Skip to main content
. 2024 May 27;43(7):1375–1381. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04847-2

Table 3.

Performance of BD Phoenix, Vitek®2 and Etest® compared to broth microdilution for the determination of susceptibility to penicillin, amoxicillin and cefotaxime of 60 S. pneumoniae strains. Each testing method was performed in 2 different labs

penicillin amoxicillin cefotaxime
Testing method EA (%) CA (%) VME (n) ME (n) mE (n) bias
(%)
EA (%) CA (%) VME (n) ME (n) mE (n) bias
(%)
EA (%) CA (%) VME (n) ME (n) mE (n) bias
(%)
BD Phoenix™ 90.8 82.5 1 15 5 + 19.9 99.2 88.3 0 12 2 + 7.1 100 87.5 3 0 12 -24.8
Vitek®2 96.6 90.0 6 0 6 -8.7 91.7 86.7 0 16 0 + 18.3 99.2 90.0 0 5 7 + 7.5
Etest on Oxoid plate 58.3 74.2 31 0 10 -73.0 65.8 75.8 19 2 8 -72.0 90.8 79.2 4 0 21 -35.1
Etest on BD BBL plate 94.2 84.2 12 1 6 -20.4 84.2 82.5 7 10 4 -27.7 95.0 87.5 1 2 12 + 7.9

EA, essential agreement; CA, categorical agreement; VME, very major error; ME, major error; mE, minor error

aEUCAST 2023 clinical breakpoints for indications other than meningitis were used to interpret the results

bCLSI and ISO acceptance rates (EA and CA ≥ 90%, difference bias ± 30%) are in bold