Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease, one of the most common forms of dementia, is characterized by a slow progression of cognitive impairment and neuronal loss. Currently, approved treatments for AD are hindered by various side effects and limited efficacy. Despite considerable research, practical treatments for AD have not been developed. Increasing evidence shows that glial cells, especially microglia and astrocytes, are essential in the initiation and progression of AD. During AD progression, activated resident microglia increases the ability of resting astrocytes to transform into reactive astrocytes, promoting neurodegeneration. Extensive clinical and molecular studies show the involvement of microglia and astrocyte-mediated neuroinflammation in AD pathology, indicating that microglia and astrocytes may be potential therapeutic targets for AD. This review will summarize the significant and recent advances of microglia and astrocytes in the pathogenesis of AD in three parts. First, we will review the typical pathological changes of AD and discuss microglia and astrocytes in terms of function and phenotypic changes. Second, we will describe microglia and astrocytes’ physiological and pathological role in AD. These roles include the inflammatory response, “eat me” and “don’t eat me” signals, Aβ seeding, propagation, clearance, synapse loss, synaptic pruning, remyelination, and demyelination. Last, we will review the pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies targeting microglia and astrocytes in AD. We conclude that microglia and astrocytes are essential in the initiation and development of AD. Therefore, understanding the new role of microglia and astrocytes in AD progression is critical for future AD studies and clinical trials. Moreover, pharmacological, and non-pharmacological therapies targeting microglia and astrocytes, with specific studies investigating microglia and astrocyte-mediated neuronal damage and repair, may be a promising research direction for future studies regarding AD treatment and prevention.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, microglia, astrocytes, synaptic pruning, neuroinflammation
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD), an age-related neurodegenerative disease, is one of the most common forms of dementia [1, 2]. In the early 20th century, Dr. Alois Alzheimer described the first case of AD in a middle-aged lady (Auguste Deter) who progressively lost cognitive function and developed abnormal behavior [3]. The β-amyloid (Aβ) hypothesis is one of the most common hypotheses explaining the initiation and progression of AD. The progressively accumulated extracellular Aβ forms amyloid plaques, inducing neuronal damage, apoptosis, and degeneration [4-6]. In another widely studied hypothesis, the excessive accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau causes neuronal dysfunction and induces impaired cognitive function [7, 8]. Current therapeutic agents applied in the clinical treatment of AD primarily focus on eliminating the production of Aβ and abnormal tau [3, 9]. Unfortunately, the approved pharmacological therapies for AD only slow disease progression or temporarily improve cognitive function [3, 10].
Recent studies support the essential role of glial cell-involved neuroinflammation in AD pathologies [10-15]. The excessive activation of glial cells, including astrocytes and microglia, induces Aβ accumulation, neuronal damage, synapse loss, and neurodegeneration [16-20]. Glial cells are essential in preserving homeostasis of the central nervous system (CNS) through the generation of myelin sheaths around the axons, the formation of synapses, and the maintenance of physiological levels of neurotransmitters [21, 22]. However, with the progression of AD, the abnormal generation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines by microglia and astrocytes causes detrimental effects through the disruption of the neuron system, the dysfunction of synapses, and, ultimately, the decline of cognition [23, 24]. Despite numerous compelling research studies investigating the pathological mechanism of AD, effective curative treatments or drugs are still unavailable [9]. Notably, increasing studies suggest that glial cells exert both neuroprotective and neurotoxic roles in the multifaceted neurodegenerative process of AD [21, 23]. Typically, glial cells promote neuronal survival by releasing neuroprotective cytokines, maintaining an adequate supply of glutamate in synapses, and eliminating extra synaptic terminals [25]. In recent years, the role of glial cells in neurodegenerative diseases, especially in AD, has received increasing attention. In this review, we summarize the significance of glial cells in AD pathologies and discuss the new advances in glial cells in AD.
Typical pathological changes in AD
Amyloid plaques. The amyloid cascade hypothesis was proposed over 30 years ago, posing that AD initiates with Aβ accumulation followed by a series of pathological events resulting in neuronal loss [5, 26]. Aβ is a neurotoxic peptide derived from amyloid precursor protein (APP). As shown in Figure 1A, APP is cleaved by α-, β-, and γ-secretases [27]. Under physiological conditions, APP is mainly cleaved by α-and γ-secretase, which generates a neurotrophic fragment, APPα, and a C-terminal fragment, C83. γ-secretase cleaves C83 into the nontoxic peptide P3 and the APP intracellular domain (AICD) [28, 29]. sAPPα and AICD support neurite outgrowth and the formation of learning and memory-related genes, providing neuroprotection for nerve cells [29, 30]. Under pathological conditions, β-secretase cleaves APP, generating a membrane-bound CTFβ fragment and N-terminal APPsβ. γ secretase cleaves the CTFβ fragment, producing the Aβ peptide and the AICD [29, 31]. The generated Aβ peptide mainly includes Aβ1-40 and the more neurotoxic Aβ1-42 [29, 31]. The extracellular Aβ accumulation induces the formation of neurotoxic amyloid fibrils and the development of insoluble amyloid plaques. These insoluble amyloid plaques cause mitochondrial damage, synaptic dysfunction, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, neuronal loss, and learning and memory impairment [32, 33]. In addition, the accumulation of Aβ activates Tau protein kinase 1 to enhance the spread of pathological tau, accelerating the development of tau pathology in AD [34].
Figure 1.
Typical pathological changes in AD. (A) APP is cleaved by α-, β-, and γ-secretases. Under physiological conditions, APP is mainly cleaved by α-and γ-secretase, which generates a neurotrophic fragment, APPα, and a C-terminal fragment, C83. The C83 is cleaved into the nontoxic peptide P3 and APP intracellular domain (AICD) by γ-secretase. sAPPα and AICD support neurite outgrowth and the formation of learning and memory-related genes, providing neuroprotection for nerve cells. Under pathological conditions, APP is cleaved by β-secretase generating membrane-bound CTFβ fragment and N-terminal APPsβ. CTFβ fragment is then cleaved by γ secretase generating Aβ peptide and the AICD. (B) Tau, a microtubule-associated protein, acts as a stabilizer, promoting microtubule stabilization. Under physiological conditions, tau binds to microtubules and maintains cytoskeleton stability, microtubule structure, and neuronal transport. However, under pathological conditions, the abnormally phosphorylated tau protein dissociates from the neuronal microtubules. The detached phosphorylated tau forms paired helical filaments and develops into NFTs.
Tau pathology. As shown in Figure 1B, Tau, a microtubule-associated protein, acts as a stabilizer promoting microtubule stabilization. Under physiological conditions, tau binds to microtubules and maintains cytoskeleton stability, microtubule structure, and neuronal transport [35]. The tau hypothesis poses that the hyperphosphorylated tau-induced intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) are the pathogenic initiators triggering downstream pathological changes [4]. Under pathological conditions, the abnormally phosphorylated tau protein dissociates from the neuronal microtubules [36, 37]. The detached phosphorylated tau forms paired helical filaments and finally develops into NFTs [36, 37]. The intracellular NFTs cause axonal instability and impair the transport of nutrients and cell signal communication [4].
Microglia and astrocyte-mediated neuroinflammation in AD. In addition to Aβ and tau pathologies, neuroinflammation has a prominent role in AD pathology. The activation of microglia, the excessive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and the polarization of glial cells contribute to neuroinflammatory changes and exacerbate pathologies [5, 38]. Microglial cells, which arise from marrow myeloid progenitors in the embryonic yolk sac during early development, are the essential innate immune cells accounting for approximately 0.5-16% of the glial cells in the human brain [39, 40]. Based on their morphological and physiological properties, three divisions of microglia exist. These divisions include resting, activated, and phagocytic microglia [41]. Under physiological conditions, microglia are mainly ramified microglia in a resting state. Microglia become activated into an amoeboid state in response to brain injury, misfolded protein, and cell debris in neurodegenerative diseases. During activation, the microglia undergo morphological changes, including the enlargement of cell bodies, the reduction in number and the presence of shorter processes, and the presence of cytoplasmic vacuoles. Functional changes also accompany the morphological changes of microglia [42, 43]. For instance, activated microglia show increases in migration, pro-inflammatory release, and phagocytosis [44]. The phagocytic microglia are full-blown brain macrophages with typical amoeboid morphology and increased release of immune molecules [41].
In AD, microglia express specific pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including highly conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs), which detect signals near Aβ and stimulate PRRs. The stimulation of PRRs causes the sustained release of neuroinflammatory factors, promoting cell death and exacerbating AD pathologies [43]. Recent studies suggest that TLR4 microglial signaling is critical for mediating the increased production of inflammatory cytokines, the inhibition of phagocytic function, and the accumulation of plaques [42]. Similarly, Aβ peptides activate NLRs, particularly NLR3, promoting the formation of inflammasome complexes and the maturation of IL-1β, leading to subsequent inflammatory events [45]. Moreover, PRRs activate various transcription factors, regulating the expression of several downstream inflammatory response genes [46]. Microglia are also essential in CNS development. During the early stages of brain development, microglia are indispensable in eliminating inappropriate neuronal connections and excess synapses [47]. This process is referred to as synaptic pruning [47]. Excessive synaptic pruning has been detected in AD and is implicated in neuronal damage, loss, and neurodegeneration-associated cognitive deficits [47, 48].
Like microglia, astrocytes are another subtype of glial cells in the CNS that play an essential role in the modulation of neuroinflammation [49]. Under healthy conditions, astrocytes exert various pivotal physiological functions, including synaptogenesis, neurotransmission, ion homeostasis, secretion of growth factor, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability [49-51]. Under pathological conditions, reactive astrocytes undergo morphological and functional changes [42]. These morphological and function changes include hypertrophy of the cell and the overproduction of neurotoxic factors [42]. Characterization of these reactive astrocytes includes increased glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and vimentin [18]. Increases in reactive astrocytes have been detected around amyloid plaques in AD, suggesting an intimate relationship between astrocytes and typical AD pathologies [18, 52]. Like microglia, astrocytes also detect Aβ aggregates, leading to the activation of target genes and the production of corresponding factors [53]. Furthermore, signal transduction pathways involved in astrocyte responses in AD, including the Janus kinase (JAK)/STAT3, the calcium/calcineurin/NFAT Pathway, the NFκB, and the MAPK pathways, regulate astrocyte APP processing homeostasis and promote overproduction of neurotoxic factors leading to Aβ accumulation and toxicity [54]. However, studies also found that the knockdown GFAP or the attenuation of astrocyte activation accelerates amyloid plaque-associated pathogenesis [55]. This inconsistency may be attributed to the different pathogeneses or pathological stages of AD.
In addition to the three pathogenic mechanisms, several other factors, including cholinergic neuronal dysfunction, vascular impairments, and genetic factors, are implicated in AD’s pathogenesis [56]. Acetylcholine is an essential neurotransmitter that regulates critical physiological processes such as attention, learning, memory, stress response, wakefulness and sleep, and sensory information [57]. Damage to cholinergic neurons is a critical pathological change associated with AD cognitive impairment [57]. Vascular damage is another essential component of the pathology of AD [58]. Vascular risk factors of AD, such as hypoglycemia and hypertension, lead to blood-brain barrier dysfunction during the aging process and cause damage to the neurovascular unit (NVU) [58]. Simultaneously, dysregulation in the NVU results in neurodegeneration of neuronal terminals and retrograde degeneration of cholinergic neurons, impairing the function of the blood-brain barrier and weakening the ability to clear Aβ [58]. As a result, Aβ accumulates in the brain, triggering chronic inflammation and further promoting the development of AD pathology [58]. In addition, AD pathology is associated with genetic risk factors, including Mendelian, rare, polygenic, APOE, and familial risk factors [59].
Polarization of microglia and astrocytes
As mentioned, microglia are broadly distributed throughout the CNS, with morphological and functional changes in response to brain injury and neurodegeneration [60]. The activated microglia can be polarized into the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype and the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype [61]. At the early stage of AD, microglia are activated in response to the misfolded aggregates of intracellular tau proteins and excessive Aβ accumulation [62]. Although the activated microglia at the early stage of AD is considered a neuroprotective mechanism, phagocytosis does not successfully eliminate the excessive accumulation of Aβ and abnormal tau [4]. Indeed, with the progression of AD pathologies, the microglial polarization also changes. The microglia are polarized from the neuroprotective M2 phenotypes to the neurotoxic M1 phenotypes [4]. The activated microglia at the early stage of AD are mainly M2 phenotype [4]. The M2 phenotype exerts neuroprotective effects by releasing anti-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13) and elevated phagocytosis, aiding in the inflammatory response against AD pathologies [63]. At the late stage of AD, microglia polarization from M2 to M1 phenotypes occurs (Fig. 2) [5, 7]. The M1 microglia exacerbate AD pathology by releasing pro-inflammatory factors (i.e., IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-18) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [4, 64].
Figure 2.
Schematic of microglia and astrocyte-mediated polarization. Microglia and astrocytes are usually classified into pro-inflammatory (M1/A1) or anti-inflammatory (M2/A2) phenotypes. The M1 and A1 are neurotoxic phenotypes releasing proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-12, IL-6, IL-23, TNF-α, IL-1β, IFNγ, IL-1α, and TNFα. The neuroprotective A2 and M2 phenotypes release anti-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, TGF-β, IL-4, and IL-10. Generally, during the early stage of AD, the resting microglia and astrocytes are polarized into the M2 and A2 phenotypes, secreting anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective cytokines. However, during the late stage, the activated microglia and astrocytes are polarized into M1 and A1 phenotypes, secreting pro-inflammatory and neurotoxins cytokines.
Like microglia, astrocytes at different stages of AD exhibit different phenotypes and functions [4, 5, 65]. Under physiological conditions, the astrocytes are quiescent, maintaining brain homeostasis, regulating neurotransmitters, and preserving synaptic function and neuroimmune response [66, 67]. However, astrocytes are activated during brain injuries or neurodegenerative diseases and perform different functions [22, 68]. In the early stage of AD, the astrocytes are activated and mainly polarized into neuroprotective A2 phenotype [69]. Similarly, the A2 astrocytes have an anti-inflammatory phenotype and release anti-inflammatory cytokines in response to AD pathologies [69]. During later stages, A2 astrocytes undergo polarization to the A1 phenotype in response to the excessive accumulation of Aβ, fragmented mitochondria, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. The pro-inflammatory cytokines released by A1 astrocytes exacerbate AD pathology and provide positive feedback for enhanced neuroinflammation [70, 71].
Microglia and astrocyte senescence
Cellular senescence refers to the state in which cells enter a cell cycle arrest during aging or in response to external stimuli [72]. In a senescent state, cells lose proliferative, differentiative, and functional capacities [72]. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) represents a characteristic feature of cellular senescence [73]. Senescent cells secrete many inflammatory factors through SASP, thereby engaging in the pathological processes of neurodegenerative changes [73]. Previous studies have established the presence of senescent microglia and astrocytes in the brain tissue of AD [74, 75]. Recent research has revealed that in postmortem tissues of APP/PS1 mice and AD patients, early and sustained proliferation promotes a replicative senescence phenotype in microglia. This senescence phenotype is characterized by increased SA-β-gal activity, shortened telomeres, and aging-associated transcriptional markers [74, 76]. Inhibiting early proliferation of microglia hinders the aging process in APP/PS1 mice while suppressing the accumulation of Aβ, neuroinflammation, and synaptic injury, providing an effective therapeutic strategy to prevent subsequent pathological processes [74, 76]. In addition, astrocyte senescence exhibits characteristic features of decreased normal physiological function and increased secretion of SASP factors, contributing to Aβ deposition, tau hyperphosphorylation, and the formation of NFTs in AD [77].
Furthermore, astrocyte senescence leads to various detrimental effects, including the induction of glutamate excitotoxicity, the impairment of synaptic plasticity, the loss of neural stem cells, and the dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [77]. Interestingly, astrocytes show substantial accumulation around senile plaques in aged individuals. Most of these accumulated astrocytes express the age-related secretory factor interleukin-6 (IL-6), suggesting that astrocytes clustered around senile plaques possess aging characteristics [75]. Previous studies have indicated that clearance of senescent astrocytes contributes to improving cognitive dysfunction and pathological changes in tau [75]. Thus, therapeutic strategies targeting aging astrocytes may be a novel approach to treating age-related neurodegenerative diseases.
