Skip to main content
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment logoLink to Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
. 2024 Jul 23;23:15330338241261836. doi: 10.1177/15330338241261836

Male Breast Cancer: Current Scenario and Future Perspectives

Anitha Chidambaram 1,, Rajkumar Prabhakaran 2,, Sivabalan Sivasamy 2, Thanigaivelan Kanagasabai 3, Malarvili Thekkumalai 4, Ankit Singh 5, Mayurika S Tyagi 6, Sivanesan Dhandayuthapani 2,
PMCID: PMC11271170  PMID: 39043043

Abstract

Male breast cancer (MBC), one of the rare types of cancer among men where the global incidence rate is 1.8% of all breast cancers cases with a yearly increase in a pace of 1.1%. Since the last 10 years, the incidence has been increased from 7.2% to 10.3% and the mortality rate was decreased from 11% to 3.8%. Nevertheless, the rate of diagnoses has been expected to be around 2.6% in the near future, still there is a great lack in studies to characterize the MBC including the developed countries. Based on our search, it is evidenced from the literature that the number of risk factors for the cause of MBC are significant, which includes the increase in age, family genetic history, mutations in specific genes due to various environmental impacts, hormonal imbalance and unregulated expression receptors for specific hormones of high levels of estrogen or androgen receptors compared to females. MBCs are broadly classified into ductal and lobular carcinomas with further sub-types, with some of the symptoms including a lump or swelling in the breast, redness of flaky skin in the breast, irritation and nipple discharge that is similar to the female breast cancer (FBC). The most common diagnostic tools currently in use are the ultrasound guided sonography, mammography, and biopsies. Treatment modalities for MBC include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and targeted therapies. However, the guidelines followed for the diagnosis and treatment modalities of MBC are mostly based on FBC that is due to the lack of prospective studies related to MBC. However, there are distinct clinical and molecular features of MBC, it is a need to develop different clinical methods with more multinational approaches to help oncologist to improve care for MBC patients.

Keywords: male breast cancer, epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis of MBC, treatment modalities

Introduction

Globally cancer is one of the leading non-communicable diseases and is responsible for a majority of death in both males and females. Therefore, it is considered as main barriers in increasing life expectancy and decreasing mortality worldwide.1,2 One of the globally identified most burdensome is the breast cancer (BC) and responsible for higher incidence of death in females. 3 Even though BC in male is rare/uncommon type of cancers, the global incidence rate is reported as 1.8% of all BC cases 4 with a yearly increase in a pace of 1.1%48 where the incidence in Indian population is also similar to the global rate.9,10 Till the hormones influence the differentiation during the puberty, breast tissues in both male and female are identical. 11 Boys during their pubertal age will have increased level of estrogen along with a 30-fold increase in testosterone levels. Estrogen stimulation of the growth of breast tissue will normally be antagonized by the androgen in males. Hence, male breast is normally characterized as fat mass in sub-cutaneous area along with residue in sub-areolar tissues of the ductal region. 12

BC in men is one of the rare/uncommon forms of malignancy and is not fully understood. A unimodal peak at the age of 71 years reported in male based on age distribution in men with BC might be delayed diagnosis due to low suspicion 7 whereas, in women a bimodal distribution with peaks at 52 and 71 years of age were identified. 13 Identified risk factors for most of the BC cases in both sexes are unknown. Though comparative studies on the risk factors of BC in women and men are inadequate, certain factors like BRCA2 mutations had been ascertained to be a common risk factor for both sexes.

Male breast cancer (MBC) accounts for a small fraction of all BC cases and presents unique challenges in terms of prevention, early detection, and management. One of the key aspects in preventing MBC involves understanding the risk factors associated with its development. One of the major risk factors concerning MBC is the genetic predisposition, and is reported that inherited germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for approximately 2% and 10% of MBC respectively with a life time risk in men harboring BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is 1.2% and 6.8%. 14 In light of this, genetic counseling and testing are strongly recommended for individuals with a family history of breast and ovarian cancers. 15 Cautious use or avoidance of estrogen-containing hormone replacement therapy is advisable for men with a history of conditions such as gynecomastia or other breast-related issues, as this can help in reducing the risk of MBC. 16 Moreover, promoting lifestyle modifications is crucial in MBC prevention. Encouraging men to maintain a healthy body weight, engage in regular physical activity, and limited alcohol consumption not only contributes to their overall well-being but also plays a role in lowering the risk of BC, mirroring the benefits observed in women's BC prevention strategies.

Early detection and screening are vital components in the management of MBC. It is imperative to educate men about the importance of self-awareness when it comes to their breast health. This includes encouraging them to perform regular breast self-examinations and promptly reporting any unusual findings to a healthcare provider. Additionally, routine clinical breast examinations by healthcare professionals play a crucial role in detecting MBC, particularly among individuals at higher risk. Even though mammography is considered to be a common screening tool for BC, it is reported that mammography in men is highly sensitive and specific, which might lead to high negative predictive value.17,18 Bearing in mind the limitations of using mammography to diagnose MBC, it is worthwhile to consider using appropriate diagnostic tool such as genetic counselling for men those with elevated risk factors, including family history of BC or known genetic mutations 19 for early detection and to increase the chances of treatment success.

The primary approach in managing MBC involves surgery encompassing mastectomy, which involves the complete removal of the breast, or breast-conserving surgery, depending on the need. Additionally, the management of MBC may entail to adjuvant therapies, which includes chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormone therapy, with the focus of reducing the risk of recurrence. The post-treatment phase of MBC is marked by a focus on follow-up and survivorship care. Regular follow-up examinations are essential to monitor for any signs of recurrence or potential complications arising from the treatment received. Additionally, emphasizing lifestyle management is vital in enhancing the overall well-being of MBC survivors. Furthermore, participation in cancer support groups or survivorship programs can offer MBC survivors an invaluable source of emotional support and a sense of community. These support networks provide a safe space for individuals to share experiences, exchange advice, and navigate the unique challenges that come with surviving MBC, fostering resilience and improving the quality of life for those on to the survivorship journey.

Epidemiology

The incidence of MBC will greatly differ with geographic areas and race.14,20 It is reported that in comparison to the Asian Countries, the frequency of MBC is much higher in the North America and Europe. 21 The epidemiology of MBC has changed significantly over the last 10 years. The American Cancer Society (ACS) reported that the estimated new cases of MBC in the year 2019 as 2670 with 18% mortality rate. 13 Subsequently it has been reported that rate of MBC diagnoses was expected to be around 2.6% in the year 2023 of all newly diagnosed cases with an estimation of 3200 men would be diagnosed and reported that the occurrence of MBC has been raised from 7.2% to 10.3% over the last 10 years and the mortality rate was decreased from 11% to 3.8%. 22 The incidence and 5-year survival rate of MBC in the last 20 years is depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Incidence and 5-year survival rate of MBC in the last 20 years.

According to the SEER data, a significant raise in the rate of MBC, which exceeds at least 25% higher than that of women has been reported. 23 The ACS has predicted almost 2800 new cases in the United States with 530 deaths by the end of the year 2023. 24

Etiology

In spite of the increase in the global rate of MBC in the last 3 decades, 25 studies showing the etiology, prognosis, and treatment is seldom available, as most of the population-based studies and clinical trials focused on MBC is very limited. 26 However, guidelines for the treatment and clinical management for managing MBC are being used those which have been developed and followed based on female BC. The risk of BC in men increases with increasing age of an average between 60 and 70 years, with most cases happening in men over the age of 50 years old.22,27,28 The 5-year survival rate for MBC in India is estimated to be around 56%.2932 Even though there are no solid evidences stating the mechanism of MBC, some reports have reported that MBC are more likely to express high levels of either estrogen receptors (ERs) or androgen receptors compared to female with a minimal or no expression of HER2.7,23,33

Identified risk factors for the cause of MBC are familial history, radiation exposure of the chest in the past, engorged breasts, exposure to estrogen, overweight, inherited gene mutation (BRCA1 and BRCA2), and certain medical conditions, including cirrhosis, obesity, Klinefelter syndrome, and so on, may increase the risk. Moreover, certain lifestyle behaviors, such as smoking, over consumption of alcohol, and less or no physical activities could also increase the chances of developing MBC. Men diagnosed with BC typically present with a lump in the breast or nipple discharge and may also include rash, itching, or pain in the breast area.29,34

Risk Factors

As like female BC, factors including genetic, endocrine compounds, and other environmental risk factors are considered as the major risk factors that can cause MBC. The known risk factors for the cause of MBC are given in Figure 2. A recent review by Fentiman has reported that BRCA2 mutation carriers and individuals with Klinefelter's syndrome are the 2 significant cohorts responsible for up to 15% of MBC cases. 35 Moreover, the risk of BC increases at least 2-fold in case of family history and it can be considered as the main predisposing factor. 10 Considering the epidemiological prospective, BC in men most closely resembles the BC in post-menopausal women but the clinical and pathological characteristics are different from each other. Additionally, BC in men has poor prognosis in comparison with female breast cancer (FBC) because of the symptoms appear in unconventional stage in men,3639 where the scenario remains to be the same even decades. Hence, the increase in age is directly proportional to the risk of BC.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Risk factors of MBC.

