Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 8;28(8):825–833. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01274-y

Table 2.

Comparative synthesis of regenerative medicine clinical studies concentrating on PRP in the management of musculoskeletal pain

Study ID Type of pain Total cohort, n Age, years Male, n Intervention details Control details Route of administration Follow up duration
Wu (2017) [1] Lumbar facet joint syndrome 23 vs 23 52.91 ± 7.60 vs 52.78 ± 7.25 10 vs 9 0.5 mL of autologous PRP for every targeted joint 0.5% lidocaine and 5 mg/mL betamethasone Intra-articular 6 months
Tuakli-Wosornu et al. [2•] Chronic lumbar discogenic pain 29 vs 18 41.40 ± 8.08 vs 43.80 ± 8.91 14 vs 2 3 – 4 mL of PRP Contrast agent Intradiscal 12 months
Singla et al. [3•] Sacroiliac joint pain 20 vs 20 35.20 ± 12.86 vs 37.00 ± 10.89 16 vs 16 3 mL of PRP with 0.5 mL of calcium chloride 1.5 g of methylprednisolone and 1.5 mL of 2% lidocaine with 0.5 mL 0.9% sterile saline Sacroiliac joint 3 months
Xu et al. [4] Lumbar disc herniation 61 vs 63 56.0 (44.5–60.0) vs 56.0 (50.0–59.0) 28 vs 37 3 mL of PRP 2 ml betamethasone + 0.5 ml 0.9% sterile saline + 0.5 ml 2% lidocaine Transforaminal 12 months
Won et al. [5•] Chronic non-specific low back pain 14 vs 16 51.0 ± 18.1 vs 50.5 ± 17.0 6 vs 6 5 – 6 mL of PRP, intradiscal 6 mL 0.5% lidocaine Ligament and muscular 6 months
Ruiz-Lopez and Tsai [6] Chronic degenerative spinal disease 25 vs 25 68 ± 13.06 vs 61 ± 12.60 11 vs 10 16.5 mL of PRP with 3.5 mL 0.9% sterile saline 60 mg of triamcinolone acetonide and 3.5 0.9% sterile saline Epidural 6 months
Akeda (2023) [16•] Discogenic low back pain 44 vs 45 40.3 ± 10.4 vs 39.1 ± 11.5 16 vs 19 1 mL of PRP 1 mL 0.9% sterile saline and 0.2 g Kefzol Intradiscal 12 months
Zielinski et al. [9•] Lumbar discogenic pain 18 vs 8 n/r n/r 2 mL of PRP 3 mL 0.9% sterile saline Intradiscal 8 weeks
Mohi Eldin et al. [10] Discogenic low back pain 44 vs 88

 < 40 years: 63

 ≥ 40 years: 69

n/r 3 mL of PRP 3 mL of PRF Intradiscal 6 months
Akeda (2022) [7•] Discogenic low back pain 9 vs 7 35.1 ± 8.7 vs 27.9 ± 5.2 6 vs 5 2 mL of PRP 2 mg betamethasone and 2 mL 0.9% sterile saline Intradiscal 12 months

Data in “vs” was displayed as intervention vs control