Crosstalk between microglia and astrocytes
The cross-talk between microglia and astrocytes is implicated in the pathological progression of AD [42]. As previously described, microglia and astrocytes are essential in the immune response [78]. In both physiological and pathological conditions, astrocytes and microglia work synchronously and complementarily to maintain the normal function of the blood-brain barrier, neuroinflammation, and other cellular processes involved in brain homeostasis [78, 79]. According to previous studies, astrocyte-derived cytokines, including inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, regulate microglial function [80]. The astrocyte-derived interleukin-15 (IL-15) promotes microglial polarization to a pro-inflammatory phenotype, bridging astrocyte-microglia crosstalk. The IL-15-mediated astrocyte-microglia crosstalk elevates the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., CD86, TNF-α, and IL-1β) and exacerbates neuronal damage following intracerebral hemorrhage [80]. In addition, astrocytes regulate microglial migration, phagocytosis, microglia-mediated synaptic pruning, and neural circuit development with interleukin-33 [81]. Intriguingly, astrocyte-derived inflammatory cytokines contribute to microglial migration and phagocytosis by increasing the permeability of the BBB and the recruitment of immune cells [78, 82].
Moreover, microglia also regulate astrocyte function and exacerbate neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity in brain injuries and neurodegenerative diseases [83, 84]. For example, previous studies demonstrated that pro-inflammatory cytokines released by activated microglia could induce astrocyte activation and determine the phenotypes of reactive astrocytes [78, 85]. Co-cultures of microglia and astrocytes significantly promoted lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced neurotoxic cytokine release from astrocytes, suggesting microglia enhance the neurotoxic effects of astrocytes following excessive activation [85, 86]. In normal aging and AD, the fragmented mitochondria released from the microglia contribute to the astrocyte’s polarization to the neurotoxic A1 phenotype [87]. Astrocytes compensate for the neuroimmune system dominated by microglia in acute brain injury through appropriate cross-talk between astrocytes and microglia [79]. Microglia are the first line of defense against brain injury by phagocytosing dead cells and debris and releasing anti-inflammatory cytokines [88]. Astrocytes are activated following the microglial reaction, releasing inflammatory cytokines, and forming glial scars [79, 88].
The crosstalk between microglia and astrocytes exhibits excellent potential for AD treatment [89]. A previous study shows that astrocyte-derived interleukin-3 (IL-3) could reprogram microglial function and promote microglia-mediated phagocytosis [89]. In detail, the accumulation of Aβ causes elevated expression of microglial interleukin-3 receptor alpha (IL-3Rα), a specific receptor of IL-3 [89]. The microglial IL-3Rα receptor receives the signal from the astrocyte-derived IL-3 and increases microglial motility and ability to cluster around amyloid plaques [89]. The enhanced microglial clustering and phagocytosis promote Aβ clearance and potentially alleviate AD pathologies [89]. While more studies are needed, the crosstalk between microglia and astrocytes is promising as a novel therapeutic target for AD treatment.
Microglia and astrocyte-mediated Aβ seeding, propagation, and clearance
Although controversial, the amyloid cascade hypothesis proposes that Aβ accumulation causes various pathological changes, including neurofibrillary tangles, neuronal dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and cognitive deficits [90, 91]. Activated microglia engage in the disease-associated microglia (DAM) response [92]. Likewise, disease-associated astrocytes are activated, contributing to AD progression by polarizing towards the pro-inflammatory phenotype and exacerbating neuroinflammation [4, 5]. Recently, several studies identified new roles of astrocytes and microglia in AD [66, 90, 93].
Aβ Seeding. Brain-wide post-mortem studies found that Aβ deposition does not randomly form amyloid plaques throughout the brain. Instead, Aβ accumulated in a stereotyped pattern, with amyloid detected initially in the neocortex, subsequently in the allocortex, and lastly in the subcortex [91]. During this process, small amounts of aggregation components function as a protein template, and the β-sheet-rich protein structure induces the misfolding and deposition of the normally soluble protein. This process, usually referred to as seeding, contributes to Aβ propagation in AD [94, 95]. The polymerization of monomeric or oligomeric Aβ peptides causes the formation of insoluble fibrillar Aβ and amyloid plaques following Aβ propagation and seeding at new locations [91]. The polymerization process has two phases: the initial nucleation phase and the growth phase [94, 96]. During the initial nucleation phase, the formation of the putatively multimeric nucleus (“seed”) following Aβ seeding causes a rapid increase in cognate proteins that are incorporated into amyloid fibrils in AD [97]. In the growth phase, Aβ aggregation is a progressive and time-dependent process. During this process, the fragmentation of Aβ fibrils causes increased Aβ seeding, leading to a vicious cycle of progressive protein polymerization and misfolding [94, 95]. In AD, primary nucleation is a slow and time-consuming process [98]. However, the deposition of diffusible oligomeric protein is inevitable after the initial nucleation stage and progresses rapidly [91].
Previously, neurons were considered the only cell type capable of generating Aβ [18]. However, increasing evidence demonstrates that astrocytes and microglia are involved with Aβ deposition [18, 99, 100]. In AD, gliosis occurs in response to Aβ accumulation, neuronal damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction [18]. The interactions between glial cells and amyloid plaques involve a membrane protein Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2) [101]. Neurodegenerative diseases are closely associated with microglia, including chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and genetic variants in microglial TREM2 [101]. Previous studies reported that TREM2 deficiency caused increased Aβ seeding and impaired microglia barrier function [99, 100]. Intriguingly, TREM2-dependent microglial activity restricts amyloid plaque growth in the early AD stage but exacerbates AD progression at the late stage [99, 102]. For example, at the early stages of AD progression, TREM2 activation triggers the clustering of phagocytic CD68-positive microglia around amyloid plaques and may facilitate the clearance of Aβ [99]. However, genetic variation and deletion of TREM2 impair the microglial clustering around plaques and cause the accumulation of extracellular and intraneuronal deposits [103, 104].
In addition to microglia, astrocytes contribute to Aβ production and seeding [105]. A previous study found that pro-inflammatory factors or a small amount of Aβ could cause elevated activity of β-Site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1), APP, and β-secretase within astrocytes. This elevation of function led to increases in astrocytic Aβ production. Since astrocytes are more abundant than neurons, astrocyte-derived Aβ is an essential source of Aβ [105]. The produced Aβ42 oligomers and fibrils trigger higher levels of astrocytic BACE1 to elevate cerebral Aβ levels, thereby promoting a vicious positive feedback cycle [105]. Previous research demonstrated that the pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFNγ and TNFα), JAK2 and ERK1/2 signaling pathways, and the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) mediate the upregulation of BACE1 in astrocytes [106-108]. Moreover, TGF-β1 enhances Aβ production by upregulating astrocytic APP and exacerbating the burden of plaques in the brain of AD patients [109]. Notedly, activated microglia are one of the primary sources of inflammatory cytokines [110]. Thus, microglia may contribute to the positive feedback mechanism of astrocytic Aβ production. Therefore, microglia and astrocytes participate in Aβ production and seeding.
Aβ propagation. As mentioned, microglial activation is a neuroprotective mechanism against AD pathologies under normal conditions. However, under pathological conditions, the excessive activation of microglia accelerates AD progression by releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and enhancing Aβ seeding [4, 5, 93, 111]. In addition to neuroinflammation and Aβ seeding, recent studies identified microglia-mediated Aβ propagation [90, 93]. Researchers transplanted Aβ from transgenic AD mice to wild-type (WT) grafts, an unaffected brain tissue. During the study, only a small number of neuronal axons from the affected brain tissue were present in the WT grafts, indicating neuronal axons are not involved in Aβ propagation [90]. Intriguingly, prominent microglia invasion from the AD tissue to the WT grafts was evident, and Aβ was identified within microglia. These findings suggest that microglia participate in Aβ propagation and contribute to seeding into unaffected brain tissue [90]. Notably, these microglia in the WT grafts were derived from the host brain tissue and had no apparent cellular death [90]. However, another study found that activated microglia establish an intimate connection with Aβ plaques, subsequently causing microglial cell death [112]. The Aβ released by dying microglia exacerbated Aβ accumulation, further confirming microglial contribution to Aβ propagation [112].
In addition, the adaptor protein apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC) in microglia also contributes to Aβ seeding and spreading [113]. Injections of ASC specks to the hippocampus led to Aβ spreading in the AD mouse model. In contrast, ASC-deficient mice or co-application of ASC-blocking antibodies inhibited Aβ propagation and exacerbated AD progression [113]. During this process, early immune activation of IL-1β leads to the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome, triggering the assembly of ASC specks and phagocytosis by neighboring microglia to mediate further immune response [114, 115]. Thus, ASC released by microglia acts as a cross-seed for Aβ pathology, promoting Aβ aggregation and propagation in AD [113]. Aβ plaques create a unique environment that facilitates local tau seeding in dystrophic axons, leading to the propagation and formation of neuritic plaque (NP) tau at early seeding stages [116]. Furthermore, increasing microglia cluster around the amyloid plaques, elevating NP-tau seeding and spreading [111]. The astrocyte contribution to Aβ propagation remains unclear; thus, future research should aim to elucidate their role in Aβ aggregation.
Aβ clearance. Microglia, the core component of the cerebral immune system, play an essential role in the defense against Aβ burden. Activated microglia protect neurons by surrounding and compacting Aβ plaques to form a physical barrier, limiting the expansion of plaques and reducing neurite dystrophy [117]. Microglia interaction with Aβ plaques polarizes microglia to an anti-inflammatory phenotype and initiates microglial phagocytosis, leading to Aβ clearance [70]. Microglia promote Aβ clearance through direct interaction with PRRs [118], toll-like receptors (TLRs) [119], scavenger receptors (SR) [120], TREM2 [121], the autophagy machinery of LC3-associated endocytosis (LANDO) [122], type 1 transmembrane protein (CD33) [123] and other receptors [124]. Furthermore, the cell surface receptor of Aβ is a composite of the A scavenger receptor (SR-A) and the class B scavenger receptors, including CD36, α6β1 integrin, CD14, and CD47 [125]. A cascade of intracellular signal pathways activated by targeting these receptors can enhance the phagocytic activity of microglia to remove Aβ [126]. Besides microglial phagocytosis, microglia contribute to Aβ clearance through degradation [127-129]. For example, microglia enhance Aβ clearance by releasing amyloid-degrading enzymes, such as an insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), epinephrine (NEP), metalloproteinases (MMPs), and lysosomal protease [128-130]. Notedly, previous research suggested that IDE and NEP contributed to the degradation of monomeric peptides but not Aβ amyloid fibrils [124, 131]. However, MMP-2 and MMP-9 are zinc-dependent metalloproteases capable of cleaving fibrillar Aβ in the brain [128]. Furthermore, the lysosome possesses endopeptidase activity and contains more than 60 hydrolases, among cathepsin B, and tripeptidyl peptidase 1, which can destabilize fibril stability and proteolyze fibrillar Aβ efficiently [130, 132]. In addition, microglial complement receptor 3 (CR3) and complement component (C3) are involved in the phagocytosis and clearance of fibrillar Aβ by microglia in vitro and in vivo [133]. Another study suggested that microglial CR3 regulates Aβ homeostasis through secreted proteolytic activity [134].
Like microglia, astrocytes respond to AD pathogenesis and are involved in Aβ clearance [54]. According to a previous study, astrocytes secreted protease MMP-2 and MMP-9 to promote Aβ clearance [135]. Increases in neprilysin and IDE enhance astrocyte-mediated Aβ clearance [136, 137]. Similarly, astrocytes are involved in Aβ clearance through the secretion of kallikrein-related peptidase 7 (KLK7), which degrades Aβ [138, 139]. In AD, KLK7 levels were reduced [138]. In addition, reactive astrocytes express multiple receptors that are involved in Aβ clearance by recognizing and combining Aβ, including the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) [140], lipoprotein receptor-related proteins (LRPs), and membrane-associated proteoglycans [141]. In addition to astrocytic Aβ production and astrocyte-mediated inflammatory response, astrocytes contribute to Aβ seeding and deposition via the glymphatic system [142]. Aquaporin-4 (AQP4), a water-selective transporter expressed in astrocytes, is essential in glymphatic system-mediated Aβ clearance [143]. In AD, the reduced expression or depolarization of AQP4 contributes to Aβ deposition [144, 145]. Our studies have found that AQP4 polarization is closely associated with astrocyte phenotype polarization. The improved astrocytic AQP4 polarization enhances Aβ clearance through the glymphatic system [146].
Microglia and astrocyte-mediated synapse loss and pruning
Synaptic loss is a prominent feature of Alzheimer’s disease and the most robust correlate for learning and memory in AD [147]. Microglia identify and remove unnecessary neural connections, which is crucial in brain development and homeostasis [47]. Synaptic pruning mainly happens in postnatal development, wherein the brain eliminates extra synapses to refine neuronal circuits [47, 148, 149]. However, excessive microglia-mediated pruning in the adult brain induces abnormal synaptic refinement, leading to behavioral deficits associated with neurodegeneration [47, 48]. Recent studies also show that astrocytes play a role in synaptic phagocytosis [150].
Microglia-mediated “eat me” signal pathways
The “eat me” signal is essential in microglia-mediated pruning [151]. Microglial exposure to and recognition of the “eat me” signal begins the phagocytosis of the target cells [152]. The complement C1q and C3 are the constituents of the “eat me” signal that trigger microglial engulfment of excess synapses through the activation of C3 receptors (CR3) [153, 154]. Synaptic pruning by microglia is regulated by complement-dependent mechanisms and neuronal activity. During this process, the C1q label-based synaptic pruning is essential in the selective removal of synapses by the adjacent microglia [155]. C1q is the classical complement pathway’s initial component, binding to pathogens, apoptotic cells, and synapses [156, 157]. Subsequent activation of the downstream cascade induces proteolytic cleavage of C3, promoting microglial prune complement-tagged synapses [156].
In aging and neurodegenerative diseases, excessive activation of complement-mediated synapse pruning causes synapse loss and behavioral alterations in the aging brain [158]. Previous research suggested that knocking out complement systems such as C1q, C3, or CR3 disrupted microglia-specific phagocytic pathways, consequently impairing synaptic connectivity [158, 159]. Indeed, synaptic C1q is abnormally elevated in AD, triggering early synapse loss by microglial phagocytosis [160]. Furthermore, the malfunction of the selective pruning of synapses by microglial phagocytosis strongly affected memory processes [155, 161]. Recently, studies have shown that microglia eliminate synapses in the C1q dependent-complement pathway, which strongly regulates forgetting less-active memories [161]. Overexpression of CD55 (inhibitor of complement pathways) further demonstrates that suppressing microglia phagocytosis prevented forgetting in a complement- and activity-dependent manner [161].
Beyond the complement system, exposed phosphatidylserine (PS) is another extrinsic signal representing the ‘eat-me’ signal that drives aberrant microglia-mediated synapse pruning in AD [162, 163]. During developmental pruning, localized PS exposure is a usual neuronal signal that promotes microglial engulfment through interactions with complement or other proteins [163]. The recognition of exposed PS by microglial phagocytic receptor TREM2 enables synaptic pruning associated with apoptotic cells and debris clearing [164]. In addition, perivascular secretion of phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1/osteopontin) modulates microglia-mediated synaptic engulfment in the hippocampus of AD context [162]. Furthermore, upregulation of SPP1 is required to activate C1q [162].
Microglia-mediated ‘don’t eat me’ signal pathways
In contrast, during synaptic refinement, the ‘don’t-eat-me’ signal is the negative regulatory pathway to counterbalance the effects of ‘eat-me’ signals, preventing excessive synapse elimination (Fig. 3) [165]. CD47 is a transmembrane immunoglobulin superfamily protein that acts as a specific ‘don’t eat me’ pathway protein, interacting with its receptor signal regulatory protein-α (SIRPα), which is highly expressed on microglia during developmental peak pruning periods [166]. Previous research discovered that CD47-SIRPα interactions regulate myelin phagocytosis [47, 167]. However, recently, a similar study suggested that during postnatal development, CD47-SIRPα interaction protects synapses from aberrant pruning [168, 169]. CD47 knockout mice displayed sustainable synapse reduction with increased microglial engulfment in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus, suggesting the CD47-SIRPα axis limits aberrant microglial phagocytosis [170]. Furthermore, CD47 preferentially localized in more active neurons to engulf synapses, indicating the protective role of CD47 against targeting specific synaptic populations by microglia [169]. In addition, a recent study suggested the exact effect of microglial SIRPα alongside the progression of AD [168]. Using a microglia-specific SIRPα knockout mouse model, a previous study elucidated that knockout of microglial SIRPα enhances excessive synaptic loss by promoting microglia phagocytosis and exacerbates the cognitive deficits in AD [168]. In line with this, microglial SIRPα levels in the AD model have no significant changes compared with the control animal during the early AD stage. However, the microglial SIRPα significantly decreases at 5 or 8 months of age, suggesting the microglia-mediated ‘don’t eat me’ signal is essential in the cognitive impairment of AD [168].
