. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 1.

Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Nov 4;7(4):794–803. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.016

Table 2:

Association between biomechanical computed tomography assessments and subsequent fracture

	Overall fracture			Pathologic fracture			Non-pathologic fracture
	Fracture present (n=26)	Fracture absent (n=62)	Odds ratio (95% CI)^*	Fracture present (n=16)	Fracture absent (n=70)	Odds ratio (95% CI)^*	Fracture present (n=15)	Fracture absent (n=76)	Odds ratio (95% CI)^*
Femoral Neck BMD (T-Score) (mean)	−0.83	−0.28	1.43 (0.98, 2.21) p=0.07	−1.06	−0.26	1.80 (1.10, 3.25) p = 0.03	−0.94	−0.33	1.52 (0.95, 2.63) p = 0.11
Femur Strength (kN) (mean)	4.94	5.30	1.23 (0.87. 1.81) p=0.26	4.64	5.37	1.63 (0.99 2.71) p = 0.055	4.99	5.22	1.14 (0.75, 1.80) p = 0.57

Odds Ratios reflect odds of subsequent fracture for lower BMD or strength, relative to higher BMD or strength, and are controlled for use of antiresorptive therapy.

NOTE: BMD = Bone mineral density.