Abstract
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) continue to increase in the United States with more than 2.5 million cases of gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2022. Untreated STIs in women can lead to adverse outcomes, including pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, chronic pelvic pain, and pregnancy complications such as ectopic pregnancy, early pregnancy loss, stillbirth, and neonatal transmission. STI-related guidelines can be complex and are frequently updated, making it challenging to stay informed on current guidance. This article provides high-yield updates to support clinicians managing STIs by highlighting changes in screening, diagnosis, and treatment. One important topic includes new guidance on syphilis screening, including a clarified description of high community rates of syphilis based on Healthy People 2030 goals, defined as a case rate of primary or secondary syphilis > 4.6 per 100,000. Reproductive aged persons living in counties above this threshold should be offered syphilis screening. Additionally, American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists now recommends syphilis screening three times during pregnancy regardless of risk—at the first prenatal visit, during the third trimester, and at delivery. In addition, new guidance to support consideration for extragenital screening for gonorrhea and chlamydia in women at sites such as the anus and pharynx is discussed. Other topics include the most recent chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis, and pelvic inflammatory disease treatment recommendations; screening and treatment guidance for Mycoplasma genitalium; genital herpes screening indications and current diagnostic challenges; and the diagnosis and management of mpox in women and during pregnancy.
Keywords: sexually transmitted infections, STIs, syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea, mpox
Introduction
In 2022, 2.5 million chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis infections were reported in the United States (U.S.) with increases over the prior five years for gonorrhea (11%), syphilis (80%), and congenital syphilis (183%).1 Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) can adversely affect health, including infertility, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), chronic pelvic pain, and increased cancer risks.2,3 In addition, some STIs can affect pregnancy, leading to increased risks of adverse outcomes such as spontaneous abortion, preterm labor, stillbirth, and transmission to the fetus in utero or neonate during delivery.4,5 In support of clinicians who provide care in an ever-changing STI landscape, this article highlights updates by reviewing and summarizing important changes in STI screening and treatment in syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea, Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen), trichomoniasis, genital herpes, and mpox (Table 1). This article is not intended to be comprehensive; more detailed information on the diagnosis and treatment of these STIs can be found in the CDC 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines (https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/) and on the STI Treatment (Tx) Guide Mobile app (https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/provider-resources.htm).
Table 1.
Major Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Updates and Key Points for Clinical Practice
TOPIC OR DISEASE | MAJOR STIa UPDATES AND KEY POINTS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE |
---|---|
Extragenital Screening | Chlamydia and gonorrhea screening at pharyngeal and rectal anatomical sites can be considered in women at increased risk based on sexual behaviors and/or sexual exposures with shared clinical decision making |
Chlamydia | The recommended treatment for chlamydia was changed to:
|
Gonorrhea | The recommended treatment for gonorrhea was changed for all persons, including during pregnancy to:
|
Genital Herpes | |
|
|
Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) | |
|
|
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) | Metronidazole was added to recommended parenteral and nonparenteral treatment regimens for PID. In addition, ceftriaxone dosage was increased The recommended intramuscular or oral treatment regimens for outpatient PID treatment is:
|
Syphilis | |
|
|
Trichomoniasis | Screening for trichomoniasis can be considered in people with individual risk factors or those living in counties with high trichomoniasis incidence The recommended treatment regimen for trichomoniasis was changed for nonpregnant and pregnant women to:
|
Mpox | |
|
Adapted from American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). Sexually Transmitted Infections: Updates from the 2021 CDC Guidelines. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2022/0500/p514.html.
Bolded items are the medications/treatment regimens.
STI: sexually transmitted infection.
IM: intramuscularly.
ceftriaxone 1 gram for individuals ≥150 kg
Syphilis
Syphilis and congenital syphilis (CS) are caused by Treponema pallidum and cases continue to rise at alarming rates across the United States.1 Over the last 10 years, rates of primary and secondary syphilis among reproductive-aged women have increased more than 8-fold (from 2.1 to 19.1 per 100,000) and reported CS cases have increased over 10-fold (from 362 to 3755 cases).1,6 Untreated syphilis can lead to long-term neurological and cardiac sequelae, and syphilis during pregnancy can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes, including spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, preterm birth, and neonatal death.7 Vertical transmission of syphilis to the fetus can lead to permanent sequelae in children, including musculoskeletal abnormalities, blindness, deafness, and neurodevelopmental delay.4,7 This article reviews important points on syphilis screening, diagnosis, and management.
