Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Res. 2022 Jan 22;209:112774. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112774

Cigarette smoking is associated with acrylamide exposure among the U.S. population: NHANES 2011–2016

Brandon M Kenwood 1,*, Wanzhe Zhu 1, Luyu Zhang 1, Deepak Bhandari 1, Benjamin C Blount 1
PMCID: PMC11268364  NIHMSID: NIHMS2009513  PMID: 35074357

Abstract

2-carbamoylethyl mercapturic acid (2CaEMA, N-Acetyl-S-carbamoylethyl-L-cysteine) is a urinary metabolite and exposure biomarker of acrylamide, which is a harmful volatile organic compound found in cigarette smoke and in some foods. The goal of this study was to determine the association between cigarette smoking and urinary 2CaEMA concentrations among the U.S. population while considering potential dietary sources of acrylamide intake and demographics. We measured 2CaEMA concentrations in urine specimens collected during the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2012, 2013–2014, and 2015–2016 cycles from eligible participants 18 years and older (n = 5443) using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. We developed multiple regression models with urinary 2CaEMA concentrations as the dependent variable and sex, age, race/Hispanic origin, reported primary sources of dietary acrylamide intake, and cigarette smoke exposure as independent variables. This study demonstrates that cigarette smoking is strongly associated with urinary 2CaEMA, suggests that cigarette smoking is likely a primary source of acrylamide exposure, and provides a baseline measure for 2CaEMA in the U.S. population.

Keywords: 2-Carbamoylethyl mercapturic acid (2CaEMA), AAMA, GAMA, Acrylamide, Tobacco smoke, The national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES)

1. Introduction

Acrylamide is a volatile organic compound (VOC) and probable human carcinogen (Virk-Baker et al., 2014). It is a product of tobacco combustion, and the smoke of one cigarette contains approximately 0.5–4.3 μg of acrylamide (Moldoveanu and Gerardi, 2011; Smith et al., 2001). Acrylamide is also found in baked or fried food products (Stadler et al., 2002) such as fried potatoes (French fries and potato chips, ca. < 0.01–8 μg/g), breakfast cereals (ca. < 0.01–1.4 μg/g), and ground coffee (ca. 0.07–1.1 μg/g) (Doerge et al., 2008; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2019), which are the primary sources of dietary acrylamide exposure in the U.S. population and account for approximately 57% of dietary acrylamide intake (Wilson et al., 2009).

2-carbamoylethyl mercapturic acid (2CaEMA, N-Acetyl-S-2-carbamoylethyl-L-cysteine) and 2-carbamoyl-2-hydroxyethyl mercapturic acid (2CaHEMA, N-Acetyl-S-2-carbamoyl-2-hydroxyethyl-L-cysteine) (Tevis et al., 2021) are urinary metabolites of acrylamide (Sumner et al., 1992). Evidence from a relatively small study (n = 29) demonstrated that urinary 2CaEMA and 2CaHEMA concentrations are correlated (Boettcher et al., 2005), however, 2CaHEMA represents only 5% of total acrylamide uptake. In contrast, 2CaEMA represents ~50% of the total acrylamide uptake (Boettcher et al., 2006; Fennell et al., 2006; Fuhr et al., 2006; Kopp and Dekant, 2009). Urinary 2CaEMA concentrations are higher among people exposed to airborne acrylamide (Huang et al., 2011; Sams et al., 2015) and among people who smoke compared to people who do not smoke (Bjellaas et al., 2007; Boettcher et al., 2005; Choi et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2007; Mojska et al., 2016). 2CaEMA concentrations are also positively associated with cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) (Huang et al., 2007). However, these studies either focused on a relatively small number of participants (n = 29–93) (Bjellaas et al., 2007; Boettcher et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2007; Mojska et al., 2016) or were confined to participants under the age of 18 (Choi et al., 2019).

Larger U.S. population-based assessments using the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) have also shown that people who smoke have higher 2CaEMA compared to people who do not smoke (De Jesús et al., 2020; Jain, 2015; Wei et al., 2016). However, these analyses did not determine the association between 2CaEMA and cigarette smoking intensity or consider primary dietary sources of acrylamide, which may confound the association between 2CaEMA and tobacco smoking. For example, consuming fried potatoes causes urinary 2CaEMA concentrations to increase (Fuhr et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2016; Watzek et al., 2012), and higher urinary 2CaEMA concentrations are associated with consumption of fried potatoes and coffee in studies which determined dietary consumption of acrylamide-containing foods with questionnaires (Bjellaas et al., 2007; Brantsæter et al., 2008; Choi et al., 2019; Heudorf et al., 2009).