Figure 3.

Microglia and astrocyte-mediated “eat me” and “don’t eat me” signals. During development, the “eat me signal” is crucial for eliminating unnecessary or inappropriate synapses. This process involves the complement system (C1q, CR3, and C3) and PS mediated by microglia, MERTK, and MEGF10 mediated by astrocytes. However, the microglial SIRα mediated “don't eat me” signal is a negative synaptic pruning regulator to avoid excessive synapse loss.
In addition, several proteins that bind to C1q and downstream complement factors protect synapses against excessive elimination in the brain [171, 172]. Previous evidence suggested that the secreted neuronal sushi repeat protein X-linked 2 (SRPX2) acts as a complement inhibitor and binds to C1q, limiting complement activation and protecting synapses from complement-mediated elimination in the visual system and somatosensory cortex [173]. Furthermore, another study found that during the early development of the central nervous, C1q and SRPX2 interaction regulates microglia-mediated synapse pruning in the visual thalamus but not in the visual cortex [172]. Moreover, a recent study demonstrated that neuronal pentraxin 2 (Nptx2) is involved in complement activation and regulates microglia-mediated synapses in neurodegenerative diseases. Neuronal overexpression of Nptx2 sufficiently diminished complement system activation and ultimately decreased synapse loss [171]. In summary, the disruption of microglia-mediated ‘don’t eat me’ signal contributes to microglia-mediated excessive pruning of synapses and enhances cognitive impairment.
Astrocyte-mediated microglial phagocytosis of synaptic pruning
Astrocytes also affect microglia-mediated synaptic pruning through the activated complement cascade and other proteins. The increased activation of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) signaling facilitates synaptic C1q activation and microglial phagocytosis of hippocampal glutamatergic synapses in hippocampal CA1, inducing synaptic and cognitive impairment in AD [174]. A previous study reported that the upregulation of mGluR1 is mediated by disruption of astrocytic glutamate transporter 1 (GLT1/EAAT2) [175]. Astrocytic GLT1 expression is markedly decreased in the early stages of AD and specifically occurs in surrounding amyloid plaques [175]. Thus, astrocytic GLT1 dysfunction may contribute to the increase of C1q-mediated microglial phagocytosis of synapses in the setting of AD. Furthermore, recent findings demonstrated that blocking type 2A protein phosphatase (a key enzyme downstream of mGluR1 signaling) attenuated the microglial phagocytosis of glutamatergic synapses and cognitive deficiency in the rat model of AD [176]. In addition, selective knockout of astrocyte-apoE4 decreased microglial-dependent engulfment of synapses in the presence of tauopathy, demonstrating that astrocyte-secreted apoE4 could serve as a regulator for specific microglia receptors [177].
Astrocytes-mediated phagocytic clearance of synapses
Although most studies focused on microglia-mediated synapse pruning, the astrocytic function is also crucial for the phagocytosis of synapses throughout the brain [150]. Astrocytes are present near Aβ plaques and are closely associated with engulfed dystrophic neurites in AD [178]. Reactive astrocytes enclose and phagocytose presynaptic dystrophy axons in the hippocampus of APP mice and AD patients, resulting in the degradation of presynaptic structures [179]. The accumulation of dystrophic presynaptic structures around Aβ plaques continues with disease progression [179, 180]. However, the reactive astrocytes only affected less than 7% of dystrophic neurites, indicating astrocyte phagocytic capacity might be weakened or impaired in AD [179, 180]. Furthermore, another study further confirmed that Aβ plaques damaged the astrocytic phagocytosis of astrocytes, thereby enhancing AD pathology [180]. According to previous studies, astrocytes actively engulf synapses in vitro and in vivo through the multiple EGF-like domains 10 (MEGF10) and c-mer proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase (MERTK) phagocytic pathways, which are closely related to neuronal activity [181, 182]. Moreover, these phagocytic receptors recognize phosphatidylserine in target debris, triggering the engulfment process [183]. Deletion of either Mertk or Megf10 in astrocytes was observed in the retention of excessive functional synapses, suggesting that Megf10 and Mertk are critical for synapse remodeling in neural circuit refinement, with potential implications for learning and memory [182]. Notedly, phagocytosis of dystrophic synapses by astrocytes is detected in AD [180]. MEGF10 binds to C1q and participates in astrocytes’ clearance of apoptotic cells [184]. Therefore, AD-related decreases in MERTK and MEGF10 expression might be related to defective astrocyte phagocytosis, inducing the aggregation of dystrophic neurites and impaired synapses [185]. Therefore, the recovery of astrocytic phagocytosis could restore neural circuits, decrease neuronal damage, and ultimately limit AD progression.
Microglia and astrocyte-mediated demyelination, myelin debris clearance, and remyelination
The classical neuropathological hallmarks of AD are the deposition of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain, resulting in neuronal damage and synaptic loss [5]. In addition, changes to myelin structure are observed with increasing age and are more pronounced in AD [186, 187]. Generally, the reduction of white matter volume and the pathological demyelination or remyelination process contribute to decreasing axon size and internodal distance, exacerbating AD development [186]. Recent research has revealed defects in myelin lipid biosynthesis during the preclinical stages of AD, significantly contributing to the deterioration of synaptic function and cognitive decline [188]. Interestingly, myelin-formation impairment seems to be compromised even earlier than the neurofibrillary tangles that characterize AD pathology, suggesting that myelin damage may be a primary neuropathological abnormality in AD [188].
On the other hand, the deposition of Aβ in the brain of AD patients induces the deterioration of myelin phospholipids [189]. Studies have found that Aβ causes oligodendrocyte degeneration and inhibits the formation of myelin phospholipids [190]. Therefore, myelin loss in AD may involve a positive feedback loop that accelerates further neuronal loss and disease progression [189]. In the CNS, oligodendrocytes predominately synthesize myelin phospholipids [191]. Mature oligodendrocytes depend on the proliferation, migration, and differentiation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells, gradually producing multilayered lipid sheaths around the axons that lead to the myelination of neuronal axons [191]. Moreover, astrocytes and microglia release soluble factors that affect the myelination process [192].
Microglia and astrocyte-mediated demyelination under inflammatory conditions
In AD, the excessive activation of glial cells and increased release of pro-inflammatory cytokines contribute to myelin damage [193]. The production of pro-inflammatory mediators and the prolonged activation of microglia and astrocytes lead to enhanced oligodendrocyte degeneration, thereby affecting myelination [193]. The balance between demyelination and remyelination is essential in brain damage and repair [194]. Microglia-mediated myelin debris clearance is critical for remyelination [194]. Impaired microglial phagocytosis or inadequate recruitment to the site of demyelination impedes remyelination [194]. Moreover, the proliferation and activation of microglia in AD tissues is associated with the overactivation of the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) pathway [195]. In demyelinating white matter lesions, the pro-inflammatory cytokines released by microglia stimulate the upregulation of colony-stimulating factor 1 (Csf1), resulting in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration [196]. Previous studies have discovered that direct injection of Csf1 into the white matter of the CNS causes focal microglial proliferation and demyelination, suggesting that the activated CSF1R signaling pathway contributes to demyelination [196].
On the other hand, pharmacological depletion of microglia in a focal demyelination model delays oligodendrocyte progenitor cell (OPC) recruitment, damages myelin protein synthesis, and decreases remyelination [197]. Therefore, CSF1R inhibitor prevents microglial proliferation and activation in AD pathology, promotes new myelin phospholipid formation, and slows disease progression [195]. Early investigation has established that the increased expression of heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60) in activated microglia is detrimental to AD [198]. The HSP60 released by microglia increases the production of pro-inflammatory factors by binding to Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) on the surface of OPCs, which subsequently activates the TLR4-NFκB signaling pathway and MyD88-dependent pathway to mediate OPC apoptosis and demyelination [199, 200].
In addition to microglia, astrocytes are involved in remyelination through the recruitment of microglia and the release of cytokines affecting demyelination [194]. For instance, reactive astrocyte activation contributes to inflammatory responses resulting in excessive engulfment of myelin, leading to acute damage of white matter, breakdown of the blood-brain barrier, and demyelination through the LCN2/LRP1 signaling pathway [201]. Furthermore, astrocytes are not only responsive to demyelination in the later period of inflammation but are also highly active and involved in the early progression of the lesion [202]. Reactive astrocytes exhibit hypertrophic morphology and contain damaged myelin lipids, promoting the recruitment of inflammatory cells [202]. Therefore, astrocyte hypertrophy is one of the earliest hallmarks in the demyelination process [202]. In addition, astroglia NF-κB activation contributes to maintaining brain homeostasis, which is also pivotal to neurodegeneration, causing pro-inflammatory cytokine formation and increasing excitotoxicity in AD [203]. A previous study demonstrated that NF-κB-dependent processes within astrocytes damaged oligodendrocytes and increased myelin loss [204]. Therefore, downregulation of the astrocytic NF-κB pathway and LCN2/LRP1 signaling pathway might be a promising therapy for the attenuated demyelination that occurs in AD [205].
Microglia and astrocyte-mediated impairment of remyelination
As mentioned previously, microglia and astrocytes participate in the demyelination in neurodegenerative diseases [206]. The balance between demyelination and remyelination is crucial for brain damage and repair [194]. Interestingly, microglia are also critical in the clearance of brain toxins, which is essential for remyelination [207]. In response to Aβ accumulation, the microglia are activated to eliminate Aβ burdens through microglial phagocytosis [208]. However, the ability of microglia to remove toxic substances from the brain is reduced during the late stage of AD, inducing myelin damage in AD events [209]. The phagocytic clearance of myelin debris resulting from lesion damage is critical for the remyelination of axons and the reconstitution of neuronal circuits [194, 210]. Insufficient or delayed debris clearance hinders remyelination and impedes regeneration [194, 210].
CX3CR1 signaling has been identified as a critical checkpoint regulator for microglial activation in AD [211]. Loss of CX3CR1 impairs microglial function, enhancing the oxidative stress response and dysregulated pro-inflammatory activation [212]. Cx3cr1 deficiency impairs the uptake of and degradation of fibrillar Aβ by microglia, resulting in increased accumulation of neurotoxic Aβ species [212]. Furthermore, in Cx3cr1-deficient mice, microglial clearance of myelin debris is impaired, affecting the integrity of axons and myelin sheaths and preventing myelin regeneration, indicating a critical role of CX3CR1 in myelin debris removal [213]. These findings suggest the significance of CX3CR1 signaling in microglia-mediated myelin debris through phagocytosis in remyelination and AD pathology.
NOX4, a major isoform of the NADPH oxidase, promotes the generation of reactive oxygen species and exacerbates cognitive impairment and memory loss in AD [214]. Recent studies found that the loss of Nox4 contributed to myelin regeneration by enhancing the microglia-mediated myelin debris clearance and increasing oligodendrocytes’ production of nutrient factors [215]. Consistent with previous research, inhibiting or knocking out Nox4 decreased amyloid load and oxidative stress in APP/PS1 mice, alleviating synaptic and memory dysfunction [216]. Thus, limiting the level of Nox4 may be a potential target for promoting myelin regeneration in AD pathology.
Additionally, astrocytes are also involved in impaired remyelination. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is highly expressed in reactive astrocytes after demyelination, drastically decreasing the rate of remyelination [217]. Mechanistically, ET-1 acts as an endogenous inhibitor of remyelination by reducing the Jagged1 expression in reactive astrocytes and enhancing Notch activation in OPCs during remyelination. Inhibition of ET-1 signaling in the demyelinated lesion inhibits Notch activation and enhances remyelination [217]. These findings suggest that astrocytes are crucial for remyelination in AD in addition to microglia.
Microglia and astrocytes promote myelin debris clearance and remyelination
Currently, a wealth of research has provided evidence that activating TREM2 on microglia promotes the clearance of myelin debris and remyelination in neurodegenerative diseases (Fig. 4) [218-220]. TREM2 is necessary for the coordinated transcriptional process in microglia in response to prolonged demyelination, the clearing of damaged myelin, and the secretion of nutritional factors that support oligodendrocyte differentiation or survival [220]. Furthermore, previous studies found that TREM2-deficient microglia fail to remove damaged myelin, resulting in the accumulation of myelin debris and inhibition of the differentiation and remyelination of oligodendrocyte precursor cells [220, 221]. Recent research found that AL002a treatment can activate TREM2-dependent intracellular pathways in vitro and in vivo, potentiating microglia-mediated myelin phagocytosis and degradation [218]. Another study using a focal demyelination model in the brain demonstrated that TREM2 is crucial for efficient myelin debris uptake and remyelination following demyelinating injury [222]. TREM2 on microglia is a phospholipid-sensing receptor during demyelination. It maintains microglial phagocytic activity and binds to myelin debris with subsequent engulfment and clearance [220].
Figure 4.
Microglia and astrocytes are involved in phagocytosis and remyelination. AD pathology leads to demyelination and fragmentation of myelin, consequently leading to the activation of microglia and astrocytes. These activated cells release pro-inflammatory factors (NOX4, ET-1) and upregulate the activity of CSF1R, Hsp60, NF-κB, and LCN2/LRP1, exacerbating myelin loss. However, activated microglia and astrocytes also promote TREM2, APOE, and QKI expressions, which support the clearance of myelin fragments and enhance remyelination.
Similarly, TREM2 is required for lipid droplet biogenesis, allowing remyelination [223]. In AD pathology, TREM2-deficient microglia fail to remove myelin cholesterol, inducing pathogenic lipid accumulation [219]. Like TREM2, cholesteryl ester accumulation also occurs in APOE-deficient glial cells, resulting in damaged brain cholesterol transport [219]. Intriguingly, APOE upregulation depends on TREM2 expression, suggesting apoE-TREM2 interaction in microglia is essential for modulating phagocytosis and cholesterol transport of APOE [224]. Thus, the enhancement of TREM2 function may selectively alleviate cholesteryl ester accumulation in microglia, possibly offering therapeutic benefits in AD [219].
Recent studies on demyelinating diseases have found that the phagocytic activity of microglia is regulated by the expression of QKI protein (KH domain containing RNA binding) [225, 226]. Loss of the Qki gene impairs the microglia-mediated clearance of myelin debris and affects microglia phagocytic activity, inhibiting oligodendrocyte maturation and delaying remyelination [226]. Early studies have identified Qki as a gene exclusively expressed in glial cells, critical for promoting oligodendrocyte differentiation, moderating the expression of myelin basic protein, and participating in myelin phospholipid formation [227, 228]. However, in AD pathology, Qki expression increases with the severity of the disease [227]. Notably, current studies only explore the expression of Qki in oligodendrocytes and astrocytes of sporadic AD patients [227, 229]. Therefore, further investigation is needed to determine how the upregulation of Qki mediates the microglial phagocytic activity and remyelination in AD pathology.
Astrocytes and microglia differ in spatiotemporal phagocytic activity [230]. Astrocytes eliminated debris and remodeled synapses later than microglia but persisted longer, suggesting that astrocytes have a distinct role in different phagocytic mechanisms from microglia [230]. Under physiological conditions, either microglial ablation or microglial dysfunction can induce activation of astrocyte phagocytosis, suggesting astrocytes have the potential to support and compensate for the phagocytic clearance system predominated by microglia [231]. However, the AD model has not investigated microglial compensatory phagocytosis mediated by astrocytes.
During adulthood, astrocytes are the primary source of cholesterol in the CNS, and significant disturbances in brain lipid metabolism occur in AD, particularly in lipids abundant in myelin [232, 233]. It has been previously demonstrated that myelin instability contributes to AD progression [232]. Astrocytes regulate remyelination through cholesterol metabolism [233, 234]. Dietary cholesterol promotes remyelination, partially by affecting the astrocyte phenotype or the secretion of fibroblast growth factor 2, which supports remyelination [235]. Furthermore, astrocytes directly impact the clearance of myelin debris by expressing angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4), an inhibitor of lipoprotein lipase, facilitating myelin debris clearing [236]. Strongly decreased expression of ANGPTL4 in astrocytes could prompt microglia to sufficiently clear myelin debris, thereby achieving remyelination [236]. Recent studies have demonstrated that conditional repression of muscarinic signaling in OPCs augments myelin formation, restores myelin renewal, and improves cognitive deficits in AD mice [237]. Therefore, enhancing myelin formation may hold therapeutic potential for alleviating AD-related cognitive impairment [237]. However, the correlation between the observed lipid imbalance and demyelination remains unclear in AD pathology. Thus, additional studies should be conducted to elucidate lipid-dependent myelin homeostasis and discover new therapeutic targets for AD-related myelin instability.
