Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 13;11(7):711. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11070711

Table 2.

Tabular comparison between the different imaging modalities.

Modality When to Use Cost Pros. Cons.
Color Fundus Photographs (CFP) Screening for retinal abnormalities Low cost Detailed images of the back of the eye. Inconsistent pigmentation, inability to resolve fundus depth.
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Evaluation of retinal disorders High cost High-resolution cross-sectional images of the retina. Limited by medium opacities, operator skill required.
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) Detection of microvascular alterations Moderate cost Non-invasive, three-dimensional imaging of blood vessels. Limited normative data, affected by media opacity.
Fluorescein Angiography (FA) Identifying and categorizing CNV Moderate cost Evaluation of retinal and choroidal circulation pathology. Invasive, requires dye injection, limited to 2D imaging.
Indocyanine Green Angiography (ICG) Visualization of choroidal circulation Moderate cost Deeper penetration into the retina, clearer images of choroidal veins. Invasive, limited diffusion, requires skilled interpretation.