In this report, we used multiple regression models to characterize the association between cigarette smoke exposure and 2CaEMA from the 2011–2016 NHANES cycles. Our analyses controlled for other variables such as prominent known sources of dietary acrylamide (fried potatoes, coffee, and cereal) determined from NHANES questionnaire data, age, sex, and demographics as part of one multivariate regression model. This report provides a comprehensive determination of the association between urinary 2CaEMA concentrations and cigarette smoking while also controlling for the primary dietary sources of acrylamide exposure. Additionally, this study provides a baseline analysis of 2CaEMA in the U. S. population that may be utilized for future biomonitoring studies.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study design and variable definitions

Spot urine samples were collected through NHANES, which is a cross-sectional study that combines physical examination and interviews to assess the health and nutrition of the U.S. population (The National Center for Health Statistics, 2017). NHANES uses a complex sample design to select a nationally representative sample of the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population. The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducts NHANES. The Research Ethics Review Board of NCHS, CDC reviewed and approved the NHANES study (“NCHS Research Ethics Review Board (ERB) Approval,” 2017).

We measured urinary 2CaEMA (URXAAM) and 2CaHEMA (URXGAM) concentrations from 7207 participants from NHANES cycles 2011–2012, 2013–2014, and 2015–2016 from special subsets UVOCS_G, UVOCS_H, and UVOCS_I, which oversamples tobacco smokers and does not include children. We excluded participants with missing urinary creatinine concentrations, 2CaEMA, concentrations, or dietary information values, leaving 5443 participants. We stratified participants into tobacco smoke exposure categories using a combination of NHANES questionnaire data and serum cotinine concentrations as previously described (Kenwood et al., 2021a). Briefly, we categorized participants who answered ‘no’ to NHANES question ‘Used any tobacco/nicotine product within the last five days?’ (NHANES dataset SMQRTU) and had serum cotinine concentrations (LBXCOT) ≤3.08 ng/mL as participants who did not smoke (Benowitz et al., 2009). We categorized participants who did not smoke and had serum cotinine concentrations from >0.015 to ≤3.08 ng/mL as participants exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS), and we categorized participants who did not smoke and had serum cotinine concentrations of ≤0.015 ng/mL as nonexposed participants. We also categorized participants who smoked cigarettes and did not use other tobacco or nicotine products at the time of specimen collection (referred to as participants who exclusively smoked cigarettes) as having smoked 1–9 CPD, 10–19 CPD, and >19 CPD as previously described (Kenwood et al., 2021b) using a serum cotinine concentration cutoff of 3.08 ng/mL (Benowitz et al., 2009). We categorized age (RIDAGEYR) into the following ranges: 18–39, 40–59, and ≥60 years, and we categorized race/Hispanic origin group (RIDRETH1) into Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Multi-race/other. We created binary indicators for consumption of acrylamide-containing food into three categories from dietary data from the 24-h recall period in the NHANES Individual Foods – First Day file (NHANES dataset: DR1IFF) based on the eight-digit USDA food code, which consisted of fried potatoes (fried potatoes and potato chips, 71,400,990–71, 411,170 and 71,200,010–71,203,030, respectively), coffee (92,100, 000–92,171,010), and cereal (57,100,100–57,418,000) (US Department of Agriculture, 2019).

2.2. Laboratory measurements

We stored and prepared urine specimens collected during NHANES 2011–2016 (National Center for Health Statistics, 2021) as previously described (Kenwood et al., 2021a), and measured 2CaEMA and 2CaHEMA using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (Alwis et al., 2012). The analytical limits of detection for 2CaEMA and 2CaHEMA were 2.2 ng/mL and 9.4 ng/mL, respectively, and we imputed measurements below the limit-of-detection (LOD) by dividing the LOD by the square root of two (Hornung and Reed, 1990). Urinary creatinine (URXCUR) was measured using an enzymatic assay (Eckfeldt, 2014).

2.3. Quality control (QC)

We met the accuracy and precision specifications of the quality control/quality assurance program of the CDC National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Laboratory Sciences, and we accepted and rejected analytical results using modified Westgard rules (Caudill et al., 2008) by measuring 2CaEMA and 2CaHEMA in two preparations of two separate QC pools (high and low) in each run. We characterized the QC material by measuring 2CaEMA and 2CaHEMA in each pool with twenty separate runs, and we determined the standard deviation associated with mean QC results (Sm), the standard deviation associated with individual QC results (Si), and the within-run standard deviation (Sw). We accepted QC results if the mean measured 2CaEMA and 2CaHEMA concentrations from each pool were within 2Sm and individual measurements were within 2Si. If mean analyte concentrations were outside 2Sm, we rejected the run if the mean analyte concentrations were either outside 3Sm, if both QC pool run means were outside of 2Sm in the same direction, or if the current and previous nine run means were on the same side of the characterization mean. If one individual measurement was outside of 2Si, we rejected the run if an individual result was outside 4Si or if the pooled within-run ranges for both QC pools were greater than 4Sw. We also measured 2CaEMA and 2CaHEMA among five blinded proficiency testing specimens twice per year. We considered an analyte to be passing if four out of five specimens were ±25% of the target value.