Furthermore, the interplay between OPCs, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes mediates remyelination. During the pathological process of AD, oligodendrocytes, and OPCs are highly susceptible to factors such as Aβ, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation [238]. Moreover, in the early stages of AD pathology, functional impairments and demyelination of oligodendrocytes and OPCs have been detected, and these changes progressively worsen as the pathological process advances, eventually leading to the progressive decline and loss of neurons [238]. Following brain injury, OPCs migrate along cerebral blood vessels to the relevant brain regions and differentiate into myelin-forming cells or participate in remyelination after injury [239]. Interestingly, when perivascular astrocytes surround OPCs, their migration along the blood vessels is impeded [240]. Specifically, axon guidance factors Sema 3a and Sema 6a secreted by perivascular astrocytes relieve the inhibitory effect of endothelial cells on OPC differentiation and induce detachment of OPCs from the vascular surface [240]. These findings suggest that astrocyte-OPC interactions are essential in oligodendrocyte-mediated remyelination.
Pharmacological approaches targeting glial cells in AD
Galantamine. Galantamine treatment has been used to inhibit excessive astrocyte activation, alleviate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α and IL-6), and alleviate hippocampal Aβ accumulation [241]. Early treatment with galantamine in the pre-plaque stage enhances microglia function, promotes Aβ clearance, reduces insoluble Aβ in the brain, and inhibits the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [242]. Indeed, synthetic galantamine has received regulatory approval in more than 20 counties in recent decades [243]. As a specific, competitive, and reversible inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase and an allosteric modulator at nicotinic cholinergic receptor sites, galantamine potentiates cholinergic nicotinic neurotransmission and promotes cholinergic function [244]. Therefore, galantamine has significant clinical applications in preventing AD [241, 242].
Senolytics. Senolytics, endowed with the remarkable capability to eradicate senescent cells selectively, have garnered substantial support in AD neuropathology, as evidenced by empirical findings from preclinical trials [245, 246]. Significantly, the combination of dasatinib (D) and quercetin (Q) (D+Q) is considered the prototypical senolytic treatment, which targets multiple types of senescent cells and has been demonstrated to effectively clear senescent cells and ameliorate various chronic diseases in preclinical models [245]. For example, senolytic treatment selectively eliminates OPC senescence in the plaque environment in AD mice, thereby improving Aβ plaque-associated inflammation and cognitive impairments [247]. Additionally, robust and widespread induction of senescent cells occurs in the brain following injury, particularly in microglia and astrocytes [248]. Senolytic therapy effectively eliminates senescent cells, reducing the expression of SASP factors, decreasing neurodegeneration, and correcting deficits in reference memory, recognition memory, and depressive behaviors [248]. Notably, preliminary results from initial clinical trials of senolytic treatment for AD support its safety, tolerability, and feasibility and suggest that astrocytes and Aβ may be particularly effective targets for therapy [249].
Palmitoylethanolamide. N-palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is a non-endogenous endocannabinoid-like lipid mediator produced by astrocytes belonging to the N-acylethanolamine phospholipids class [250]. PEA, especially in ultra-micronized formulation (um-PEA), exhibits a protective role in treating neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases and is a potential therapeutic molecule for AD [251]. PEA reduces the aggregation of Aβ and the phosphorylation of tau protein, promoting the normalization of astrocytic function. This normalization of astrocytic function decreases the release of the glutamate-aspartate complex and alleviates neuroinflammation, thereby improving hippocampal CA1 neuron survival [252]. Similarly, a previous study has found that continuous treatment of AD mice with 100 mg/kg/day of um-PEA for three months significantly reduces the glutamate-aspartate complex, inhibits neuroinflammation and oxidative stress response, and improves cognitive deficits [250]. Moreover, studies have demonstrated that PEA in vitro and in vivo has a significant beneficial effect on Aβ-induced neurodegeneration, not only by directly affecting neurons but also by counteracting harmful effects of astrocyte dysfunction, further improving the pathological symptoms of AD [253].
N-methyltransferase inhibitors. Neuronal histamine is involved in developing cognitive impairment in AD [254]. However, increasing histamine levels is a promising strategy to enhance cognitive function in AD patients. Inhibiting astrocyte histamine N-methyltransferase (HNMT) elevates histamine levels [255]. HNMT inhibitors increase histamine levels, affecting cognitive function, neural plasticity, neuron survival, and Aβ degradation [256]. Oral metoprine has been demonstrated to increase histamine levels, improving cognitive function in AD patients by inhibiting HNMT and increasing histamine levels in the brain [257]. Recently, virtual screening of FDA-approved drugs based on drug repurposing found that drugs with a high affinity for HNMT benefit AD treatment [258]. For example, a previous study screening a database of 185 FDA-approved medications for treating neurological diseases found dihydroergotamine and vilazodone targeting HNMT are promising in AD treatment [258]. Thus, inhibiting histamine N-methyltransferase in astrocytes offers the possibility of enhancing histamine’s beneficial effects in AD patients’ brains, such as improving cognitive function, promoting neural plasticity, and facilitating Aβ peptide degradation.
Resveratrol. Resveratrol is a natural polyphenolic compound closely related to regulating neuroprotective molecules and glial function [259]. Resveratrol is an effective activator of SIRT1, linking to the modulation of energy balance (NAD/NADH) and gene transcription, and may prevent AD similar to caloric restriction [260]. Resveratrol protects neurons from toxins and damage associated with neurodegenerative diseases by activating SIRT1. In addition, resveratrol possesses anti-inflammatory properties, preventing Aβ-induced neuronal inflammation and toxicity by inhibiting NF-κB signaling and p38 MAPK signaling in microglia and astrocytes [259, 260]. Clinical trials have shown that resveratrol maintains the integrity of the BBB by reducing MMP9 and activating microglia to produce adaptive immune responses, which may have clinical benefits for AD subjects [261]. Additionally, the antioxidant effects of resveratrol reduce the production of Aβ by inhibiting the activation of ROS [260]. Long-term treatment with resveratrol has been demonstrated to prevent changes in metabolism, oxidation, inflammation, senescence parameters, and neuroglial markers associated with aging [262]. Resveratrol stimulates aging astrocytes to resist glial cell toxication stimuli by upregulating core signaling pathways and cellular homeostasis, including adenosine receptors, nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2-like 2 (Nrf2), heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), SIRT1, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), thereby attenuating the inflammatory process [263]. Furthermore, evidence indicates that resveratrol inhibits the pro-inflammatory signaling pathway dependent on the activation of adenosine receptors, participating in the anti-inflammatory activity of astrocytes [259]. Thus, given the close association between the pathology of AD and aging, the protective mechanism of resveratrol in astrocytes against inflammation through adenosine receptors in AD merits further exploration.
Presently, studies have evaluated resveratrol’s efficacy in treating AD [264]. For instance, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study assessed the impact of resveratrol on 64 patients with mild AD [265]. However, research findings indicated that resveratrol and its primary metabolites can cross the blood-brain barrier, resulting in adverse effects such as weight loss, nausea, and diarrhea [265]. Additionally, the resveratrol-treated group exhibited more pronounced brain volume loss [265]. Nevertheless, the evidence regarding resveratrol in clinical trials remains relatively weak [264, 265]. Most human studies have found an association between the consumption of resveratrol-rich foods and a decreased incidence or prevalence of AD, along with improvements in learning, memory, visual abilities, spatial orientation, and social behavior [266]. Therefore, further clinical trials are recommended to validate the neuroprotective effects of resveratrol and explore its potential mechanisms of action.
Other pharmacological approaches. Moreover, additional pharmacological interventions targeting the pathophysiology of AD have shown promising advancements on the clinical front. Minocycline, an anti-inflammatory tetracycline-class drug, reduces the accumulation of Aβ and attenuates microglia activation by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome [267]. However, it is noteworthy that the therapeutic targeting of inflammation by minocycline did not delay the progression of cognitive impairment in AD patients, thus necessitating further research [268]. Additionally, idebenone, a free radical scavenger, similarly attenuates the pro-inflammatory response of microglia to Aβ [269, 270]. With favorable permeability across the blood-brain barrier and the capacity to exert multiple actions on diverse molecular targets, idebenone stands out as a highly promising therapeutic drug, holding immense potential for clinical applications [271, 272].
Non-pharmacological treatment
Exercise. Evidence demonstrates that physical exercise provides a multifaceted benefit for alleviating AD by reducing Tau hyperphosphorylation, Aβ accumulation, and glial cell-mediated neuroinflammation [273, 274]. Exercise has been found to significantly increase the number of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-positive cells in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus, suppress excessive microglia activation, and effectively prevent neuron damage in aging mice [275, 276]. Furthermore, physical exercise upregulates the expression of TREM2 and SR-A, enhancing the positive modulating effect of microglia [277]. In recent years, emerging studies found that exercise promoted the transformation of activated microglia from the M1 phenotype to the M2 phenotype, reducing Aβ deposits and oxidative stress and improving hippocampal-dependent cognitive function at the early AD stage [278, 279]. Furthermore, exercise promotes the AQP4 polarization in astrocytes, enhancing the astrocyte AQP4-mediated glymphatic system’s efficiency in removing Aβ and abnormal tau clearance [280].
However, despite the encouraging results mentioned above, it is necessary to emphasize the presence of conflicting research findings. Short-term treadmill exercise has been found to increase the number of activated microglia in the hippocampal region of aged Tg18 female mice and elevate pro-inflammatory cytokines levels such as IL-1β and IL-1 [281]. Additionally, increased levels of C-terminal insoluble tau protein and tau phosphorylation have been observed following exercise [281]. These findings suggest that while exercise may positively impact AD patients, alterations in brain function may require adjustments based on the duration of exercise as well as the frequency, intensity, and type of exercise during the intervention period.
Photobiomodulation. Photobiomodulation (PBM) is a potential therapeutic strategy for AD, which utilizes low-power laser and near-infrared spectra to activate beneficial biological responses in cells [282, 283]. PBM therapy operated in pulsed or continuous wave modes [284]. Previous studies have revealed the beneficial effects of both pulsed light and continuous wave PBM therapies on the brain [284]. The optimal therapeutic parameters of brain PBM therapy depend on various factors, including wavelength, fluence, power density, repetition rate, treatment time, and mode of light transfer (i.e., continuous wave or pulsed light) [284]. Considerable investigations have shown the biological responses of glial cells induced by PBM therapy and its impact on Aβ clearance [282, 285]. Our previous study found PBM therapy with 808 nm low-level laser significantly enhanced the expression of IL-3 in astrocytes and IL-3Rα in microglia, resulting in recruiting microglia surrounding amyloid plaques and improving Aβ clearance [5]. Moreover, treatment with 808 nm low-level laser modulates the phenotype of microglia and astrocytes, converting them from a neurotoxic M1/A1 phenotype to a neuroprotective M2/A2 phenotype and inhibiting neuroinflammatory reactions [5]. In another study, PBM decreases vascular-associated microglia and promotes angiogenesis, attracting microglia to Aβ deposits and further reducing brain Aβ levels, ultimately leading to improved memory and cognitive function [282]. Similarly, PBM with pulsed light can also activate and induce morphological alterations of microglia in the primary visual cortex, significantly reducing Aβ burden and tau phosphorylation [286]. Notably, as mentioned previously, the beneficial effects of PBM therapy depend on multiple parameters. Thus, more studies are needed to define the optimal parameter for AD treatment and glial cell regulation.
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is an effective and non-invasive method for treating dementia [287]. LIPUS treatment inhibits chronic inflammatory responses in microglia of AD mice and enhances endothelial nitric oxide synthase, thereby reducing Aβ accumulation and neuroinflammation [288]. However, although LIPUS treatment reduced the total number of activated microglia, microglia phagocytosis for Aβ was significantly enhanced, indicating that the mechanism of LIPUS-induced reduction in Aβ plaque load may involve multiple factors that require further exploration [288]. In addition, previous research has shown that LIPUS treatment boosts the production of BDNF in astrocytes, regulating the development and function of neural circuits [289, 290]. Therefore, further research is needed to elucidate the role of astrocytes in LIPUS-mediated cognitive improvement in AD pathology.
Deep brain stimulation. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a potential method for improving cognitive function in AD through the modulation of neural circuits [291]. Compared to non-invasive neural modulation strategies, invasive DBS through implanted electrodes targets specific brain areas and provides real-time EEG-neurofeedback, resulting in better treatment effects [292]. Chronic fornix DBS treatment significantly reduced amyloid deposition in the hippocampus and cortex, decreased activation of astrocytes and microglia, and promoted neurogenesis [293]. Interestingly, the rats treated with DBS showed a decrease in the number of abnormally activated astrocytes and morphological changes, indicating that DBS contributes to restoring the balance of the nervous system [293]. Clinical trials also found that DBS targeting the fornix helps to regulate cognitive ability and stabilize or attenuate memory impairment in mild AD patients [292, 293]. Unfortunately, current DBS therapy targeting the fornix for AD only improves episodic memory in a subset of patients [294]. Because the impact of DBS therapy on memory impairment may vary depending on the specific brain targets stimulated, DBS parameter settings, pre-existing brain states, and the specific memory processing stage are evaluated (such as encoding or retrieval) [295, 296]. Additionally, there are differences among patients participating in studies and between studies regarding age, severity of symptoms, possible current brain states, genetic backgrounds, and AD etiology [295]. Consequently, obtaining consistent outcomes of DBS therapy efficacy between patients and studies is challenging. Overall, fornix DBS appears to be a promising intervention for memory impairment in AD patients, but further research is still needed.
Conclusion
This review revealed the dual role of astrocytes and microglia in AD pathology. Specifically, in the acute response stage of AD, microglia and astrocyte-mediated neuroinflammation contribute to restoring intra-organism balance. Neuroglial activation can prevent AD progression by releasing anti-inflammatory cytokines to mediate Aβ clearance and prevent excessive synaptic engulfment and demyelination. However, in the late stage, excessive or abnormal microglia and astrocyte activation may further induce Aβ aggregation, synaptic loss, and impair remyelination. In fact, the dual function of neuroglia in the progression of AD pathogenesis is controlled by specific inflammatory cytokines that determine their functional phenotype (Table 1).
Table 1.
Microglia and astrocyte-mediated Aβ clearance and accumulation.
| Outcome | Cell | Mediators | Functions/Activities | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aβ aggregation | Microglia | TREM2 | TREM2 (usually R47H) variation interferes with microglial function and promotes dystrophic neurites around plaques, affecting the microglial phagocytic activity. | [103, 104] |
| Aβ aggregation | Astrocytes | BACE1, TGF-β1 | BACE1 or TGF-β1 induces the upregulation of APP in astrocytes, enhancing the burden of plaques. | [105, 109] |
| Aβ aggregation | Astrocytes | AQP4 | Perivascular AQP4 polarization induces misfolding of Aβ and impairs Aβ clearance. | [143, 144] |
| Aβ aggregation and propagation | Microglia | ASC specks | IL-1β activates NLRP3 inflammasome and triggers microglia-mediated ASC specks to assemble, resulting in the increased spreading and deposition of Aβ. | [45, 114, 115] |
| Aβ clearance | Microglia | Anti-inflammatory cytokines | Microglia-activated M2 phenotypes induce increased anti-inflammatory cytokines, restraining pro-inflammatory cytokines and leading to the clearance of Aβ. | [70] |
| Aβ clearance | Microglia | Receptors | Several receptors contribute to the microglia-enhanced phagocytic activity, including PRRs, TLRs, SR, TREM2, LANDO, CD33, and other receptors. | [118-124] |
| Degrade Aβ fibrils and oligomers | Microglia | Amyloid-degrading enzymes | Microglia releases amyloid-degrading enzymes, including IDE, NEP, MMPs, and lysosomal protease, destabilizing fibril stability and proteolyzing fibrillar Aβ efficiently to promote the clearance of Aβ. | [128-130] |
| Degrade Aβ fibrils | Astrocytes | Amyloid-degrading enzymes | Astrocytes secreted protease MMP-2, MMP-9, neprilysin, IDE, and KLK7 capable of degraded fibrillar Aβ pathology that alleviates the toxic effects of peptide deposition. | [135-139] |
| Aβ clearance | Astrocytes | Receptors | Reactive astrocytes express multiple receptors, including RAGE, LRPs, and membrane-associated proteoglycans, combining and clearing Aβ. | [140, 141, 299] |
We also discussed potential interventions targeting microglia and astrocytes in AD pathology, including drug therapies, exercise, photobiomodulation, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy, and deep brain stimulation (Fig. 5). Although recent studies have shown that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), the other widely applied non-invasive treatments for brain diseases, have the potential to slow down AD progression, the impact of TMS and tACS on glial cells requires further investigation [297, 298]. Microglia and astrocytes are essential in multiple processes involved in the initiation and development of AD. Therefore, targeting microglia and astrocytes may be a promising approach to alleviate neuronal damage and AD pathologies.