Syphilis testing is recommended in any sexually active person presenting with STI symptoms, a possible STI exposure, or behavioral risk factors such as having human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or another STI, using illicit drugs or medications not as prescribed, or a history of transactional sex, incarceration, or military service.7,8 Additionally, screening should be offered to sexually active women 15–44 years of age if they live in a high incidence area.7 The Healthy People 2030 target for primary and secondary syphilis is a case rate in reproductive-aged women less than or equal to 4.6 per 100,000.6 In 2022, over 30% of U.S. counties exceeded this threshold, and these areas accounted for over 70% of the reproductive-aged population.6 During pregnancy, all people should undergo syphilis screening at the first prenatal visit or encounter with the health care system.7,9 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) now recommends additional screening during pregnancy in the third trimester (around 28 weeks gestation) and at delivery for all pregnant people regardless of risk for syphilis.10 No neonate or postpartum person should leave the hospital without syphilis testing results. In addition, syphilis testing should be performed at the time of delivery for all people diagnosed with a stillbirth.7
At the time of syphilis testing or a positive result, a thorough history and physical exam should be performed to determine the clinical stage. This includes an oral, urogenital (with speculum), and perirectal exam, inspecting all anatomical sites of sexual exposure as signs and symptoms of primary and secondary syphilis might be unrecognized by patients (Table 2).7 Primary syphilis classically presents as a single painless ulcer, called a chancre, at the site of inoculation but occasionally can present as multiple and painful lesions (Fig. 1).7,11 Common findings of secondary syphilis include a skin rash on the trunk, arms, palms, and soles (Fig. 2); mucocutaneous lesions; condyloma lata (Fig. 3); fever; chills; and lymphadenopathy. Condyloma lata might be difficult to differentiate from other vulvar lesions, such as condyloma acuminata, but are usually notable for being moist and occasionally ulcerated.7 Latent stages of syphilis have no clinical manifestations, relying on history and laboratory testing for diagnosis, and are divided into early latent (syphilis infection of <12 months duration), late latent (syphilis infection of ≥12 months), and latent of unknown duration. To diagnose early versus late latent syphilis, a person must have a known negative titer within 12 months or known infection timing based on signs, symptoms, prior titers, and/or sexual history. Tertiary syphilis typically presents after 15–30 years of untreated syphilis and includes late manifestations such as gummas (granulomas that present as soft tumors throughout the body) or cardiovascular findings such as aortitis. Clinicians should screen all patients diagnosed with syphilis for neurological, visual, and auditory signs and symptoms as neurosyphilis, ocular syphilis, and otosyphilis can present during any clinical stage (Table 2).7
Table 2.
Syphilis Stages, Clinical Manifestations, and Treatment Regimens
Stage | Clinical manifestations | Treatment | |
---|---|---|---|
Early | Primary | Single painless ulcer or chancre at the site of infection; can also present with multiple, atypical, or painful lesions | Recommended: Benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million units IM in a single dose Alternative: In nonpregnant persons, doxycycline 100 mg orally two times daily for 14 days |
Secondary | Skin rash, mucocutaneous lesions, lymphadenopathy | ||
Early Latent (acquired <12 months) | No clinical manifestations | ||
Late | Late Latent (acquired ≥12 months) or Latent of Unknown Duration | No clinical manifestations | Recommended: Benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million units IM three times each at 1-week intervals Alternative: In nonpregnant persons, doxycycline 100 mg orally two times daily for 28 days |
Tertiary | Cardiac involvement, gummatous lesions, tabes dorsalis (a long-term manifestation of neurosyphilis), general paresis | ||
Any | Neurosyphilis | Cognitive dysfunction, motor or sensory deficits, cranial nerve palsies, meningeal signs, signs of stroke | Aqueous crystalline penicillin G 18–24 units per day, administered as 3–4 million units IV every 4 hours or continuous infusion for 10–14 days |
Ocular syphilis | Vision changes, uveitis, neuroretinitis, optic neuritis | ||
Otosyphilis | Sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo |
FIG 1.
Primary syphilis chancre of the vulva—with permissions from Orange County Health Care Agency, Dr. Christopher Ried.
FIG 2.
Rash seen in secondary syphilis—with permissions from Orange County Health Care Agency, Dr. Christopher Ried
FIG 3.
Secondary syphilis—condyloma lata—with permissions from Orange County Health Care Agency, Dr. Christopher Ried
Syphilis testing relies on a combination of nontreponemal and treponemal tests. Nontreponemal tests (e.g., rapid plasma reagin or Venereal Disease Research Laboratory) are nonspecific and detect cardiolipin antigen when reactive.12 Treponemal tests (e.g., T. pallidum enzyme immunoassay, chemiluminescence assay, fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption, and the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination [TPPA]) are specific and detect antibodies to T. pallidum (Fig. 4).7,12 The traditional serologic testing algorithm starts with a nontreponemal screening test followed by a confirmatory treponemal test, while the reverse algorithm starts with a treponemal test. With the reverse algorithm, discordant results (i.e., a positive treponemal test followed by a negative nontreponemal test) are followed by a second different treponemal test, optimally the TPPA.13 In recent studies comparing the two algorithms, the reverse algorithm detects more early infections but has an increased risk of false positives.14 Point-of-care treponemal tests for syphilis are available and performed by fingerstick with ≤ 15-minute turnaround, providing the opportunity for timely testing and same-day treatment in people with no history of treated syphilis and with challenges following up or in settings without phlebotomy (e.g., syringe service programs, correctional facilities). They have lower sensitivity and specificity than laboratory-based tests and, as such, should only be used when indicated and laboratory-based tests should be collected simultaneously when possible.7,15,16
FIG 4.