2.4. Statistical analysis

We conducted all statistical analyses using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institutes, Cary, NC). We evaluated statistical reliability to ensure all proportions follow the NCHS Data Presentation Standards (Parker et al., 2018), and our analysis considered the complex sampling design of NHANES by incorporating complex survey design variables SDMVPSU and SDMVSTRA, and special smoking subsample weights (WTFSM) (Chen et al., 2020). We expressed 2CaEMA concentrations in ng/mL, as well as in μg/g creatinine to normalize for participant hydration (Cone et al., 2009). Dietary variables were categorized either as “yes” to indicate consumption or “no” to indicate no consumption, rather than continuous, due to the wide range of acrylamide concentration in food products such as fried potatoes (Martinez et al., 2019; Michalak et al., 2011; Palazoglu et al., 2010; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2019; Williams, 2005).

We also determined the association between urinary 2CaEMA and each independent variable using a multiple linear regression model as previously described (Kenwood et al., 2021a, 2021b). We fit the model with 2CaEMA (ng/mL) as the dependent variable and CPD, age, sex, race/Hispanic origin, urinary creatinine, and dietary consumption as independent variables. We log-transformed 2CaEMA concentrations in the model to normalize the distribution of values. We included urinary creatinine an independent variable and expressed 2CaEMA in ng/mL rather than expressing 2CaEMA as μg/g creatinine because urinary creatinine concentrations vary across demographic groups (Barr et al., 2005). The reference category for each dietary consumption variable were participants who did not consume the dietary product. We also investigated interactions between CPD and other independent variables in our regression model. The interactions were not included in our final model because they were either not statistically significant or did not significantly affect the associations between 2CaEMA concentrations and independent variables. We derived least squares geometric means of 2CaEMA by tobacco smoke exposure from the regression results, and we compared means to each other using Bonferroni correction (two-tailed) to adjust for multiple comparisons. Finally, we calculated the percent change in 2CaEMA associated with an independent variable from regression model coefficients using Equation (1):

%(Δdependentvariable)=(exponentiatedcoefficient-1)×100. (1)

3. Results

The relationship between urinary 2CaEMA and 2CaHEMA concentrations (ng/mL) among NHANES participants with reported 2CaEMA and 2CaHEMA concentrations (n = 6961) is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1, but we focused our analyses on 2CaEMA concentrations because the sample-weighted detection rate of 2CaHEMA was relatively low (41%) compared to 2CaEMA (99%). Table 1 lists the distributions of the 5443 participants in our analyses by age, sex, and race/Hispanic origin. The sample-weighted geometric means of urinary 2CaEMA concentrations among cigarette smoke exposure categories, dietary categories, and demographic groups expressed in μg/g creatinine and ng/mL are shown in Table 2 and Supplementary Table 1, respectively. We observed that mean 2CaEMA concentrations among unexposed participants (n = 1523) and participants exposed to SHS (n = 2030) were 44.3 μg/g creatinine and 45.3 μg/g creatinine, respectively. Participants who exclusively smoked 1–9 CPD (n = 721), 10–19 CPD (n = 678), and >19 CPD (n = 491) had mean urinary 2CaEMA concentrations of 104 μg/g creatinine, 136 μg/g creatinine, and 159 μg/g creatinine, respectively. We also observed that among participants who did not smoke (unexposed participants and participants exposed to SHS), the mean 2CaEMA concentrations among participants who consumed fried potatoes (n = 674) and did not consume fried potatoes (n = 2879) were 60.9 μg/g creatinine and 41.6 μg/g creatinine, respectively. Among participants who exclusively smoked cigarettes, participants that consumed and did not consume fried potatoes had a mean 2CaEMA concentrations of 145 μg/g creatinine and 124 μg/g creatinine, respectively. Mean 2CaEMA concentrations among participants who did not smoke and consumed or did not consume coffee or cereal ranged from 42.8 to 46.7 μg/g creatinine and ranged from 123 to 139 μg/g creatinine among participants who exclusively smoked cigarettes.

Table 1.

Distributions of study participants who did not smoke and exclusively smoked cigarettes by age, sex, and race/ethnic group from NHANES 2011–2016 (N = 5443).

