lai PL. Mechanotransduction in intervertebral discs. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18(12):2351‐2360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245. Yan W, Maimaitimin M, Wu Y, et al. Meniscal fibrocartilage regeneration inspired by meniscal maturational and regenerative process. Sci Adv. 2023;9(45):eadg8138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246. Brylka LJ, Alimy AR, Tschaffon‐Müller MEA, et al. Piezo1 expression in chondrocytes controls endochondral ossification and osteoarthritis development. Bone Res. 2024;12(1):12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247. Wu Y, Wu J, Huang X, et al. Accelerated osteogenesis of bone graft by optimizing the bone microenvironment formed by electrical signals dependent on driving micro vibration stimulation. Mater Today Bio. 2023;23:100891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248. Xie W, Xiao W, Tang K, Zhang L, Li Y. Yes‐associated protein 1: role and treatment prospects in orthopedic degenerative diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:573455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249. Sasaki F, Hayashi M, Mouri Y, Nakamura S, Adachi T, Nakashima T. Mechanotransduction via the Piezo1‐akt pathway underlies sost suppression in osteocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;521(3):806‐813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250. Kornak U, Kasper D, Bösl MR, et al. Loss of the ClC‐7 chloride channel leads to osteopetrosis in mice and man. Cell. 2001;104(2):205‐215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251. Sun W, Guo S, Li Y, et al. Anoctamin 1 controls bone resorption by coupling cl− channel activation with RANKL‐RANK signaling transduction. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252. Li Z, Huang Z, Zhang H, et al. Moderate‐intensity exercise alleviates pyroptosis by promoting autophagy in osteoarthritis via the P2×7/AMPK/mTOR axis. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7(1):346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253. Jørgensen NR. The purinergic P2×7 ion channel receptor‐a “repair” receptor in bone. Curr Opin Immunol. 2018;52:32‐38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254. Huang H, He YM, Lin MM, et al. P2×7Rs: new therapeutic targets for osteoporosis. Purinergic Signal. 2023;19(1):207‐219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255. Renke G, Almeida VBP, Souza EA, et al. Clinical outcomes of the deleterious effects of aluminum on neuro‐cognition, inflammation, and health: a review. Nutrients. 2023;15(9):2221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256. Douguet D, Honoré E. Mammalian mechanoelectrical transduction: structure and function of force‐gated ion channels. Cell. 2019;179(2):340‐354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257. Zhou L, Xue C, Chen Z, Jiang W, He S, Zhang X. c‐fos is a mechanosensor that regulates inflammatory responses and lung barrier dysfunction during ventilator‐induced acute lung injury. BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22(1):9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258. Masuyama R, Vriens J, Voets T, et al. TRPV4‐mediated calcium influx regulates terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. Cell Metab. 2008;8(3):257‐265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259. Nam MH, Park HJ, Seo YK. Reduction of osteoclastic differentiation of raw 264.7 cells by EMF exposure through TRPV4 and p‐CREB pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(4):3058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260. Lyons JS, Joca HC, Law RA, et al. Microtubules tune mechanotransduction through NOX2 and TRPV4 to decrease sclerostin abundance in osteocytes. Sci Signal. 2017;10(506):eaan5748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261. Ali SA, Peffers MJ, Ormseth MJ, Jurisica I, Kapoor M. The non‐coding RNA interactome in joint health and disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17(11):692‐705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262. Chen L, Heikkinen L, Wang C, Yang Y, Sun H, Wong G. Trends in the development of miRNA bioinformatics tools. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20(5):1836‐1852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263. Tan YT, Lin JF, Li T, Li JJ, Xu RH, Ju HQ. LncRNA‐mediated posttranslational modifications and reprogramming of energy metabolism in cancer. Cancer Commun Lond Engl. 2021;41(2):109‐120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264. Chen W, Wu P, Yu F, Luo G, Qing L, Tang J. HIF‐1α regulates bone homeostasis and angiogenesis, participating in the occurrence of bone metabolic diseases. Cells. 2022;11(22):3552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265. Correia de Sousa M, Gjorgjieva M, Dolicka D, Sobolewski C, Foti M. Deciphering miRNAs’ action through miRNA editing. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(24):6249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266. Yang Y, Xiong Y, Pan Z. Role of ceRNAs in non‐tumor female reproductive diseases†. Biol Reprod. 