Role of Lifestyle Factors, Diet, and Exercise

Several studies have highlighted the role of lifestyle and environmental elements in influencing the onset and advancement of the disease.4044 Among the risk factors, obesity through the hormonal mechanisms emerge as particularly noteworthy due to their potential causal connection with BC and the feasibility of modification.35,43 Further the studies have also stated that dietary factors, physical activities, and socio-economic status could also deserve for the cause of MBC.35,43 It is advised to limit saturated fats derived from red and processed meats, full-fat dairy products, and fried foods, as their high consumption is associated with an elevated risk of BC. 45 Furthermore, added sugars and processed foods, which are crucial to contribute towards weight gain and inflammation, are recognized risk factors for BC. 46 Additionally, excessive intake of alcohol is also linked to increased risk of BC. 47

Several studies have reported that eating more dietary fiber from various sources including whole grains, pulses, vegetables, and fruits can supply essential nutrients and antioxidants that bolster overall health and not only reduce the risk of BC in men but also improve the overall survival (OS) rate.4851 Incorporation of a diverse array of colors with a wide spectrum of essential nutrients could ensure prevention of BC. 52 Lean proteins sourced from poultry, fish, beans, lentils, and tofu provide essential amino acids necessary for cellular repair and maintenance. 53 Healthy fats, consumed from avocados, nuts, seeds, and olive oil, support overall well-being and help in reducing inflammation. 54 Omega-3 fatty acids, found in fatty fish like salmon, mackerel, and chia seeds, possess anti-inflammatory properties that may confer protection against BC. 55 Antioxidant-rich foods like berries, nuts, and dark leafy greens play a crucial role in neutralizing harmful free radicals in the body. 56

Green tea, containing compounds such as catechins, has been studied for its potential protective effects against BC. 57 Turmeric and curcumin, known for their anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, may also offer some protective benefits. 58 It is reported that compared to the omega-6 arachidonic acid, marine omega-3 fatty acids such as eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid have demonstrated a lower associated risk of BC. Regular exercise is also crucial in this context. 59

Recent study has demonstrated the significance of heightened lipogenesis in facilitating the self-renewal and proliferation of BC stem cells. 60 Furthermore, it highlighted the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids through targeting the site-specific pathways to exert their anticancer properties. 60 It is also reported that the combination of hydroxytyrosol, omega-3 fatty acids, and curcumin effectively alleviated inflammation, which is evidenced by a decrease in CRP levels, and furthermore the reduction in pain among patients experiencing aromatase-induced musculoskeletal symptoms. 61 Flaxseeds, abundant in fiber, are recommended for improving constipation as they aid in enhancing intestinal function, additionally, they contain omega-3 fatty acids. It is also reported that flaxseed either enhanced or sustained tamoxifen's effectiveness in reducing tumor growth through inhibiting cell proliferation and promoting apoptosis. 62

However, several studies have reported due to the germline mutations in the onco-suppressor genes such as BRCA2, p53, ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2, almost around 10% of the cases are hereditary in nature. More specifically it has been reported that mutation in PALB2 gene has at least 8-fold increased risk of developing MBC.6367 As reported above, Kaur et al, in the year 2019 revealed 13 novel missense mutations in 8 genes in MBC patients from Malwa region of Panjab, India. 68 Genetic profiling of men could be helpful via identification of genetic markers; those which are associated with MBC patients can be helpful in paving way for newer therapeutic strategies and furthermore to design site-specific agents.69,70 Table 1 shows the various genes and proteins that are more prone for mutation and their functions in MBC.

Table 1.

Genes and Proteins That are More Prone for Mutation and Their Functions in Male Breast Cancer.

S. No. Gene and protein Functions Amino acids involved in the mutation References
1 BRCA2 (Breast Cancer 2, early onset) DNA repair mechanism and helps to maintain the genomic stability. Changes in the base pairs called mutation of BRCA2 gene could increase the risk of MBC. R28C, T397X, N372X 71
2 BRCA1 (Breast Cancer 1, early onset) DNA repair and tumor suppressor functions. Although more commonly associated with female breast cancer, mutations in the BRCA1 gene can also increase the risk of male breast cancer. E198X, R94W, R50X 72
3 PALB2 (Partner and Localizer of BRCA2) PALB2 interacts with BRCA2 and helps in DNA repair. Mutations in PALB2 have been found to increase at least 2 to 4 times more likely to develop breast cancer on men. 73
4 CHEK2 (Checkpoint Kinase 2) CHEK2 is involved in cell cycle regulation and DNA repair. Any changes in the base pairs of CHECK2 gene are highly associated with increased risk different cancers including MBC. del5395insC, 1100delC, IVS2 + 1G > A 74
5 PTEN (Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog) PTEN, a tumor suppressor gene, helps in regulating cell growth and cell division mechanisms. Mutations in PTEN have been linked to various cancers, including male breast cancer. R130Q, P123Q, E285K 75
6 TP53 (Tumor Protein p53) TP53, a tumor suppressor gene, prevents the development of cancer. Mutations in TP53 have been associated with an increased risk of several cancers, including male breast cancer. R273H, R282 W, P72R 76,77
7 RAD51C (RAD51 Homolog C) RAD51C involved in DNA repair by homologous recombination and its’ mutation is oriented with an increased risk of MBC. E133K, M117I, A121T 78
8 RAD51D (RAD51 Homolog D) Similar to RAD51C, RAD51D is also involved in DNA repair by homologous recombination and its mutation is oriented with an increased risk of MBC. V93M, R127X, L182F 79
9 NBN (Nibrin) DNA repair and genomic stability. Mutations in the NBN gene, which codes for the protein nibrin, is associated with increased risk of MBC. R434X, Q38X, R51C 71
10 ATM (Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated) DNA repair and conservation of genomic stability. Mutation in ATM is associated with an increased risk of MBC. L2536P, K2518N, A3012T 80
11 STK11 (Serine/Threonine Kinase 11) Cell cycle regulation and tumor suppression. Mutations in STK11 gene have been linked to an increased risk of various cancers, including MBC. M419K, I323 T, R189X 81
12 CDH1 (Cadherin 1) CDH1 codes for the protein E-cadherin, that involve in cell adhesion. Mutation in the CDH1 is associated with an increased risk of various cancers, including MBC. R168G, P50L, R87Q 82
13 MRE11A (MRE11 Homolog A) DNA repair and conservation of genomic stability. Mutations in MRE11A have been linked to an increased risk of MBC. IVS10- 1G > A, R20 W, Y127C 83
14 MLH1 (MutL Homolog 1) MSH1 involve in DNA mismatch repair, which is essential for maintaining genomic stability. Mutation in MLH1 is associated with an increased risk of MBC. V741fs, Y179F2, V577G 84
15 MSH2 (MutS Homolog 2) MSH2 are involved in DNA mismatch repair, which is essential for maintaining genomic stability. Mutation in MSH2 is associated with an increased risk of MBC. D242N, K923E, L420X 78
16 MSH6 (MutS Homolog 6) MSH6 are involved in DNA mismatch repair, which is essential for maintaining genomic stability. Mutation in MSH6 is linked with an increased risk of MBC. IVS7 + 1G > A, Y978C, Q721H 78
17 PPM1D (Protein Phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ Dependent 1D) DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation. Mutations in PPM1D have been found to increase the risk of MBC. P56T, Q71R, R475H 85
18 RAD51 (RAD51 Recombinase) Involve in DNA repair and maintenance of genomic stability. Mutations in RAD50 have been associated with an increased risk of MBC. F51L, M16T, R59C 86
19 RAD50 (RAD50 Double Strand Break Repair Protein) Involved in DNA repair by homologous recombination. Mutations in these genes have been associated with an increased risk of MBC. D509N, L206P, R161C 87
20 BARD1 (BRCA1 Associated RING Domain 1) Interacts with BRCA1 and plays a role in DNA repair and tumor suppression. Mutations in BARD1 have been linked to an increased risk MBC. G33R, Y56H, Q3Q 88

