. 2024 Jul 13;25(14):7698. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147698

Table A2.

Accumulated fruit yield, displayed as the mean and standard deviation differentiated for the six treatments.

Treatment	WAP ¹	Accumulated Fruit Yield	n	Treat.	WAP	Accumulated Fruit Yield	n
Treatment	WAP ¹	[g]	n	Treat.	WAP	[g]	n
Non-treated + non-stressed (control)	12	693.7 ± 274.2 ^a	16	Primed + salt-stressed	12	677.0 ± 186.8 ^a	16
	13	2116.2 ± 588.2 ^a	32		13	2036.7 ± 342.3 ^a	32
	14	2530.8 ± 649.6 ^a	15		14	2300.9 ± 372.9 ^a	16
	15	2685.6 ± 946.2 ^a	17		15	2936.3 ± 481.3 ^a	16
	16	3348.1 ± 767.2 ^a	16		16	3522.8 ± 561.8 ^a	16
	17	4362.7 ± 642.5 ^ab	16		17	4548.0 ± 593.5 ^ab	16
Non-treated + salt-stressed	12	573.4 ± 81.0 ^a	16	BTH ²-treated + non-stressed	12	797.4 ± 278.4 ^a	16
	13	2179.2 ± 397.4 ^a	32		13	1880.8 ± 445.6 ^a	32
	14	2647.8 ± 414.9 ^a	16		14	2233.3 ± 486.4 ^a	16
	15	3135.5 ± 355.8 ^a	16		15	2786.5 ± 637.5 ^a	16
	16	3702.6 ± 357.8 ^a	16		16	3218.5 ± 618.3 ^a	16
	17	4727.1 ± 307.7 ^b	16		17	4072.9 ± 728.0 ^a	16
Primed + non-stressed	12	687.9 ± 210.4 ^a	16	BTH-treated + salt-stressed	12	761.7 ± 264.7 ^a	16
	13	1891.6 ± 365.1 ^a	32		13	2098.3 ± 558.3 ^a	32
	14	2183.0 ± 452.6 ^a	16		14	2457.4 ± 464.5 ^a	16
	15	2849.4 ± 445.2 ^a	16		15	2991.9 ± 476.1 ^a	16
	16	3361.3 ± 563.0 ^a	16		16	3527.5 ± 518.5 ^a	16
	17	4467.5 ± 550.9 ^ab	16		17	4451.1 ± 584.9 ^ab	16

¹ WAP: week after priming; ² BTH: benzothiadiazole. Notes: the different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA and EMMs post hoc; α = 0.05) between groups in the same week after priming for the corresponding parameter. n corresponds to the sample size of the previous parameters.