2023;108(3):363‐381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267. Anastasiadou E, Jacob LS, Slack FJ. Non‐coding RNA networks in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(1):5‐18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268. Yang Y, Yujiao W, Fang W, et al. The roles of miRNA, lncRNA and circRNA in the development of osteoporosis. Biol Res. 2020;53(1):40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269. Yang L, Li Y, Gong R, et al. The long non‐coding RNA‐ORLNC1 regulates bone mass by directing mesenchymal stem cell fate. Mol Ther. 2019;27(2):394‐410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270. Wang L, Wu F, Song Y, et al. Long noncoding RNA related to periodontitis interacts with miR‐182 to upregulate osteogenic differentiation in periodontal mesenchymal stem cells of periodontitis patients. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(8):e2327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271. Tang X, Lin J, Wang G, Lu J. MicroRNA‐433‐3p promotes osteoblast differentiation through targeting DKK1 expression. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272. Yu L, Liu Y. circRNA_0016624 could sponge miR‐98 to regulate BMP2 expression in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;516(2):546‐550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273. Mi B, Xiong Y, Chen L, et al. CircRNA AFF4 promotes osteoblast cells proliferation and inhibits apoptosis via the mir‐7223‐5p/PIK3R1 axis. Aging. 2019;11(24):11988‐12001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274. Wang S, Liu Z, Wang J, Ji X, Yao Z, Wang X. miR‑21 promotes osteoclastogenesis through activation of PI3K/akt signaling by targeting pten in RAW264.7 cells. Mol Med Rep. 2020;21(3):1125‐1132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275. Salmena L, Poliseno L, Tay Y, Kats L, Pandolfi PP. A ceRNA hypothesis: the rosetta stone of a hidden RNA language? Cell. 2011;146(3):353‐358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276. Mao Z, Zhu Y, Hao W, Chu C, Su H. MicroRNA‐155 inhibition up‐regulates LEPR to inhibit osteoclast activation and bone resorption via activation of AMPK in alendronate‐treated osteoporotic mice. IUBMB Life. 2019;71(12):1916‐1928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277. Sun Y, Kuek V, Liu Y, et al. MiR‐214 is an important regulator of the musculoskeletal metabolism and disease. J Cell Physiol. 2018;234(1):231‐245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278. Wang C, Wang P, Li F, et al. Adenovirus‐associated anti‐miRNA‐214 regulates bone metabolism and prevents local osteoporosis in rats. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1164252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279. Wang CG, Liao Z, Xiao H, et al. LncRNA KCNQ1OT1 promoted BMP2 expression to regulate osteogenic differentiation by sponging miRNA‐214. Exp Mol Pathol. 2019;107:77‐84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280. Li Z, Xue H, Tan G, Xu Z. Effects of miRNAs, lncRNAs and circRNAs on osteoporosis as regulatory factors of bone homeostasis (review). Mol Med Rep. 2021;24(5):788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281. Han JJ, Wang XQ, Zhang XA. Functional interactions between lncRNAs/circRNAs and miRNAs: insights into rheumatoid arthritis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:810317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282. Chen WK, Yu XH, Yang W, et al. lncRNAs: novel players in intervertebral disc degeneration and osteoarthritis. Cell Prolif. 2017;50(1):e12313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283. Wu QY, Li X, Miao ZN, et al. Long non‐coding RNAs: a new regulatory code for osteoporosis. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284. van Hoolwerff M, Metselaar PI, Tuerlings M, et al. Elucidating epigenetic regulation by identifying functional cis‐acting long noncoding RNAs and their targets in osteoarthritic articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(11):1845‐1854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285. Shen P, Gao J, Huang S, et al. LncRNA AC006064.4‐201 serves as a novel molecular marker in alleviating cartilage senescence and protecting against osteoarthritis by destabilizing CDKN1B mRNA via interacting with PTBP1. Biomark Res. 2023;11(1):39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286. Feng L, Yang Z, Li Y, et al. Malat1 attenuated the rescuing effects of docosahexaenoic acid on osteoarthritis treatment via repressing its chondroprotective and chondrogenesis activities. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;154:113608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287. Liu NN, Huang YP, Shao YB, et al. The regulatory role and mechanism of lncTUG1 on cartilage apoptosis and inflammation in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2023;25(1):106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288. Zhang L, Zhang P, Sun X, Zhou L, Zhao J. Long non‐coding RNA DANCR regulates proliferation and apoptosis of chondrocytes in osteoarthritis via miR‐216a‐5p‐JAK2‐STAT3 axis. Biosci Rep. 2018;38(6):BSR20181228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289. Cao Y, Tang S, Nie X, et al. Decreased miR‐214‐3p activates NF‐κB pathway and aggravates osteoarthritis progression. EBioMedicine. 