The other risk factors include, exposure to estrogen as hormone therapy for prostate cancer; Klinefelter's syndrome, a genetic syndrome, which causes abnormal development of the testicles that produce lower levels of certain male hormones such as androgens and more levels of estrogen, a female hormone. Inflamed testicles (Orchitis) or removal of testicles (Orchiectomy) might also increase the risk of MBC. Certain medical conditions such as hormonal imbalance due to any liver diseases and obesity could also increase the risk of MBC.89,90 In addition to the above-mentioned risk factors, quite a few more that are related to occupational hazards such as hot working environments, working with chemical and hormonal synthetics, long-term exposure of ionizing radiations and electro-magnetic radiation and chemicals and its’ combustion products are also reported to increase the risk of developing MBC.9193

Types

There are several types and subtypes of MBC classified based on various factors including histology, hormone receptor status, and genetic mutations. Various types of MBC and its characteristics are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Various Types of Breast Cancer in Male and its Characteristics.

Type Characteristics
Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) One of the most common type in both men and women that start to grow from the milk ducts and invades to nearby tissues of the breast.
Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILB) Begins in the milk-producing glands called as lobules and can spread to various other parts of the body.
Mixed types Breast cancer having both the IDC and ILC like characteristics, which are classified as mixed type
Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) A rare and aggressive type, without any normal symptoms of any other BC, instead the breast may appear red, swollen and feel warm.
Paget's disease of the nipple Another rare type of BC that starts in the ducts of the nipple and further spreads to the surface of the nipple and may be associated with any other underlying BC.
Angiosarcoma This is also a rare type of BC that starts in cells lining blood vessels or lymph vessels in the breast
Phyllodes tumor This is a rare type of tumor that forms in the connective tissue of the breast. It can be benign (non-cancerous), borderline (potentially cancerous), or malignant (cancerous
Based on hormone and receptor status Male breast cancers, like female breast cancers, can be classified based on hormone receptor status. This includes
Estrogen Positive
Progesterone Positive
Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Positive
BRCA mutation Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which are known to increase the risk of breast in men and women and ovarian cancers.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) Lack or absence of hormone receptors (ER, PR) and does not express HER2, which is one of the most aggressive types.

Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)

DCIS in the breast is identified by a lesion confined within the breast ducts, devoid of invasive traits or metastatic potential. Pure DCIS comprises approximately 10% of all MBCs and constitutes less than 0.1% of all cancer types in men. Ensuring a prompt diagnosis of male carcinoma in situ and implementing effective clinical interventions are pivotal in averting its advancement into a more severe form, like invasive carcinoma. 94 It constitutes roughly 1% of all malignancies in men and accounts for 5% to 7% of MBC cases. 95

However, studies have reported that as like in women, majority of men have invasive ductal caricnomas,9698 which constitutes about 90% of all MBCs. 99 However, medullary, papilloma, and lobular are also implicated to be the other types. In spite of the low level of knowledge and awareness and stigmas towards MBC, in-situ ductal carcinoma is found desperately, which leads to delayed diagnosis and poorer patient outcomes. Approximately 90% of MBC expresses ER, and 81% expresses progesterone receptor (PR).100102 Comparatively papillary carcinoma is one of the most prevalent types and lobular carcinomas are rare. 103 However, a recent study by Chhabra et al, in the year 2021, showed around 81% of ER, 76% PR, 25% HER2neu, and 2% of TNBC in Indian population. 29 It is also reported that hormone receptor expression is more common in MBC when compared with FBC. 92 Hence, inhibition of these receptors could be usually predicted for the treatment and management of MBC, which will be discussed under the treatment modalities in the further sections.

Signs and Symptoms

MBC also shows some of the most common symptoms of FBC such as painless subareolar lump in the breast, nipple retraction called as flattening, nipple inversion where the nipple seems growing inward, fluid discharge from the nipple, redness or scaling of the nipple or breast skin.104106 It is also evidenced that there would be a single preponderance of left-sided versus right-sided disease similar to women. 106 Deficiency of established screening guidelines for MBC is directly reflecting on the delayed diagnosis of the disease. International Male Breast Cancer Program has reported that approximately 46.7% of men with this disease are reported to have at least one lymphnode at the time of diagnosis. 33 Chances of treatment success could be increased with early detection of the disease.

Secondary Malignancies due to BC

Development of the secondary malignancies due to MBC has increased risk of generalized malignancy in a secondary spot. A retrospective registry-based cohort study conducted at the UC Irvine by involving data from the year 1988 to 2023 with 1926 men aged 85 years or less diagnosed with primary BC. Out of the 1926 patients, 221 (11.5%) patients have developed a secondary cancer. 107 The development of second cancer is reported to be more particularly of a 2nd primary cancer of the breast, cutaneous melanoma, and stomach cancer compared with general population. However, younger men are more prone or at high risk of developing second malignancies. An earlier study had reported that 17% of MBC patients have developed prostate cancer out of the total 69 MBC cases identified.107,108 This might be due to the use of aromatase inhibitor (AI) to treat MBC, which could increase the serum testosterone levels and could enable the growth and proliferation of prostate cancer clones. 109 It is also reported that the other frequent secondary spot for the development of cancer in MBC patients are leukemia, pancreas, small intestine, and rectum.104,110

Diagnosis

Studies have reported that lack of knowledge and awareness of the disease and delay in diagnosis are the major reasons that usually BC in men are diagnosed at later stages that would pave way for the overall poorer prognosis.111,112 Recommendation from the American College of Radiology strongly suggests the bilateral ultrasound evaluation for younger aged men (<25 years) with palpable mass, whereas bilateral mammography for men older than 25 years of old. 113 On identification of any lumps or suspicious area in the breast, complete family history with physical examination may lead for distinguishing the BC and to choose the better choice of diagnosis and treatment modalities. Evidences of lumps or suspicious areas with any further possible spread especially the enlarged lymph nodes under the arm by felling the texture, size, and its relationship to the skin and muscle could be diagnosed by complete breast physical examination. Irregular, hypoechoic retro-areolar masses with variable vascularity are some of the most common finding on the ultrasound evaluation whereas similar speculated and radio-dense irregular retro-areolar masses on mammography. 114 Mammograms in diagnosing MBC were reported to have 92% to 100% sensitivity and 90% to 96% of specificity. 19

Additionally, various breast biopsy methods such as fine needle aspiration (FNA) to differentiate malignant from non-malignant type of breast disease in men, 115 core needle biopsy (CNB), surgical biopsy, and lymph node biopsy can also be employed. However, identification of specific markers those associated with MBC via., molecular profiling could pave way to discover and/or identify newer therapeutic strategies. Chatterji et al have systematically reviewed the existing prognostic MBC marker data for a period of 29 years and reported that consolidated all existing prognostic biomarker data in MBC spanning genetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and epigenetics, and phenotypic features of prognostic value from articles published over a 29-year period (March 16, 1992, to May 1, 2021). 116 Additionally, they also reported 4 epigenetics-based clusters from the relative promoter hypermethylation levels of RASSF1A, GSTP1, WIF1, RARB, and MAL. Notably, cluster 3 associated with mutated BRCA2. The authors have also reported that a subgroup analysis on BRCA2-mutated MBCs can be separated into 2 clusters based on the hypermethylation levels of GSTP1, MAL, and RASSF1A. 116

A new horizon in understanding of cancer biology has been attained with the multi-omics molecular characterization of cancer. Despite, a major confounding factor that hampers a vigorous and reproducible tool involving bioinformatic analysis is that the diverse types of cells which are not only limited to the cancerous cells but also to the tumor microenvironmental cells those are adjacent to the normal cells could also present in biopsy of any tumor. 117

Turajlic et al have reported that a snapshot of the genetic landscape of most of the cancer types could be determined using the next-generation sequencing with an insight of the cancer genomics approach which could emerge newer evolutionary patterns. 118 The authors have also stated that an evolutionary framework could be a powerful tool to understand not only the cancer progression and/or the treatment failure but also could be a predictive tool to assess the tumor behavior and strategize treatment support. 118 Similarly, Siavoshi et al have also reported that analysis of multiple gene differential expression profile datasets by using Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyot Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) for protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis could be used to define the hub genes. 119 Furthermore, the authors have also stated that Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) could be used to determine the relative mRNA expression of the hub gene, and thereby a prognostic gene signature can be identified. 119

Hence, in the current review we have sought the PPIs of 20 different proteins that play major role in MBC which has been sorted out based on the STRING mapping (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Protein–protein interaction of all 20 proteins in MBC using STRING.

