Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 24;13(14):e70005. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70005

TABLE 2.

Multivariate analyses of cardiotoxicity and pathological complete response rate (pCR) by fitting two linear fixed‐effects meta‐regression models with the modern stepwise variable selection method a .

Covariate Regression coefficient estimate Estimated standard error p value c 95% confidence interval
Cardiotoxicity (log RR)q
Intercept −0.1205 0.2762 0.6625 −0.6619−0.4208
Trials with HR(+) participants >57.20% 1.0875 0.4225 0.0100 0.2595–1.9154
Trials with a control arm containing lapatinib −1.3250 0.8431 0.1161 −2.9775−0.3275
Fixed‐effects meta‐regression model (QE = 1.0755, df = 5, p = 0.9563; I 2 = 0.00% < 50%, R 2 = 0.8121) b
pCR (log OR)
Intercept 0.5582 0.1376 <0.0001 0.2886–0.8278
Trials with HR(+) participants >58.02% −0.4911 0.1994 0.0138 −0.8819 to −0.1003
Fixed‐effects meta‐regression model (QE = 6.2820, df = 6, p = 0.3924; I 2 = 4.49% < 50%, R 2 = 0.3812) b
a

A multivariable linear meta‐regression analysis of 7 randomized clinical trials with 8 observations was conducted using the escalc() and rma() functions in the ‘metafor’ package, version 3.8‐1 (2022‐08‐27), of the statistical software R, version 4.2.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), with the modern stepwise variable selection procedure, to fit the meta‐regression models of the log(hazard ratio) of cardiotoxicity and the log(odds ratio) of the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, respectively, where “log” was the natural logarithm.

b

The coefficient of determination, R 2, was the squared Pearson correlation between the observed and predicted responses from all included observations, which helped us assess the GOF of the fitted linear meta‐regression model.

c

The boldfaced p values reached statistical significance at α = 0.05.