2021;65:103283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290. Zhang S, Jin Z. Bone mesenchymal stem cell‐derived extracellular vesicles containing long noncoding RNA NEAT1 relieve osteoarthritis. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:5517648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291. Zhao W, Qin P, Zhang D, et al. Long non‐coding RNA PVT1 encapsulated in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell‐derived exosomes promotes osteosarcoma growth and metastasis by stabilizing ERG and sponging miR‐183‐5p. Aging. 2019;11(21):9581‐9596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292. Qin F, Tang H, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Huang P, Zhu J. Bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cell‐derived exosomal microRNA‐208a promotes osteosarcoma cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235(5):4734‐4745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293. Sha L, Ma D, Chen C. Exosome‐mediated hic‐5 regulates proliferation and apoptosis of osteosarcoma via wnt/β‐catenin signal pathway. Aging. 2020;12(23):23598‐23608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294. Walker MD, Shane E. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(21):1979‐1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295. Chang J, Wang Z, Tang E, et al. Inhibition of osteoblastic bone formation by nuclear factor‐kappaB. Nat Med. 2009;15(6):682‐689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296. Wei X, Zhang Y, Xiang X, et al. Exploring the relationship of bone turnover markers and bone mineral density in community‐dwelling postmenopausal women. Dis Markers. 2021;2021:6690095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297. Box CD, Cronin O, Hauser B. The impact of high dose glucocorticoids on bone health and fracture risk in systemic vasculitides. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:806361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298. Abuna RPF, Stringhetta‐Garcia CT, Fiori LP, Dornelles RCM, Rosa AL, Beloti MM. Aging impairs osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells grown on titanium by favoring adipogenesis. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24(4):376‐382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299. Sun W, Lv J, Guo S, Lv M. Cellular microenvironment: a key for tuning mesenchymal stem cell senescence. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1323678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300. Ma B, Guan G, Lv Q, Yang L. Curcumin ameliorates palmitic acid‐induced saos‐2 cell apoptosis via inhibiting oxidative stress and autophagy. Evid‐Based Complement Altern Med. 2021;2021:5563660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301. Zhou L, Song HY, Gao LL, Yang LY, Mu S, Fu Q. MicroRNA‑100‑5p inhibits osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption by regulating fibroblast growth factor 21. Int J Mol Med. 2019;43(2):727‐738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302. Marom R, Rabenhorst BM, Morello R. Osteogenesis imperfecta: an update on clinical features and therapies. Eur J Endocrinol. 2020;183(4):R95‐R106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303. Bishop N. Bone material properties in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(4):699‐708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304. Vollersen N, Zhao W, Rolvien T, et al. The WNT1G177C mutation specifically affects skeletal integrity in a mouse model of osteogenesis imperfecta type XV. Bone Res. 2021;9(1):48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305. Grafe I, Yang T, Alexander S, et al. Excessive transforming growth factor‐β signaling is a common mechanism in osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Med. 2014;20(6):670‐675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306. Song IW, Nagamani SC, Nguyen D, et al. Targeting TGF‐β for treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta. J Clin Invest. 2022;132(7):e152571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307. Yue L, Berman J. What is osteoarthritis? JAMA. 2022;327(13):1300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308. Hu W, Chen Y, Dou C, Dong S. Microenvironment in subchondral bone: predominant regulator for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(4):413‐422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309. Wu CJ, Liu RX, Huan SW, et al. Senescent skeletal cells cross‐talk with synovial cells plays a key role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022;24(1):59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310. Blaney Davidson EN, van Caam APM, Vitters EL, et al. TGF‐β is a potent inducer of nerve growth factor in articular cartilage via the ALK5‐Smad2/3 pathway. Potential role in OA related pain? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23(3):478‐486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311. Gravallese EM, Firestein GS. Rheumatoid arthritis—common origins, divergent mechanisms. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(6):529‐542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312. Ding Q, Hu W, Wang R, et al. Signaling pathways in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for targeted therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):1‐24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313. Duan M, Wang Q, Liu Y, Xie J. The role of TGF‐β2 in cartilage development and diseases. Bone Jt Res. 2021;10(8):474‐487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314. Zhang Z, Lai Q, Li Y, et al. Acidic pH environment induces autophagy in osteoblasts. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315. Fassio A, Adami G, Idolazzi L, et al. Wnt inhibitors and bone turnover markers in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica and acute effects of glucocorticoid treatment. Front Med. 2020;7:551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316. Wei J, Huang X, Zhang X, et al. Elevated fatty acid β‐oxidation by leptin contributes to the proinflammatory characteristics of fibroblast‐like synoviocytes from RA patients via LKB1‐AMPK pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(2):97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317. Zavala‐Cerna MG, Moran‐Moguel MC, Cornejo‐Toledo JA, et al. Osteoprotegerin polymorphisms in a mexican population with rheumatoid arthritis and generalized osteoporosis: a preliminary report. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:376197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318. Gennari L, Rendina D, Falchetti A, Merlotti D. Paget's disease of bone. Calcif Tissue Int. 2019;104(5):483‐500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319. Gennari L, Rendina D, Merlotti D, et al. Update on the pathogenesis and genetics of paget's disease of bone. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:932065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320. Singer FR. The evaluation and treatment of paget's disease of bone. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2020;34(3):101506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321. Ehrlich LA, Roodman GD. The role of immune cells and inflammatory cytokines in Paget's disease and multiple myeloma. Immunol Rev. 2005;208:252‐266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322. Roodman GD, Kurihara N, Ohsaki Y, et al. Interleukin 6. a potential autocrine/paracrine factor in paget's disease of bone. J Clin Invest. 1992;89(1):46‐52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323. Miyagawa K, Ohata Y, Delgado‐Calle J, et al. Osteoclast‐derived IGF1 is required for pagetic lesion formation in vivo. JCI Insight. 2020;5(6):e133113. 133113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324. Teramachi J, Nagata Y, Mohammad K, et al. Measles virus nucleocapsid protein increases osteoblast differentiation in paget's disease. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(3):1012‐1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325. Miyagawa K, Tenshin H, Mulcrone PL, et al. Osteoclast‐derived IGF1 induces RANKL production in osteocytes and contributes to pagetic lesion formation. JCI Insight. 2023;8(14):e159838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326. Coleman RE, Croucher PI, Padhani AR, et al. Bone metastases. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2020;6(1):1‐28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327. Simatou A, Sarantis P, Koustas E, Papavassiliou AG, Karamouzis MV. The role of the RANKL/RANK axis in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti‐RANKL. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328. Joseph GJ, Johnson DB, Johnson RW. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in bone metastasis: clinical challenges, toxicities, and mechanisms. J Bone Oncol. 2023;43:100505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329. Wu X, Li F, Dang L, Liang C, Lu A, Zhang G. RANKL/RANK system‐based mechanism for breast cancer bone metastasis and related therapeutic strategies. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330. Zuo H, Wan Y. Inhibition of myeloid PD‐l1 suppresses osteoclastogenesis and cancer bone metastasis. Cancer Gene Ther. 2022;29(10):1342‐1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 331. Wang K, Gu Y, Liao Y, et al. PD‐1 blockade inhibits osteoclast formation and murine bone cancer pain. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(7):3603‐3620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332. Li D, Yang Z, Wei Z, Kang P. Efficacy of bisphosphonates in the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: a PRISMA‐compliant meta‐analysis of animal studies and clinical trials. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333. Bian Y, Hu T, Lv Z, et al. Bone tissue engineering for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Exploration. 2023;3(2):20210105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334. Kerachian MA, Séguin C, Harvey EJ. Glucocorticoids in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a new understanding of the mechanisms of action. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;114(3):121‐128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335. Nie Z, Chen S, Peng H. Glucocorticoid induces osteonecrosis of the femoral head in rats through GSK3β‐mediated osteoblast apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;511(3):693‐699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 336. Chai H, Huang Q, Jiao Z, et al. Osteocytes exposed to titanium particles inhibit osteoblastic cell differentiation via connexin 43. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(13):10864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337. Li N, Li X, Zheng K, et al. Inhibition of sirtuin 3 prevents titanium particle‐induced bone resorption and osteoclastsogenesis via suppressing ERK and JNK signaling. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17(5):1382‐1394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338. Wang J, Tao Y, Ping Z, et al. Icariin attenuates titanium‐particle inhibition of bone formation by activating the wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway in vivo and in vitro. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 339. Zhou C, Wang Y, Meng J, et al. Additive effect of parathyroid hormone and zoledronate acid on prevention particle wears‐induced implant loosening by promoting periprosthetic bone architecture and strength in an ovariectomized rat model. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:871380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 340. Wang L, Gao Z, Zhang J, Huo Y, Xu Q, Qiu Y. Netrin‐1 regulates ERK1/2 signaling pathway and autophagy activation in wear particle‐induced osteoclastogenesis. Cell Biol Int. 2021;45(3):612‐622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 341. Reid IR, Billington EO. Drug therapy for osteoporosis in older adults. Lancet Lond Engl. 2022;399(10329):1080‐1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342. Wang LT, Chen LR, Chen KH. Hormone‐related and drug‐induced osteoporosis: a cellular and molecular overview. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(6):5814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343. Gossiel F, Scott JR, Paggiosi MA, et al. Effect of teriparatide treatment on circulating periostin and its relationship to regulators of bone formation and BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(4):1302‐1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344. Takami K, Okamoto K, Etani Y, et al. Anti‐NF‐κB peptide derived from nuclear acidic protein attenuates ovariectomy‐induced osteoporosis in mice. JCI Insight. 2023;8(22):e171962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345. Solomon DH, Kay J, Duryea J, et al. Effects of teriparatide on joint erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(9):1741‐1750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346. Krege JH, Gilsenan AW, Komacko JL, Kellier‐Steele N. Teriparatide and osteosarcoma risk: history, science, elimination of boxed warning, and other label updates. JBMR Plus. 2022;6(9):e10665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 347. Matsumoto T, Sone T, Soen S, Tanaka S, Yamashita A, Inoue T. Abaloparatide increases lumbar spine and hip BMD in japanese patients with osteoporosis: the phase 3 ACTIVE‐J study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(10):e4222‐e4231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348. Hattersley G, Dean T, Corbin BA, Bahar H, Gardella TJ. Binding selectivity of abaloparatide for PTH‐type‐1‐receptor conformations and effects on downstream signaling. Endocrinology. 2016;157(1):141‐149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 349. Miller PD, Hattersley G, Riis BJ, et al. Effect of abaloparatide vs placebo on new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(7):722‐733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 350. Dempster DW, Zhou H, Rao SD, et al. Early effects of abaloparatide on bone formation and resorption indices in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2021;36(4):644‐653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351. Deeks ED. Denosumab: a review in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Drugs Aging. 2018;35(2):163‐173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352. Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, et al. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(8):756‐765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353. Wittoek R, Verbruggen G, Vanhaverbeke T, Colman R, Elewaut D. RANKL blockade for erosive hand osteoarthritis: a randomized placebo‐controlled phase 2a trial. Nat Med. Published online February 15, 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 354. Nakamura Y, Suzuki T, Yoshida T, Yamazaki H, Kato H. Vitamin D and calcium are required during denosumab treatment in osteoporosis with rheumatoid arthritis. Nutrients. 2017;9(5):428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355. Dell'Aquila E, Armento G, Iuliani M, et al. Denosumab for cancer‐related bone loss. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020;20(11):1261‐1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356. Lambrinoudaki I, Christodoulakos G, Bisphosphonates BotsisD. