Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 25;12(7):E905–E913. doi: 10.1055/a-2337-3865

Table 1 Patient, lesion, and procedure characteristics.

Characteristic Overall, 503 patients (lesions = 515)
SD, standard deviation; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Gender
  • Male

265 (52.7%)
Age (y)
  • Median (range)

66 (27–90)
Anticoagulant/antiplatelet use 119 (23.6%) 
Endoscopic size of lesions (mean ± SD) 39 ± 18.7 mm
Lesion location N = 515
  • Colon

221 (42.9%)
  • Esophagus

111 (21.5%)
  • Rectum

61 (11.8%)
  • Duodenum

45 (8.7%)
  • Stomach

42 (8.1%)
  • Ileocecal valve

17 (3.3%)
  • Appendix

16 (3.1%)
  • Jejunum

2 (0.3%)
Subepithelial tumor 13 (2.5%)
Lesion characteristics
  • Previous manipulation

42 (8.1%)
  • Previous tattoo

40 (7.7%)
  • Severe fibrosis

88 (17.0%)
Paris classification N = 515 lesions
  • Is

228 (44.2%)
  • II a

130 (25.2%)
  • Ip

28 (5.4%)
  • II a+c

109 (21.1%)
  • Others

20 (3.8%)
Procedure characteristics
  • Use of a stabilization platform

119 lesions
  • Dilumen platform

98 (82.3%)
  • Pathfinder

110 (21.2%)
  • Use of traction

60 (11.6%)
  • Use of coagulation grasper

57 (11.06%)
ESD techniques N = 515
  • ESD

405 (78.8%)
  • Hybrid ESD

110 (21.2%)
Closure methods N = 515
  • No closure

101 (19.6%)
  • Clipping

322 (62.5%)
  • Suturing

92 (17.8%)