Figure 5.
Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments targeting microglia and astrocytes in AD. Pharmacological therapies, including galantamine, Vukazidibem, N-palmitoylethanolamide, Dihydroergotamine, Resveratrol, and non-pharmacological therapies, including exercise photobiomodulation, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy, and deep brain stimulation, targeting glial cells have exhibited therapeutic potential in AD. Although recent studies have shown that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), the other widely applied non-invasive treatment for brain diseases, have the potential to slow down AD progression, the impact of TMS and tACS on glial cells require further investigation.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB0403801), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971096, 31771256, and 32100918), the project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M6900 60 and 2022T150227), Guangzhou Scientific Research Grant (SL2022B04J00013), and the SCNU Young Faculty Development Program (22KJ04).
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB0403801), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971096, 31771256, and 32100918), the project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M690060 and 2022T150227), Guangzhou Scientific Research Grant (SL2022B04J00013), and the SCNU Young Faculty Development Program (22KJ04).
Footnotes
Author contributions
QD reviewed the literature and drafted the manuscript. QD and LY drew the figures and tables. LY and RD supervised the writing and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
References
- [1].Khojaste-Sarakhsi M, Haghighi SS, Ghomi S, Marchiori E (2022). Deep learning for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis: A survey. Artif Intell Med, 130:102332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Reitz C, Brayne C, Mayeux R (2011). Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol, 7:137-152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Uddin MS, Lim LW (2022). Glial cells in Alzheimer's disease: From neuropathological changes to therapeutic implications. Ageing Res Rev, 78:101622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Wu C, Yang L, Feng S, Zhu L, Yang L, Liu TC, et al. (2022). Therapeutic non-invasive brain treatments in Alzheimer's disease: recent advances and challenges. Inflamm Regen, 42:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Yang L, Wu C, Parker E, Li Y, Dong Y, Tucker L, et al. (2022). Non-invasive photobiomodulation treatment in an Alzheimer Disease-like transgenic rat model. Theranostics, 12:2205-2231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Ju Y, Tam KY (2022). Pathological mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer's disease. Neural Regen Res, 17:543-549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Yang L, Wu C, Li Y, Dong Y, Wu CY, Lee RH, et al. (2022). Long-term exercise pre-training attenuates Alzheimer's disease-related pathology in a transgenic rat model of Alzheimer's disease. Geroscience, 44:1457-1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Wu C, Yang L, Tucker D, Dong Y, Zhu L, Duan R, et al. (2018). Beneficial Effects of Exercise Pretreatment in a Sporadic Alzheimer's Rat Model. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 50:945-956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Poon CH, Wang Y, Fung ML, Zhang C, Lim LW (2020). Rodent Models of Amyloid-Beta Feature of Alzheimer's Disease: Development and Potential Treatment Implications. Aging Dis, 11:1235-1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Cai Y, Liu J, Wang B, Sun M, Yang H (2022). Microglia in the Neuroinflammatory Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Therapeutic Targets. Front Immunol, 13:856376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Fakhoury M (2018). Microglia and Astrocytes in Alzheimer's Disease: Implications for Therapy. Curr Neuropharmacol, 16:508-518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Rodriguez-Arellano JJ, Parpura V, Zorec R, Verkhratsky A (2016). Astrocytes in physiological aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscience, 323:170-182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Morimoto K, Horio J, Satoh H, Sue L, Beach T, Arita S, et al. (2011). Expression profiles of cytokines in the brains of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients compared to the brains of non-demented patients with and without increasing AD pathology. J Alzheimers Dis, 25:59-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Ojala J, Alafuzoff I, Herukka SK, van Groen T, Tanila H, Pirttila T (2009). Expression of interleukin-18 is increased in the brains of Alzheimer's disease patients. Neurobiol Aging, 30:198-209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Patel NS, Paris D, Mathura V, Quadros AN, Crawford FC, Mullan MJ (2005). Inflammatory cytokine levels correlate with amyloid load in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. J Neuroinflammation, 2:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Rather MA, Khan A, Alshahrani S, Rashid H, Qadri M, Rashid S, et al. (2021). Inflammation and Alzheimer's Disease: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications by Natural Products. Mediators Inflamm, 2021:9982954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Swanson MEV, Scotter EL, Smyth LCD, Murray HC, Ryan B, Turner C, et al. (2020). Identification of a dysfunctional microglial population in human Alzheimer's disease cortex using novel single-cell histology image analysis. Acta Neuropathol Commun, 8:170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Frost GR, Li YM (2017). The role of astrocytes in amyloid production and Alzheimer's disease. Open Biol, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Wang WY, Tan MS, Yu JT, Tan L (2015). Role of pro-inflammatory cytokines released from microglia in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Transl Med, 3:136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Varnum MM, Ikezu T (2012). The classification of microglial activation phenotypes on neurodegeneration and regeneration in Alzheimer's disease brain. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz), 60:251-266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Wong KY, Roy J, Fung ML, Heng BC, Zhang C, Lim LW (2020). Relationships between Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Neurotransmission Failure in Alzheimer's Disease. Aging Dis, 11:1291-1316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Nirzhor SSR, Khan RI, Neelotpol S (2018). The Biology of Glial Cells and Their Complex Roles in Alzheimer's Disease: New Opportunities in Therapy. Biomolecules, 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Kaur D, Sharma V, Deshmukh R (2019). Activation of microglia and astrocytes: a roadway to neuroinflammation and Alzheimer's disease. Inflammopharmacology, 27:663-677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Jiang T, Yu JT, Tan L (2012). Novel disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis, 31:475-492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Kim E, Otgontenger U, Jamsranjav A, Kim SS (2020). Deleterious Alteration of Glia in the Brain of Alzheimer's Disease. Int J Mol Sci, 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Hardy JA, Higgins GA (1992). Alzheimer's disease: the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Science, 256:184-185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].O'Brien RJ, Wong PC (2011). Amyloid precursor protein processing and Alzheimer's disease. Annu Rev Neurosci, 34:185-204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Fan L, Mao C, Hu X, Zhang S, Yang Z, Hu Z, et al. (2019). New Insights Into the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease. Front Neurol, 10:1312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].De Strooper B, Karran E (2016). The Cellular Phase of Alzheimer's Disease. Cell, 164:603-615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Zhang YW, Thompson R, Zhang H, Xu H (2011). APP processing in Alzheimer's disease. Mol Brain, 4:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Haass C, Kaether C, Thinakaran G, Sisodia S (2012). Trafficking and proteolytic processing of APP. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2:a006270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Kametani F, Hasegawa M (2018). Reconsideration of Amyloid Hypothesis and Tau Hypothesis in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Neurosci, 12:25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Coronel R, Bernabeu-Zornoza A, Palmer C, Muniz-Moreno M, Zambrano A, Cano E, et al. (2018). Role of Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) and Its Derivatives in the Biology and Cell Fate Specification of Neural Stem Cells. Mol Neurobiol, 55:7107-7117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Vergara C, Houben S, Suain V, Yilmaz Z, De Decker R, Vanden Dries V, et al. (2019). Amyloid-beta pathology enhances pathological fibrillary tau seeding induced by Alzheimer PHF in vivo. Acta Neuropathol, 137:397-412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Kimura T, Whitcomb DJ, Jo J, Regan P, Piers T, Heo S, et al. (2014). Microtubule-associated protein tau is essential for long-term depression in the hippocampus. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 369:20130144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Jouanne M, Rault S, Voisin-Chiret AS (2017). Tau protein aggregation in Alzheimer's disease: An attractive target for the development of novel therapeutic agents. Eur J Med Chem, 139:153-167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Gao Y, Tan L, Yu JT, Tan L (2018). Tau in Alzheimer's Disease: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies. Curr Alzheimer Res, 15:283-300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Martini-Stoica H, Cole AL, Swartzlander DB, Chen F, Wan YW, Bajaj L, et al. (2018). TFEB enhances astroglial uptake of extracellular tau species and reduces tau spreading. J Exp Med, 215:2355-2377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Hamelin L, Lagarde J, Dorothee G, Potier MC, Corlier F, Kuhnast B, et al. (2018). Distinct dynamic profiles of microglial activation are associated with progression of Alzheimer's disease. Brain, 141:1855-1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Ginhoux F, Lim S, Hoeffel G, Low D, Huber T (2013). Origin and differentiation of microglia. Front Cell Neurosci, 7:45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Stratoulias V, Venero JL, Tremblay ME, Joseph B (2019). Microglial subtypes: diversity within the microglial community. EMBO J, 38:e101997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Singh D (2022). Astrocytic and microglial cells as the modulators of neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease. J Neuroinflammation, 19:206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Wolf SA, Boddeke HW, Kettenmann H (2017). Microglia in Physiology and Disease. Annu Rev Physiol, 79:619-643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Wendimu MY, Hooks SB (2022). Microglia Phenotypes in Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Cells, 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Heneka MT, Kummer MP, Stutz A, Delekate A, Schwartz S, Vieira-Saecker A, et al. (2013). NLRP3 is activated in Alzheimer's disease and contributes to pathology in APP/PS1 mice. Nature, 493:674-678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].McKernan DP (2020). Pattern recognition receptors as potential drug targets in inflammatory disorders. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol, 119:65-109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Wu C, Yang L, Youngblood H, Liu TC, Duan R (2022). Microglial SIRPalpha Deletion Facilitates Synapse Loss in Preclinical Models of Neurodegeneration. Neurosci Bull, 38:232-234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Bartels T, De Schepper S, Hong S (2020). Microglia modulate neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Science, 370:66-69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Colombo E, Farina C (2016). Astrocytes: Key Regulators of Neuroinflammation. Trends Immunol, 37:608-620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Siracusa R, Fusco R, Cuzzocrea S (2019). Astrocytes: Role and Functions in Brain Pathologies. Front Pharmacol, 10:1114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Abbott NJ, Ronnback L, Hansson E (2006). Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the blood-brain barrier. Nat Rev Neurosci, 7:41-53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Filippini A, Salvi V, Dattilo V, Magri C, Castrezzati S, Veerhuis R, et al. (2023). LRRK2 Kinase Inhibition Attenuates Astrocytic Activation in Response to Amyloid beta(1-42) Fibrils. Biomolecules, 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Paudel YN, Angelopoulou E, Piperi C, Othman I, Aamir K, Shaikh MF (2020). Impact of HMGB1, RAGE, and TLR4 in Alzheimer's Disease (AD): From Risk Factors to Therapeutic Targeting. Cells, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Perez-Nievas BG, Serrano-Pozo A (2018). Deciphering the Astrocyte Reaction in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Aging Neurosci, 10:114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Kraft AW, Hu X, Yoon H, Yan P, Xiao Q, Wang Y, et al. (2013). Attenuating astrocyte activation accelerates plaque pathogenesis in APP/PS1 mice. FASEB J, 27:187-198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Du X, Wang X, Geng M (2018). Alzheimer's disease hypothesis and related therapies. Transl Neurodegener, 7:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Haam J, Yakel JL (2017). Cholinergic modulation of the hippocampal region and memory function. J Neurochem, 142 Suppl 2:111-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Stanimirovic DB, Friedman A (2012). Pathophysiology of the neurovascular unit: disease cause or consequence? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 32:1207-1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Wu HM, Goate AM, O'Reilly PF (2021). Heterogeneous effects of genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease on the phenome. Transl Psychiatry, 11:406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Boche D, Perry VH, Nicoll JA (2013). Review: activation patterns of microglia and their identification in the human brain. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol, 39:3-18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Yang L, Tucker D, Dong Y, Wu C, Lu Y, Li Y, et al. (2018). Photobiomodulation therapy promotes neurogenesis by improving post-stroke local microenvironment and stimulating neuroprogenitor cells. Exp Neurol, 299:86-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Lai AY, McLaurin J (2012). Clearance of amyloid-beta peptides by microglia and macrophages: the issue of what, when and where. Future Neurol, 7:165-176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Wang Q, Yao H, Liu W, Ya B, Cheng H, Xing Z, et al. (2021). Microglia Polarization in Alzheimer's Disease: Mechanisms and a Potential Therapeutic Target. Front Aging Neurosci, 13:772717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Tang Y, Le W (2016). Differential Roles of M1 and M2 Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mol Neurobiol, 53:1181-1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Wu C, Zou P, Feng S, Zhu L, Li F, Liu TC, et al. (2023). Molecular Hydrogen: an Emerging Therapeutic Medical Gas for Brain Disorders. Mol Neurobiol, 60:1749-1765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Yang L, Zhang D, Zhang Q (2023). Astrocyte-Mediated Myelin Phagocytosis in Ischemia. Neurosci Bull, 39:167-169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Preman P, Alfonso-Triguero M, Alberdi E, Verkhratsky A, Arranz AM (2021). Astrocytes in Alzheimer's Disease: Pathological Significance and Molecular Pathways. Cells, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Sajja VS, Hlavac N, VandeVord PJ (2016). Role of Glia in Memory Deficits Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Biomarkers of Glia Dysfunction. Front Integr Neurosci, 10:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Fan YY, Huo J (2021). A1/A2 astrocytes in central nervous system injuries and diseases: Angels or devils? Neurochem Int, 148:105080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Leng F, Edison P (2021). Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here? Nat Rev Neurol, 17:157-172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Habib N, McCabe C, Medina S, Varshavsky M, Kitsberg D, Dvir-Szternfeld R, et al. (2020). Disease-associated astrocytes in Alzheimer's disease and aging. Nat Neurosci, 23:701-706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Bussian TJ, Aziz A, Meyer CF, Swenson BL, van Deursen JM, Baker DJ (2018). Clearance of senescent glial cells prevents tau-dependent pathology and cognitive decline. Nature, 562:578-582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Saez-Atienzar S, Masliah E (2020). Cellular senescence and Alzheimer disease: the egg and the chicken scenario. Nat Rev Neurosci, 21:433-444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Hu Y, Fryatt GL, Ghorbani M, Obst J, Menassa DA, Martin-Estebane M, et al. (2021). Replicative senescence dictates the emergence of disease-associated microglia and contributes to Abeta pathology. Cell Rep, 35:109228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Cohen J, Torres C (2019). Astrocyte senescence: Evidence and significance. Aging Cell, 18:e12937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Liu RM (2022). Aging, Cellular Senescence, and Alzheimer's Disease. Int J Mol Sci, 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Han X, Zhang T, Liu H, Mi Y, Gou X (2020). Astrocyte Senescence and Alzheimer's Disease: A Review. Front Aging Neurosci, 12:148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Yang L, Zhou Y, Jia H, Qi Y, Tu S, Shao A (2020). Affective Immunology: The Crosstalk Between Microglia and Astrocytes Plays Key Role? Front Immunol, 11:1818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Matejuk A, Ransohoff RM (2020). Crosstalk Between Astrocytes and Microglia: An Overview. Front Immunol, 11:1416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Shi SX, Li YJ, Shi K, Wood K, Ducruet AF, Liu Q (2020). IL (Interleukin)-15 Bridges Astrocyte-Microglia Crosstalk and Exacerbates Brain Injury Following Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke, 51:967-974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Vainchtein ID, Chin G, Cho FS, Kelley KW, Miller JG, Chien EC, et al. (2018). Astrocyte-derived interleukin-33 promotes microglial synapse engulfment and neural circuit development. Science, 359:1269-1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Abbott NJ (2002). Astrocyte-endothelial interactions and blood-brain barrier permeability. J Anat, 200:629-638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Subhramanyam CS, Wang C, Hu Q, Dheen ST (2019). Microglia-mediated neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 94:112-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Rothhammer V, Borucki DM, Tjon EC, Takenaka MC, Chao CC, Ardura-Fabregat A, et al. (2018). Microglial control of astrocytes in response to microbial metabolites. Nature, 557:724-728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, et al. (2017). Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature, 541:481-487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Luchena C, Zuazo-Ibarra J, Valero J, Matute C, Alberdi E, Capetillo-Zarate E (2022). A Neuron, Microglia, and Astrocyte Triple Co-culture Model to Study Alzheimer's Disease. Front Aging Neurosci, 14:844534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Clarke LE, Liddelow SA, Chakraborty C, Munch AE, Heiman M, Barres BA (2018). Normal aging induces A1-like astrocyte reactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115:E1896-E1905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Hanisch UK, Kettenmann H (2007). Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nat Neurosci, 10:1387-1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].McAlpine CS, Park J, Griciuc A, Kim E, Choi SH, Iwamoto Y, et al. (2021). Astrocytic interleukin-3 programs microglia and limits Alzheimer's disease. Nature, 595:701-706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].d'Errico P, Ziegler-Waldkirch S, Aires V, Hoffmann P, Mezo C, Erny D, et al. (2022). Microglia contribute to the propagation of Abeta into unaffected brain tissue. Nat Neurosci, 25:20-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Sowade RF, Jahn TR (2017). Seed-induced acceleration of amyloid-beta mediated neurotoxicity in vivo. Nat Commun, 8:512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Chen WT, Lu A, Craessaerts K, Pavie B, Sala Frigerio C, Corthout N, et al. (2020). Spatial Transcriptomics and In Situ Sequencing to Study Alzheimer's Disease. Cell, 182:976-991 e919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Yang L, Feng S, Wu C, Yang L (2022). Microglia-Mediated Abeta Propagation in Alzheimer's Disease. Neurosci Bull, 38:1274-1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Eisele YS (2013). From soluble abeta to progressive abeta aggregation: could prion-like templated misfolding play a role? Brain Pathol, 23:333-341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Jucker M, Walker LC (2011). Pathogenic protein seeding in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Ann Neurol, 70:532-540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Jarrett JT, Lansbury PT Jr. (1993). Seeding "one-dimensional crystallization" of amyloid: a pathogenic mechanism in Alzheimer's disease and scrapie? Cell, 73:1055-1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Knowles TP, Waudby CA, Devlin GL, Cohen SI, Aguzzi A, Vendruscolo M, et al. (2009). An analytical solution to the kinetics of breakable filament assembly. Science, 326:1533-1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Cohen SI, Linse S, Luheshi LM, Hellstrand E, White DA, Rajah L, et al. (2013). Proliferation of amyloid-beta42 aggregates occurs through a secondary nucleation mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110:9758-9763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].Parhizkar S, Arzberger T, Brendel M, Kleinberger G, Deussing M, Focke C, et al. (2019). Loss of TREM2 function increases amyloid seeding but reduces plaque-associated ApoE. Nat Neurosci, 22:191-204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].Yuan P, Condello C, Keene CD, Wang Y, Bird TD, Paul SM, et al. (2016). TREM2 Haplodeficiency in Mice and Humans Impairs the Microglia Barrier Function Leading to Decreased Amyloid Compaction and Severe Axonal Dystrophy. Neuron, 92:252-264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Yeh FL, Hansen DV, Sheng M (2017). TREM2, Microglia, and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Trends Mol Med, 23:512-533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Jay TR, Hirsch AM, Broihier ML, Miller CM, Neilson LE, Ransohoff RM, et al. (2017). Disease Progression-Dependent Effects of TREM2 Deficiency in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease. J Neurosci, 37:637-647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Joshi P, Riffel F, Kumar S, Villacampa N, Theil S, Parhizkar S, et al. (2021). TREM2 modulates differential deposition of modified and non-modified Abeta species in extracellular plaques and intraneuronal deposits. Acta Neuropathol Commun, 9:168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Cheng-Hathaway PJ, Reed-Geaghan EG, Jay TR, Casali BT, Bemiller SM, Puntambekar SS, et al. (2018). The Trem2 R47H variant confers loss-of-function-like phenotypes in Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurodegener, 13:29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Zhao J, O'Connor T, Vassar R (2011). The contribution of activated astrocytes to Abeta production: implications for Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. J Neuroinflammation, 8:150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Yamamoto M, Kiyota T, Horiba M, Buescher JL, Walsh SM, Gendelman HE, et al. (2007). Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha regulate amyloid-beta plaque deposition and beta-secretase expression in Swedish mutant APP transgenic mice. Am J Pathol, 170:680-692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [107].Cho HJ, Kim SK, Jin SM, Hwang EM, Kim YS, Huh K, et al. (2007). IFN-gamma-induced BACE1 expression is mediated by activation of JAK2 and ERK1/2 signaling pathways and direct binding of STAT1 to BACE1 promoter in astrocytes. Glia, 55:253-262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Bourne KZ, Ferrari DC, Lange-Dohna C, Rossner S, Wood TG, Perez-Polo JR (2007). Differential regulation of BACE1 promoter activity by nuclear factor-kappaB in neurons and glia upon exposure to beta-amyloid peptides. J Neurosci Res, 85:1194-1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [109].Lesne S, Docagne F, Gabriel C, Liot G, Lahiri DK, Buee L, et al. (2003). Transforming growth factor-beta 1 potentiates amyloid-beta generation in astrocytes and in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem, 278:18408-18418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [110].Onyango IG, Jauregui GV, Carna M, Bennett JP Jr., Stokin GB (2021). Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's Disease. Biomedicines, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [111].Gratuze M, Chen Y, Parhizkar S, Jain N, Strickland MR, Serrano JR, et al. (2021). Activated microglia mitigate Abeta-associated tau seeding and spreading. J Exp Med, 218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [112].Baik SH, Kang S, Son SM, Mook-Jung I (2016). Microglia contributes to plaque growth by cell death due to uptake of amyloid beta in the brain of Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Glia, 64:2274-2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [113].Venegas C, Kumar S, Franklin BS, Dierkes T, Brinkschulte R, Tejera D, et al. (2017). Microglia-derived ASC specks cross-seed amyloid-beta in Alzheimer's disease. Nature, 552:355-361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [114].Ransohoff RM (2017). Specks of insight into Alzheimer's disease. Nature, 552:342-343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [115].Baroja-Mazo A, Martin-Sanchez F, Gomez AI, Martinez CM, Amores-Iniesta J, Compan V, et al. (2014). The NLRP3 inflammasome is released as a particulate danger signal that amplifies the inflammatory response. Nat Immunol, 15:738-748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [116].He Z, Guo JL, McBride JD, Narasimhan S, Kim H, Changolkar L, et al. (2018). Amyloid-beta plaques enhance Alzheimer's brain tau-seeded pathologies by facilitating neuritic plaque tau aggregation. Nat Med, 24:29-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [117].Condello C, Yuan P, Schain A, Grutzendler J (2015). Microglia constitute a barrier that prevents neurotoxic protofibrillar Abeta42 hotspots around plaques. Nat Commun, 6:6176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [118].Kawasaki T, Kawai T (2014). Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front Immunol, 5:461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [119].Chakrabarty P, Li A, Ladd TB, Strickland MR, Koller EJ, Burgess JD, et al. (2018). TLR5 decoy receptor as a novel anti-amyloid therapeutic for Alzheimer's disease. J Exp Med, 215:2247-2264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [120].Wilkinson K, El Khoury J (2012). Microglial scavenger receptors and their roles in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Int J Alzheimers Dis, 2012:489456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [121].Lessard CB, Malnik SL, Zhou Y, Ladd TB, Cruz PE, Ran Y, et al. (2018). High-affinity interactions and signal transduction between Abeta oligomers and TREM2. EMBO Mol Med, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [122].Heckmann BL, Teubner BJW, Tummers B, Boada-Romero E, Harris L, Yang M, et al. (2019). LC3-Associated Endocytosis Facilitates beta-Amyloid Clearance and Mitigates Neurodegeneration in Murine Alzheimer's Disease. Cell, 178:536-551 e514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [123].Griciuc A, Serrano-Pozo A, Parrado AR, Lesinski AN, Asselin CN, Mullin K, et al. (2013). Alzheimer's disease risk gene CD33 inhibits microglial uptake of amyloid beta. Neuron, 78:631-643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [124].Brown MR, Radford SE, Hewitt EW (2020). Modulation of beta-Amyloid Fibril Formation in Alzheimer's Disease by Microglia and Infection. Front Mol Neurosci, 13:609073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [125].Lee CY, Landreth GE (2010). The role of microglia in amyloid clearance from the AD brain. J Neural Transm (Vienna), 117:949-960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [126].Cai W, Wu T, Chen N (2023). The Amyloid-Beta Clearance: From Molecular Targets to Glial and Neural Cells. Biomolecules, 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [127].Schaeffer J, Delpech C, Albert F, Belin S, Nawabi H (2020). Adult Mouse Retina Explants: From ex vivo to in vivo Model of Central Nervous System Injuries. Front Mol Neurosci, 13:599948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [128].Vafadari B, Salamian A, Kaczmarek L (2016). MMP-9 in translation: from molecule to brain physiology, pathology, and therapy. J Neurochem, 139 Suppl 2:91-114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [129].Tamboli IY, Barth E, Christian L, Siepmann M, Kumar S, Singh S, et al. (2010). Statins promote the degradation of extracellular amyloid beta-peptide by microglia via stimulation of exosome-associated insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) secretion. J Biol Chem, 285:37405-37414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [130].Sole-Domenech S, Rojas AV, Maisuradze GG, Scheraga HA, Lobel P, Maxfield FR (2018). Lysosomal enzyme tripeptidyl peptidase 1 destabilizes fibrillar Abeta by multiple endoproteolytic cleavages within the beta-sheet domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115:1493-1498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [131].Leissring MA, Farris W, Chang AY, Walsh DM, Wu X, Sun X, et al. (2003). Enhanced proteolysis of beta-amyloid in APP transgenic mice prevents plaque formation, secondary pathology, and premature death. Neuron, 40:1087-1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [132].Mueller-Steiner S, Zhou Y, Arai H, Roberson ED, Sun B, Chen J, et al. (2006). Antiamyloidogenic and neuroprotective functions of cathepsin B: implications for Alzheimer's disease. Neuron, 51:703-714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [133].Fu H, Liu B, Frost JL, Hong S, Jin M, Ostaszewski B, et al. (2012). Complement component C3 and complement receptor type 3 contribute to the phagocytosis and clearance of fibrillar Abeta by microglia. Glia, 60:993-1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [134].Czirr E, Castello NA, Mosher KI, Castellano JM, Hinkson IV, Lucin KM, et al. (2017). Microglial complement receptor 3 regulates brain Abeta levels through secreted proteolytic activity. J Exp Med, 214:1081-1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [135].Yin KJ, Cirrito JR, Yan P, Hu X, Xiao Q, Pan X, et al. (2006). Matrix metalloproteinases expressed by astrocytes mediate extracellular amyloid-beta peptide catabolism. J Neurosci, 26:10939-10948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [136].Leal MC, Dorfman VB, Gamba AF, Frangione B, Wisniewski T, Castano EM, et al. (2006). Plaque-associated overexpression of insulin-degrading enzyme in the cerebral cortex of aged transgenic tg2576 mice with Alzheimer pathology. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 65:976-987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [137].Apelt J, Ach K, Schliebs R (2003). Aging-related down-regulation of neprilysin, a putative beta-amyloid-degrading enzyme, in transgenic Tg2576 Alzheimer-like mouse brain is accompanied by an astroglial upregulation in the vicinity of beta-amyloid plaques. Neurosci Lett, 339:183-186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [138].Kidana K, Tatebe T, Ito K, Hara N, Kakita A, Saito T, et al. (2018). Loss of kallikrein-related peptidase 7 exacerbates amyloid pathology in Alzheimer's disease model mice. EMBO Mol Med, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [139].Shropshire TD, Reifert J, Rajagopalan S, Baker D, Feinstein SC, Daugherty PS (2014). Amyloid beta peptide cleavage by kallikrein 7 attenuates fibril growth and rescues neurons from Abeta-mediated toxicity in vitro. Biol Chem, 395:109-118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [140].Jones RS, Minogue AM, Connor TJ, Lynch MA (2013). Amyloid-beta-induced astrocytic phagocytosis is mediated by CD36, CD47 and RAGE. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol, 8:301-311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [141].Ries M, Sastre M (2016). Mechanisms of Abeta Clearance and Degradation by Glial Cells. Front Aging Neurosci, 8:160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [142].Lan YL, Chen JJ, Hu G, Xu J, Xiao M, Li S (2017). Aquaporin 4 in Astrocytes is a Target for Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease. Curr Pharm Des, 23:4948-4957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [143].Yang J, Zhang R, Shi C, Mao C, Yang Z, Suo Z, et al. (2017). AQP4 Association with Amyloid Deposition and Astrocyte Pathology in the Tg-ArcSwe Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis, 57:157-169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [144].Zeppenfeld DM, Simon M, Haswell JD, D'Abreo D, Murchison C, Quinn JF, et al. (2017). Association of Perivascular Localization of Aquaporin-4 With Cognition and Alzheimer Disease in Aging Brains. JAMA Neurol, 74:91-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [145].Xu Z, Xiao N, Chen Y, Huang H, Marshall C, Gao J, et al. (2015). Deletion of aquaporin-4 in APP/PS1 mice exacerbates brain Abeta accumulation and memory deficits. Mol Neurodegener, 10:58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [146].Patabendige A, Chen R (2022). Astrocytic aquaporin 4 subcellular translocation as a therapeutic target for cytotoxic edema in ischemic stroke. Neural Regen Res, 17:2666-2668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [147].Griffiths J, Grant SGN (2023). Synapse pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 139:13-23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [148].Brioschi S, d'Errico P, Amann LS, Janova H, Wojcik SM, Meyer-Luehmann M, et al. (2020). Detection of Synaptic Proteins in Microglia by Flow Cytometry. Front Mol Neurosci, 13:149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [149].Weinhard L, di Bartolomei G, Bolasco G, Machado P, Schieber NL, Neniskyte U, et al. (2018). Microglia remodel synapses by presynaptic trogocytosis and spine head filopodia induction. Nat Commun, 9:1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [150].Lee JH, Kim JY, Noh S, Lee H, Lee SY, Mun JY, et al. (2021). Astrocytes phagocytose adult hippocampal synapses for circuit homeostasis. Nature, 590:612-617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [151].Cornell J, Salinas S, Huang HY, Zhou M (2022). Microglia regulation of synaptic plasticity and learning and memory. Neural Regen Res, 17:705-716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [152].Jia J, Yang L, Chen Y, Zheng L, Chen Y, Xu Y, et al. (2021). The Role of Microglial Phagocytosis in Ischemic Stroke. Front Immunol, 12:790201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [153].Wu T, Dejanovic B, Gandham VD, Gogineni A, Edmonds R, Schauer S, et al. (2019). Complement C3 Is Activated in Human AD Brain and Is Required for Neurodegeneration in Mouse Models of Amyloidosis and Tauopathy. Cell Rep, 28:2111-2123 e2116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [154].Fonseca MI, Chu SH, Hernandez MX, Fang MJ, Modarresi L, Selvan P, et al. (2017). Cell-specific deletion of C1qa identifies microglia as the dominant source of C1q in mouse brain. J Neuroinflammation, 14:48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [155].Gyorffy BA, Kun J, Torok G, Bulyaki E, Borhegyi Z, Gulyassy P, et al. (2018). Local apoptotic-like mechanisms underlie complement-mediated synaptic pruning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115:6303-6308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [156].Bohlen CJ, Friedman BA, Dejanovic B, Sheng M (2019). Microglia in Brain Development, Homeostasis, and Neurodegeneration. Annu Rev Genet, 53:263-288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [157].Stephan AH, Madison DV, Mateos JM, Fraser DA, Lovelett EA, Coutellier L, et al. (2013). A dramatic increase of C1q protein in the CNS during normal aging. J Neurosci, 33:13460-13474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [158].Hong S, Beja-Glasser VF, Nfonoyim BM, Frouin