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1092:397‐402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 357. Fuggle N, Al‐Daghri N, Bock O, et al. Novel formulations of oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022;34(11):2625‐2634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 358. Srivichit B, Thonusin C, Chattipakorn N, Chattipakorn SC. Impacts of bisphosphonates on the bone and its surrounding tissues: mechanistic insights into medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Arch Toxicol. 2022;96(5):1227‐1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 359. Beth‐Tasdogan NH, Mayer B, Hussein H, Zolk O, Peter JU. Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;7(7):CD012432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 360. Teicher BA. TGFβ–directed therapeutics: 2020. Pharmacol Ther. 2021;217:107666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 361. Markham A. Baricitinib: first global approval. Drugs. 2017;77(6):697‐704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 362. Liu W, Nicol L, Orwoll E. Current and developing pharmacologic agents for improving skeletal health in adults with osteogenesis imperfecta. Calcif Tissue Int. Published online March 12, 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 363. Al Hezaimi K, Rotstein I, Katz J, Nevins M, Nevins M. Effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (paroxetine) on newly formed bone volume: real‐time in vivo micro‐computed tomographic analysis. J Endod. 2023;49(11):1495‐1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 364. Marini F, Giusti F, Palmini G, Brandi ML. Role of wnt signaling and sclerostin in bone and as therapeutic targets in skeletal disorders. Osteoporos Int. 2023;34(2):213‐238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 365. Wang H, Zhao S, Liu Y, Sun F, Huang X, Wu T. Sclerostin suppression facilitates uveal melanoma progression through activating wnt/β‐catenin signaling via binding to membrane receptors LRP5/LRP6. Front Oncol. 2022;12:898047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 366. Bandeira L, Lewiecki EM, Bilezikian JP. Romosozumab for the treatment of osteoporosis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2017;17(2):255‐263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 367. Wu D, Li L, Wen Z, Wang G. Romosozumab in osteoporosis: yesterday, today and tomorrow. J Transl Med. 2023;21:668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 368. McClung MR, Grauer A, Boonen S, et al. Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(5):412‐420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 369. Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, et al. Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(16):1532‐1543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 370. Cosman F, Nieves JW, Dempster DW. Treatment sequence matters: anabolic and antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(2):198‐202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 371. Saag KG, Petersen J, Brandi ML, et al. Romosozumab or alendronate for fracture prevention in women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(15):1417‐1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 372. Tracey D, Klareskog L, Sasso EH, Salfeld JG, Tak PP. Tumor necrosis factor antagonist mechanisms of action: a comprehensive review. Pharmacol Ther. 2008;117(2):244‐279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 373. Urbano PCM, Soccol VT, Azevedo VF. Apoptosis and the FLIP and NF‐kappa B proteins as pharmacodynamic criteria for biosimilar TNF‐alpha antagonists. Biol Targets Ther. 2014;8:211‐220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 374. Inoue K, Hu X, Zhao B. Regulatory network mediated by RBP‐J/NFATc1‐miR182 controls inflammatory bone resorption. FASEB J. 2020;34(2):2392‐2407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 375. Combe B, Kivitz A, Tanaka Y, et al. Filgotinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase III randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(7):848‐858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 376. Jin C, Tan K, Yao Z, et al. A novel anti‐osteoporosis mechanism of VK2: interfering with ferroptosis via AMPK/SIRT1 pathway in type 2 diabetic osteoporosis. J Agric Food Chem. 2023;71(6):2745‐2761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 377. Gupta SC, Patchva S, Aggarwal BB. Therapeutic roles of curcumin: lessons learned from clinical trials. AAPS J. 2013;15(1):195‐218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 378. Unlu A, Nayir E, Dogukan Kalenderoglu M, Kirca O, Ozdogan M. Curcumin (turmeric) and cancer. J BUON. 2016;21(5):1050‐1060. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 379. Patel SS, Acharya A, Ray RS, Agrawal R, Raghuwanshi R, Jain P. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of curcumin in prevention and treatment of disease. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(6):887‐939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 380. Herrington FD, Carmody RJ, Goodyear CS. Modulation of NF‐κB signaling as a therapeutic target in autoimmunity. J Biomol Screen. 