Table 12. Comparative study of the proposed approach with previous work.
Reference | Year | No. of Classes | Model | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
[28] | 2021 | 29 | Ensemble CNN | F1 Score 94.32% |
[29] | 2022 | 29 | Ensemble Learning | Sensitivity for all 29 Classes Ranging from 0.00-1.00 |
[31] | 2022 | 4 | Deep Learning | RVO 88.4% |
DR 85.2% | ||||
CSR 93.8% | ||||
Healthy 86.2% | ||||
[12] | 2023 | 4 | EyeDeep-Net | Accuracy: |
Validation 82.13% | ||||
Testing 76.04% | ||||
[27] | 2023 | 4 | Convolutional Ensemble | Accuracy 79.2% |
[32] | 2024 | 5 | Deep Learning | Accuracy 89.10% |
[34] | 2024 | 2 | ResNet152 | ResNet152 89.17%‘ |
Vision Transformer | Transformer 87.26% | |||
InceptionResNetV2 | Inc.ResNetV2 88.11% | |||
RegNet | RegNet 88.54% | |||
ConVNext | ConVNext 89.08% | |||
Proposed | 2024 | 4 | CNN | MH 93.17% |
Overall Acc. 89.81% | ||||
DR 91.95%, | ||||
ODC 94.60% | ||||
WNL 92.43% |