A, Li S, Ramakrishnan S, et al. (2016). Complement and microglia mediate early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models. Science, 352:712-716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [159].Shi Q, Colodner KJ, Matousek SB, Merry K, Hong S, Kenison JE, et al. (2015). Complement C3-Deficient Mice Fail to Display Age-Related Hippocampal Decline. J Neurosci, 35:13029-13042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [160].Dejanovic B, Huntley MA, De Maziere A, Meilandt WJ, Wu T, Srinivasan K, et al. (2018). Changes in the Synaptic Proteome in Tauopathy and Rescue of Tau-Induced Synapse Loss by C1q Antibodies. Neuron, 100:1322-1336 e1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [161].Wang C, Yue H, Hu Z, Shen Y, Ma J, Li J, et al. (2020). Microglia mediate forgetting via complement-dependent synaptic elimination. Science, 367:688-694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [162].De Schepper S, Ge JZ, Crowley G, Ferreira LSS, Garceau D, Toomey CE, et al. (2023). Perivascular cells induce microglial phagocytic states and synaptic engulfment via SPP1 in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Neurosci, 26:406-415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [163].Scott-Hewitt N, Perrucci F, Morini R, Erreni M, Mahoney M, Witkowska A, et al. (2020). Local externalization of phosphatidylserine mediates developmental synaptic pruning by microglia. EMBO J, 39:e105380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [164].Filipello F, Morini R, Corradini I, Zerbi V, Canzi A, Michalski B, et al. (2018). The Microglial Innate Immune Receptor TREM2 Is Required for Synapse Elimination and Normal Brain Connectivity. Immunity, 48:979-991 e978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [165].Rivest S (2018). A 'don't eat me' immune signal protects neuronal connections. Nature, 563:42-43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [166].Sato-Hashimoto M, Nozu T, Toriba R, Horikoshi A, Akaike M, Kawamoto K, et al. (2019). Microglial SIRPalpha regulates the emergence of CD11c(+) microglia and demyelination damage in white matter. Elife, 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [167].Gitik M, Liraz-Zaltsman S, Oldenborg PA, Reichert F, Rotshenker S (2011). Myelin down-regulates myelin phagocytosis by microglia and macrophages through interactions between CD47 on myelin and SIRPalpha (signal regulatory protein-alpha) on phagocytes. J Neuroinflammation, 8:24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [168].Ding X, Wang J, Huang M, Chen Z, Liu J, Zhang Q, et al. (2021). Loss of microglial SIRPalpha promotes synaptic pruning in preclinical models of neurodegeneration. Nat Commun, 12:2030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [169].Lehrman EK, Wilton DK, Litvina EY, Welsh CA, Chang ST, Frouin A, et al. (2018). CD47 Protects Synapses from Excess Microglia-Mediated Pruning during Development. Neuron, 100:120-134 e126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [170].Jiang D, Burger CA, Akhanov V, Liang JH, Mackin RD, Albrecht NE, et al. (2022). Neuronal signal-regulatory protein alpha drives microglial phagocytosis by limiting microglial interaction with CD47 in the retina. Immunity, 55:2318-2335 e2317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [171].Zhou J, Wade SD, Graykowski D, Xiao MF, Zhao B, Giannini LAA, et al. (2023). The neuronal pentraxin Nptx2 regulates complement activity and restrains microglia-mediated synapse loss in neurodegeneration. Sci Transl Med, 15:eadf0141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [172].Cong Q, Soteros BM, Huo A, Li Y, Tenner AJ, Sia GM (2022). C1q and SRPX2 regulate microglia mediated synapse elimination during early development in the visual thalamus but not the visual cortex. Glia, 70:451-465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [173].Cong Q, Soteros BM, Wollet M, Kim JH, Sia GM (2020). The endogenous neuronal complement inhibitor SRPX2 protects against complement-mediated synapse elimination during development. Nat Neurosci, 23:1067-1078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [174].Bie B, Wu J, Foss JF, Naguib M (2019). Activation of mGluR1 Mediates C1q-Dependent Microglial Phagocytosis of Glutamatergic Synapses in Alzheimer's Rodent Models. Mol Neurobiol, 56:5568-5585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [175].Wu J, Bie B, Foss JF, Naguib M (2020). Amyloid Fibril-Induced Astrocytic Glutamate Transporter Disruption Contributes to Complement C1q-Mediated Microglial Pruning of Glutamatergic Synapses. Mol Neurobiol, 57:2290-2300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [176].Wu J, Xu J, Naguib M, Bie B (2023). Blockade of Type 2A Protein Phosphatase Signaling Attenuates Complement C1q-Mediated Microglial Phagocytosis of Glutamatergic Synapses Induced by Amyloid Fibrils. Mol Neurobiol, 60:1527-1536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [177].Wang C, Xiong M, Gratuze M, Bao X, Shi Y, Andhey PS, et al. (2021). Selective removal of astrocytic APOE4 strongly protects against tau-mediated neurodegeneration and decreases synaptic phagocytosis by microglia. Neuron, 109:1657-1674 e1657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [178].St-Pierre MK, Carrier M, Gonzalez Ibanez F, Khakpour M, Wallman MJ, Parent M, et al. (2023). Astrocytes display ultrastructural alterations and heterogeneity in the hippocampus of aged APP-PS1 mice and human post-mortem brain samples. J Neuroinflammation, 20:73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [179].Gomez-Arboledas A, Davila JC, Sanchez-Mejias E, Navarro V, Nunez-Diaz C, Sanchez-Varo R, et al. (2018). Phagocytic clearance of presynaptic dystrophies by reactive astrocytes in Alzheimer's disease. Glia, 66:637-653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [180].Sanchez-Mico MV, Jimenez S, Gomez-Arboledas A, Munoz-Castro C, Romero-Molina C, Navarro V, et al. (2021). Amyloid-beta impairs the phagocytosis of dystrophic synapses by astrocytes in Alzheimer's disease. Glia, 69:997-1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [181].Tremblay ME, Cookson MR, Civiero L (2019). Glial phagocytic clearance in Parkinson's disease. Mol Neurodegener, 14:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [182].Chung WS, Clarke LE, Wang GX, Stafford BK, Sher A, Chakraborty C, et al. (2013). Astrocytes mediate synapse elimination through MEGF10 and MERTK pathways. Nature, 504:394-400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [183].Tung TT, Nagaosa K, Fujita Y, Kita A, Mori H, Okada R, et al. (2013). Phosphatidylserine recognition and induction of apoptotic cell clearance by Drosophila engulfment receptor Draper. J Biochem, 153:483-491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [184].Iram T, Ramirez-Ortiz Z, Byrne MH, Coleman UA, Kingery ND, Means TK, et al. (2016). Megf10 Is a Receptor for C1Q That Mediates Clearance of Apoptotic Cells by Astrocytes. J Neurosci, 36:5185-5192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [185].Hulshof LA, van Nuijs D, Hol EM, Middeldorp J (2022). The Role of Astrocytes in Synapse Loss in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review. Front Cell Neurosci, 16:899251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [186].Maitre M, Jeltsch-David H, Okechukwu NG, Klein C, Patte-Mensah C, Mensah-Nyagan AG (2023). Myelin in Alzheimer's disease: culprit or bystander? Acta Neuropathol Commun, 11:56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [187].Dean DC 3rd, Hurley SA, Kecskemeti SR, O'Grady JP, Canda C, Davenport-Sis NJ, et al. (2017). Association of Amyloid Pathology With Myelin Alteration in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol, 74:41-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [188].Couttas TA, Kain N, Suchowerska AK, Quek LE, Turner N, Fath T, et al. (2016). Loss of ceramide synthase 2 activity, necessary for myelin biosynthesis, precedes tau pathology in the cortical pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging, 43:89-100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [189].Papuc E, Rejdak K (2020). The role of myelin damage in Alzheimer's disease pathology. Arch Med Sci, 16:345-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [190].Lee JT, Xu J, Lee JM, Ku G, Han X, Yang DI, et al. (2004). Amyloid-beta peptide induces oligodendrocyte death by activating the neutral sphingomyelinase-ceramide pathway. J Cell Biol, 164:123-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [191].Lebel C, Deoni S (2018). The development of brain white matter microstructure. Neuroimage, 182:207-218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [192].Traiffort E, Kassoussi A, Zahaf A, Laouarem Y (2020). Astrocytes and Microglia as Major Players of Myelin Production in Normal and Pathological Conditions. Front Cell Neurosci, 14:79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [193].Gudi V, Gingele S, Skripuletz T, Stangel M (2014). Glial response during cuprizone-induced de- and remyelination in the CNS: lessons learned. Front Cell Neurosci, 8:73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [194].Sen MK, Mahns DA, Coorssen JR, Shortland PJ (2022). The roles of microglia and astrocytes in phagocytosis and myelination: Insights from the cuprizone model of multiple sclerosis. Glia, 70:1215-1250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [195].Olmos-Alonso A, Schetters ST, Sri S, Askew K, Mancuso R, Vargas-Caballero M, et al. (2016). Pharmacological targeting of CSF1R inhibits microglial proliferation and prevents the progression of Alzheimer's-like pathology. Brain, 139:891-907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [196].Marzan DE, Brugger-Verdon V, West BL, Liddelow S, Samanta J, Salzer JL (2021). Activated microglia drive demyelination via CSF1R signaling. Glia, 69:1583-1604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [197].Wylot B, Mieczkowski J, Niedziolka S, Kaminska B, Zawadzka M (2019). Csf1 Deficiency Dysregulates Glial Responses to Demyelination and Disturbs CNS White Matter Remyelination. Cells, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [198].Campanella C, Pace A, Caruso Bavisotto C, Marzullo P, Marino Gammazza A, Buscemi S, et al. (2018). Heat Shock Proteins in Alzheimer's Disease: Role and Targeting. Int J Mol Sci, 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [199].Li Y, Zhang R, Hou X, Zhang Y, Ding F, Li F, et al. (2017). Microglia activation triggers oligodendrocyte precursor cells apoptosis via HSP60. Mol Med Rep, 16:603-608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [200].Rosenberger K, Dembny P, Derkow K, Engel O, Kruger C, Wolf SA, et al. (2015). Intrathecal heat shock protein 60 mediates neurodegeneration and demyelination in the CNS through a TLR4- and MyD88-dependent pathway. Mol Neurodegener, 10:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [201].Wan T, Zhu W, Zhao Y, Zhang X, Ye R, Zuo M, et al. (2022). Astrocytic phagocytosis contributes to demyelination after focal cortical ischemia in mice. Nat Commun, 13:1134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [202].Ponath G, Ramanan S, Mubarak M, Housley W, Lee S, Sahinkaya FR, et al. (2017). Myelin phagocytosis by astrocytes after myelin damage promotes lesion pathology. Brain, 140:399-413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [203].Sun E, Motolani A, Campos L, Lu T (2022). The Pivotal Role of NF-kB in the Pathogenesis and Therapeutics of Alzheimer's Disease. Int J Mol Sci, 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [204].Bruck W, Pfortner R, Pham T, Zhang J, Hayardeny L, Piryatinsky V, et al. (2012). Reduced astrocytic NF-kappaB activation by laquinimod protects from cuprizone-induced demyelination. Acta Neuropathol, 124:411-424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [205].Srinivasan M, Lahiri DK (2015). Significance of NF-kappaB as a pivotal therapeutic target in the neurodegenerative pathologies of Alzheimer's disease and multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin Ther Targets, 19:471-487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [206].Kwon HS, Koh SH (2020). Neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disorders: the roles of microglia and astrocytes. Transl Neurodegener, 9:42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [207].Olah M, Amor S, Brouwer N, Vinet J, Eggen B, Biber K, et al. (2012). Identification of a microglia phenotype supportive of remyelination. Glia, 60:306-321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [208].Maat-Schieman ML, Yamaguchi H, Hegeman-Kleinn IM, Welling-Graafland C, Natte R, Roos RA, et al. (2004). Glial reactions and the clearance of amyloid beta protein in the brains of patients with hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis-Dutch type. Acta Neuropathol, 107:389-398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [209].Agosta F, Dalla Libera D, Spinelli EG, Finardi A, Canu E, Bergami A, et al. (2014). Myeloid microvesicles in cerebrospinal fluid are associated with myelin damage and neuronal loss in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol, 76:813-825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [210].Neumann H, Kotter MR, Franklin RJ (2009). Debris clearance by microglia: an essential link between degeneration and regeneration. Brain, 132:288-295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [211].Lopez-Lopez A, Gelpi E, Lopategui DM, Vidal-Taboada JM (2018). Association of the CX3CR1-V249I Variant with Neurofibrillary Pathology Progression in Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease. Mol Neurobiol, 55:2340-2349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [212].Puntambekar SS, Moutinho M, Lin PB, Jadhav V, Tumbleson-Brink D, Balaji A, et al. (2022). CX3CR1 deficiency aggravates amyloid driven neuronal pathology and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurodegener, 17:47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [213].Lampron A, Larochelle A, Laflamme N, Prefontaine P, Plante MM, Sanchez MG, et al. (2015). Inefficient clearance of myelin debris by microglia impairs remyelinating processes. J Exp Med, 212:481-495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [214].Fragoso-Morales LG, Correa-Basurto J, Rosales-Hernandez MC (2021). Implication of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate (NADPH) Oxidase and Its Inhibitors in Alzheimer's Disease Murine Models. Antioxidants (Basel), 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [215].Yamanaka K, Nakamura K, Shibahara T, Takashima M, Takaki H, Hidaka M, et al. (2023). Deletion of Nox4 enhances remyelination following cuprizone-induced demyelination by increasing phagocytic capacity of microglia and macrophages in mice. Glia, 71:541-559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [216].Tao W, Yu L, Shu S, Liu Y, Zhuang Z, Xu S, et al. (2021). miR-204-3p/Nox4 Mediates Memory Deficits in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease. Mol Ther, 29:396-408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [217].Hammond TR, Gadea A, Dupree J, Kerninon C, Nait-Oumesmar B, Aguirre A, et al. (2014). Astrocyte-derived endothelin-1 inhibits remyelination through notch activation. Neuron, 81:588-602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [218].Cignarella F, Filipello F, Bollman B, Cantoni C, Locca A, Mikesell R, et al. (2020). TREM2 activation on microglia promotes myelin debris clearance and remyelination in a model of multiple sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol, 140:513-534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [219].Nugent AA, Lin K, van Lengerich B, Lianoglou S, Przybyla L, Davis SS, et al. (2020). TREM2 Regulates Microglial Cholesterol Metabolism upon Chronic Phagocytic Challenge. Neuron, 105:837-854 e839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [220].Poliani PL, Wang Y, Fontana E, Robinette ML, Yamanishi Y, Gilfillan S, et al. (2015). TREM2 sustains microglial expansion during aging and response to demyelination. J Clin Invest, 125:2161-2170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [221].Kotter MR, Li WW, Zhao C, Franklin RJ (2006). Myelin impairs CNS remyelination by inhibiting oligodendrocyte precursor cell differentiation. J Neurosci, 26:328-332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [222].Wang Y, Kyauk RV, Shen YA, Xie L, Reichelt M, Lin H, et al. (2023). TREM2-dependent microglial function is essential for remyelination and subsequent neuroprotection. Glia, 71:1247-1258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [223].Gouna G, Klose C, Bosch-Queralt M, Liu L, Gokce O, Schifferer M, et al. (2021). TREM2-dependent lipid droplet biogenesis in phagocytes is required for remyelination. J Exp Med, 218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [224].Atagi Y, Liu CC, Painter MM, Chen XF, Verbeeck C, Zheng H, et al. (2015). Apolipoprotein E Is a Ligand for Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2). J Biol Chem, 290:26043-26050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [225].Chen X, Liu Y, Xu C, Ba L, Liu Z, Li X, et al. (2021). QKI is a critical pre-mRNA alternative splicing regulator of cardiac myofibrillogenesis and contractile function. Nat Commun, 12:89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [226].Ren J, Dai C, Zhou X, Barnes JA, Chen X, Wang Y, et al. (2021). Qki is an essential regulator of microglial phagocytosis in demyelination. J Exp Med, 218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [227].Farnsworth B, Peuckert C, Zimmermann B, Jazin E, Kettunen P, Emilsson LS (2016). Gene Expression of Quaking in Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease Patients is Both Upregulated and Related to Expression Levels of Genes Involved in Amyloid Plaque and Neurofibrillary Tangle Formation. J Alzheimers Dis, 53:209-219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [228].Chen Y, Tian D, Ku L, Osterhout DJ, Feng Y (2007). The selective RNA-binding protein quaking I (QKI) is necessary and sufficient for promoting oligodendroglia differentiation. J Biol Chem, 282:23553-23560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [229].Radomska KJ, Halvardson J, Reinius B, Lindholm Carlstrom E, Emilsson L, Feuk L, et al. (2013). RNA-binding protein QKI regulates Glial fibrillary acidic protein expression in human astrocytes. Hum Mol Genet, 22:1373-1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [230].Morizawa YM, Hirayama Y, Ohno N, Shibata S, Shigetomi E, Sui Y, et al. (2017). Reactive astrocytes function as phagocytes after brain ischemia via ABCA1-mediated pathway. Nat Commun, 8:28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [231].Konishi