Traditional sequence and reverse sequence screening algorithm for syphilis diagnosis Papp JR, Park IU, Fakile Y, Pereira L, Pillay A, Bolan GA. CDC Laboratory Recommendations for Syphilis Testing, United States, 2024. MMWR Recomm Rep 2024;73(No. RR-1):1–32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7301a1. Abbreviations: CIA = chemiluminescence immunoassay; EIA = enzyme immunoassay; RPR = rapid plasma reagin; TPPA = Treponema pallidum particle agglutination; VDRL = Venereal Disease Research Laboratory.
Primary, secondary, and early latent syphilis are treated with benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million units intramuscularly in a single dose (Table 2). During pregnancy, a second dose 1 week later may be considered.7,17 Late latent syphilis, latent syphilis of unknown duration, and tertiary syphilis should be treated with benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million units intramuscularly in three doses given 7 days apart; during pregnancy if doses are more than 9 days apart, the treatment course must be restarted. An alternative regimen for people who are not pregnant is doxycycline. Benzathine penicillin G is the only current treatment option for people who are pregnant; in those with severe penicillin allergy, inpatient desensitization is required.7 The Jarisch–Herxheimer reaction is a temporary febrile illness in response to treatment presenting in the first 24 hours after initial treatment and is more likely to occur with higher titers.7 During the second half of pregnancy, the reaction can lead to preterm labor and fetal distress, but this risk should not delay treatment, and patients should be educated to monitor for signs of labor or decreased fetal movement.7,18 Given recent benzathine penicillin G (Bicillin L-A®) shortages, in instances of Bicillin L-A® supply difficulty, Bicillin L-A® should be prioritized for people who are pregnant.19
All people with syphilis should be tested for other STIs, including HIV, and should undergo a clinical exam and repeat serologic testing after treatment to confirm treatment response and no evidence of reinfection; timing and frequency depends on clinical stage and HIV coinfection.7 In pregnant persons diagnosed before 24 weeks’ gestation, serologic titers should be performed no sooner than eight weeks after treatment to allow for an appropriate titer response as well as at delivery; after 24 weeks, serologic titers should be repeated at delivery. Titers should be repeated sooner, however, if there are concerns for reinfection or treatment failure. All partners should be referred for testing and treatment.7
Chlamydia
Chlamydia is the most reported bacterial STI in the United States and occurs more often among people under the age of 24.1 Because chlamydia is often asymptomatic, screening is the backbone of early detection and treatment to prevent transmission and sequelae such as PID, infertility, and ectopic pregnancy.7 Annual chlamydia screening by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) of either a vaginal swab or urine specimen should be performed in all sexually active women younger than 25 years and in women over 25 years with increased individual risk factors (e.g., a new sex partner, more than one sex partner, a sex partner with concurrent partners, or a sex partner who has an STI).20 Although either specimen type can be used, vaginal swabs have shown superior sensitivity for detecting chlamydia and gonorrhea.21
Recent studies have shown that rectal chlamydia is relatively common in women and is not uniformly associated with receptive anal intercourse, suggesting possible spread from one’s own genital infection.22,23 Although the significance remains unclear, there are concerns that persistent rectal chlamydia could reinfect the genital tract.22–24 As a result, the 2021 treatment guidelines recommend consideration for rectal chlamydia screening in women based on sexual behaviors and exposures (e.g., anal intercourse), using shared decision making with the patient.7,25,26 In addition, data suggest that while azithromycin has high efficacy for urogenital chlamydial infections, it is less effective against concomitant rectal chlamydial infections than doxycycline.27,28 As such, in 2021, the recommended treatment for chlamydia changed to doxycycline 100 mg orally two times per day for seven days for chlamydia in nonpregnant people.7,29 Azithromycin 1 g orally as a single dose is an alternative when there is a concern that a patient might not be able to complete this regimen, but might require post-treatment evaluation. During pregnancy, the recommended treatment is azithromycin 1 g orally as a single dose due to doxycycline teratogenicity concerns.7 All patients should be instructed to abstain from intercourse until they and their sex partners have been treated (i.e., after completion of a 7-day regimen or for 7 days after a single-dose regimen) and any symptoms have resolved.7 Testing for other STIs, including HIV, should be recommended if not already performed. A test of cure (TOC) for chlamydia is indicated 3–4 weeks after treatment during pregnancy and a test for reinfection is recommended for all people three months after treatment completion.7 Sexual partners should also be referred for testing and treatment. In situations where clinicians are concerned regarding timely access to testing and treatment for partners, expedited partner therapy (EPT) should be considered unless prohibited by law or regulations.7
Gonorrhea
