Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 13;11(7):711. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11070711

Table 5.

Summary of the machine and deep learning segmentation approaches.

Study Method Dataset Segmentation Type Performance Modality
Yan et al. [74] Encoder-decoder Network STARE, DRIVE Drusen segmentation Accuracy: 97.13%, Sensitivity: 92.02%, Specificity: 97.30% CFP
Pham et al. [67] DeeplabV3,U-Net Kangbuk Samsung hospital, STARE Drusen segmentation Accuracy: 0.99, 0.981%, Sensitivity: 0.662, 0.588%, Specificity: 0.997, 0.991% Dice Score: 0.625, 0.542 CFP
Chen et al. [75] Faster R-CNN RETOUCH Cysts/fluid Accuracy: 0.665%, Dice Score: 0.997 OCT
Schlegl et al. [66] FCN 1200 volumes OCT Cysts/fluid Sensitivity: IRC 0.84, SRF 0.81%, Precision: IRC 0.91, SRF 0.61, Area under the curve (AUC): IRC 0.94, SRF 0.92 OCT
Sappa et al. [76] RetFluidNet 124 volumes OCT Cysts/fluid Accuracy: IRF 80.05, PED 92.74, SRF 95.53%, Dice Score: 0.885 OCT
Kang et al. [77] U-Net RETOUCH Cysts/fluid Accuracy: 0.968%, Dice Score: 0.9 OCT
Liu et al. [78] FCN RETOUCH Cysts/fluid Dice Score: 0.744 OCT
Tennakoon et al. [79] U-Net RETOUCH Cysts/fluid Dice Score: 0.737 OCT
Diao et al. [80] CM-CNN, (CAM-UNet) Heidelberg Engineering, Germany Drusen and CNV lesions Dice Score: 77.51% OCT