Table 8.
Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis to evaluate factors independently associated with the percentage of adequacy of the physical parameters of the PHC facilities analyzed.
| Variables | b (95% CI) | Beta | p | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature/humidity adequacy percentage in the PHC facilities | 26.6% | |||
| Percentage of perceived physical risk of any intensity | 0.34 (−0.82 to 1.51) | 0.128 | 0.542 | |
| Uncomfortable room temperature percentage | 0.41 (−0.12 to 0.94) | 0.335 | 0.120 | |
| Percentage of physicians | −0.95 (−1.88 to −0.03) | −0.444 | 0.044 | |
| Percentage of other work parallel to PHC | −0.38 (−1.33 to 0.57) | −0.195 | 0.411 | |
| Lighting adequacy percentage in the PHC facilities | 19.0% | |||
| Percentage of perceived physical risk of any intensity | −0.27 (−1.18 to 0.64) | −0.140 | 0.540 | |
| Percentage of nurses in the PHC facilities | 0.33 (−0.58 to 1.24) | 0.181 | 0.453 | |
| Percentage with Specialization/Master’s/Doctorate degree | 0.58 (−0.05 to 1.21) | 0.386 | 0.069 | |
| General adequacy percentage in the PHC facilities | 60.3% | |||
| Percentage of poor lighting perceived in the PHC facilities | 0.08 (−0.11 to 0.26) | 0.162 | 0.389 | |
| Percentage of nurses | 0.69 (0.25 to 1.13) | 0.605 | 0.004 | |
| Percentage of doctors | −0.33 (−0.68 to 0.02) | −0.342 | 0.066 | |
| Percentage of oral health technician/assistant | 0.74 (0.08 to 1.40) | 0.389 | 0.031 | |
| Percentage with specialization/Master’s/Doctorate degree | −0.03 (−0.40 to 0.33) | −0.036 | 0.847 |
b = regression coefficient; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; Beta = standardized regression coefficient; R2 = coefficient of determination.