Gonorrhea has increased among women 15–39 years of age in the United States over the last 5 years.1,30 Like chlamydia, many women with gonorrhea report no or nonspecific symptoms, making screening an important strategy to diagnose, treat, and reduce the risk of sequelae.7 Routine annual screening for gonorrhea is recommended for all sexually active females less than 25 years of age and for women over 25 with increased risk factors for infection (same criteria as for chlamydia).20 Similar to chlamydia, testing for gonorrhea should occur when a person presents with STI symptoms, has an STI exposure, or is diagnosed with another STI.7 Also like chlamydia, gonococcal infections can occur at extragenital sites, including the pharynx and the rectum.31,32 In a recent study, 35% of females exposed to gonorrhea tested positive at the pharynx.33 While studies show high concurrency between urogenital and extragenital infections, up to 30% of extragenital infections would be missed with urogenital screening alone.32,33 Based on this, screening for pharyngeal and rectal gonorrhea in women can be considered if oral or anal intercourse is reported.7
The recommended treatment for uncomplicated urogenital, pharyngeal, and anorectal gonorrhea in nonpregnant and pregnant people is a single dose of ceftriaxone 500 mg IM (or a single 1-gram dose for persons weighing ≥150 kg).7 If chlamydial coinfection has not been excluded and the patient is not pregnant, doxycycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days should be added.7 In 2020, the gonorrhea treatment recommendations were changed due to concerns regarding the effect of azithromycin therapy on antimicrobial resistance in N. gonorrhoeae and other concurrent STI pathogens, as well as its decreased effectiveness given increases in gonococcal azithromycin resistance.34 The ceftriaxone dose was also increased based on new ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies.35 Alternatives for when ceftriaxone is not available include a single dose of gentamicin 240 mg IM with azithromycin 2 g orally in a single dose, or cefixime 800 mg orally in a single dose for rectal and urogenital infections only.7
Gonorrhea has been considered an urgent antimicrobial resistant (AMR) threat-level pathogen in the United States since 2013 due to its ability to develop resistance to multiple antimicrobials.36 Treatment failures with ceftriaxone have been reported internationally, but no cases have been reported in the United States; however, there remain concerns about the potential for treatment failures in the United States as resistant strains have been reported.37,38 Pharyngeal infections rarely cause symptoms, but may play an important role in the development of AMR as pharyngeal infections can be more difficult to eradicate and most gonorrhea ceftriaxone treatment failures have occurred in the pharynx.39,40
Persons treated for gonorrhea should be counseled to abstain from sexual activity for 7 days after treatment or until symptoms resolve (whichever occurs last) and until all sex partners are treated.7 Any person with pharyngeal gonorrhea should have a TOC using culture or NAAT within 7–14 days posttreatment with a lower chance of false positive if performed closer to 14 days.7,40 TOC is not necessary at other sites, but all persons diagnosed with gonorrhea should be retested at 3 months.7 Like chlamydia, testing for other STIs, including HIV, should be recommended and sex partners should get referred for testing and treatment. EPT should be considered if permissible by law and regulation, especially in situations where there are concerns regarding partner access to timely testing and treatment.7
Mycoplasma genitalium
Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) is a bacterium that causes asymptomatic urogenital infections or persistent or recurrent urethritis in men; in women, Mgen is often asymptomatic.7,41 A national survey estimated the overall Mgen prevalence to be 1.7% among people 14–59 years of age with a similar prevalence between men (1.8%) and women (1.7%).42 However, estimates among women presenting to an STI clinic were as high as 26%.42–44 It is thought that Mgen in women might be associated with cervicitis, PID, infertility, and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth and spontaneous abortion, although the natural course of Mgen in women is not yet well understood.7,45 In addition, there are insufficient data demonstrating that treatment of asymptomatic women testing positive for Mgen prevents PID or other complications.7 Mgen has gained attention due to AMR concerns, resulting in limited treatment options and new detection capabilities, resulting in its addition to multiplex laboratory panels.46
CDC does not recommend screening for Mgen in people who are asymptomatic.7 In women, Mgen testing should only be performed in cases of recurrent cervicitis and can be considered for the initial evaluation of PID.7 Testing for Mgen can be performed using an FDA-approved NAAT on urine, urethral, endocervical, and vaginal samples. Culture can be performed in few specialty research laboratories but has little clinical utility due to slow growth in vitro.7