It is clearly evident that BRCA2, BRCA1, and PALB2 form a complex involved in exchanging DNA strands during DNA repair. CHEK2 and PTEN collaborate in suppressing tumor growth through their regulation of the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. TP53 and RAD51C work together in DNA repair and apoptosis. RAD51D, NBN, and ATM are all involved in the homologous recombination process of DNA repair. STK11 and CDH1 regulate the Hippo signaling pathway and regulate cell growth and apoptosis. MRE11A, MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 form the MutL complex and control DNA mismatch repair. PPM1D and RAD51 form a complex and function in the DNA damage response. RAD50 and BARD1 work together in DNA repair by coordinating single-stranded breaks.

Treatment Modalities

Owing limited information available regarding the treatment options for men diagnosed with MBC, currently the treatment strategies for MBC are mostly based on the FBC guidelines.117,120 Even though the disease characteristics are similar to FBC, with the understanding of the distinct clinical features, treatment strategies for MBC require a specific clinical approach. 121 Therefore, in the recent years involving men in BC clinical trials are growing. Several studies have reported that OS of MBC is comparatively lower than FBC.122124 In contrast to the above studies, it is also reported that on comparison with women, men have a slightly better or equivalent disease-specific survival.125,126

Various modalities those are currently being practiced for the treatment of MBC have been shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Treatment modalities for the MBC patients.

Based on search of literature, the treatment for early stage or non-metastatic MBCs includes the following127130:

  • Surgery

  • Radiation therapy

  • Chemotherapy

  • Hormonal therapy

Earlier, Scott-Conner 106 and his colleagues have also reported that men with BC would also be treated with:

  • Modified radical mastectomy

  • Axillary lymph node dissection

  • Sentinel node biopsy

Beside which, the other options may include breast conservation or nipple-sparing of skin-sparing mastectomies. With respect to the limited number of studies and data for the use of chemotherapy to treat MBC, clinicians would prefer to assess the typical factors that has similar features of the FBC with early-stage of the disease. 121 With large tumors or nodal involvement and if BCS is anticipated, neoadjuvant therapy could be employed to reduce the tumor size for the feasibility of BCS. 131

Modified radical mastectomy is one of the most chosen surgical treatment for MBCs despite of radical mastectomy, where some of the less favored approaches including total mastectomy, and lumpectomy with or without radiation especially in patients of older age. 132 Recently, a large population-cohort study evaluated the data of 16,498 MBCs from the National Cancer Database and has reported that treatments involving surgical methods showed an improved rate of survival. 133 Oppositely, Yadav et al have reported a negative association with mastectomy. 134 However, both the studies have also reported that increase in age, black ethnicity, government insurance, accumulated comorbidities and later stage with high grade tumors were highly associated with worse prognosis and decreased survival.133,134 Despite, Yadav et al have reported that comparatively more male patients have underwent total mastectomy rather breast-conserving treatment, which is the most preferred option for female patients undergoing surgical treatment. 134 Moreover, 2 different studies from a European and USA Center have stated that sentinel lymph node biopsy is a reliable tool for the identification of nodal metastases.135,136 Considering that there is no strong evidence available for the use of radiation after mastectomy, adhering the guidelines for FBC is the current recommendations as shown in few of the single institutional experiences.137,138

Owing that hormonal therapy (HT) is considered to be the gold standard treatment option for hormone receptor positive in MBC, tamoxifen is characterized as adjuvant HT for 5 years which is associated to reduced risk of recurrence, representing by 51% in comparison to the treatment of FBC. 139 Aromatase pathway is responsible for about 80% of the total estrogen produced in male and 20% of which is produced by the testes. 140 Inhibiting the aromatase pathway that is responsible for the major production of estrogen could be one of the right choices of MBC treatment. However, studies focusing the role of adjuvant AIs in male patients is very limited. 141 A study by Eggermann et al has compared the adjuvant tamoxifen versus AIs and reported that the outcome in AI cohort was statistically not significant for both mortality risk and OS. 142 In general adjuvant chemotherapy could also be recommended on considering the age, high tumor grade, and/or the involvement of axillary nodes. However, it is also reported that adjuvant chemotherapy showed a statistically not significant results while considering lower time to recurrence and improvement of OS. 139 Based on literature search and the best of our knowledge, there is no data available related to the adjuvant use of trastuzumab in MBC treatment expect one case report with the speculation of its efficacy in metastatic disease. 143 The authors have also anticipated there is no specific biological reason for showing different activity of trastuzumab in MBC than in FBC, the use of trastuzumab and pertuzumab might be considered for treating HER-2-positive MBC. 143

In view of the greater number of MBC patients have hormone receptor positive, endocrine therapy using tamoxifen could be considered as first-line of choice while choosing the treatment option for the MBC patients. 144 AI could be used in combination with gonadotropin releasing hormone where the disease is progressed even after with tamoxifen treatment. 145 Recent studies have also emphasized a partial response with the use of selective ER degrader fulvestrant for the treatment of MBC.102,146,147 Agents targeting endocrine and other specific targets such as mTOR and CDK and its combinations are also suggested in treating MBC patients. The same chemotherapeutic agents and regimens that are being used to treat FBC could be used for metastatic MBC treatment.92,113,117,148

Targeted Treatments: Precision Medicine in MBC

The advent of targeted therapies marks a significant stride in the field of oncology. Yang et al has reported that, Epirubicin (EPI), upon entering the BC cells under the guidance of the targeting NKA-α1 peptide, exhibited a gradual release from the nanocarrier. 149 The controlled delivery and subsequent release of EPI within the BC cells resulted in significant inhibition of cell proliferation and migration in vitro and led to a substantial reduction in tumor volume in vivo. 149 The introduction of lumpectomy as a treatment for BC marked a significant advancement in disease management. Onik in 2004 has suggested that a procedure akin to a “male lumpectomy”—one that precisely targets the cancerous portion of the prostate gland while minimizing patient morbidity—is indeed feasible. 150 The authors have also stated that at a time when patients are faced with the choice between “watchful waiting” or potentially high-morbidity whole-gland treatments, such a focal approach would be a highly welcomed addition to the treatment options available. 150 Overall, the well-being and quality of life of individual patients could be successfully integrated into the general approach to cancer treatment, all while maintaining treatment efficacy.

Immunotherapies: Unleashing the Immune System Against MBC

Immunotherapies have revolutionized cancer treatment by harnessing the body's immune system to recognize and eliminate malignant cells. 151 This approach has yielded extraordinary outcomes across various malignancies, prompting exploration in the realm of MBC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs), a class of immunotherapeutic agents, have shown potential in enhancing immune response against cancer cells. Recent trials investigating the efficacy of ICPIs in MBC have demonstrated encouraging results, warranting further investigation into their role as a viable treatment option.152,153 Combination therapies involving immunomodulatory agents, such as ICPIs with targeted treatments, have also emerged as a promising avenue. Studies have indicated synergistic effects, underscoring the potential of a multifaceted therapeutic approach in MBC.154,155

Biomarker-Driven Patient Categorization: Paving the Way for Personalized Therapy

The identification of specific biomarkers holds paramount importance in tailoring treatment strategies for MBC. Biomarkers serve as critical indicators, guiding therapeutic decisions and enabling a more personalized approach to patient care. Genomic profiling has emerged as a powerful tool in characterizing the molecular landscape of MBC. Studies have identified distinct genomic alterations in MBC, highlighting potential targets for therapy.156,157 Moreover, the integration of liquid biopsies for the detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown promise in monitoring disease progression and identifying actionable mutations in MBC.158,159 This non-invasive approach offers a valuable avenue for real-time monitoring and treatment adjustment.

