Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 26;16(6):e63196. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63196

Table 2. Distribution of the studied cases according to stone data.

SD: standard deviation, C2: Chi-square test, t: Student's t-test, U: Man-Whitney test, H/U: Hounsfield unit, P: p-value for comparing between the studied groups

Variables Group 1 (n = 35) Group 2 (n = 35) Test of Sig. P-value
Laterality No. % No. %    
Left 15 42.9 17 48.6 c2 = 0.230 0.631
Right 20 57.1 18 51.4
Site            
L2 7 20.0 4 11.4 c2 = 2.329 0.312
L3 12 34.3 18 51.4
L4 16 45.7 13 37.1
Ureteral stone diameter (millimeter)        
Range (mm) 10–20 10–20 t = 1.473 0.145
Mean ± SD 13.48 ± 3.2 14.69 ± 3.64
Stone opacity No. % No. %    
Faint radio-opaque 3 8.6 2 5.7 c2 = 0.718 0.699
Radio-lucent 3 8.6 5 14.3
Radio-opaque 29 82.9 28 80.0
H/U        
Range 390–1830 466–1912 U = 582.0 0.720
Median (IQR) 1130 (890–1525) 1220 (965–1368.5)
Degree of hydronephrosis No. % No. %    
Minimal (Grade I) 1 2.9 0 0.0 c2 = 11.620 0.008
Mild (Grade II) 24 68.6 11 31.4
Moderate (Grade III) 7 20.0 16 45.7
Marked (Grade IV) 3 8.6 8 22.9