A two-stage treatment approach is recommended for Mgen and the treatment regimen with the regimen depends on if resistance testing has been performed (i.e., resistance-guided therapy). If Mgen resistance testing is either not available or demonstrates resistance to macrolides (e.g., azithromycin), the recommended treatment is doxycycline 100 mg two times daily orally for 7 days to reduce the bacterial load followed by moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily orally for 7 days.7 If Mgen resistance testing is available and it is sensitive to macrolides, the treatment should be doxycycline 100 mg two times daily orally for 7 days followed by azithromycin 2.5 g over 4 days (1 g on day 1, followed by 500 mg on days 2–4).7,47 Partner testing and treatment can be considered to reduce reinfection risk.7 Treatment of Mgen during pregnancy presents challenges due to potential teratogenicity of the recommended first-line treatments. For cases of Mgen during pregnancy, consultation with the National Network of STD Prevention Training Centers STD Clinical Consultation Network is recommended (https://www.stdccn.org/render/Public).7
Trichomonas vaginalis
Trichomoniasis, caused by the protozoan Trichomonas vaginalis, affects approximately 3.7 million people in the United States with an estimated prevalence among women of 3.1%.48 Some women with trichomoniasis are asymptomatic, but symptoms, including yellow-green vaginal discharge, vaginal irritation, postcoital spotting, or malodor, can occur.7 Screening for trichomonas is only recommended in women with HIV but may also be considered for women living in high prevalence settings or in women with risk factors for infection (e.g., having multiple sex partners, engaging in transactional sex, or having a history of STIs). Testing should be performed in all women presenting with a complaint of vaginal discharge.7
The recommended treatment for trichomoniasis in women is metronidazole 500 mg orally twice daily for 7 days.7 The duration and dose changed in the 2021 guidelines based on data demonstrating that the new regimen reduced the proportion of women testing positive at a one-month study-based TOC visit by half compared with women who received the prior single 2-g dose of metronidazole.49 A single dose of tinidazole 2 g orally is an alternative regimen for women.7 Before resuming intercourse, symptoms should be resolved and at least 7 days should have passed after completing treatment. HIV and other STI testing are recommended and partners should be referred for testing and treatment. Retesting for T. vaginalis for reinfection is recommended for all sexually active women 3 months after initial treatment, regardless of partner treatment status.7
Because recurrent or persistent trichomonas infections are most often due to reinfection, in these scenarios, a patient history and repeat NAAT should be performed no sooner than 3 weeks after treatment.7 If treatment failure occurs after receiving the recommended treatment regimen, metronidazole or tinidazole 2 g orally once daily for 7 days can be considered.7 If infection is persistent and not attributable to re-exposure, clinicians should contact CDC (parasiteslab@cdc.gov; TVConsultation@cdc.gov) to request drug-resistance testing and additional treatment guidance.
Genital herpes
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections are common in the United States with 47.8% and 11.9% of persons 14–49 years of age estimated to have HSV type 1 (HSV-1) and HSV type 2 (HSV-2), respectively.50 Genital herpes was traditionally thought to be caused mostly by HSV-2, but there has been an increasing proportion of HSV-1 genital herpes infections.51,52 Genital herpes is a lifelong infection and symptoms can vary greatly over one’s lifetime.7 Although rare, HSV can be transmitted to neonates perinatally, most often due to viral exposure via the urogenital tract at the time of delivery and can cause significant neonatal morbidity.5,7
HSV detection is challenging because viral shedding often occurs without symptoms; serologic test performance is sub-optimal; and, with HSV-1, most persons acquire the infection and develop antibodies during childhood.7 Genital herpes is best diagnosed during an active genital outbreak by swabbing an active lesion using an HSV NAAT.7 Serologic HSV-1 and HSV-2 testing for immunoglobin G antibodies may be helpful to confirm a suspected diagnosis of genital herpes based on active symptoms with atypical, healing lesions, or negative HSV NAAT testing; diagnose patients with risk factors and a history suggestive of prior genital outbreak; or for the management of sex partners of people with known genital herpes.7
Three important limitations in the interpretation of currently available serologic tests should be considered. First, positive serology for HSV-1 in an asymptomatic person cannot differentiate between orolabial or anogenital infections.7 Second, HSV-1 serologic test sensitivity is low, meaning some cases of herpes infections will be missed.7,53 Finally, HSV-2 serologic testing has an increased risk of false-positive results, especially when the positive result is near the cutoff value.53 Because of this, confirmatory testing should be pursued using western blot tests to avoid misdiagnosis and potential psychological harm.53,54 Because of the above serologic testing limitations for herpes, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and CDC currently recommend against routine serologic screening for genital herpes, including during pregnancy.7,54 Refer to the CDC STI Treatment Guidelines for information on genital herpes treatment.7
PID
PID comprises a spectrum of inflammatory disorders of the upper genital tract and has commonly been associated with gonorrheal or chlamydial infections. However, recent studies have found additional pathogen associations, including Mgen, T. vaginalis, facultative anaerobes, Gardnerella vaginalis, H. influenzae, enteric gram-negative rods, and Streptococcus agalactiae.7,55 As knowledge expands surrounding the role of other organisms and PID, studies have evaluated the efficacy of different PID treatment regimens.