Category Did not smoke Exclusively smoked cigarettes
na %b SEb na %b SEb
Overall 3553 83.5 0.7114 1890 16.5 0.7114
Sex
Female 1903 45.6 1.06 820 8.00 0.445
Male 1650 37.9 0.862 1070 8.53 0.428
Age
18–39 1298 30.0 1.22 716 6.66 0.381
40–59 1084 28.9 1.07 750 6.92 0.442
60 or older 1171 24.5 1.04 424 2.96 0.226
Race/ethnicity
Hispanic 1003 13.7 1.42 311 1.92 0.271
Non-Hispanic Black 674 7.76 0.903 507 2.39 0.304
Non-Hispanic White 1310 55.3 2.14 884 11.1 0.735
Other Race/Multi-Racial 566 6.74 0.575 188 1.14 0.149

SE, standard error of the percentage.

a

Not sample-weighted.

b

Sample-weighted.

Table 2.

Sample-weighted geometric means of urinary 2CaEMA concentrations (μg/g creatinine) among NHANES 2011–2016 participants (n = 5443).

Category Did not smoke Exclusively smoked cigarettes
n GM 95% CI n GM 95% CI
All participants 3553 44.8 43.0 46.6 1890 128 120 137
Tobacco smoke exposure
Nonexposed 1523 44.3 42.6 46.1
Exposed to SHS 2030 45.3 42.6 48.1
1–9 CPD 721 104 95.8 112
10–19 CPD 678 136 126 147
>19 CPD 491 159 146 173
Diet
Consumed fried potatoes 674 60.9 56.8 65.4 396 145 132 160
Did not consume fried potatoes 2879 41.6 39.9 43.3 1494 124 115 134
Consumed coffee 1795 46.7 44.3 49.3 1058 132 123 142
Did not consume coffee 1758 42.8 40.9 44.8 832 123 114 133
Consumed cereal 635 45.6 42.6 48.9 238 139 128 152
Did not consume cereal 2918 44.6 42.8 46.5 1652 127 118 136
Age
18–39 1298 45.1 42.5 47.9 716 120 110 132
40–59 1084 44.6 42.1 47.3 750 141 131 152
60 or older 1171 44.6 42.0 47.4 424 118.9 108.4 130
Sex
Male 1650 42.5 40.6 44.6 1070 119 110 128
Female 1903 46.8 44.5 49.2 820 139 128 152
Race/Hispanic origin
Non-Hispanic White 1310 46.2 43.9 48.7 884 136 124 148
Non-Hispanic Black 674 38.3 36.0 40.8 507 114 106 121
Hispanic 1003 44.5 41.6 47.5 311 113 101 127
Other Race/Multi-Racial 566 42.1 38.8 45.7 188 120 109 133

SHS, Secondhand smoke.

We further characterized the association between cigarette smoking and urinary 2CaEMA concentrations among NHANES participants using a multiple log-linear regression model (Table 3). The dependent variable was log-transformed 2CaEMA concentrations (ng/mL), and independent variables included tobacco smoke exposure, dietary sources of acrylamide, urinary creatinine, age, sex, and race/Hispanic origin. Compared to nonexposed participants, participants who smoked 1–9 CPD had 141% higher 2CaEMA (p < 0.0001), participants who smoked 10–19 CPD had 204% higher 2CaEMA (p < 0.0001), and participants who smoked >19 CPD had 260% higher 2CaEMA (p < 0.0001). We then calculated the geometric least squares mean concentrations from the multiple regression model among each tobacco smoke exposure category (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 2). The geometric least-squared mean concentration of 2CaEMA (ng/mL) among participants who exclusively smoked cigarettes and smoked 1–9 CPD was 106 ng/mL, which was higher compared to unexposed participants (43.9 ng/mL, p < 0.0001, Supplementary Table 3) and participants exposed to SHS (46.7 ng/mL, p < 0.0001), and lower compared participants who smoked 10–19 CPD (133 ng/mL, p < 0.0001) and >19 CPD (158 ng/mL, p < 0.0001). Additionally, participants who smoked >19 CPD had a higher mean 2CaEMA concentration compared to participants who smoked 10–19 CPD (p = 0.0038). Dietary exposure sources of acrylamide associated with higher 2CaEMA concentrations included fried potatoes (49.7% higher, p < 0.0001) and coffee (6.76% higher, p = 0.0279). Race/Hispanic origin was also significantly associated with 2CaEMA concentrations; Non-Hispanic Black and Other Race/Multi-Racial participants had lower 2CaEMA compared to Non-Hispanic White participants (10% lower, p = 0.0135 and p = 0.00920, respectively).

Table 3.

Association between % (Δ 2CaEMA) (ng/mL) and CPD using a multiple regression analysis of urinary 2CaEMA (ng/mL) from NHANES 2011–2016 (n = 5443).