H, Okamoto T, Hara Y, Komine O, Tamada H, Maeda M, et al. (2020). Astrocytic phagocytosis is a compensatory mechanism for microglial dysfunction. EMBO J, 39:e104464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [232].Barnes-Velez JA, Aksoy Yasar FB, Hu J (2023). Myelin lipid metabolism and its role in myelination and myelin maintenance. Innovation (Camb), 4:100360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [233].Molina-Gonzalez I, Miron VE (2019). Astrocytes in myelination and remyelination. Neurosci Lett, 713:134532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [234].Luo X, Li K, Zeng Q, Huang P, Jiaerken Y, Wang S, et al. (2019). Application of T1-/T2-Weighted Ratio Mapping to Elucidate Intracortical Demyelination Process in the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum. Front Neurosci, 13:904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [235].Berghoff SA, Gerndt N, Winchenbach J, Stumpf SK, Hosang L, Odoardi F, et al. (2017). Dietary cholesterol promotes repair of demyelinated lesions in the adult brain. Nat Commun, 8:14241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [236].Kamermans A, Rijnsburger M, Chakraborty A, van der Pol S, de Vries HE, van Horssen J (2019). Reduced Angiopoietin-Like 4 Expression in Multiple Sclerosis Lesions Facilitates Lipid Uptake by Phagocytes via Modulation of Lipoprotein-Lipase Activity. Front Immunol, 10:950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [237].Chen JF, Liu K, Hu B, Li RR, Xin W, Chen H, et al. (2021). Enhancing myelin renewal reverses cognitive dysfunction in a murine model of Alzheimer's disease. Neuron, 109:2292-2307 e2295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [238].Vanzulli I, Papanikolaou M, De-La-Rocha IC, Pieropan F, Rivera AD, Gomez-Nicola D, et al. (2020). Disruption of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells is an early sign of pathology in the triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging, 94:130-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [239].Skaper SD (2019). Oligodendrocyte precursor cells as a therapeutic target for demyelinating diseases. Prog Brain Res, 245:119-144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [240].Su Y, Wang X, Yang Y, Chen L, Xia W, Hoi KK, et al. (2023). Astrocyte endfoot formation controls the termination of oligodendrocyte precursor cell perivascular migration during development. Neuron, 111:190-201 e198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [241].Wu Z, Zhao L, Chen X, Cheng X, Zhang Y (2015). Galantamine attenuates amyloid-beta deposition and astrocyte activation in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Exp Gerontol, 72:244-250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [242].Saito T, Hisahara S, Iwahara N, Emoto MC, Yokokawa K, Suzuki H, et al. (2019). Early administration of galantamine from preplaque phase suppresses oxidative stress and improves cognitive behavior in APPswe/PS1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Free Radic Biol Med, 145:20-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [243].Olin J, Schneider L (2002). Galantamine for Alzheimer's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD001747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [244].Olin J, Schneider L (2001). Galantamine for Alzheimer's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD001747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [245].Gonzales MM, Garbarino VR, Marques Zilli E, Petersen RC, Kirkland JL, Tchkonia T, et al. (2022). Senolytic Therapy to Modulate the Progression of Alzheimer's Disease (SToMP-AD): A Pilot Clinical Trial. J Prev Alzheimers Dis, 9:22-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [246].Zhu Y, Tchkonia T, Pirtskhalava T, Gower AC, Ding H, Giorgadze N, et al. (2015). The Achilles' heel of senescent cells: from transcriptome to senolytic drugs. Aging Cell, 14:644-658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [247].Zhang P, Kishimoto Y, Grammatikakis I, Gottimukkala K, Cutler RG, Zhang S, et al. (2019). Senolytic therapy alleviates Abeta-associated oligodendrocyte progenitor cell senescence and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer's disease model. Nat Neurosci, 22:719-728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [248].Wang J, Lu Y, Carr C, Dhandapani KM, Brann DW (2023). Senolytic therapy is neuroprotective and improves functional outcome long-term after traumatic brain injury in mice. Front Neurosci, 17:1227705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [249].Orr M, Gonzales M, Garbarino V, Kautz T, Palavicini J, Lopez-Cruzan M, et al. (2023). Senolytic therapy to modulate the progression of Alzheimer's Disease (SToMP-AD) - Outcomes from the first clinical trial of senolytic therapy for Alzheimer's disease. Res Sq. [Google Scholar]
- [250].Beggiato S, Tomasini MC, Cassano T, Ferraro L (2020). Chronic Oral Palmitoylethanolamide Administration Rescues Cognitive Deficit and Reduces Neuroinflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Glutamate Levels in A Transgenic Murine Model of Alzheimer's Disease. J Clin Med, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [251].Beggiato S, Tomasini MC, Ferraro L (2019). Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) as a Potential Therapeutic Agent in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Pharmacol, 10:821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [252].Scuderi C, Bronzuoli MR, Facchinetti R, Pace L, Ferraro L, Broad KD, et al. (2018). Ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide rescues learning and memory impairments in a triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease by exerting anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. Transl Psychiatry, 8:32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [253].Bronzuoli MR, Facchinetti R, Steardo L Jr., Romano A, Stecca C, Passarella S, et al. (2018). Palmitoylethanolamide Dampens Reactive Astrogliosis and Improves Neuronal Trophic Support in a Triple Transgenic Model of Alzheimer's Disease: In Vitro and In Vivo Evidence. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2018:4720532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [254].Zlomuzica A, Dere D, Binder S, De Souza Silva MA, Huston JP, Dere E (2016). Neuronal histamine and cognitive symptoms in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropharmacology, 106:135-145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [255].Flores-Clemente C, Nicolas-Vazquez MI, Mera Jimenez E, Hernandez-Rodriguez M (2021). Inhibition of Astrocytic Histamine N-Methyltransferase as a Possible Target for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease. Biomolecules, 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [256].Otsuka R, Naganuma F, Nakamura T, Miwa H, Nakayama-Naono R, Matsuzawa T, et al. (2022). Contribution of astrocytic histamine N-methyltransferase to histamine clearance and brain function in mice. Neuropharmacology, 212:109065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [257].Kitanaka N, Hall FS, Kobori S, Kushihara S, Oyama H, Sasaoka Y, et al. (2021). Metoprine, a histamine N-methyltransferase inhibitor, attenuates methamphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion via activation of histaminergic neurotransmission in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 209:173257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [258].Jimenez EM, Zolek T, Hernandez Perez PG, Miranda Ruvalcaba R, Nicolas-Vazquez MI, Hernandez-Rodriguez M (2023). Drug Repurposing to Inhibit Histamine N-Methyl Transferase. Molecules, 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [259].Bobermin LD, Roppa RHA, Quincozes-Santos A (2019). Adenosine receptors as a new target for resveratrol-mediated glioprotection. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis, 1865:634-647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [260].Sawda C, Moussa C, Turner RS (2017). Resveratrol for Alzheimer's disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1403:142-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [261].Moussa C, Hebron M, Huang X, Ahn J, Rissman RA, Aisen PS, et al. (2017). Resveratrol regulates neuro-inflammation and induces adaptive immunity in Alzheimer's disease. J Neuroinflammation, 14:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [262].Sovrani V, Bobermin LD, Santos CL, Brondani M, Goncalves CA, Leipnitz G, et al. (2023). Effects of long-term resveratrol treatment in hypothalamic astrocyte cultures from aged rats. Mol Cell Biochem, 478:1205-1216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [263].Bobermin LD, de Souza Almeida RR, Weber FB, Medeiros LS, Medeiros L, Wyse ATS, et al. (2022). Lipopolysaccharide Induces Gliotoxicity in Hippocampal Astrocytes from Aged Rats: Insights About the Glioprotective Roles of Resveratrol. Mol Neurobiol, 59:1419-1439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [264].Islam F, Nafady MH, Islam MR, Saha S, Rashid S, Akter A, et al. (2022). Resveratrol and neuroprotection: an insight into prospective therapeutic approaches against Alzheimer's disease from bench to bedside. Mol Neurobiol, 59:4384-4404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [265].Gomes BAQ, Silva JPB, Romeiro CFR, Dos Santos SM, Rodrigues CA, Goncalves PR, et al. (2018). Neuroprotective Mechanisms of Resveratrol in Alzheimer's Disease: Role of SIRT1. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2018:8152373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [266].Garrigue P, Mounien L, Champion S, Mouhajir Y, Pechere L, Guillet B, et al. (2021). Long-term administration of resveratrol at low doses improves neurocognitive performance as well as cerebral blood flow and modulates the inflammatory pathways in the brain. J Nutr Biochem, 97:108786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [267].Garcez ML, Mina F, Bellettini-Santos T, da Luz AP, Schiavo GL, Macieski JMC, et al. (2019). The Involvement of NLRP3 on the Effects of Minocycline in an AD-Like Pathology Induced by beta-Amyloid Oligomers Administered to Mice. Mol Neurobiol, 56:2606-2617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [268].Howard R, Zubko O, Bradley R, Harper E, Pank L, O'Brien J, et al. (2020). Minocycline at 2 Different Dosages vs Placebo for Patients With Mild Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol, 77:164-174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [269].Parikh A, Kathawala K, Li J, Chen C, Shan Z, Cao X, et al. (2018). Self-nanomicellizing solid dispersion of edaravone: part II: in vivo assessment of efficacy against behavior deficits and safety in Alzheimer's disease model. Drug Des Devel Ther, 12:2111-2128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [270].Wang HM, Zhang T, Huang JK, Xiang JY, Chen JJ, Fu JL, et al. (2017). Edaravone Attenuates the Proinflammatory Response in Amyloid-beta-Treated Microglia by Inhibiting NLRP3 Inflammasome-Mediated IL-1beta Secretion. Cell Physiol Biochem, 43:1113-1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [271].Althafar ZM (2022). Targeting Microglia in Alzheimer's Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Potential Therapeutic Targets for Small Molecules. Molecules, 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [272].Feng T, Yamashita T, Shang J, Shi X, Nakano Y, Morihara R, et al. (2019). Clinical and Pathological Benefits of Edaravone for Alzheimer's Disease with Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion in a Novel Mouse Model. J Alzheimers Dis, 71:327-339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [273].Huuha AM, Norevik CS, Moreira JBN, Kobro-Flatmoen A, Scrimgeour N, Kivipelto M, et al. (2022). Can exercise training teach us how to treat Alzheimer's disease? Ageing Res Rev, 75:101559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [274].Hansen DV, Hanson JE, Sheng M (2018). Microglia in Alzheimer's disease. J Cell Biol, 217:459-472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [275].Giorgetti E, Panesar M, Zhang Y, Joller S, Ronco M, Obrecht M, et al. (2019). Modulation of Microglia by Voluntary Exercise or CSF1R Inhibition Prevents Age-Related Loss of Functional Motor Units. Cell Rep, 29:1539-1554 e1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [276].Xiong JY, Li SC, Sun YX, Zhang XS, Dong ZZ, Zhong P, et al. (2015). Long-term treadmill exercise improves spatial memory of male APPswe/PS1dE9 mice by regulation of BDNF expression and microglia activation. Biol Sport, 32:295-300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [277].Jensen CS, Bahl JM, Ostergaard LB, Hogh P, Wermuth L, Heslegrave A, et al. (2019). Exercise as a potential modulator of inflammation in patients with Alzheimer's disease measured in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma. Exp Gerontol, 121:91-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [278].Zhang X, He Q, Huang T, Zhao N, Liang F, Xu B, et al. (2019). Treadmill Exercise Decreases Abeta Deposition and Counteracts Cognitive Decline in APP/PS1 Mice, Possibly via Hippocampal Microglia Modifications. Front Aging Neurosci, 11:78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [279].Lu Y, Dong Y, Tucker D, Wang R, Ahmed ME, Brann D, et al. (2017). Treadmill Exercise Exerts Neuroprotection and Regulates Microglial Polarization and Oxidative Stress in a Streptozotocin-Induced Rat Model of Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis, 56:1469-1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [280].Liu Y, Hu PP, Zhai S, Feng WX, Zhang R, Li Q, et al. (2022). Aquaporin 4 deficiency eliminates the beneficial effects of voluntary exercise in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neural Regen Res, 17:2079-2088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [281].Elahi M, Motoi Y, Matsumoto SE, Hasan Z, Ishiguro K, Hattori N (2016). Short-term treadmill exercise increased tau insolubility and neuroinflammation in tauopathy model mice. Neurosci Lett, 610:207-212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [282].Tao L, Liu Q, Zhang F, Fu Y, Zhu X, Weng X, et al. (2021). Microglia modulation with 1070-nm light attenuates Abeta burden and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Light Sci Appl, 10:179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [283].Hamblin MR (2019). Photobiomodulation for Alzheimer's Disease: Has the Light Dawned? Photonics, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [284].Salehpour F, Mahmoudi J, Kamari F, Sadigh-Eteghad S, Rasta SH, Hamblin MR (2018). Brain Photobiomodulation Therapy: a Narrative Review. Mol Neurobiol, 55:6601-6636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [285].Bok J, Ha J, Ahn BJ, Jang Y (2022). Disease-Modifying Effects of Non-Invasive Electroceuticals on beta-Amyloid Plaques and Tau Tangles for Alzheimer's Disease. Int J Mol Sci, 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [286].Iaccarino HF, Singer AC, Martorell AJ, Rudenko A, Gao F, Gillingham TZ, et al. (2016). Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature, 540:230-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [287].Lin WT, Chen RC, Lu WW, Liu SH, Yang FY (2015). Protective effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on aluminum-induced cerebral damage in Alzheimer's disease rat model. Sci Rep, 5:9671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [288].Eguchi K, Shindo T, Ito K, Ogata T, Kurosawa R, Kagaya Y, et al. (2018). Whole-brain low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy markedly improves cognitive dysfunctions in mouse models of dementia - Crucial roles of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Brain Stimul, 11:959-973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [289].Liu SH, Lai YL, Chen BL, Yang FY (2017). Ultrasound Enhances the Expression of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Astrocyte Through Activation of TrkB-Akt and Calcium-CaMK Signaling Pathways. Cereb Cortex, 27:3152-3160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [290].Yang FY, Lu WW, Lin WT, Chang CW, Huang SL (2015). Enhancement of Neurotrophic Factors in Astrocyte for Neuroprotective Effects in Brain Disorders Using Low-intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Stimulation. Brain Stimul, 8:465-473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [291].Luo Y, Sun Y, Tian X, Zheng X, Wang X, Li W, et al. (2021). Deep Brain Stimulation for Alzheimer's Disease: Stimulation Parameters and Potential Mechanisms of Action. Front Aging Neurosci, 13:619543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [292].Liu Z, Shu K, Geng Y, Cai C, Kang H (2023). Deep brain stimulation of fornix in Alzheimer's disease: From basic research to clinical practice. Eur J Clin Invest:e13995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [293].Leplus A, Lauritzen I, Melon C, Kerkerian-Le Goff L, Fontaine D, Checler F (2019). Chronic fornix deep brain stimulation in a transgenic Alzheimer's rat model reduces amyloid burden, inflammation, and neuronal loss. Brain Struct Funct, 224:363-372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [294].Lozano AM, Fosdick L, Chakravarty MM, Leoutsakos JM, Munro C, Oh E, et al. (2016). A Phase II Study of Fornix Deep Brain Stimulation in Mild Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis, 54:777-787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [295].Li R, Zhang C, Rao Y, Yuan TF (2022). Deep brain stimulation of fornix for memory improvement in Alzheimer's disease: A critical review. Ageing Res Rev, 79:101668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [296].Mankin EA, Fried I (2020). Modulation of Human Memory by Deep Brain Stimulation of the Entorhinal-Hippocampal Circuitry. Neuron, 106:218-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [297].Bashir S, Uzair M, Abualait T, Arshad M, Khallaf RA, Niaz A, et al. (2022). Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on neurobiological changes in Alzheimer's disease (Review). Mol Med Rep, 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [298].Dhaynaut M, Sprugnoli G, Cappon D, Macone J, Sanchez JS, Normandin MD, et al. (2022). Impact of 40 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Cerebral Tau Burden in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A Case Series. J Alzheimers Dis, 85:1667-1676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [299].Liu CC, Hu J, Zhao N, Wang J, Wang N, Cirrito JR, et al. (2017). Astrocytic LRP1 Mediates Brain Abeta Clearance and Impacts Amyloid Deposition. J Neurosci, 37:4023-4031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