One promising avenue in targeted therapy for MBC involves the inhibition of hormonal receptors. ER positive MBC, though less common in men than women, represents a significant subset. Recent studies have highlighted the effectiveness of anti-estrogen agents like tamoxifen and AIs in male patients, emphasizing the importance of tailored hormonal therapies.160162 HER2-targeted therapies have shown remarkable success in HER2-positive BC cases. Although less prevalent in MBC, the presence of HER2 amplification necessitates targeted intervention. Studies exploring the efficacy of anti-HER2 agents like trastuzumab have demonstrated promising results in male patients, underlining the importance of targeted treatments in specific molecular contexts.163,164

Understanding the unique challenges and experiences faced by men with BC can lead to more effective and tailored treatment strategies. Some of the few key points that could be considered in such analysis have been summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Comparison Table for the Disease Progression, Treatment Responses, and Quality of Life in Male and Female Breast Cancer.

Tailored treatment strategies Male breast cancer Female breast cancer
Disease progression Explore specific risk factors and genetic predispositions that may contribute to BC in men. Highlight differences in disease presentation, including tumor characteristics, histology, and prevalence of subtypes.
Investigate any gender-specific variations in tumor biology, hormone receptor status, and other molecular characteristics of MBC. Consider hormonal influences and their impact on disease progression in female patients.
Treatment response Evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of standard breast cancer treatments in male patients, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy, and targeted therapies. Emphasize established treatment approaches for female breast cancer and their effectiveness based on factors like hormone receptor status, HER2 status, and molecular subtypes.
Investigate any potential gender-specific differences in response rates, side effects, and long-term outcomes. Address nuances in treatment responses related to hormonal influences and menopausal status.
Quality of life Examine the psychosocial, emotional, and physical challenges faced by men with MBC, including issues related to body image, self-esteem, and masculinity. Consider quality of life factors such as body image, fertility concerns, and menopausal symptoms that may be particularly relevant to female patients.
Explore the availability and effectiveness of support networks and resources specifically tailored for male breast cancer patients. Evaluate the impact of support systems, survivorship programs, and psychological interventions on the well-being of female breast cancer survivors.

Future Directions

Men with BC have an increased risk of developing secondary malignancies, such as secondary primary BC, cutaneous melanoma, stomach cancer, leukemia, and prostate cancer. The use of AIs to treat MBC may contribute to the development of prostate cancer. Diagnosis of MBC involves a complete family history, physical examination, bilateral ultrasound evaluation for younger men, and mammography as well. Biopsy methods, including FNA, CNB, surgical biopsy, and lymph node biopsy, can help in diagnosing the disease. Screening guidelines for MBC are not well established, leading to late-stage diagnosis and poorer outcomes. Implementation of proper guidelines for MBC and early detection can improve treatment success.

Conclusion

In conclusion, MBC is a rare but increasingly diagnosed condition. The current study emphasizes the urgent need for increased awareness and understanding of BC in men. The identified risk factors, including genetic predisposition, environmental exposures, occupational hazards, and lifestyle factors, highlight the complex nature of MBC etiology has been comprehensively reviewed. Even though the diagnosis and treatment modalities for MBC encompass a range of options, the comparison shows that the guidelines for MBC largely rely on those developed for FBC. It is clear that even with the adjusted differences in patients’ clinical characteristics, the death rate in men is higher than in women across all stages of BC. Hence, there is a need for prospective studies specifically focused on MBC to provide more tailored approaches. Hence, there is an immediate need to develop different clinical methods with a multinational approach to further improve the care of MBC patients. Strategic studies aiming to identify novel biomarkers specific to MBC and advancements in targeted treatments hold the potential to improve outcomes and save lives. It is important to raise awareness, improve knowledge, and develop tailored strategies for the prevention, early detection, and treatment regimens for MBC.

Abbreviations

BC

breast cancer

MBC

male breast cancer

FBC

Female breast cancer

ER

estrogen receptor

PR

progesterone receptor

HER2

human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

TNBC

triple-negative breast cancer

ACS

American Cancer Society

BRCA1

breast cancer gene 1

BRCA2

breast cancer gene 2

AI

aromatase inhibitor

DCIS

ductal carcinoma in situ

IDC

invasive ductal carcinoma

ILC

invasive lobular carcinoma

IBC

inflammatory breast cancer

FNA

fine needle aspiration

CNB

core needle biopsy

GO

gene ontology

KEGG

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

PPI

protein-protein interaction

GEPIA

gene expression profiling interactive analysis

BCS

breast-conserving surgery

HT

hormonal therapy

EPI

epirubicin

ICPI

immune checkpoint inhibitor

ctDNA

circulating tumor DNA

OS

overall survival

ATM

ataxia telangiectasia mutated

CHEK2

checkpoint kinase 2

PALB2

partner and localizer of BRCA2

CDH1

cadherin 1

MLH1

MutL homolog 1

MRE11A

MRE11 homolog A

MSH2

MutS homolog 2

MSH6

MutS homolog 6

NBN

nibrin

PTEN

phosphatase and tensin homolog

PPM1D

protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent 1D

RAD50

RAD50 double strand break repair protein

RAD51

RAD51 recombinase

RAD51C

RAD51 paralog C

RAD51D

RAD51 paralog D

STK11

serine/threonine kinase 11

TP53

tumor protein p53.

Footnotes

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD: Sivanesan Dhandayuthapani https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2017-2980