2016;21(3):223‐242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 381. Weber CK, Liptay S, Wirth T, Adler G, Schmid RM. Suppression of NF‐kappaB activity by sulfasalazine is mediated by direct inhibition of IkappaB kinases alpha and beta. Gastroenterology. 2000;119(5):1209‐1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 382. Verzella D, Cornice J, Arboretto P, et al. The NF‐κB pharmacopeia: novel strategies to subdue an intractable target. Biomedicines. 2022;10(9):2233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 383. Yin MJ, Yamamoto Y, Gaynor RB. The anti‐inflammatory agents aspirin and salicylate inhibit the activity of I(kappa)B kinase‐beta. Nature. 1998;396(6706):77‐80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 384. Grothe K, Flechsenhar K, Paehler T, et al. IκB kinase inhibition as a potential treatment of osteoarthritis—results of a clinical proof‐of‐concept study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017;25(1):46‐52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 385. Li CH, Xu LL, Jian LL, et al. Stattic inhibits RANKL‐mediated osteoclastogenesis by suppressing activation of STAT3 and NF‐κB pathways. Int Immunopharmacol. 2018;58:136‐144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 386. Yang X, Zhan N, Jin Y, et al. Tofacitinib restores the balance of γδtreg/γδt17 cells in rheumatoid arthritis by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome. Theranostics. 2021;11(3):1446‐1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 387. Fleischmann R, Kremer J, Cush J, et al. Placebo‐controlled trial of tofacitinib monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(6):495‐507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 388. Chen J, Che Q, Kou Y, et al. A novel drug combination of tofacitinib and iguratimod alleviates rheumatoid arthritis and secondary osteoporosis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;124:110913. Pt B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 389. Letarouilly JG, Paccou J, Badr S, Chauveau C, Broux O, Clabaut A. Stimulatory effect of tofacitinib on bone marrow adipocytes differentiation. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:881699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 390. Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, et al. Baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):652‐662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 391. Scott LJ. Tocilizumab: a review in rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs. 2017;77(17):1865‐1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 392. Shimizu T, Kawashiri SY, Morimoto S, et al. Efficacy and safety of selective JAK 1 inhibitor filgotinib in active rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate: comparative study with filgotinib and tocilizumab examined by clinical index as well as musculoskeletal ultrasound assessment (TRANSFORM study): study protocol for a randomized, open‐label, parallel‐group, multicenter, and non‐inferiority clinical trial. Trials. 2023;24(1):161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 393. Emery P, Rondon J, Parrino J, et al. Safety and tolerability of subcutaneous sarilumab and intravenous tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2019;58(5):849‐858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 394. Ozaki Y, Koide M, Furuya Y, et al. Treatment of OPG‐deficient mice with WP9QY, a RANKL‐binding peptide, recovers alveolar bone loss by suppressing osteoclastogenesis and enhancing osteoblastogenesis. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 395. Udagawa N, Koide M, Nakamura M, et al. Osteoclast differentiation by RANKL and OPG signaling pathways. J Bone Miner Metab. 2021;39(1):19‐26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 396. Ko YJ, Sohn HM, Jang Y, et al. A novel modified RANKL variant can prevent osteoporosis by acting as a vaccine and an inhibitor. Clin Transl Med. 2021;11(3):e368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 397. Chen C, Yin Y, Shi G, et al. A highly selective JAK3 inhibitor is developed for treating rheumatoid arthritis by suppressing γc cytokine–related JAK‐STAT signal. Sci Adv. 2022;8(33):eabo4363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 398. Xu Y, Yang Y, Hua Z, et al. BMP2 immune complexes promote new bone formation by facilitating the direct contact between osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 2021;275:120890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 399. Li W, Yu L, Li W, et al. Prevention and treatment of inflammatory arthritis with traditional Chinese medicine: underlying mechanisms based on cell and molecular targets. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;89:101981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 400. Wang L, Yu Y, Ni S, et al. Therapeutic aptamer targeting sclerostin loop3 for promoting bone formation without increasing cardiovascular risk in osteogenesis imperfecta mice. Theranostics. 2022;12(13):5645‐5674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from MedComm are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES