Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2025 Jun 4:2024.07.15.603616. Originally published 2024 Jul 18. [Version 2] doi: 10.1101/2024.07.15.603616

Figure 3. Quantification of nanomodule distribution in spines.

Figure 3.

(A) Frequency distribution of the number of nanomodules in spines.

(B) Frequency distribution of spine sizes, separately for spines containing no nanomodules and for spines containing nanomodules.

(C) Spine size versus the number of nanomodules in the spine.

(D) Frequency distribution of nanomodule size.

(E) Spine size versus the average nanomodule size in the spine.

(F) Frequency distribution of nanomodule volume.

(G) Spine size versus the average nanomodule volume in the spine.

Significance values are determined by Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests (mean 1 ≠ mean 2) when comparing two cases (B and E) and Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA when comparing more than two cases (C and G) as the data does not follow a normal distribution : p > 0.05, * : p < 0.05, ** : p < 0.01, *** : p < 0.001, ****: p < 0.0001. Data is obtained from 4 independent experiments (from 3 mice), dendritic segments of 12 neurons, and a total of 381 spines. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.