Independent Variable Coefficienta 95% CI P-value % (Δ 2CaEMA)b,c,d
Cigarette smoke exposure
Nonexposed Reference
Exposed to SHS 0.0615 −0.00413 0.127 0.0656 N.S.
1–9 CPD 0.882 0.803 0.960 <0.0001 141% higher
10–19 CPD 1.11 1.02 1.20 <0.0001 204% higher
>19 CPD 1.28 1.18 1.38 <0.0001 260% higher
Diet e
Fried potatoes 0.403 0.330 0.477 <0.0001 49.7% higher
Coffee 0.0654 0.00742 0.123 0.0279 6.76% higher
Cereal 0.0493 −0.00972 0.108 0.0995 N.S.
Age
18–39 Reference
40–59 0.00154 −0.0733 0.0763 0.967 N.S.
60 or older −0.00869 −0.0966 0.0792 0.843 N.S.
Sex
Male Reference
Female 0.0236 −0.0397 0.0869 0.458 N.S.
Race/Hispanic origin
Non-Hispanic White Reference
Non-Hispanic Black −0.106 −0.188 −0.0229 0.0135 10% lower
Hispanic 0.0199 −0.0729 0.113 0.668 N.S.
Other Race/Multi-Racial −0.109 −0.190 −0.0283 0.00920 10% lower
Creatinine (mg/mL) 0.808 0.746 0.869 <0.0001 124% higher per mg/mL creatinine
Intercept 2.61 2.51 2.72 <0.0001 N/A

CPD, Cigarettes per day.

SHS, Secondhand smoke.

N.S., Not significant.

N/A, Not applicable.

a

2CaEMA concentrations were natural log transformed.

b

Calculated by multiplying the expected 2CaEMA concentration by the exponentiated coefficient.

c

% (Δ 2CaEMA) associated with each food group was calculated from median consumption.

d

Adjusted for all independent variables shown in the Table.

e

Reference variables were participants who did not consume the indicated food.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Geometric least-squares means of urinary 2CaEMA (ng/mL) among NHANES 2011–2016 participants stratified by tobacco smoke exposure categories (n = 5443).

1. Significantly different compared to unexposed participants.

2. Significantly different compared to participants exposed to SHS.

3. Significantly different compared to participants who smoked 1–9 CPD.

4. Significantly different compared to participants who smoked 10–19 CPD.

CPD, cigarettes per day

SHS, secondhand smoke

4. Discussion

Our findings suggests that cigarette smoking is a major source of acrylamide exposure in the U.S. population. We found that smoking 1–9 CPD, 10–19 CPD, and >19 CPD was associated with 141%, 204%, and 260% higher urinary 2CaEMA, respectively (Table 3). This is consistent with a previous finding which demonstrated that 2CaEMA was associated with cigarettes smoked per day (Huang et al., 2007), and that acrylamide hemoglobin adducts are associated with serum cotinine, a nicotine exposure biomarker, among NHANES participants (Tran et al., 2010). Our analysis also demonstrates that participants who exclusively smoked cigarettes have approximately 3-fold higher mean 2CaEMA concentrations compared to unexposed participants. Smoking was associated with a similar effect (3.4-fold higher) among participants in the Population Assessment for Tobacco and Health (PATH) (De Jesús et al., 2020), and we found that the geometric mean urinary 2CaEMA concentrations among unexposed nonsmokers (44.3 μg/g creatinine) was similar to previous population-based reports by our laboratory (45.0 μg/g creatinine, PATH, Wave 1, 2013–2014) (De Jesús et al., 2020). However, the mean concentration of 2CaEMA among PATH participants who smoked was 152 μg/g creatinine, but the mean 2CaEMA concentration among participants in NHANES who exclusively smoked cigarettes was only 128 μg/g creatinine (Table 2). This may be due to differences in study design between the two studies; specifically, PATH is designed around tobacco use and thus smoking intensity may be higher in PATH compared with NHANES. Furthermore, PATH urine samples are collected in the study participant’s home with no required smoking abstinence, while NHANES urines are collected at a mobile exam center that has a no smoking policy.

We also found that consumption of fried potatoes and coffee were associated with 49.7% higher 2CaEMA and 6.9% higher 2CaEMA, respectively (Table 3). However, this study was limited by our analysis of dietary intake. We included dietary intake in our statistical models, but only included predominant sources of dietary acrylamide. Other food sources, such as cookies and popcorn, also contain acrylamide, but their relative dietary contributions are thought to be lower compared to fried potatoes, cereals, and coffee (Wilson et al., 2009). We also relied on reported consumption from dietary questionnaires, which rely on participant accuracy and truthfulness and underestimate dietary consumption of fat and carbohydrates (Archer et al., 2013, 2015). In support of this, we did not find any observable association between the mass of fried potatoes reported to be consumed and 2CaEMA concentrations among participants who reported eating fried potatoes (not shown). However, the association between reported consumption and 2CaEMA is likely further complicated by the large disparities of acrylamide content in fried potato products. Thus, we constructed categorical dietary variables, but did not report an association between the mass of a food product consumed and 2CaEMA in our statistical models. Finally, we did not compare the association between 2CaEMA and dietary variables to other studies because our analysis was focused on cigarette smoke exposure, and comparisons across questionnaire-based dietary studies are difficult due to differences in methods used to record dietary intakes and food categorization (Dybing et al., 2005).

Characterizing the associations between acrylamide exposure and cigarette smoking is critical for determining the potential public health impact of acrylamide exposure. This report provides public health researchers a recent and comprehensive population-based assessment of 2CaEMA concentrations in the U.S. population, and is the most thorough characterization of acrylamide exposure using 2CaEMA to date. In sum, this analysis demonstrates that cigarette smoking is strongly associated with higher urinary 2CaEMA concentrations and is likely a primary source of acrylamide exposure in the U.S. population.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Table 1
Supplemental Table 2
Supplemental Figure 1
Supplemental Table 3

Acknowledgements

We thank the Volatile Organic Compounds Metabolites Team in the Tobacco and Volatiles Branch, CDC for measuring urinary 2CaEMA and CaHEMA.

Abbrevations:

2CaEMA

2-carbamoylethyl mercapturic acid

2CaHEMA

2-carbamoyl-2-hydroxyethyl mercapturic acid

PATH

Population Assessment for Tobacco and Health

NHANES

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

CPD

Cigarettes per day

QC

Quality control

Footnotes

+Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112774.

References

  1. Alwis KU, Blount BC, Britt AS, Patel D, Ashley DL, 2012. Simultaneous analysis of 28 urinary VOC metabolites using ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI/MSMS). Anal. Chim. Acta 750, 152–160. 10.1016/J.ACA.2012.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Archer E, Hand GA, Blair SN, 2013. Validity of U.S. Nutritional surveillance: national health and nutrition examination survey caloric energy intake data , 1971 – 2010. PLoS One 8, 1–12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Archer E, Pavela G, Lavie CJ, 2015. The inadmissibility of what we eat in America. Mayo Clin. Proc 90, 911–926. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barr DB, Wilder LC, Caudill SP, Gonzalez AJ, Needham LL, Pirkle JL, 2005. Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements. Environ. Health Perspect 113, 192–200. 10.1289/ehp.7337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benowitz NL, Bernert JT, Caraballo RS, Holiday DB, Wang J, 2009. Optimal serum cotinine levels for distinguishing cigarette smokers and nonsmokers within different racial/ethnic groups in the United States between 1999 and 2004. Am. J. Epidemiol 169, 236–248. 10.1093/aje/kwn301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bjellaas T, Stølen LH, Haugen M, Paulsen JE, Alexander J, Lundanes E, Becher G, 2007. Urinary acrylamide metabolites as biomarkers for short-term dietary exposure to acrylamide. Food Chem. Toxicol 45, 1020–1026. 10.1016/j.fct.2006.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boettcher MI, Bolt HM, Drexler H, Angerer J, 2006. Excretion of mercapturic acids of acrylamide and glycidamide in human urine after single oral administration of deuterium-labelled acrylamide. Arch. Toxicol 80, 55–61. 10.1007/s00204-005-0011-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boettcher MI, Schettgen T, Kütting B, Pischetsrieder M, Angerer J, 2005. Mercapturic acids of acrylamide and glycidamide as biomarkers of the internal exposure to acrylamide in the general population. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen 580, 167–176. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brantsæter AL, Haugen M, Mul A. de, Bjellaas T, Becher G, Klaveren J. Van, Alexander J, Meltzer HM, 2008. Exploration of different methods to assess dietary acrylamide exposure in pregnant women participating in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Food Chem. Toxicol 46, 2808–2814. 10.1016/j.fct.2008.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Caudill SP, Schleicher RL, Pirkle JL, 2008. Multi-rule quality control for the age-related eye disease study. Stat. Med 27, 4094–4106. 10.1002/sim.3222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen TC, Clark J, Riddles MK, Mohadjer LK, Fakhouri THI, 2020. National health and nutrition examination survey, 2015–2018: sample design and estimation procedures. Vital Heal. Stat 2, 1–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Choi SY, Ko A, Kang H, 2019. Association of urinary acrylamide concentration with lifestyle and demographic factors in a population of South Korean children and adolescents. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res 26, 18247–18255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cone EJ, Caplan YH, Moser F, Robert T, Shelby MK, Black DL, 2009. Normalization of urinary drug concentrations with specific gravity and creatinine. J. Anal. Toxicol 33, 1–7. 10.1093/jat/33.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. De Jesús VR, Bhandari D, Zhang L, Reese C, Capella K, Tevis D, Zhu W, Del Valle-Pinero AY, Lagaud G, Chang JT, van Bemmel D, Kimmel HL, Sharma E, Goniewicz ML, Hyland A, Blount BC, 2020. Urinary biomarkers of exposure to volatile organic compounds from the population assessment of tobacco and health study wave 1 (2013–2014). Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 17, 1–12. 