Skip to main content
. 2023 May 26;23(4):1304–1312. doi: 10.1007/s12311-023-01570-0

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the patients (N = 30)

Age, mean (SD) 36.6 (11.9)
Sex, n (%) Women 11 (36.7)
Men 19 (63.3)
Location of the cerebellar lesion, n (%) Hemispheric 9 (30.0)
Pancerebellar 21 (70.0)
Years of education, median [Q1, Q3] 8.0 [6.0, 10.0]
ICARS posture, mean (SD) 10.5 (5.4)
ICARS kinetic, median [Q1, Q3] 13.0 [9.0, 15.0]
ICARS speech, median [Q1, Q3] 3.0 [2.0, 4.0]
ICARS eye movement, mean (SD) 2.6 (1.3)
ICARS total, mean (SD) 28.4 (9.6)
Serial subtraction, median [Q1, Q3] 4.0 [3.0, 5.0]
Backward Digit Span, median [Q1, Q3] 3.0 [2.0, 3.8]
Category Fluency, median [Q1, Q3] 12.0 [8.0, 15.8]
Phonemic fluency, mean (SD) 7.3 (3.0)
Immediate Recall Trial 1, mean (SD) 4.2 (1.1)
Immediate Recall Trial 2, median [Q1, Q3] 5.0 [4.0, 6.0]
Immediate Recall Trial 3, mean (SD) 5.7 (1.4)
Delayed recall, median [Q1, Q3] 6.0 [4.0, 6.0]
Recognition, mean (SD) 14.3 (2.6)
Construction, mean (SD) 8.6 (3.1)
FAB Score, mean (SD) 13.9 (3.0)
Motor Luria, n (%) Impaired 20 (66.7)
Normal 10 (33.3)
Graphic Luria, n (%) Impaired 21 (70.0)
Normal 9 (30.0)
P300 Latency, mean (SD) 366.8 (40.1)
P300 Amplitude, mean (SD) 7.6 (2.8)

Mean (median) ± standard deviation (SD) and frequency (%) are reported. Median and interquartile ranges were reported if the variables did not follow a normal distribution