Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 25;23(Suppl 1):1250. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10427-4

Table 2.

Summary of objective response

Epacadostat + pembrolizumab with chemotherapy (n = 91) Placebo + pembrolizumab with chemotherapy (n = 87)
n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI)
CR 0 0 (0.0–4.0) 0 0 (0.0–4.2)
PR 24 26.4 (17.7–36.7) 39 44.8 (34.1–55.9)
Overall responsea 24 26.4 (17.7–36.7) 39 44.8 (34.1–55.9)
SDb 38 41.8 (31.5–52.6) 35 40.2 (29.9–51.3)
Disease controlc 62 68.1 (57.5–77.5) 74 85.1 (75.8–91.8)
PD 14 15.4 (8.7–24.5) 8 9.2 (4.1–17.3)
NEd 7 7.7 (3.1–15.2) 2 2.3 (0.3–8.1)
No assessmente 8 8.8 (3.9–16.6) 3 3.4 (0.7–9.7)
Patients with a responsef 24 39
 TTR, median (range), months 1.6 (1.2–6.1) 1.4 (1.1–6.2)
 DOR,g median (range), months NR (1.1 + to 7.0 +) 7.0 (1.2 + to 8.0 +)
Patients with ongoing response, n (%)h 20 (83.3) 29 (74.4)
 ≥ 3 months 14 (58.3) 19 (48.7)
 ≥ 6 months 7 (29.2) 6 (15.4)

Responses based on BICR assessment per RECIST v1.1

BICR Blinded independent central review, CI Confidence interval, CR Complete response, DOR Duration of response, NE Not evaluable, NR Not reached, PD Progressive disease, PR Partial response, RECIST v1.1 Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1, SD Stable disease, TTR time to response

aOverall response includes CR and PR

bSD includes both SD and Non-CR/Non-PD

cDisease control includes CR, PR and SD

dPost-baseline assessment(s) available but not evaluable or CR/PR/SD < 6 weeks from randomization

eNo post-baseline assessment available

fIncludes patients with best objective response as confirmed CR or PR

gFrom product-limit (Kaplan–Meier) method for censored data. " + " indicates there is no PD by the time of last disease assessment

hIncludes patients who are alive, have not progressed, have not initiated new anticancer treatment, are not lost to follow-up and whose last disease assessment was < 5 months prior to data cutoff date