The current recommended outpatient regimen for PID is a three-drug regimen of a cephalosporin (either ceftriaxone 500 mg intramuscularly [1 g if ≥ 150 kg], cefoxitin 2 g intramuscularly with probenecid 1 g orally, or other parenteral third generation cephalosporins), doxycycline 100 mg orally two twice daily for 14 days, and metronidazole 500 mg orally twice daily for 14 days.7 Metronidazole was added to the recommended treatment regimens based on the findings of a recent randomized control trial that compared the clinical outcomes of individuals treated for PID with ceftriaxone and doxycycline with and without metronidazole. The findings support the addition of metronidazole to PID treatment as the group treated with metronidazole was less likely to have pelvic tenderness on examination, an Mgen cervical infection, or bacterial vaginosis and its associated organisms.56
Mpox
In May 2022, a global outbreak of mpox, an orthopox viral infection formerly known as monkeypox, occurred in multiple nonendemic countries with unique findings of person-to-person transmission, mainly through sexual contact. This was the largest outbreak in the United States with over 30,000 mpox cases reported and there was a disproportionate impact among men who have sex with men.57 However, over 700 cases were reported in cisgender women, more than 20 of whom were pregnant or recently pregnant at the time of diagnosis; in addition, three neonates developed mpox perinatally.58 Although reported cases have significantly declined in the United States, small mpox clusters are still occurring. Because of this, it is important to remain alert for the signs and symptoms of mpox, to test when patients have symptoms consistent with mpox, and to recommend the JYNNEOS vaccine to those at increased risk of mpox exposure (https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/mpox/clinicians/vaccines/vaccine-basics-healthcare.html).
The mpox rash is classically described as painful, firm, vesicular, or pustular lesions and typically lasts 2–4 weeks. The lesions may have an umbilicated center before crusting over (Fig. 5) and are often found on the legs, arms, genital and anorectal areas, oropharynx, or trunk.58,59 Other symptoms include fever, headaches, malaise, and lymphadenopathy.59 Testing for mpox is performed by DNA polymerase chain reaction test and requires swabbing the lesion(s); unroofing or aspiration of lesions is not recommended.59 Most infections resolve spontaneously, but occasionally hospitalization is required for severe disease and pain control.58,59 Tecovirimat, an antiviral medication, might be considered during pregnancy and in people with severe disease or immunocompromising conditions.58,59 Tecovirimat is available through the STOMP clinical trial (https://www.stomptpoxx.org/main) or CDC’s Investigational New Drug protocol (https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/mpox/clinicians/obtaining-tecovirimat.html). Additional mpox information can be found at https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/mpox/index.html.
FIG 5.
Mpox lesions of the vulva The Lancet 2022 4001953-1965 DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02187-0) unchanged from publication. Permissions: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Conclusion
Growing rates of STIs are a public health challenge and continue to impact quality of life in all segments of the population. Women and people who are pregnant are uniquely vulnerable to the risks associated with STIs due to higher efficiency of penile-to-vaginal transmission and increased sequelae among women, including long-term infertility and chronic pain-related sequelae, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and risks of vertical transmission. Discussing sexual health, obtaining a sexual history, and screening for STIs, when indicated, should be routine and readily accessible, but many experience challenges accessing comprehensive health care; this is highlighted by the 2022 surveillance, which shows that nearly 40% of people delivering infants with CS received no prenatal care during pregnancy.6 Patient and provider discomfort when discussing sexual health may add additional barriers.60 Efforts to improve access to care and testing is critical to reduce STIs. In addition, through promoting sexual, reproductive, pregnancy, and infant health, women’s health clinicians can further reduce the burden of STIs through taking a thorough sexual history, educating patients, and providing appropriate screening and treatment.
Acknowledgments
Laura Bachmann, MD, MPH—project administration and conceptualization; K. Meryl Davis, MD—Writing—Reviewing and Editing; Haben Debessai, MD—Writing—Reviewing and Editing.
Funding Information
This publication was developed as part of a series of projects through CDC Foundation under the award: The Perinatal Infectious Diseases Fellowship Training, which is supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) with a financial assistance award totaling $782,543 with 100 percent funded by CDC/HHS.
Footnotes
Author Disclosure Statement
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC Foundation or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Mention of company names or products does not imply endorsement by the CDC. The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.
Additional Disclosures
In this article, the terminology “women” is used for concision, although this information applies to all people with a vulva, vagina, cervix, and/or uterus.
References
- 1.CDC. Sexually Transmitted Infections Surveillance, 2022. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2024. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/default.htm [February 5, 2024]. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Paavonen J, Eggert-Kruse W. Chlamydia trachomatis: Impact on human reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 1999;5(5):433–447; doi: 10.1093/humupd/5.5.433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cogliano V, Baan R, Straif K, et al. Carcinogenicity of human papillomaviruses. Lancet Oncol 2005;6(4):204; doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70086-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lago EG, Vaccari A, Fiori RM. Clinical features and follow-up of congenital syphilis. Sex Transm Dis 2013;40(2):85–94; doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31827bd688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kimberlin DW. Neonatal herpes simplex infection. ClinMicrobiol Rev 2004;17(1):1–13; doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.1.1-13.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McDonald R, O’Callaghan K, Torrone E, et al. Vital signs: Missed opportunities for preventing congenital syphilis—United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023; 72(46):1269–1274; doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7246e1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep 2021;70(4):1–187; doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mangione CM, Barry MJ, Nicholson WK, et al. Screening for syphilis infection in nonpregnant adolescents and adults: US preventive services task force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Jama. 2022;328(12):1243–1249; doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.15322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, et al. Screening for syphilis infection in pregnant women: US preventive services task force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Jama. 2018; 320(9):911–917; doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists. Screening for Syphilis in Pregnancy, 2024. Available from: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2024/04/screening-for-syphilis-in-pregnancy
- 11.Towns JM, Leslie DE, Denham I, et al. Painful and multiple anogenital lesions are common in men with Treponema pallidum PCR-positive primary syphilis without herpes simplex virus coinfection: A cross-sectional clinic-based study. Sex Transm Infect 2016;92(2):110–115; doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Papp JR, Park IU, Fakile Y, et al. CDC laboratory recommendations for syphilis testing, United States, 2024. MMWR Recomm Rep 2024;73(1):1–32; doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7301a1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Park IU, Fakile YF, Chow JM, et al. Performance of treponemal tests for the diagnosis of syphilis. Clin Infect Dis 2019;68(6):913–918; doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ortiz DA, Shukla MR, Loeffelholz MJ. The traditional or reverse algorithm for diagnosis of syphilis: Pros and Cons. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71(Suppl 1):S43–S51; doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bristow CC, Klausner JD, Tran A. Clinical test performance of a rapid point-of-care syphilis treponemal antibody test: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71(Suppl 1):S52–S57; doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gliddon HD, Peeling RW, Kamb ML, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the performance and operational characteristics of dual point-of-care tests for HIV and syphilis. Sex Transm Infect 2017;93(S4): S3–S15; doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-053069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wendel GD, Sheffield JS, Hollier LM, et al. Treatment of syphilis in pregnancy and prevention of congenital syphilis. Clin Infect Dis 2002;35(Suppl 2):S200–S209; doi: 10.1086/342108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Butler T. The Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction after antibiotic treatment of spirochetal infections: A review of recent cases and our understanding of pathogenesis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2017;96(1):46–52; doi: 10.4269/ajtmh [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bachmann LD, Mena L. Clinical Reminders during Bicillin L-A® Shortage. Centers for Disease and Control. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/std/dstdp/dcl/2023-july-20-Mena-BicillinLA.htm [January 16, 2024]. [Google Scholar]
- 20.LeFevre ML, US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161(12):902–910; doi: 10.7326/M14-1981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Aaron JK, Griner S, Footman A, et al. Vaginal swab vs urine for detection of chlamydia trachomatis, neisseria gonorrhoeae, and trichomonas vaginalis: A Meta-analysis. Ann Fam Med 2023;21(2):172–179; doi: 10.1370/afm.2942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chan PA, Robinette A, Montgomery M, et al. Extragenital infections caused by chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A review of the literature. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2016;2016:5758387–5758317; doi: 10.1155/2016/5758387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Llata E, Braxton J, Asbel L, et al. Rectal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections among women reporting anal intercourse. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132(3): 692–697; doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Khosropour CM, Soge OO, Suchland R, et al. Recurrent/intermittent vaginal and rectal chlamydial infection following treatment: A prospective cohort study among female sexually transmitted disease clinic patients. J Infect Dis 2019; 220(3):476–483; doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jann JT, Cunningham NJ, Assaf RD, et al. Evidence supporting the standardisation of extra-genital gonorrhoea and chlamydia screenings for women. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97(8):601–606; doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dukers-Muijrers N, SchimvanderLoeff M, Wolffs P, et al. Incident urogenital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis in women: The role of sexual exposure and autoinoculation: A multicentre observational study (FemCure). Sex Transm Infect 2022;98(6):427–437; doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2021-055032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Geisler WM, Uniyal A, Lee JY, et al. Azithromycin versus doxycycline for urogenital chlamydia trachomatis infection. N Engl J Med 2015;373(26):2512–2521; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1502599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dombrowski JC, Wierzbicki MR, Newman LM, et al. Doxycycline versus azithromycin for the treatment of rectal chlamydia in men who have sex with men. Clin Infect Dis 2021;73(5):824–831; doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Workowski KA, Bolan GA. Centers for disease control and prevention sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015;64(RR-03):1–137. [Mismatch [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pollock ED, Clay PA, Kreisel KM, et al. Estimated incidence and prevalence of Gonorrhea in the United States, 2006–2019. Sex Transm Dis 2023;50(4):188–195; doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rahman MM, Johnson C, Taylor SN, et al. Extragenital sexually transmitted infection testing among louisiana parish health units, 2016–2019. Sex Transm Dis 2023;50(5): 274–279; doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Danby CS, Cosentino LA, Rabe LK, et al. Patterns of extragenital Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in women and men who have sex with men reporting a history of receptive anal intercourse. Sex Transm Dis 2016;43(2):105–109; doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.McLaughlin SE, Golden MR, Soge OO, et al. Pharyngeal Gonorrhea in heterosexual male and female sex partners of persons with Gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis 2023;50(4): 203–208; doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.St. Cyr S, Barbee L, Workowski KA, et al. Update to CDC’s treatment guidelines for Gonococcal Infection, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69(50):1911–1916; doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6950a6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lewis DA. Will targeting oropharyngeal gonorrhoea delay the further emergence of drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains? Sex Transm Infect 2015;91(4):234–237; doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States,2019. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/mpox/clinicians/vaccines/vaccine-basics-healthcare.html [January 16, 2024]. [Google Scholar]
- 37.The Commonwealth of Massachusetts. (2023, January 19). Multi-drug non-susceptible gonorrhea in Massachusetts. Boston, MA; 2023. Available from: https://www.mass.gov/news/department-of-public-health-announces-first-cases-of-concerning-gonorrhea-strain [January 16, 2024]. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Picker MA, Knoblock RJ, Hansen H, et al. Notes from the field: First case in the United States of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Harboring Emerging Mosaic penA60 allele, conferring reduced susceptibility to cefixime and ceftriaxone. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69(49):1876–1877; doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6949a5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Adamson PC, Klausner JD. The staying power of pharyngeal gonorrhea: Implications for public health and antimicrobial resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2021;73(4):583–585; doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gieseker K, Learner ER, Mauk K, et al. Demographic and epidemiological characteristics associated with reduced antimicrobial susceptibility to Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United States, strengthening the U.S. response to resistant Gonorrhea (SURRG), 2018–2019. Sex Transm Dis 2021;48(12S Suppl 2):S118–S123; doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bachmann LH, Kirkcaldy RD, Geisler WM, et al. Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium infection, antimicrobial resistance mutations and symptom resolution following treatment of urethritis. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71(10):e624–e632; doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Torrone EA, Kruszon-Moran D, Philips C, et al. Prevalence of urogenital mycoplasma genitalium infection, United States, 2017 to 2018. Sex Transm Dis 2021;48(11):e160–e162; doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Manhart LE, Gaydos CA, Taylor SN, et al. Characteristics of Mycoplasma genitalium urogenital infections in a diverse patient sample from the United States: Results from the Aptima Mycoplasma genitalium evaluation study (AMES). J Clin Microbiol 2020;58(7):e00165–20. doi [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Khosropour CM, Jensen JS, Soge O, et al. High prevalence of vaginal and rectal mycoplasma genitalium macrolide resistance among female sexually transmitted disease clinic patients in Seattle, Washington. Sex Transm Dis 2020; 47(5):321–325; doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lis R, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Manhart LE. Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: A meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2015;61(3):418–426; doi: 10.1093/cid/civ312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019. Available from: 10.15620/cdc:82532 [January 16, 2024] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Horner P, Ingle SM, Garrett F, et al. Which azithromycin regimen should be used for treating Mycoplasma genitalium? A meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2018;94(1): 14–20; doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-053060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sutton M, Sternberg M, Koumans EH, et al. The prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among reproductive-age women in the United States, 2001–2004. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45(10):1319–1326; doi: 10.1086/522532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kissinger P, Mena L, Levison J, et al. A randomized treatment trial: Single versus 7-day dose of metronidazole for the treatment of Trichomonas vaginalis among HIV-infected women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010;55(5): 565–571; doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181eda955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.McQuillan G, Kruszon-Moran D, Flagg EW, et al. Prevalence of herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 in persons aged 14–49: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS Data Brief 2018;304:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Roberts CM, Pfister JR, Spear SJ. Increasing proportion of herpes simplex virus type 1 as a cause of genital herpes infection in college students. Sex Transm Dis 2003;30(10): 797–800; doi: 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000092387.58746.C7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Spicknall IH, Flagg E, Torrone EA. Estimates of the prevalence and incidence of genital herpes, United States, 2018. Sex Transm Dis 2021;48(4):260–265; doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Agyemang E, Le Q, Warren T, et al. Performance of commercial enzyme-linked immunoassays for diagnosis of Herpes Simplex Virus-1 and Herpes Simplex Virus-2 infection in a clinical setting. Sex Transm Dis 2017;44(12):763–767; doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mangione CM, Barry MJ, Nicholson WK, et al. Serologic screening for genital herpes infection: US preventive services task force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Jama 2023;329(6):502–507; doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ness RB, Kip KE, Hillier SL, et al. A cluster analysis of bacterial vaginosis-associated microflora and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162(6):585–590; doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wiesenfeld HC, Meyn LA, Darville T, et al. A randomized controlled trial of ceftriaxone and doxycycline, with or without metronidazole, for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Clin Infect Dis 2021;72(7):1181–1189; doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Minhaj FS, Ogale YP, Whitehill F, et al. Monkeypox outbreak—nine states, May 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71(23):764–769; doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7123e1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Oakley LP, Hufstetler K, O’Shea J, et al. Mpox cases among cisgender women and pregnant persons—United States, May 11-November 7, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023;72(1):9–14; doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7201a2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Meaney-Delman DM, Galang RR, Petersen BW, et al. A primer on monkeypox virus for obstetrician-gynecologists: Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Obstet Gynecol 2022; 140(3):391–397; doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Brookmeyer KA, Coor A, Kachur RE, et al. Sexual history taking in clinical settings: A narrative review. Sex Transm Dis 2021;48(6):393–402; doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]