10.3390/ijerph17155408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Doerge DR, Young JF, Chen JJ, DiNovi MJ, Henry SH, 2008. Using dietary exposure and physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in human risk extrapolations for acrylamide toxicity. J. Agric. Food Chem 56, 6031–6038. 10.1021/jf073042g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dybing E, Farmer PB, Andersen M, Fennell TR, Lalljie SPD, Müller DJG, Olin S, Petersen BJ, Schlatter J, Scholz G, Scimeca JA, Slimani N, Törnqvist M, Tuijtelaars S, Verger P, 2005. Human exposure and internal dose assessments of acrylamide in food. Food Chem. Toxicol 43, 365–410. 10.1016/j.fct.2004.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eckfeldt J, 2014. Laboratory procedure manual. Analyte: urine creatinine [WWW document]. Natl. Cent. Heal. Stat URL. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/2015-2016/labmethods/ALB_CR_I_MET_CREATININE.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fennell TR, Sumner SCJ, Snyder RW, Burgess J, Friedman MA, 2006. Kinetics of elimination of urinary metabolites of acrylamide in humans. Toxicol. Sci 93, 256–267. 10.1093/toxsci/kfl069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fuhr U, Boettcher MI, Kinzig-Schippers M, Weyer A, Jetter A, Lazar A, Taubert D, Tomalik-Scharte D, Pournara P, Jakob V, Harlfinger S, Klaassen T, Berkessel A, Angerer J, Sörgel F, Schömig E, 2006. Toxicokinetics of acrylamide in humans after ingestion of a defined dose in a test meal to improve risk assessment for acrylamide carcinogenicity. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev 15, 266–271. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heudorf U, Hartmann E, Angerer J, 2009. Acrylamide in children - exposure assessment via urinary acrylamide metabolites as biomarkers. Int. J. Hyg Environ. Health 212, 135–141. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2008.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hornung RW, Reed LD, 1990. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg 5, 46–51. 10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389587. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang CJ, Li C, Wu C, Jao S, Ã KW, 2007. Analysis of urinary N-acetyl-S-(propionamide)-cysteine as a biomarker for the assessment of acrylamide exposure in smokers. Environ. Res 104, 346–351. 10.1016/j.envres.2007.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang YF, Wu KY, Liou SH, Uang SN, Chen CC, Shih WC, Lee SC, Huang CCJ, Chen ML, 2011. Biological monitoring for occupational acrylamide exposure from acrylamide production workers. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 84, 303–313. 10.1007/s00420-010-0558-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jain RB, 2015. Distributions of selected urinary metabolites of volatile organic compounds by age, gender, race/ethnicity, and smoking status in a representative sample of U.S. adults. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol 40, 471–479. 10.1016/j.etap.2015.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kenwood BM, Bagchi P, Zhang L, Zhu W, Chambers DM, Blount BC, De Jesús VR, 2021a. Characterization of US population levels of urinary methylcarbamoyl mercapturic acid, a metabolite of N,N-dimethylformamide and methyl isocyanate. In: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2006 and 2011–2016, vol. 28. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res, pp. 16781–16791. 10.1007/s11356-020-12135-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kenwood BM, McLoughlin C, Zhang L, Zhu W, Bhandari D, 2021b. Characterization of the Association between Cigarette Smoking Intensity and Urinary Concentrations of 2-hydroxyethyl Mercapturic Acid Among Exclusive Cigarette Smokers in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011 – 2016. Biomarkers In press. 10.1080/1354750X.2021.1970809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kopp EK, Dekant W, 2009. Toxicokinetics of acrylamide in rats and humans following single oral administration of low doses. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 235, 135–142. 10.1016/j.taap.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Martinez E, Rodriguez JA, Mondragon AC, Lorenzo JM, Santos EM, 2019. Influence of potato crisps processing parameters on acrylamide formation and bioaccesibility. Molecules 24, 3827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Michalak J, Gujska E, Klepacka J, 2011. The effect of domestic preparation of some potato products on acrylamide content. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr 66, 307–312. 10.1007/s11130-011-0252-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mojska H, Gielecińska I, Zielińska A, Winiarek J, Sawicki W, 2016. Estimation of exposure to dietary acrylamide based on mercapturic acids level in urine of Polish women post partum and an assessment of health risk. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol 26, 288–295. 10.1038/jes.2015.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Moldoveanu SC, Gerardi AR, 2011. Acrylamide analysis in tobacco, alternative tobacco products, and cigarette smoke. J. Chromatogr. Sci 49, 234–242. 10.1093/chrsci/49.3.234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. National Center for Health Statistics, 2021. National health and nutrition examination survey [WWW document]. Natl. Cent. Heal. Stat URL. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm. [Google Scholar]