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available: who. int/gho/database/en/ [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394‐424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209‐249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gomig TH, Gontarski AM, Cavalli IJ, et al. Integrated analysis of label-free quantitative proteomics and bioinformatics reveal insights into signaling pathways in male breast cancer. Genet Mol Biol. 2021;44(1):e20190410. 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2019-0410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Staruch RM, Rouhani MJ, Ellabban M. The surgical management of male breast cancer: time for an easy access national reporting database? Ann Med Surg. 2016;9:41‐49. 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Maguire SL, Tomczyk K, Perrakis E, et al. Rare variants in DNA damage repair genes are associated with male breast cancer predisposition. Cancer Res. 2018;78(13_Supplement):1225.29259013 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Giordano SH, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN. Breast cancer in men. Ann Intern Med. 2002, 15;137(8):678‐687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cui X. The prevalence and death risk of male breast cancer: a study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Am J Mens Health. 2022;16(1):15579883221074818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hodgson NC, Button JH, Franceschi D, Moffat FL, Livingstone AS. Male breast cancer: Is the incidence increasing? Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(8):751‐755. 10.1245/ASO.2004.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sundriyal D, Kotwal S, Dawar R, Parthasarathy KM. Male breast cancer in India: series from a cancer research centre. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2015;6(4):384‐386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chantra PK, Shiroshi MS, So GJ, Wollman JS, Bassett LW. In: Bassett LW, Jackson VP, Fu KL, Fu YS, eds. Diagnosis of diseases of the breast, 2nd ed. Saunders; 2005:531‐556. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen L, Chantra PK, Larsen LH, et al. Imaging characteristics of malignant lesions of the male breast. Radiographics. 2006;26(4):993‐1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shen B, Xu H, Liu X, et al. Analysis of genotype and age distribution of cervical human papillomavirus infection in Futian District, Shenzhen. China Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2023;44(3):83‐88. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Campos FAB, Rouleau E, Torrezan GT, et al. Genetic landscape of male breast cancer. Cancers. 2021;13(14):3535. 10.3390/cancers13143535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lee A, Moon BI, Kim TH. BRCA1/BRCA2 Pathogenic variant breast cancer: Treatment and prevention strategies. Ann Lab Med. 2020;40(2):114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hussain MS, Selaibeekh NS, Almozher MA, et al. Overview on epidemiology, causes and management of gynecomastia. Saudi Med Horiz J. 2024;4(1):19‐24. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Expert Panel on Breast Imaging, Niell BL, Lourenco AP, Moy L, et al. ACR Appropriateness criteria® evaluation of the symptomatic male breast. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15(11S):S313‐S320. 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Muñoz Carrasco R, Alvarez Benito M, Muñoz Gomariz E, Raya Povedano JL, Martínez Paredes M. Mammography and ultrasound in the evaluation of male breast disease. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(12):2797‐2805. 10.1007/s00330-010-1867-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Woods RW, Salkowski LR, Elezaby M, Burnside ES, Strigel RM, Fowler AM. Image-based screening for men at high risk for breast cancer: benefits and drawbacks. Clin Imaging. 2020;60(1):84‐89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu N, Johnson KJ, Ma CX. Male breast cancer: An updated surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data analysis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(5):e997‐1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tajima N, Tsukuma H, Oshima A. Descriptive epidemiology of male breast cancer in Osaka, Japan. J Epidemiol. 2001;11(1):1‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Roy M, Biswas J, Datta A. Breast cancer: epidemiology, types, diagnosis, and treatment. In: Genetics and epigenetics of breast cancer. Vol 11. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023, pp. 1‐24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9925-3 [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer statistics review, 1975–2018. National Cancer Institute. 2021;15:1‐25. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Society A.C. Cancer A-Z. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer.html (Accessed on July 7th, 2023).
  • 25.Chen Z, Xu L, Shi W, et al. Trends of female and male breast cancer incidence at the global, regional, and national levels, 1990–2017. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;180(2):481‐490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zeinomar N, Bandera EV, Qin B. Toward understanding the etiology of male breast cancer: an ongoing research challenge. JNCI Cancer Spectrum. 2021;5(5):pkab079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ishii T, Nakano E, Watanabe T, Higashi T. Epidemiology and practice patterns for male breast cancer compared with female breast cancer in Japan. Cancer Med. 2020;9(16):6069‐6075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yu E, Stitt L, Vujovic O, et al. Male breast cancer prognostic factors versus female counterparts with propensity scores and matched-pair analysis. Cureus. 2015, 16;7(10):e355. 10.7759/cureus.355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Valentini V, Silvestri V, Bucalo A, et al. Molecular profiling of male breast cancer by multigene panel testing: implications for precision oncology. Front Oncol. 2023;12:1092201. 10.3389/fonc.2022.1092201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chhabra MK, Chintamani. Kadyaprath G, et al. Male breast cancer—an Indian multicenter series of 106 cases. Indian J Surg. 2021;83(S2):333‐340. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Khandelwal S, Goel P, Sharma R, et al. Presentation and spectrum of male breast cancer in a rural cancer center in a subunit of Tata Memorial Center, India. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021;12(2):330‐334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Korde LA, Zujewski JA, Kamin L, et al. Multidisciplinary meeting on male breast cancer: Summary and research recommendations. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(12):2114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cardoso F, Bartlett JM, Slaets L, et al. Characterization of male breast cancer: results of the EORTC 10085/TBCRC/BIG/NABCG International Male Breast Cancer Program. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(2):405‐417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Boffano P, Agnone AM, Zanellato I, Brucoli M, Rocchetti V. Breast ductal infiltrative adenocarcinoma metastasis to the mandible. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023;22(4):1176‐1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fentiman IS. Risk factors for male breast cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2023;15(12):6918. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ojara EA. Carcinoma of the male breast in Mulago Hospital, Kampala. East Afr Med J. 1978;55(10):489‐491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gnerlich JL, Deshpande AD, Jeffe DB, Seelam S, Kimbuende E, Margenthaler JA. Poorer survival outcomes for male breast cancer compared with female breast cancer may be attributable to in-stage migration. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(7):1837‐1844. 10.1245/s10434-010-1468-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.De Los Santos JF. Poorer survival outcomes for male breast cancer compared with female breast cancer may be attributable to in-stage migration. Breast Dis. 2012;2(23):138‐140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Constantinou N, Marshall C, Marshall H. Discussion and optimization of the male breast cancer patient experience. J Breast Imag. 2023;5(3):339‐345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Macciotta A, Catalano A, Giraudo MT, et al. Mediating role of lifestyle behaviors in the association between education and cancer: results from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023;32(1):132‐140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Montagnese C, Porciello G, Vitale S, et al. Quality of life in women diagnosed with breast cancer after a 12-month treatment of lifestyle modifications. Nutrients. 2020;13(1):136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Coughlin SS. Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;177(3):537‐548. 10.1007/s10549-019-05340-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hsing AW, McLaughlin JK, Cocco P, Co Chien HT, Fraumeni JF. Risk factors for male breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 1998;9(3):269‐275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Davies NJ, Batehup L, Thomas R. The role of diet and physical activity in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer survivorship: a review of the literature. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(1):S52‐S73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rinninella E, Mele MC, Cintoni M, et al. The facts about food after cancer diagnosis: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Debras C, Chazelas E, Srour B, et al. Total and added sugar intakes, sugar types, and cancer risk: results from the prospective NutriNet-Santé cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;112(5):1267‐1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zakhari S, Hoek JB. Epidemiology of moderate alcohol consumption and breast cancer: association or causation? Cancers. 2018;10(10):349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bu Y, Qu J, Ji S, et al. Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk, prognosis, and quality of life: a systematic review. Front Nutr. 2023;9:1057057. 10.3389/fnut.2022.1057057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Astori E, Garavaglia ML, Colombo G, et al. Antioxidants in smokers. Nutr Res Rev. 2022;35(1):70‐97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gray LW. Cancer-Free with food: A step-by-step plan with 100+ recipes to fight disease, nourish your body & restore your health. Hay House, Inc; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ikram A, Saeed F, Afzaal M, et al. Nutritional and end-use perspectives of sprouted grains: a comprehensive review. Food Sci Nutr. 2021;9(8):4617‐4628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang DD, Li Y, Bhupathiraju SN, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and mortality: results from 2 prospective cohort studies of US men and women and a meta-analysis of 26 cohort studies. Circulation. 2021;143(17):1642‐1654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hughes J, Pearson E, Grafenauer S. Legumes-a comprehensive exploration of global food-based dietary guidelines and consumption. Nutrients. 2022;14(15):3080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Adams S. The complete guide to the keto diet: Lose weight, improve health, and boost energy. BoD–Books on Demand; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Alagawany M, Elnesr SS, Farag MR, et al. Nutritional significance and health benefits of omega-3,-6 and-9 fatty acids in animals. Anim Biotechnol. 2022;33(7):1678‐1690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chakraborty S. Antioxidants and ageing. In: Evidence-based functional foods for prevention of age-related diseases. Springer Nature Singapore; 2023, 61‐80. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kanlaya R, Thongboonkerd V. Protective effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate from green tea in various kidney diseases. Adv Nutr. 2019 Jan 1;10(1):112‐121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kępińska-Pacelik J, Biel W. Turmeric and curcumin—health-promoting properties in humans versus dogs. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 26;24(19):14561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fabian CJ, Kimler BF, Hursting SD. Omega-3 fatty acids for breast cancer prevention and survivorship. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17(1):1‐1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Luo H, Chen CY, Li X, et al. Increased lipogenesis is critical for self-renewal and growth of breast cancer stem cells: impact of omega-3 fatty acids. Stem Cells. 2021 Dec 1;39(12):1660‐1670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Martínez N, Herrera M, Frías L, et al. A combination of hydroxytyrosol, omega-3 fatty acids and curcumin improves pain and inflammation among early stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy: results of a pilot study. Clin Transl Oncol. 2019;21(4):489‐498. 10.1007/s12094-018-1950-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Calado A, Neves PM, Santos T, Ravasco P. The effect of flaxseed in breast cancer: a literature review. Front Nutr. 2018;5:4. 10.3389/fnut.2018.00004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Pritzlaff M, Summerour P, McFarland R, et al. Male breast cancer in a multi-gene panel testing cohort: insights and unexpected results. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;161(3):575‐586. 10.1007/s10549-016-4085-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Fostira F, Saloustros E, Apostolou P, et al. Germline deleterious mutations in genes other than BRCA2 are infrequent in male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;169(1):105‐113. 10.1007/s10549-018-4661-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bucalo A, Conti G, Valentini V, et al. Male breast cancer risk associated with pathogenic variants in genes other than BRCA1/2: an Italian case-control study. Eur J Cancer. 2023;188:183‐191. 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.04.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Huang H, Shen H, Wang Y, et al. LOH12CR1 Is a novel tumor suppressor inhibiting tumor growth through deregulation of G1/S checkpoint in human colorectal carcinoma. Curr Mol Med. 2018 Jan 1;18(1):25‐35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Talwar V, Jain A. The genetic basis of breast cancer: a comprehensive overview. Curr Med Res Prac. 2023 May 1;13(3):97. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kaur RP, Kumar V, Shafi G, Vashistha R, Kulharia M, Munshi A. A study of mechanistic mapping of novel SNPs to male breast cancer. Med Oncol. 2019;36(8):70. 10.1007/s12032-019-1290-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bell R, Barraclough R, Vasieva O. Gene expression meta-analysis of potential metastatic breast cancer markers. Curr Mol Med. 2017 Mar 1;17(3):200‐210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Watanabe R, Miura N, Kurata M, Kitazawa R, Kikugawa T, Saika T. Spatial gene expression analysis reveals characteristic gene expression patterns of De Novo neuroendocrine prostate cancer coexisting with androgen receptor pathway prostate cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 18;24(10):8955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tan DS, Marchio C, Reis-Filho JS. Hereditary breast cancer: from molecular pathology to tailored therapies. J Clin Pathol. 2008 Oct 1;61(10):1073‐1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Comprehensive analysis of 989 patients with breast or ovarian cancer provides BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation profiles and frequencies for the German population. Int J Cancer. 2002 Feb 1;97(4):472‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Thompson ER, Doyle MA, Ryland GL, et al. Exome sequencing identifies rare deleterious mutations in DNA repair genes FANCC and BLM as potential breast cancer susceptibility alleles. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(9):e1002894. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cybulski C, Gorski B, Huzarski T, et al. CHEK2 Is a multiorgan cancer susceptibility gene. Am J Hum Gene. 2004 Dec 1;75(6):1131‐1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Corridoni D, Chapman T, Ambrose T, Simmons A. Emerging mechanisms of innate immunity and their translational potential in inflammatory bowel disease. Front Med. 2018;5:32. 10.3389/fmed.2018.00032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Evans DG, Woodward ER, Bajalica-Lagercrantz S, Oliveira C, Frebourg T. Germline TP53 testing in breast cancers: why, when and how? Cancers. 2020 Dec 14;12(12):3762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bouaoun L, Sonkin D, Ardin M, et al. TP53 Variations in human cancers: new lessons from the IARC TP53 database and genomics data. Hum Mutat. 2016 Sep;37(9):865‐876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sopik V, Narod SA. The relationship between tumour size, nodal status and distant metastases: on the origins of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;170(3):647‐656. 10.1007/s10549-018-4796-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Golmard L, Caux-Moncoutier V, Davy G, et al. Germline mutation in the RAD51B gene confers predisposition to breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:484. 10.1186/1471-2407-13-484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Renwick A, Thompson D, Seal S, et al. ATM Mutations that cause ataxia-telangiectasia are breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Nat Genet. 2006 Aug 1;38(8):873‐875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Iacobuzio-Donahue CA. Genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer: lessons learnt from the pancreatic cancer genome sequencing project. Gut. 2012 Jul 1;61(7):1085‐1094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Brooks-Wilson AR, Kaurah P, Suriano G, et al. Germline E-cadherin mutations in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: assessment of 42 new families and review of genetic screening criteria. J Med Genet. 2004 Jul 1;41(7):508‐517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bian L, Meng Y, Zhang M, Li D. MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex alterations and DNA damage response: implications for cancer treatment. Mol Cancer. 2019 Dec;18(1):1‐4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Jass JR. Diagnosis of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Histopathology. 1998 Jun;32(6):491‐497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Bärlund M, Kuukasjärvi T, Syrjäkoski K, Auvinen A, Kallioniemi A. Frequent amplification and overexpression of CCND1 in male breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004 Oct 10;111(6):968‐971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Malone KE, Begg CB, Haile RW, et al. Population-based study of the risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer associated with carrying a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 5;28(14):2404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Vijai J, Kirchhoff T, Schrader KA, et al. Susceptibility loci associated with specific and shared subtypes of lymphoid malignancies. PLoS Genet. 2013 Jan 17;9(1):e1003220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Shah P, Robbani I, Shah O. Clinicopathological study of male breast carcinoma: 24 years of experience. Ann Saudi Med. 2009 Jul;29(4):288‐293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Aryannejad A, Saeedi Moghaddam S, Mashinchi B, et al. National and subnational burden of female and male breast cancer and risk factors in Iran from 1990 to 2019: results from the Global Burden of Disease study 2019. Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Dec;25(1):1‐26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Nikolić A, Mićanović D, Mitrašinović P, Murtezani Z, Banašević M, Šipetić-Grujičić S. Incidence and mortality from breast cancer in the male and female population of Central Serbia in the period 2009–2020. Zdravstvena Zaštita. 2023;52(1):8‐25. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.du Plessis M, Fourie C, Stone W, Engelbrecht AM. The impact of endocrine disrupting compounds and carcinogens in wastewater: implications for breast cancer. Biochimie. 2023;209:103-115. 10.1016/j.biochi.2023.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Daniels J, Aduse-Poku AY, Gawu P. Overview of male breast cancer. World J Adv Res Rev. 2023;17(2):010‐022. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Alagan M, Kishore SC, Perumal S, et al. Narrative of hazardous chemicals in water: its potential removal approach and health effects. Chemosphere. 2023;335:139178. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Nicosia L, Lissidini G, Sargenti M, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast: clinical radiological features and management in a cancer referral center. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Nov;196(2):371‐377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sakhri S, Jaidane O, Bouhani M, et al. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ in the male breast: a rare entity. Eur J Breast Health. 2020;16(1):77‐80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ionescu SO, Madge OL, Dicu-Andreescu G, et al. Breast cancer in male patients: correlation between immunohistochemistry and diagnosis and treatment challenges. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;49(2):e80. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Singh R, Kumar Sain MN. Etiology of breast cancer. J Pharm Negat Results. 2023;14(3):1427‐1434. 10.47750/pnr.2023.14.03.192 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Elbasyouni A, Soro O, Nshimirimana J. Understanding breast cancer: a key emphasis on molecular signalling pathways and phytotherapy. Int J Oncol Radio. 2023;4(2):1‐5. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Gogia A, Raina V, Deo SV, Shukla NK, Mohanti BK. Male breast cancer: a single institute experience. Indian J Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;52(4):526‐529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Shandiz FH, Tavassoli A, Sharifi N, Khales SA, Kadkhodayan S, Khales SA. Hormone receptor expression and clinicopathologic features in male and female breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(2):471‐474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Law T, Piotrowski MJ, Ning J, Jiang X, Ding Q, Sahin AA. Trichorhinophalangeal Syndrome Type 1 (TRPS1) expression in male breast carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2023;138:62-67. 10.1016/j.humpath.2023.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Bhatia N, Hazra S, Thareja S. Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) for the treatment of breast cancer: an overview. Eur J Med Chem. 2023;256:115422. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Nahleh ZA, Srikantiah R, Safa M, Jazieh AR, Muhleman A, Komrokji R. Male breast cancer in the veterans affairs population: a comparative analysis. Cancer. 2007 Apr 15;109(8):1471‐1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Yalaza M, İnan A, Bozer M. Male breast cancer. J Breast Health. 2016 Jan;12(1):1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Goss PE, Reid C, Pintilie M, Lim R, Miller N. Male breast carcinoma: a review of 229 patients who presented to the Princess Margaret Hospital during 40 years: 1955–1996. Cancer. 1999 Feb 1;85(3):629‐639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Scott-Conner CE, Jochimsen PR, Menck HR, Winchester DJ. An analysis of male and female breast cancer treatment and survival among demographically identical pairs of patients. Surgery. 1999 Oct 1;126(4):775‐781. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Satram-Hoang S, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H. Risk of second primary cancer in men with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2007 Feb;9(1):1‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Lee UJ, Jones JS. Incidence of prostate cancer in male breast cancer patients: a risk factor for prostate cancer screening. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2009 Mar;12(1):52‐56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Zengin MN, Şahin Y, Çiftçi O. Alternative pharmacological approach to male infertility: anti-aromatase compounds: a systematic review. J Reconst Urol. 2023 Jan 1;13(1):28-37. 10.5336/urology.2022-92478 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Grenader T, Goldberg A, Shavit L. Second cancers in patients with male breast cancer: a literature review. J Cancer Surviv. 2008;2(2):73‐78. 10.1007/s11764-008-0042-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Co M, Lee A, Kwong A. Delayed presentation, diagnosis, and psychosocial aspects of male breast cancer. Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(10):3305‐3309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Xia LP, Zhou FF, Guo GF, et al. Chinese Female breast cancer patients show a better overall survival than their male counterparts. Chin Med J. 2010 Sep 5;123(17):2347‐2352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Niell BL, Lourenco AP, Moy L, et al. ACR appropriateness Criteria® evaluation of the symptomatic male breast. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Nov 1;15(11):S313‐S320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Yen PP, Sinha N, Barnes PJ, Butt R, Iles S. Benign and malignant male breast diseases: radiologic and pathologic correlation. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2015 Aug;66(3):198‐207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Chretien S, Aymes E, Barthoulot M, et al. 181P Male breast cancer (MBC): familial history (FH), clinicopathological (CP) characteristics, oncogenetic (OG) testing and outcome in a cohort of 98 patients (pts). ESMO Open. 2023 May 1;8(1):101458. 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101458 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Chatterji S, Krzoska E, Thoroughgood CW, et al. Defining genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, epigenetic, and phenotypic biomarkers with prognostic capability in male breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;24(2):e74‐e85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Soni A, Paul D, Verma M, Kaur P, Chauhan A, Kaushal V. Male breast cancer: a budding and unaddressed issue. Oncol Clin Prac. 2023;19(3):158-166. 10.5603/OCP.2023.0008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Turajlic S, Sottoriva A, Graham T, Swanton C. Resolving genetic heterogeneity in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Jul;20(7):404‐416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Siavoshi A, Taghizadeh M, Dookhe E, Piran M. Gene expression profiles and pathway enrichment analysis to identification of differentially expressed gene and signaling pathways in epithelial ovarian cancer based on high-throughput RNA-seq data. Genomics. 2022 Jan 1;114(1):161‐170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Niccolai E, Baldi S, Nannini G, et al. Breast cancer: the first comparative evaluation of oncobiome composition between males and females. Biol Sex Differ. 2023 Dec;14(1):1‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Gucalp A, Traina TA, Eisner JR, et al. Male breast cancer: a disease distinct from female breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(1):37‐48. 10.1007/s10549-018-4921-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Yao N, Shi W, Liu T, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis for male breast cancer compared to female breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wang X, Liu S, Xue Y. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of male breast cancer. J Int Med Res. 2021 Oct;49(10):03000605211049977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Dogan I, Aydin E, Ak N, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with male breast cancer: a single tertiary center experience. J Cancer Res Ther. 2023;9(7):1887-1892. 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_243_22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Clout R, Murray J, Farrell M, Hutt D, Kenyon M. Cell therapy, nursing implications and care. In: the European blood and marrow transplantation textbook for nurses: under the auspices of EBMT 2023 Apr 8. Springer International Publishing, 101‐122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Sidiropoulou Z, Vasconcelos AP, Couceiro C, et al. Prevalence of imaging detected silent male breast cancer in autopsy specimens: study of the disease held by image-guided biopsies. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2023 Mar;13(1):16‐33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Taji T, Odan N, Kataoka Y, et al. Promoters of BRCA testing under insurance coverage for non-metastatic breast cancer patients in Japan: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer. 2023 Mar;30(2):309‐314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Masood M, Nadeem M, Masood A, Ali A, Tufail MU. Association of paclitaxel induced neuropathy with quality of life of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2023 Jun 16;73(3):755‐758. [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Brosseau DC, Peláez S, Ananng B, Körner A. Obstacles and facilitators of cancer-related dyadic efficacy experienced by couples coping with non-metastatic cancers. Front Psychol. 2023;14:949443. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.949443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Upadhyay AK, Prakash A, Upadhyay A. Clinicopathological profile of breast cancer at a tertiary cancer center in Jharkhand, India: a descriptive cohort study. Cureus. 2023 Jun 5;15(6):e39990. 10.7759/cureus.39990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Boughey JC, Bedrosian I, Meric-Bernstam F, et al. Comparative analysis of sentinel lymph node operation in male and female breast cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Oct 1;203(4):475‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Cutuli B. Strategies in treating male breast cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2007;8(2):193‐202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Sarmiento S, McColl M, Musavi L, et al. Male breast cancer: a closer look at patient and tumor characteristics and factors that affect survival using the National Cancer Database. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;180(2):471‐479. 10.1007/s10549-020-05556-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Yadav S, Karam D, Bin Riaz I, et al. Male breast cancer in the United States: treatment patterns and prognostic factors in the 21st century. Cancer. 2020;126(1):26‐36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Wernberg JA, Yap J, Murekeyisoni C, Mashtare T, Wilding GE, Kulkarni SA. Multiple primary tumors in men with breast cancer diagnoses: a SEER database review. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(1):16‐19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Gentilini O, Chagas E, Zurrida S, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in male patients with early breast cancer. Oncologist. 2007;12(5):512‐515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Korde LA, Zujewski JA, Kamin L, et al. Multidisciplinary meeting on male breast cancer: summary and research recommendations. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(12):2114‐2122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Flynn LW, Park J, Patil SM, Cody HS, 3rd, Port ER. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is successful and accurate in male breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(4):616‐621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Yu E, Suzuki H, Younus J, et al. The impact of post-mastectomy radiation therapy on male breast cancer patients—A case series. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(2):696‐700. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Giordano SH, Perkins GH, Broglio K, et al. Adjuvant systemic therapy for male breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;104(11):2359‐2364. 10.1002/cncr.21526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Volm MD. Male breast cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2003;4:159‐164. 10.1007/s11864-003-0017-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Eggemann H, Ignatov A, Smith BJ, et al. Adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen compared to aromatase inhibitors for 257 male breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137(2):465‐470. 10.1007/s10549-012-2355-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Eggemann H, Altmann U, Costa SD, Ignatov A. Survival benefit of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor in male and female breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(2):337‐341. 10.1007/s00432-017-2539-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Jacquet E, Lardy-Cléaud A, Pistilli B, et al. Endocrine therapy or chemotherapy as first-line therapy in hormone receptor–positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2018;95:93‐101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Khan F, Rojas K, Schlumbrecht M, Jeudin P. Oophorectomy in premenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: new insights into long-term effects. Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 2;30(2):1794‐1804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Hanna KS, Moniz R, Chan C, et al. Imlunestrant. Selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), Treatment of breast cancer. Drugs Future. 2023 Jan 1;48(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Gombos A, Goncalves A, Curigliano G, et al. How I treat endocrine-dependent metastatic breast cancer. ESMO Open. 2023 Apr 1;8(2):100882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Zheng G, Leone JP. Male breast cancer: an updated review of epidemiology, clinicopathology, and treatment. J Oncol. 2022;2022(1):1734049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Yang Y, Feng Q, Ding C, et al. Controllable drug delivery by Na+/K+ ATPase alpha1 targeting peptide conjugated DSPE-PEG nanocarriers for breast cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2021;20:15330338211027898. 10.1177/15330338211027898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Onik G. The male lumpectomy: rationale for a cancer targeted approach for prostate cryoablation. A review. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004;3(4):365‐370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Sahu M, Suryawanshi H. Immunotherapy: the future of cancer treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2021 May 1;25(2):371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Kossai M, Radosevic-Robin N, Penault-Llorca F. Refining patient selection for breast cancer immunotherapy: beyond PD-L1. ESMO Open. 2021;6(5):100257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Giordano SH. Breast cancer in men. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(24):2311‐2320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Yap TA, Bardia A, Dvorkin M, et al. Avelumab plus talazoparib in patients with advanced solid tumors: the JAVELIN PARP medley nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9(1):40‐50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Freeman-Cook K, Hoffman RL, Miller N, et al. Expanding control of the tumor cell cycle with a CDK2/4/6 inhibitor. Cancer Cell. 2021;39(10):1404‐1421 e1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Zerdan MB, Kumar PA, Haroun E, Srivastava N, Ross J, Sivapiragasam A. Genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) loss. Oncotarget. 2023;14:178. 10.18632/oncotarget.28376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Malone ER, Oliva M, Sabatini PJ, Stockley TL, Siu LL. Molecular profiling for precision cancer therapies. Genome Med. 2020;12(8):1‐9. 10.1186/s13073-019-0703-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Ranghiero A, Frascarelli C, Cursano G, et al. Circulating tumour DNA testing in metastatic breast cancer: integration with tissue testing. Cytopathology. 2023 Nov;34(6):519‐529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Keup C, Kimmig R, Kasimir-Bauer S. The diversity of liquid biopsies and their potential in breast cancer management. Cancers. 2023 Nov 17;15(22):5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Rachner TD, Coleman R, Hadji P, Hofbauer LC. Bone health during endocrine therapy for cancer. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(11):901‐910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Khan NAJ, Tirona M. An updated review of epidemiology, risk factors, and management of male breast cancer. Med Oncol. 2021;38(4):39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Vrselja A, Latifi A, Baber RJ, et al. Q-122 as a novel, non-hormonal, oral treatment for vasomotor symptoms in women taking tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor after breast cancer: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2022;400(10364):1704‐1711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Hurvitz SA, Hegg R, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10371):105‐117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Cameron D, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Gelber RD, et al. T. Herceptin Adjuvant Trial Study. 11 Years’ follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the HERceptin adjuvant (HERA) trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1195‐1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES