Table 5.

ROC curve was used to analyze the efficacy of differential bacteria at the genus level in identifying malnutrition in patients with esophageal cancer.

Bacteria	AUC	95% CI
Klebsiella_pneumoniae_g__Klebsiella	0.688	0.504–0.872
uncultured_organism_g__Lachnoclostridium	0.688	0.518–0.858
Ruminococcus_callidus_g__Ruminococcus	0.689	0.531–0.848
Butyricimonas_sp._g__Butyricimonas	0.678	0.564–0.791
[Eubacterium]_siraeum_g__[Eubacterium]_siraeum_group	0.664	0.535–0.793
uncultured_bacterium_g__Clostridia_UCG_014	0.609	0.523–0.695
Lactobacillus_salivarius_g__Lactobacillus	0.257	0.098–0.416
uncultured_organism_g__Barnesiella	0.650	0.536–0.763
Ralstonia_insidiosa_g__Ralstonia	0.665	0.508–0.822
uncultured_bacterium_g__Sellimonas	0.619	0.499–0.739
uncultured_bacterium_g__Clostridia_vadinBB60_group	0.652	0.556–0.748
metagenome_g__uncultured	0.609	0.523–0.695
uncultured_organism_g__Coprobacter	0.609	0.523–0.695
Clostridioides_difficile_g__Clostridioides	0.382	0.278–0.486
uncultured_bacterium_g__Lachnospiraceae_UCG_010	0.412	0.318–0.505
Dielma_fastidiosa_g__Dielma	0.412	0.318–0.505
uncultured_Kroppenstedtia_g__Kroppenstedtia	0.412	0.318–0.505

AUC, area under the curve.