  33. NCHS Research Ethics Review Board (ERB) Approval [WWW Document], 2017. Natl. Cent. Heal. Stat. Centers Dis. Control Prev URL. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/irba98.htm#:~:text=NCHS Research Ethics Review Board %28ERB%29 Approval%2A %2A,2017 Content source%3A National Center for Health Statistics, 7.10.20. [Google Scholar]
  34. Palazoglu TK, Savran D, Gokmen V, 2010. Effect of cooking method (baking compared with frying) on acrylamide level of potato chips. J. Food Sci 75 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01389.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Parker JD, Talih M, Malec D, 2018. National center for health Statistics data presentation standards for proportions. Vital Heal. Stat 2, 1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sams C, Jones K, Warren N, Cocker J, Bell S, Bull P, Cain M, 2015. Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide. Toxicol. Lett 237, 30–37. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith CJ, Perfetti TA, Rumple MA, Rodgman A, Doolittle DJ, 2001. “IARC Group 2B carcinogens” reported in cigarette mainstream smoke. Food Chem. Toxicol 39, 183–205. 10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00164-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Stadler RH, Blank I, Varga N, Robert F, Hau J, Guy PA, Robert MC, Riediker S, 2002. Food chemistry: acrylamide from Maillard reaction products. Nature 419, 449–450. 10.1038/419449a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sumner SCJ, MacNeela JP, Fennell TR, 1992. Characterization and quantitation of urinary metabolites of [1,2,3–13C]acrylamide in rats and mice using 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Chem. Res. Toxicol 5, 81–89. 10.1021/tx00025a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tevis DS, Flores SR, Kenwood BM, Bhandari D, Jacob P, Liu J, Lorkiewicz PK, Conklin DJ, Hecht SS, Goniewicz ML, Blount BC, Jesús V.R. De, 2021. Harmonization of acronyms for volatile organic compound metabolites using a standardized naming system. Int. J. Hyg Environ. Health 235, 113749. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. The National Center for Health Statistics, 2017. About the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [WWW Document]. URL. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about_nhanes.htm, 10.19.21.
  42. Tran NL, Barraj LM, Murphy MM, Bi X, 2010. Dietary acrylamide exposure and hemoglobin adducts - national health and nutrition examination survey (2003–04). Food Chem. Toxicol 48, 3098–3108. 10.1016/j.fct.2010.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2019. Survey data on acrylamide in food [WWW document]. URL. https://www.fda.gov/food/chemical-contaminants-food/survey-data-acrylamide-food, 7.30.21.
  44. Us Department of Agriculture, 2019. Food and nutrient database for dietary studies (FNDDS) [WWW document]. Food Surv. Res. Group, Beltsv. Hum. Nutr. Res. Cent URL. https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/food-and-nutrient-database-dietary-studies-fndds. [Google Scholar]
  45. Virk-Baker MK, Nagy TR, Barnes S, Groopman J, 2014. Dietary acrylamide and human cancer: a systematic review of literature. Nutr. Cancer 66, 774–790. 10.1080/01635581.2014.916323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang Q, Chen X, Ren Y, Chen Q, Meng Z, Cheng J, 2016. Toxicokinetics and internal exposure of acrylamide : new insight into comprehensively profiling mercapturic acid metabolites as short - term biomarkers in rats and Chinese adolescents. Arch. Toxicol 91, 2107–2118. 10.1007/s00204-016-1869-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Watzek N, Scherbl D, Feld J, Berger F, Doroshyenko O, Fuhr U, Tomalik-Scharte D, Baum M, Eisenbrand G, Richling E, 2012. Profiling of mercapturic acids of acrolein and acrylamide in human urine after consumption of potato crisps. Mol. Nutr. Food Res 56, 1825–1837. 10.1002/mnfr.201200323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wei B, Alwis KU, Li Z, Wang L, Valentin-Blasini L, Sosnoff CS, Xia Y, Conway KP, Blount BC, 2016. Urinary concentrations of PAH and VOC metabolites in marijuana users. Environ. Int 88, 1–8. 10.1016/J.ENVINT.2015.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Williams JSE, 2005. Influence of variety and processing conditions on acrylamide levels in fried potato crisps. Food Chem. 90, 875–881. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.05.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wilson KM, Vesper HW, Tocco P, Sampson L, Rośen J, Hellenäs KE, Törnqvist M, Willett WC, 2009. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire measurement of dietary acrylamide intake using hemoglobin adducts of acrylamide and glycidamide. Cancer Causes Control 20, 269–278. 10.1007/s10552-008-9241-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Table 1
Supplemental Table 2
Supplemental Figure 1
Supplemental Table 3

RESOURCES